Agreement in grammar and discourse: A research overview

References

Acuña-Fariña, Juan C. 2012. Agreement, attraction and architectural opportunism. Journal of Linguistics 48. 257–295.10.1017/S0022226712000084Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2000. The development of person agreement markers: From pronouns to higher accessibility markers. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 197–260. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, Peter & Joan Bresnan. 1996. Non-configurationality in Australian Aboriginal languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14. 215–268.10.1007/BF00133684Search in Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael. 1992. A situated theory of agreement (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael. 1999. Agreement as a discourse phenomenon. Folia Linguistica 33(1–2). 187–210.10.1515/flin.1999.33.1-2.187Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 2013. Distributional biases in language families. In Lenore A Grenoble, Balthasar Bickel, David A Peterson & Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language typology and historical contingency: In honor of Johanna Nichols, 415–444. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.104.19bicSearch in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Taras Zakharko & Giorgio Iemmolo. 2015. Exploring diachronic universals of agreement: Alignment patterns and zero marking across person categories. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective, 29–52. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110399967-003Search in Google Scholar

Bond, Oliver, Greville G Corbett, Marina Chumakina & Dunstan Brown (eds.). 2016. Archi: Complexities of agreement in cross-theoretical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Sam Mchombo. 1987. Topic, pronoun and agreement in Chichewa. Language 63. 741–782.10.2307/415717Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Dunstan & Marina Chumakina. 2013. What there might be and what there is: An introduction to canonical typology. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Sandra Thompson. 2007 [1997]. Three frequency effects in syntax. In Joan Bybee (ed.), Frequency of use and the organization of language, 269–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1980. Agreement, animacy, and voice. In Gunter Brettschneider & Christian Lehmann (eds.), Wege zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler (Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 145), 229–234. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Contini-Morava, Ellen & Marcin Kilarski. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 40. 263–299.10.1016/j.langsci.2013.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166119Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cornish, Francis. 2006. Discourse anaphora. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 631–638. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04290-5Search in Google Scholar

Cornish, Francis. 2009. Inter-sentential anaphora and coherence relations in discourse: A perfect match. Language Sciences 31(5). 572–592.10.1016/j.langsci.2008.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2013. Agreement as anaphora, anaphora as coreference. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 95–117. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110331127.95Search in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199254125.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2011. Very atypical agreement indeed. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3–4). 153–160.10.1515/thli.2011.011Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.71Search in Google Scholar

De Cat, Cécile. 2005. French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua 115. 1195–1219.10.1016/j.lingua.2004.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Bethwyn. 2008. Subject agreement in Marovo: Diachronic explanations of synchronic conditions. Oceanic Linguistics 47. 383–408.10.1353/ol.0.0019Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas D. 1999. Why argument affixes in polysynthetic languages are not pronouns: Evidence from Bininj Gun-wok. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 52. 255–281.10.1524/stuf.1999.52.34.255Search in Google Scholar

Falk, Yehuda. 2006. Subjects and Universal Grammar: An explanatory theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486265Search in Google Scholar

Fedden, Sebastian, Dunstan Brown, Greville Corbett, Gary Holton, Marian Klamer, Laura C Robinson & Antoinette Schapper. 2013. Conditions on pronominal marking in the Alor-Pantar languages. Linguistics 51(1). 33–74.10.1515/ling-2013-0002Search in Google Scholar

Fleischer, Jürg. 2007. Das prädikative Adjektiv und Partizip im Althochdeutschen und Altniederdeutschen. Sprachwissenschaft 32. 279–348.Search in Google Scholar

Fleischer, Jürg, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.). 2015. Agreement from a diachronic perspective. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110399967Search in Google Scholar

Fuß, Eric. 2005. The rise of agreement: A formal approach to the syntax and grammaticalization of verbal inflection. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.81Search in Google Scholar

Galucio, Ana V. 2014. Argument marking and reference tracking in Mekens. In Rik Van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Ana V Galucio (eds.), Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences, 373–396. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.105.13galSearch in Google Scholar

Giacolone Ramat, Anna & Cecilia Maria Andorno. 2006. Referential relations in spoken discourse. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 450–457. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00590-3Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Li Charles (ed.), Subject and topic, 151–188. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haig, Geoffrey. 2011. Linker, relativizer, nominalizer, tense-particle: On the Ezafe in West Iranian. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, vol. 1: Sino-Tibetan and Iranian languages, 363–390. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.96.13haiSearch in Google Scholar

Haiman, John & Pamela Munro. 1983. Introduction. In John Haiman & Pamela Munro (eds.), Switch-reference and Universal Grammar, ix–xv. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.2Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C. 2009. Exuberant exponence in Batsbi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27. 267–303.10.1007/s11049-009-9070-8Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 197–226. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110331127.197Search in Google Scholar

Helmbrecht, Johannes. 1996. The syntax of personal agreement in East Caucasian languages. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49. 127–148.10.1524/stuf.1996.49.2.127Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198235293.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Iemmolo, Giorgio & Gerson Klumpp. 2014. Introduction. Linguistics 52(2). 271–279.10.1515/ling-2013-0062Search in Google Scholar

Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2. 39–76.10.1007/BF00233713Search in Google Scholar

Kibrik, Andrej. 2011. Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Koeneman, Olaf & Hedde Zeijlstra. 2014. The rich agreement hypothesis rehabilitated. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 571–615.10.1162/LING_a_00167Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Universal and typological aspects of agreement. In Hansjakob Seiler & Franz J Stachowiak (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen, Teil II: Die Techniken und ihr Zusammenhang in Einzelsprachen, 201–267. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1988. On the function of agreement. In Michael Barlow & Charles A Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural language, 55–65. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Search in Google Scholar

Lotfi, Ahmad. 2006. Agreement in Persian. Linguistik Online 4/06. http://www.linguistik-online.de/29_06/lotfi.pdf (accessed 15 June 2017).10.13092/lo.29.560Search in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia. 2011. The origin of the Proto-Indo-European gender system: Typological considerations. Folia Linguistica 45(2). 435–464.10.1515/flin.2011.016Search in Google Scholar

Matasović, Ranko. 2014. Verbal and adnominal agreement: Areal distribution and typological correlations. Linguistic Typology 18. 171–214.10.1515/lingty-2014-0009Search in Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2000a. Constraints on null subjects in Bislama (Vanuatu): Social and linguistic factors. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2000b. The emergence of creole subject-verb agreement and the licensing of null subjects. Language Variation and Change 12. 202–230.10.1017/S0954394500122045Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Pronouns and agreement: The information status of pronominal affixes. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 235–278.10.1111/1467-968X.00119Search in Google Scholar

Schnell, Stefan & Danielle Barth. Submitted. Discourse motivations for pronominal versus zero objects across genres in Vera’a.Search in Google Scholar

Schulze, Wolfgang. 2011. Personalität in den ostkaukasischen Sprachen. Banská Bytsrica: UMB publisher.Search in Google Scholar

Schwenter, Scott A. 2006. Two kinds of differential object marking in Portuguese and Spanish. In Patrícia Amaral & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Portuguese-Spanish interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact, 238–260. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Seifart, Frank. 2004. Nominal classification in Miraña, a Witotoan language of Colombia. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 57. 228–246.10.1524/stuf.2004.57.23.228Search in Google Scholar

Siewierksa, Anna. 1998. Variation in major constituent order: A global and a European perspective. In Anna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe, 475–551. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110812206.475Search in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 1999. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical agreement marker: Why objects donʼt make it. Folia Linguistica 33. 225–251.10.1515/flin.1999.33.1-2.225Search in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812729Search in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna & Dik Bakker. 2005. The agreement cross-referencing continuum: Person marking in FG. In Casper de Groot & Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in functional grammar (Functional Grammar 27), 203–247. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Stirling, Lesley. 1993. Switch-reference and discourse representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597886Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van Gijn, Rik. 2012. Switch-attention (aka switch-reference) in South-American temporal clauses: Facilitating oral transmission. Linguistic Discovery 10. 112–127.10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.407Search in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610578Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Laurel J. 1993. The discourse functions of Kiowa switch-reference. International Journal of American Linguistics 59. 137–164.10.1086/466193Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2004. Relevance theory. In Laurence R Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen. 1999. Animacy hierarchy effects on object agreement. In Paul Kotey (ed.), New Dimensions in African linguistics and languages (Trends in African Linguistics 3), 203–216. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.Search in Google Scholar