Home Technology Performance evaluation of a currently in-use dry storage cask design for spent accident tolerant fuel loading case under normal operation condition
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Performance evaluation of a currently in-use dry storage cask design for spent accident tolerant fuel loading case under normal operation condition

  • Habibe Merve Durdu and Banu Bulut Acar EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 17, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the performance of an existing dry storage cask design for accident tolerant fuel loading case and to examine the compliance with the safety limits applied currently for dry storage. In the study, for a dry storage cask design currently in use, criticality calculations, dose rate evaluation and thermal analyses are performed in case of loading with the accident tolerant fuel discharged from a PWR. Firstly, for an accident tolerant fuel selected among the concepts proposed for use in light water reactors, burnup analyses are performed by utilizing the Serpent continuous energy code and spent fuel characteristics are determined. Then, criticality analyzes are carried out by using the Serpent Monte Carlo code for the case of loading the accident tolerant fuel into the selected dry storage cask design. Gamma and neutron dose rates at the outer surface and close distances of the storage cask are determined with the Serpent code. To evaluate the thermal performance of the storage cask, thermal analyzes are performed by using the ANSYS Fluent computational fluid dynamics code. The analysis results are compared with the nuclear safety criteria applied to dry storage casks. Results of the analysis show that the dry storage cask design currently in-use does not exceed the criticality, dose rate and maximum surface temperature limits when loaded with spent accident tolerant fuel.


Corresponding author: Banu Bulut Acar, Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hacettepe University, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Türkiye, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

American Concrete Institute (1978). Code requirement for nuclear safety related concrete structure and commentary, ACI-349.Search in Google Scholar

American National Standards Institute, Inc. (2020). American National standard photon and neutron fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients, ANSI/ANS-6.1.1-2020.Search in Google Scholar

American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1995). ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, section II, part D – properties.Search in Google Scholar

ANSYS Inc. (2013). ANSYs fluent computational fluid dynamics software. ANSYS Flu. User’s Guide.Search in Google Scholar

Bragg-Sitton, S.M., Todosow, M., Montgomery, R., Stanek, C.R., Montgomery, R., and Carmack, W.J. (2016). Metrics for the technical performance evaluation of light water reactor accident-tolerant fuel. Technical Report BNL-113247-2016-JA, Brookhaven National Laboratory.10.13182/NT15-149Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, B., Chou, P., and Kim, Y.J. (2013). Development of Mo-alloy cladding to enhance fuel tolerance to severe accidents. Topfuel, Charlotte, USA. Paper number 8555.Search in Google Scholar

George, N.M., Terrani, K., Powers, J., Worrall, A., and Maldonado, I. (2015). Neutronic analysis of candidate accident-tolerant cladding concepts in pressurized water reactors. Ann. Nucl. Energy 75: 703–712, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.09.005.Search in Google Scholar

Harp, J.M., Lessing, P.A., and Hoggan, R.E. (2015). Uranium silicide pellet fabrication by powder metallurgy for accident tolerant fuel evaluation and irradiation. J. Nucl. Mater. 466: 728–738, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.06.027.Search in Google Scholar

IAEA (2006). Optimization strategies for cask design and container loading in long term spent fuel storage, IAEA-TECDOC-1523, Technical Document Series. International Atomic Energy Agency.Search in Google Scholar

IAEA (2014). Accident tolerant fuel concepts for light water reactors, IAEA-TECDOC-1797. International Atomic Energy Agency.Search in Google Scholar

IAEA (2018). Regulations for the safe transport of radioactive material, specific safety requirements, No. SSR-6 (Rev. 1). International Atomic Energy Agency.Search in Google Scholar

IAEA (2020). Storage of spent nuclear fuel, Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-15 (Rev. 1). International Atomic Energy Agency.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K.D., Raftery, A.M., Lopes, D.A., and Wallenius, J. (2016). Fabrication and microstructural analysis of UN-U3Si2 composites for accident tolerant fuel applications. J. Nucl. Mater. 477: 18–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega, L.H., Blamer, B.J., Evans, J.A., and McDeavitt, S.M. (2016). Development of an accident-tolerant fuel composite from uranium mononitride (UN) and uranium sesquisilicide (U3Si2) with increased uranium loading. J. Nucl. Mater. 471: 116–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.01.014.Search in Google Scholar

Leppanen, J. (2015). Serpent-A continuous-energy Monte Carlo reactor physics burnup calculation code. VTT Technical Research Centre, Finland.Search in Google Scholar

OECD/NEA (2018). State-of-the-art report on light water reactor accident-tolerant fuels, NEA No. 7317. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Search in Google Scholar

Terrani, K.A., Zinkle, S.J., and Snead, L.L. (2014). Advanced oxidation-resistant iron based alloys for LWR fuel cladding. J. Nucl. Mater. 448: 420–435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.041.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. NRC (2000). 10 CFR part 71, Certificate Number: 9292.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. NRC (2009). Standard review Plan for spent fuel dry storage systems at general license facility, NUREG-1536 Revisions 1A.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. NRC (2016). Holtec international final safety analysis report for the HI-STORM 100 cask system, Revision 13, Docket Number: 72-1014, USA.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. NRC (2017). NUREG-2208, validation of computational fluid dynamics methods using prototypic light water reactor spent fuel assembly thermal-hydraulic data, Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, X., Kozlowski, T., and Hales, J.D. (2015). Neutronics and fuel performance evaluation of accident tolerant FeCrAl cladding under normal operation conditions. Ann. Nucl. Energy 85: 763–775, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.06.032.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Klein, J., Zhou, H., and Zuo, L. (2018). Thermal and fluid analysis of dry cask storage containers over multiple years of service. Ann. Nucl. Energy 112: 132–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.013.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-01-05
Published Online: 2023-07-17
Published in Print: 2023-08-28

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kern-2023-0001/pdf
Scroll to top button