Home Two Cases of Irony: Kant and Wittgenstein
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Two Cases of Irony: Kant and Wittgenstein

  • Stelios Gadris EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 28, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract:

In this paper, I propose that Kant’s Träume eines Geistersehers, erläutert durch Träume der Metaphysik (TG) and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico – Philosophicus (TLP) be read as ironic texts. I will argue that both Kant and Wittgenstein deliberately deploy a literary device, i.e. irony, in order to express their ambiguous attitudes towards metaphysics and philosophy. Both texts are to be regarded as critiques of metaphysics; nevertheless, they stop short of straightforwardly rejecting metaphysics. Irony thus captures the love-hate attitude held by Kant and Wittgenstein toward philosophy. Irony might even serve as a means of critique of philosophy; it might serve as a self-reflexive and self-critical activity for both Kant and Wittgenstein – perhaps as a means of catharsis for their (empty) aspirations for metaphysical knowledge. Irony, however, preserves the possibility of an incomprehensible metaphysical insight (for Kant) or an ineffable metaphysical feeling (for Wittgenstein). This feeling constantly eludes our understanding (Kant) and language (Wittgenstein). I will argue that irony resides in the concept of a Kantian pre-critical symbol. In its multiple significances, the concept of a symbol preserves the possibility of a multiplicity of meanings. Thus irony finds shelter within this multiplicity. In this way, it can both deny and entertain the possibility of the revelation of a metaphysical picture over and above every given sign. Thus the sign becomes a symbol open to interpretation. Both the pre-critical Kant and the Wittgenstein of the TLP were held captive by such a metaphysical picture. I will conclude that the critiques of pure reason (Kant) and language (Wittgenstein) presuppose a critique of the symbolic pictures that held Kant and Wittgenstein captive.

Literature

Beany, Michael, “The analytic turn in early twentieth – century philosophy”, in: The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic – Philosophy and Phenomenology, ed. by Michael Beany. New York 2007, 1–30.Search in Google Scholar

Calebrook, Claire, Irony: The new critical idiolect. Abingdon 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Conant, James, “Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein and Nonsense,” in: Pursuits of Reason: Essays in honor of Stanley Cavell. Texas 1993, 195–224.Search in Google Scholar

Diamond, Cora, ‘Throwing away the ladder’ in Philosophy 63, 1988, No. 243, 5–27.10.1017/S0031819100043102Search in Google Scholar

“Frege – Wittgenstein Correspondence” (transl. Burton Dreben and Juliet Floyd), in: Interactive Wittgenstein: Essays in Memory of Georg Henrik von Wright, ed. Enzo de Pellegrin. Dordrecht 2011, 15–74.10.1007/978-1-4020-9909-0_2Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S., Insight and Illusion, Wittgenstein on Philosophy and the Metaphysics of Experience. London, Oxford, New York 1972.Search in Google Scholar

 Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies. Oxford 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Eduard von, KANTS Erkenntnistheorie und Metaphysik in den vier Perioden ihrer Entwicklung. Leipzig 1894.Search in Google Scholar

Janik Allan and Toulmin Stephen Toulmin, Wittgenstein’s Vienna. Elephant Paperbacks, Ivan R. Dee. Chicago 1996 (1973).Search in Google Scholar

Immanuel Kant, Das Bonner Kant-Korpus, Dokumentation, Elektronische Edition: http://www.korpora.org/kant/Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard Søren, The concept Irony with continual references to Socrates, ed. and translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. New Jersey 1989.10.1515/9781400846924-002Search in Google Scholar

Klagge James, “Das erlösende Wort”, in: Wittgenstein, Language and World, Part Two: Signs, Minds and Actions, eds. V. Munz, K. Puhl, J. Wang. Frankfurt 2010, 245–256.10.1515/9783110330571.245Search in Google Scholar

Laywine Alison, Kant’s Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy. Atascadero 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Lear, Jonathan, A case for irony. Princeton 2011.10.4159/harvard.9780674063143Search in Google Scholar

Monk, Ray, Ludwig Wittgenstein: the Duty of Genius. Athens 1998 [in Greek].Search in Google Scholar

Rauer, Constantin, Wahn und Wahrheit. Kants Auseinandersetzung mit dem Irrationalen. Berlin 2007.10.1524/9783050061375Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell. Vol. 1. Allen and Unwin. London 1971.Search in Google Scholar

Shell, Meld Susan, The Embodiment of Reason: Kant on Spirit, Generation and Community. Chicago/London 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Vaihinger, Hans, Kommentar zur Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, hrsg. von Raymund Schmidt. Band 1, Neudruck der 2. Ausgabe Stuttgart 1922 (21892 [1881]). Aalen 1970.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, The collected works of Ludwig Wittgenstein, ed. by G. H. Wright/G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford 1998 (19792 [1961]).Search in Google Scholar

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Werkausgabe. Band I. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch. Frankfurt a. M. 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Nachlass, the Bergen Electronic Edition. Oxford University Press 2000. http://www.wittgensteinsource.org/Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-6-28
Published in Print: 2016-6-28

© De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Titelseiten
  2. Abhandlungen
  3. Kants Theorie der Personalität als Selbstverhältnis in der „Tugendlehre“ und in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft
  4. Die Kohärenz der Gnadenlehre im kantischen Denken
  5. Positio contra complementum possibilitatis – Kant and Baumgarten on Existence
  6. Kant’s Natural Teleology? The Case of Physical Geography
  7. Two Cases of Irony: Kant and Wittgenstein
  8. Berichte und Diskussionen
  9. Depositum. Ein Fall moralischer Zuschreibung bei Immanuel Kant
  10. Buchbesprechungen
  11. Kiyoshi Chiba: Kants Ontologie der raumzeitlichen Wirklichkeit. Versuch einer anti-realistischen Interpretation der „Kritik der reinen Vernunft“. 428 Seiten. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2012. ISBN: 978-3-11-028068-5. [KSEH 168]
  12. Philipp-Alexander Hirsch: Kants Einleitung in die Rechtslehre von 1784. Immanuel Kants Rechtsbegriff in der Moralvorlesung „Mrongovius II“ und der Naturrechtsvorlesung „Feyerabend“ von 1784 sowie in der „Metaphysik der Sitten“ von 1797. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag, 2012. 137 Seiten. ISBN-13: 978-3863950699.
  13. Marco Ivaldo: Ragione pratica. Kant, Reinhold, Fichte. Pisa: Ed. ETS, 2012. 354 Seiten. ISBN 978-88-467-3354-2.
  14. Kant, Immanuel: Natural Science. Ed. by Eric Watkins. 818 pages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. ISBN 978-0-521-36394-5.
  15. Sebastian Maly: Kant über die symbolische Erkenntnis Gottes. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2012. 460 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-11-026079-3.
  16. Kate A. Moran: Community and Progress in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2012. 264 pp. ISBN 978-0-8132-1952-3.
  17. Jannis Pissis: Kants transzendentale Dialektik. Zu ihrer systematischen Bedeutung. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2012. 233 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-11-028156-9. [KSEH 169]
  18. Sally Sedgwick: Hegel’s Critique of Kant. From Dichotomy to Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. xii, 194 p. ISBN 9780199698363.
  19. Donald P. Verene: The Origins of the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Kant, Hegel, and Cassirer. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2012. 142 Seiten. ISBN 978-0-8101-2778-4.
  20. Zdravko Kučinar: Artur Libert/Arthur Liebert: Život i dela. Leben und Werke. Life and Works. Beograd: Dosije, 2015. 172 Seiten. ISBN 978-86-6047-193-4.
  21. Mitteilungen
  22. International Berkeley Essay Prize Competition
  23. Mitgliederversammlung der Kant-Gesellschaft
Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2016-0019/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button