Abstract:
The recent literature on the relation in Kant between duties of right and duties of virtue is dominated by a debate on whether duties of right can be derived from duties of virtue. According to one important argument, there is a tension or even a paradox in Kant between various claims concerning juridical norms, a paradox which can best be solved by assuming an “Independentist” position, that is, the view that the Universal Principle of Right is independent from the Categorical Imperative and, hence, that duties of right are normatively independent from duties of virtue. My claim in this paper is that the paradox which supports the independentist reading affects Kant’s claims only when the focus is on the subjective validity of duties. Once the focus is changed to objective validity, with which Kant is actually concerned, the paradox is dissolved and the Universal Principle of Right can appear as normatively dependent on the Categorical Imperative. In other words, in this paper, I argue that the scope of the paradox of juridical norms is confined to a specific focus and independentism (the view that duties of right are independent from duties of virtue) is confined in a similar way. Hence, the complexity of Kant’s account makes it possible for him to accommodate both independentist and dependentist views of the relation between right and virtue.
Acknowledgement
Work on this paper was carried out during a period of institutional research leave and affiliation to the ERC Advanced Research Project “Distortions of Normativity”; I am grateful to the ERC Project’s PI and to Keele University for making this period of research possible.
© De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Special Issue Freedom and Coercion. Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy
- Editorial
- Abhandlungen
- Right’s Complex Relation to Ethics in Kant: The Limits of Independentism
- The Twofold Morality of Recht: Once More Unto the Breach
- Kant on Democracy
- Kant’s Political Philosophy as a Theory of Non-Ideal Normativity
- Enactable and Enforceable: Kant’s Criteria for Right and Virtue
- “A Community of Rational Beings”. Kant’s Realm of Ends and the Dinstinction between Internal and External Freedom
- Common Possession of the Earth and Cosmopolitan Right
- Just War, Regular War, and Perpetual Peace
- Buchbesprechungen
- Motivationen für das Selbst. Kant und Spinoza im Vergleich. Hrsg. von Anne Tilkorn
- Karl Leonhard Reinhold: Gesammelte Schriften. Kommentierte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von Martin Bondeli. Bd. 1: Versuch einer neuen Theorie des menschlichen Vorstellungsvermögens. Hrsg. von Martin Bondeli und Silvan Imhof. Basel 2013.
- Giuseppe Motta: Die Postulate des empirischen Denkens überhaupt
- Christoph Gottfried Bardili. Kleine Schriften zur Logik. Mit Einleitung und ausführlichem textkritischem Kommentar herausgegeben von Rebecca Paimann.
- Mitteilung
- Prämierung von Studienabschlussarbeiten durch die Freiburger Kantstiftung
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Special Issue Freedom and Coercion. Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy
- Editorial
- Abhandlungen
- Right’s Complex Relation to Ethics in Kant: The Limits of Independentism
- The Twofold Morality of Recht: Once More Unto the Breach
- Kant on Democracy
- Kant’s Political Philosophy as a Theory of Non-Ideal Normativity
- Enactable and Enforceable: Kant’s Criteria for Right and Virtue
- “A Community of Rational Beings”. Kant’s Realm of Ends and the Dinstinction between Internal and External Freedom
- Common Possession of the Earth and Cosmopolitan Right
- Just War, Regular War, and Perpetual Peace
- Buchbesprechungen
- Motivationen für das Selbst. Kant und Spinoza im Vergleich. Hrsg. von Anne Tilkorn
- Karl Leonhard Reinhold: Gesammelte Schriften. Kommentierte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von Martin Bondeli. Bd. 1: Versuch einer neuen Theorie des menschlichen Vorstellungsvermögens. Hrsg. von Martin Bondeli und Silvan Imhof. Basel 2013.
- Giuseppe Motta: Die Postulate des empirischen Denkens überhaupt
- Christoph Gottfried Bardili. Kleine Schriften zur Logik. Mit Einleitung und ausführlichem textkritischem Kommentar herausgegeben von Rebecca Paimann.
- Mitteilung
- Prämierung von Studienabschlussarbeiten durch die Freiburger Kantstiftung