Frequency and serial order

References

Alario, F.-Xavier, Albert Costa & Alfonso Caramazza. 2002. Frequency effects in noun phrase production: Implications for models of lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes 17. 299–319.10.1080/01690960143000236Search in Google Scholar

Ambridge, Ben, Julian M. Pine, Caroline F. Rowland, Daniel Freudenthal & Franklin Chang. 2014. Avoiding dative overregularization errors: Semantics, statistics or both? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29. 218–243.10.1080/01690965.2012.738300Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, Jennifer E., Thomas Wasow, Anthony Losongco & Ryan Ginstrom. 2000. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76. 28–55.10.1353/lan.2000.0045Search in Google Scholar

Arnon, Inbal & Neil Snider. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62. 67–82.10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Leon Gulikers. 1995. The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Search in Google Scholar

Bakker, Dik. 1998. Flexibility and consistency in word order patterns in the languages of Europe. In Anna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe, 383–419. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110812206.383Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Ilan, Laly & Ruth A. Berman. 2007. Developing register differentiation: The Latinate-Germanic divide in English. Linguistics 45. 1–35.10.1515/LING.2007.001Search in Google Scholar

Benor, Sarah Nunin & Roger Levi. 2006. The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language 82. 233–278.10.1353/lan.2006.0077Search in Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 2001. Linguistic structure and change: An explanation from language processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 2011. A diachronic frequency account of the allomorphy of some grammatical markers. Journal of Linguistics 47. 31–64.10.1017/S002222671000023XSearch in Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 2012. Structure in language. A dynamic perspective. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203890165Search in Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 2014. Competition as a unifying concept for the study of language. The Mental Lexicon 9. 338–370.10.1075/ml.9.2.08berSearch in Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 2016. The multiplanar nature of frequency. Glottotheory 7. 1–19.10.1515/glot-2016-0001Search in Google Scholar

Bese, Lajos, László Dezsö & János Gulja. 1970. On the syntactic typology of the Uralic and Altaic languages. In László Dezsö & Péter Hajdú (eds.), Theoretical problems of typology and the Northern Eurasian languages, 113–128. Amsterdam: Grüner.Search in Google Scholar

Bock, Kathryn. 1987a. Co-ordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In Andrew W. Ellis (ed.), Progress in the psychology of language, vol. 3, 337–390. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Bock, Kathryn. 1987b. An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. Journal of Memory and Language 26. 119–137.10.1016/0749-596X(87)90120-3Search in Google Scholar

Braun, Albert. 1982. Studien zur Syntax und Morphologie der Steigerungsformen im Englischen. Bern: Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. & Mary Alexandra Brewer. 1980. Explanation in morphophonemics: changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite forms. Lingua 52. 201–242.10.1016/0024-3841(80)90035-2Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca & Revere D. Perkins. 1990. On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. In William Croft, Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony, 1–40. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.20.04bybSearch in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. & Joanne Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37. 575–596.10.1515/ling.37.4.575Search in Google Scholar

Carstairs, Andrew & Joseph P. Stemberger. 1988. A processing constraint on inflectional homonymy. Linguistics 26. 601–617.10.1515/ling.1988.26.4.601Search in Google Scholar

Cassidy, Frederic C. 1938. The backgrounds in Old English of the Modern English substitutes for the dative-object in the group verb + dative-object + accusative-object. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne, John A. Hawkins & Gary Gilligan. 1985. The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics 23. 723–758.10.1515/ling.1985.23.5.723Search in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2010. Dealing with diversity: Towards an explanation of NP-internal word order frequencies. Linguistic Typology 14. 253–286.10.1515/lity.2010.010Search in Google Scholar

de Cuypere, Ludovic. 2015. The old English to-dative construction. English Language and Linguistics 19. 1–26.10.1017/S1360674314000276Search in Google Scholar

Dell, Gary S., Kristopher D. Reed, David R. Adams & Antje S. Meyer. 2000. Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26. 1355–1367.10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1355Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Word order. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 1: Clause structure, 61–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619427.002Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013a. Order of adposition and noun phrase. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structure online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013b. Order of adjective and noun. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structure online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013c. Order of numeral and noun. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structure online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013d. Order of demonstrative and noun. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structure online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013e. Definite articles. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structure online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013f. Order of relative clause and noun. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structure online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013g. Prefixing and suffixing in inflectional morphology. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structure online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Search in Google Scholar

Dufour, Sophie, Angèle Brunnellière & Ulrich Frauenfelder. 2013. Tracking the time course of word-frequency effects in auditory word recognition with event-related potentials. Cognitive Science 34. 489–507.10.1111/cogs.12015Search in Google Scholar

Dunn, Michael, Simon J. Greenhill, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray. 2011. Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473. 79–82.10.1038/nature09923Search in Google Scholar

Eddington, David, Rebecca Treiman & Dirk Elzinga. 2013. Syllabification of American English: Evidence from a large-scale experiment. Part I. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 20. 45–67.10.1080/09296174.2012.754601Search in Google Scholar

Fenc-Oczlon, Gertraud. 1989. Word frequency and word order in freezes. Linguistics 27. 517–556.10.1515/ling.1989.27.3.517Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Victor S. & Gary S. Dell. 2000. Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology 40. 296–340.10.1006/cogp.1999.0730Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Victor S. & Hiromi Yoshita. 2003. Given-new ordering effects on the production of scrambled sentences in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32. 669–692.10.1023/A:1026146332132Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68. 1–76.10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1Search in Google Scholar

Gil, David & Daniel Radzinski. 1987. Georgian syllable onsets: Some arguments for unordered hierarchic phonological structures. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds.), Phonologica 1984, 59–64. London: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goyvaerts, Didier L. 1968. An introductory study on the ordering of a string of adjectives in present-day English. Philologica Pragensia 11. 12–28.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9. 97–129.10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06griSearch in Google Scholar

Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander, Richard Goldberg & Ronald Wilson. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65. 203–257.10.2307/415332Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Explaining article-possessor complementarity: economic motivation in noun phrase syntax. Language 75. 227–243.10.2307/417260Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2014. On system pressure competing with economic motivation. In Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage, 197–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554285Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 2002. Symmetries and asymmetries: Their grammar, typology and parsing. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 95–149.10.1515/thli.2002.28.2.95Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer. 2002. From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited. Language 78. 527–555.10.1353/lan.2002.0159Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 2016. Dogon adjective-numeral inversion. Linguistics 54. 189–214.10.1515/ling-2015-0040Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2008. The English comparative – Language structure and language use. English Language and Linguistics 12. 395–417.10.1017/S1360674308002694Search in Google Scholar

Hinrichs, Lars & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11. 437–474.10.1017/S1360674307002341Search in Google Scholar

Hippisley, Andrew, Marina Chumakina, Greville G. Corbett & Dunstan Brown. 2004. Suppletion: Frequency, categories and distribution of stems. Studies in Language 28. 387–418.10.1075/sl.28.2.05hipSearch in Google Scholar

Howes, Davis. 1957. On the relation between intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29. 296–305.10.1121/1.1908862Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, Stig & Knut Hofland. 1989. Frequency analysis of English vocabulary and grammar, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Juilland, Alphonse. 1970. Frequency dictionary of French words. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Juilland, Alphonse. 1973. Frequency dictionary of Italian words. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110868937Search in Google Scholar

Karlsson, Fred. 2000. Finnische Grammatik. Hamburg: Buske.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Michael H. 1998. To “brunch” or to “brench”: Some aspects of blend structure. Linguistics 36. 579–590.10.1515/ling.1998.36.3.579Search in Google Scholar

Kjellmer, Göran. 2001. ‘It’s a interesting book’. On the use of the indefinite article a before a vowel in English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 102. 307–315.Search in Google Scholar

Kohonen, Viljo. 1978. On the development of English word order in religious prose around 1000 and 1200 A.D. Åbo: Publications of the Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Koopman, Willem. 2005. Transitional syntax: Postverbal pronouns and particles in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 9. 47–62.10.1017/S136067430500153XSearch in Google Scholar

Krug, Manfred. 1998. String frequency. Journal of English Linguistics 26. 286–320.10.1177/007542429802600402Search in Google Scholar

Landauer, Thomas K. & Lynn A. Streeter. 1973. Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12. 119–131.10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80001-5Search in Google Scholar

Lohmann, Arne. 2014. English coordinate constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139644273Search in Google Scholar

Mańczak, Witold. 1980. Frequenz und Sprachwandel. In Helmut Lüdtke (ed.), Kommunikationstheoretische Grundlagen des Sprachwandels, 37–79. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

McClelland, James L. & David E. Rumelhart. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88. 375–407.10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375Search in Google Scholar

Mines, M. Ardussi, Barbara F. Hanson & June E. Shoup. 1978. Frequency of occurrence of phonemes in conversational English. Language and Speech 21. 221–235.10.1177/002383097802100302Search in Google Scholar

Mollin, Sandra. 2014. The (ir)reversibility of English binomials. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.64Search in Google Scholar

Mondorf, Britta. 2009. More support for more-support: The role of processing constraints on the choice between synthetic and analytic comparative forms. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/silv.4Search in Google Scholar

Morton, John. 1969. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76. 165–178.10.1037/h0027366Search in Google Scholar

Oldfield, Richard Charles & Arthur Wingfield. 1965. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17. 273–281.10.1080/17470216508416445Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition. The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo & R. Harald Baayen. 2009. Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85. 109–152.10.1353/lan.0.0087Search in Google Scholar

Prat-Sala, Marcè & Holly P. Branigan. 2000. Discourse constraints on syntagmatic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 42. 168–182.10.1006/jmla.1999.2668Search in Google Scholar

Renner, Vincent. 2014. A study of element ordering in English coordinate lexical items. English Studies 95. 441–458.10.1080/0013838X.2014.908039Search in Google Scholar

Rice, Keren. 2011. Principles of affix ordering. Word Structure 4. 169–200.10.3366/word.2011.0009Search in Google Scholar

Roelofs, Ardi. 1998. Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production: Verb-particle combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24. 904–921.10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.904Search in Google Scholar

Ruoff, Arno. 1981. Häufigkeitswörterbuch gesprochener Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111678214Search in Google Scholar

Saukkonen, Pauli, Marjatta Haipus, Antero Niemikorpi & Helena Sulkala. 1979. Suomen kielen taajuussanasto. Porvoo: WSOY.Search in Google Scholar

Scarborough, Don L., Charles Cortese & Hollis S. Scarborough. 1977. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3. 1–17.10.1037/0096-1523.3.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Schouwstra, Marieke & Henriette de Swart. 2014. The semantic origins of word order. Cognition 131. 431–436.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna, Kathy Conklin & Walter J. B. van Heuven. 2011. Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37. 776–784.10.1037/a0022531Search in Google Scholar

Sobkowiak, Wlodzimierz. 1993. Unmarked-before-marked as a freezing principle. Language and Speech 36. 393–414.10.1177/002383099303600403Search in Google Scholar

Stemberger, Joseph P. 1984. Structural errors in normal and agrammatic speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1. 281–313.10.1080/02643298408252855Search in Google Scholar

Stemberger, Joseph P. 1995. Phonological and lexical constraints on morphological processing. In Laurie B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing, 247–267. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Temperley, David. 2007. Minimization of dependency length in written English. Cognition 105. 300–333.10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.011Search in Google Scholar

Wolk, Christoph, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2013. Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English. Diachronica 30. 382–419.10.1075/dia.30.3.04wolSearch in Google Scholar

Wulff, Stefanie. 2003. A multifactorial corpus analysis of adjective order in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8. 245–282.10.1075/ijcl.8.2.04wulSearch in Google Scholar

Zipf, George K. 1935. The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Zirkel, Linda. 2010. Prefix combinations in English: Structural and processing factors. Morphology 20. 239–266.10.1007/s11525-010-9151-8Search in Google Scholar