Abstract
Sepsis, a potentially fatal illness marked by an abnormal host immune response to an infection, continues to be a major global health issue. This study explores the role of pyroptosis and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and their complex interactions, two dominant immune cell death, in the setting of sepsis. The review begins by explaining sepsis and its strong dependence on the immune system. It then delves into the basic mechanisms of neutrophil extracellular trap associated death (NETosis) and pyroptosis, examining their functions in inflammation and host defense. Going further, it looks at the dysregulated immune response in sepsis, with a focus on neutrophils and other immune cells and their critical role. We analyze in detail two types of cell death: pyroptosis and NETosis, both of which are closely examined for their roles in the development of sepsis, particularly the escalation of pathophysiology. Additionally, the study looks into the complex interactions between pyroptosis and NETosis, illuminating possible mechanisms for control as well as their cooperative effects. The report concludes with a summary of the major findings and recommendations for future therapy approaches and research prospects. This review adds to our knowledge of the pathophysiology of sepsis by thoroughly analyzing the roles of NETosis and pyroptosis in sepsis and providing possible directions for therapeutic intervention.
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Sepsis is a severe, occasionally widespread inflammation and fatal organ failure that results from an unbalanced host response to various infections.[1] The mortality rate for septic patients is still 25%–30% due to the rapid progression of sepsis, and it can reach 40%–50% in cases of septic shock.[2] Thus sepsis is a significant worry in the critical care field today.[3] Immune cells play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of sepsis, and the two forms of cell death, known as neutrophil extracellular trap associated death (NETosis) and pyroptosis, have been implicated in the progression of sepsis.[4] NETosis is a distinct type of cell death that is mostly linked to neutrophils, a subset of white blood cells. These threads create extracellular traps that can catch and kill microorganisms, but they can also damage the body when inflammation gets out of hand.[5] Dysregulated neutrophil cell death may be dangerous in septic patients because it increases the risk of immune-related organ failure, which lowers body defenses and makes patients more susceptible to hospital-acquired infections. Neutrophils have therefore changed from being strong antibacterial agents to possibly dangerous mediators of organ failure and tissue damage. Additionally, Immune cells including dendritic and macrophage cells, may also undergo pyroptosis which is a highly inflammatory kind of programmed cell death, in reaction to particular microbial infections.[6] During pyroptosis, a group of proteins called inflammasomes are activated. These proteins serve as intracellular sensors for pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).[7] However, the pathophysiology of sepsis is still not entirely understood, and the absence of effective treatment options contributes to the shockingly high fatality rate. Many advancements and improvements have been made in the past ten years as research on this condition has transitioned from systemic inflammatory response syndrome to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.[8]
The pathophysiology of sepsis
The most common cause of death in intensive care units is pathogen infection, which can lead to sepsis, a potentially fatal condition. However, new research suggests that immunological dysfunction and sepsis are largely driven by massive immune cell deaths.[9] The primary cause of sepsis is an improper balance between the host’s innate and adaptive immune responses. This procedure involves a multitude of immune cells, such as lymphocytes, mononuclear macrophages, and neutrophils. Immune cells identify pathogens, consume them, and then release cytokines to either directly or indirectly recruit or activate other cells. Several unique kinds of cell death, distinct from apoptosis, such as autophagy, immune cell-extracellular trap formation, and pyroptosis, are crucial in the advancement of sepsis. Through the three types of cell death listed above, immune cells might start “self-sacrifice” in order to either kill or defend against infections. Nevertheless, the precise functions and workings of immune cell self-sacrifice in sepsis remain unclear.[10]
Immune response to infection
Understanding the typical acute inflammatory response is vital to comprehending the dysregulated immune response that underpins the pathophysiology of sepsis. A number of plasma enzyme cascades are triggered, a variety of inflammatory cells are generated, and chemical mediators from cells and plasma are released when an infection or injury occurs. The leukocytes’ emigration through the porous capillary walls and subsequent entry into the injured area trigger the immune response at the same moment. Neutrophils locate and break down bacteria and cellular waste using a process known as chemotaxis, which is guided by substances in the tissues. After migrating to the injured location, monocytes grow larger and transform into macrophages, which then engulf bacteria and phagocytize foreign objects. Histamine is released when mast cells within the tissues degranulate, which also triggers the production of other inflammatory mediators. Specifically, histamine increases capillary permeability and induces further vasodilation.[11]
The immune system’s original purpose is to protect the host against the enormous array of dangerous microorganisms that are constantly changing. Additionally, immunity helps the recipient eliminate allergens and hazardous chemicals that may have entered through mucosal surfaces accidentally. The most prevalent white blood cell in the bloodstream, neutrophils act as the host’s first line of defense against pathogen invasion. These are short-lived, terminally differentiated cells that come out of the bone marrow prepared to respond to infections.[12,13] The neutrophil has a variety of defense mechanisms it can use to ensure the best possible elimination of a hazard once it has detected a foreign molecule or endogenous threat. These include the capacities for degranulation, phagocytosis, and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In order to maximize the host’s immunological response and warn other nearby cells of the threat, neutrophils can also release chemokines and cytokines.[14] Neutrophils also employ decondensed chromatin adorned with antimicrobial peptides as a means of defense. This process is known as neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, and it allows the neutrophil to ensnare the pathogen.[15]
Dysregulated immune response in sepsis
The typical inflammatory response changes with sepsis. Infection sets off a typical inflammatory response, which thereafter causes the release of certain cytokines. These cytokines trigger other chemical inflammatory mediators to call for additional assistance. The inflammatory mediators initiate a sequence of events known as cascades that give rise to and maintain the inflammatory reply. Sepsis suggests a potentially fatal organ failure brought on by an infection-related dysregulated host response. A clinical definition of organ dysfunction in sepsis is a two-point increase in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score or above. Patients with suspected infections in a hospital may have an approximate 10% mortality risk if their SOFA score is ≥2. Septic shock, which is characterized as severe metabolic, cellular, and circulatory dysregulation from underlying sepsis, can result from sepsis. The pathological process of sepsis is extremely complex, as previous research has shown, and this continues to be a major concern in critical care medicine today.[3,16] Furthermore, the pathophysiology and progression of sepsis are significantly influenced by the immune response. In the early stages of sepsis, immune cells release cytokines and inflammatory mediators to try and eliminate possible pathogens; in the later stages, immune-suppressive mechanisms emerge, leading to immunological dysfunction.[17]
Role of neutrophils and other immune cells in sepsis
Volker Brinkmann stimulated neutrophils with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), phosphor myristate (PMA), and IL-8 for the first time in 2004. They discovered that active neutrophils underwent a process known as “NETosis”, in which they flattened down and created noticeable extracellular structures known as “NETs”. In addition to effectively eliminating bacteria, the fibrous structure of NETs can operate as a physical barrier to stop the spread of bacteria. On the other hand, they noticed that the immune system could be harmed by an excessive amount of extracellular histone complex exposure, suggesting that NETosis was a two-edged sword for the immune system.[18]
Pyroptosis is a lytic type of planned cell death carried out by gasdermins, which are proteins that generate pores in cells. Gasdermin A (GSDMA), GSDMB, GSDMC, GSDMD, GSDME, and GSDMF (PJVK/DFNB59) are members of the gasdermin family.[19] Gasdermins have a linker connecting the C-terminal domain to the N-terminal domain, which is lipophilic and naturally makes pores. In a steady state, the C-terminal domain suppresses the N-terminal domain’s ability to produce pores. Specific proteases, activated in response to different signals, relieve intramolecular inhibition by cleaving the linker region that separates the N- and C-terminal domains. The N-terminal domain then translocates to the plasma membrane and attaches itself to the acidic phospholipids in the cytoplasmic leaflet, including phosphoinositides. Following this, the N-terminal domain oligomerizes and creates pores on the plasma membrane that resemble rings. The buildup of gasdermin pores ultimately causes cell lysis.
Neutrophil extracellular traps
Definition and formation of NETs
As the initial line of defense against invasive infections, neutrophils are essential to innate immunity. They are widely distributed, and when they receive chemotactic signals, they transmigrate to the infection sites. When activated neutrophils get to the site of the infection, they fight pathogens in a number of ways, including phagocytosis, oxidative burst, and “NETosis”, the process of making and releasing neutrophil extracellular traps (Figure 1). NETs are web-like structures made up of anti-microbial proteins such as serine proteases cathepsin G, proteinase 3, and neutrophil elastase (NE) and the neutrophil’s own DNA. When depolymerized chromatin and intracellular granular proteins are released, neutrophils activate, capture, and eliminate pathogens. This process, known as NETosis, would cause neutrophils to perish.[10]

Formation of NETs. Where A, represents infection site; B, represents Chemotactic signals guiding neutrophils to the infection site; C, represents Neutrophil Activation and Granule Degranulation; D, represents neutrophils membranes protrusions or pseudopodia formation; E, represents degranulation of neutrophils, and F represents neutrophil undergoing NETosis, with the chromatin (DNA) and antimicrobial proteins (like NE, proteinase 3) being expelled from the neutrophil.
One of the dominant mechanistic signalling pathways of NET formation is histone citrullination. When arginine and methylarginine in histones are changed to citrulline, the neutrophil chromatindecondensates, which leads to the growth of NETs. NETs are then expelled through NETosis. Additional information regarding the induction of NETosis was provided by studies linking autophagy to NET formation in PMA-induced neutrophils, both autophagy and production of ROS were required for NET formation. Interestingly, ROS production and autophagy occurred independently of each other; however, activation of both pathways was required for efficient chromatin decondensation. Additionally, pharmacological inhibition of the mTOR pathway enhanced autophagy and accelerated NET formation in neutrophils.[20] As a result of more research, it has been discovered that additional immune cell types are capable of causing extracellular traps to form, which release histones and DNA into the host tissue in a directed cell death process. NETs play a significant role in the regulation of infections and are a component of the innate immune response. Although NETs are mainly thought of as a defense mechanism against a variety of pathogens, there is mounting evidence linking NETs to the pathophysiology of organ dysfunction.[21]
Functions of NETs in host defense
As the initial line of defense in the innate immune system against microorganisms, neutrophils can eradicate invasive pathogens in many ways. The most common defensive mechanism, phagocytosis, is a well-known process that includes engulfing the prey inside the phagosome, an internal compartment. The phagosome then develops by fusing with other preexisting neutrophil granules, forming an unfriendly chamber that is loaded with harmful amounts of proteases, antibiotic peptides, and other microbicidal substances, most notably ROS. The NOX2-containing NADPH-oxidase, an electron-transporting enzyme system, produces these ROS by converting NADPH to superoxide. The entrapped prey is often killed by the combined effects of the ROS and the protein/peptide antimicrobials.[22]
Another defense mechanism used by neutrophils to capture and potentially eliminate microorganisms is the creation of what are known as NETs.[15] The nuclear DNA of the neutrophil is what makes up the extracellular cobweb-like fibrils known as NETs. Myeloperoxidase (MPO), proteases, histones, and antimicrobial peptides are all covered in these fibrils, which are then actively expelled from the cells through a process known as NETosis. This remarkable method of cell death has been linked to viral diseases, but it has also been demonstrated to have significance in non-infectious situations, such as autoimmune disorders, where the immune system is exposed to nuclear and granule material.[15,23]
Netosis in sepsis
Introduction to NETs
Brinkmann et al. originally described NETs as a host defensive mechanism against bacteria.[15] NETs can catch and kill germs by using proteinases and MPO, which stops them from getting into the bloodstream and nearby tissues.[15,24,25] However, uncontrolled NET formation on wounded vascular endothelial cells in sepsis promotes platelet aggregation and coagulation at the sites of attachment.[26, 27, 28]
NETs in Physiological settings
Interaction Between Platelets and Neutrophils in Sepsis
A 2007 study by Clark et al. demonstrated how platelets and neutrophils interact during sepsis, leading to the creation of NETs and improved bacterial entrapment in blood vessels.[29] Neutrophils exhibit a longer life span and decreased migration during sepsis. This restricts them to blood vessels, whereupon they release cytokines, ROS, and NETs, which cause severe vascular inflammation.[30,31] Specifically, pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic responses in endothelial cells are triggered by neutrophils and NETs, further deregulating the immune system.[32,33] An elevated rate of glycolysis is seen in activated endothelial cells, which intensifies oxidative stress and inflammation.[34,35]
Effects of NETs on Endothelial Cells and Vascular Inflammation
NETs,[15,36] one type of neutrophil activation may promote intravascular coagulation, damage vascular endothelial cells, and prevent bacterial movement in the bloodstream, all of which can result in the formation of immunothrombi.[37, 38, 39] Neutrophil-endothelial contact increases in sepsis to encourage neutrophil infiltration into tissues.[40] Increased NET formation is caused by the interaction between neutrophils and endothelial cells; this increased NET formation is partially reliant on IL-8 produced from activated endothelial cells.[41] Long-term neutrophil co-cultivation with endothelial cells caused endothelial cell damage; this damage is attributed to NETs because co-incubation with DNase or NAPDH oxidase inhibitors reduced the damage.[41] Human, murine, and canine neutrophils respond to LPS in ex vivo environments by going through a limited degree of NETosis.[42, 43, 44] However, both human and murine neutrophils release significant numbers of NETs when LPS-activated platelets are present, suggesting that platelet-neutrophil interaction plays a major role in sepsis-associated NETosis. It was initially discovered by Clark et al. that platelet Toll-like receptor 4 is necessary for platelet-mediated NETosis in humans that is caused by LPS.[29]
Pyroptosis
Definition and formation of pyroptosis
Immune cells use pattern recognition receptors to actively search for PAMPs, pathogen-induced cellular changes, and DAMPs in both the extracellular and intracellular compartments.[45] These receptors can trigger an inflammatory reaction by increasing the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Figure 2). They can also initiate homeostatic responses, such as autophagy, which helps remove PAMPs and destroy damaged organelles. In addition, inflammasomes, which are specialized sensors of the innate immune system, trigger pyroptosis. Inflammasomes are complex assemblies composed of various components, including sensor molecules such as the nod-like receptor (NLR) family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3), Absent in Melanoma 2 (AIM2), NLR family CARD domain containing 4 (NLRC4), and others. These sensor molecules are accompanied by an adaptor protein called apoptosisassociated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC), as well as an effector protease known as caspase-1. These oligomeric complex acts as a platform to cleave pro-Caspase-1 zymogen into active form. The presence of microbial components or cellular disturbances caused by infection triggers the construction of inflammasomes, resulting in the self-cleavage of caspase-1 into its active form.[46, 47, 48] Activated caspase-1 leads to DNA fragmentation and to cell lysis through different signal pathways. Caspases can activate nuclease and subsequent DNA fragmentation independent of degradation of inhibitor caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease (ICAD). Caspase-1 also facilitates the process of converting immature forms of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-18 (IL-18) into their mature counterparts, which are released easily through cell lysis and promote inflammation. Significantly, GSDMD has been identified as the substrate of caspase-1.[49,50] GSDMD can also be targeted by other caspases, namely caspase-11 in rats and caspase-4/5 in humans. These caspases work as detectors for gram-negative bacterial LPS found in the cytosol.[51, 52, 53, 54] The cleavage of GSDMD by Caspase-1/11/4/5 releases the N-terminal domain, leading to the perforation of the plasma membrane.[55,56] The development of pores by GSDMD results in the entry of ions, swelling due to osmotic pressure, and ultimately the lysis of cells, or pyroptosis, letting go of cellular contents such as proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-18), ATP and other alarmins.

Formation of cell pyroptosis.
Pyroptosis in inflammation and immune response
Pyroptosis is an intensely inflammatory kind of programmed cell death that has a critical function in triggering inflammation and immunological responses. They are involved in regulating and activating caspase-1 or caspase-4/5/11, resulting in the formation of holes in the plasma membrane. This causes the cell to break down and release pro-inflammatory chemicals.[54] These are primarily associated with the innate immune system, serving as a safeguard against microbial infections.
In the end, the cell goes through pyroptosis, which let go of its internal contents. These include pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-1β and IL-18, as well as warning signals like high-mobility group box 1.[57] These chemicals attract and stimulate immune cells, intensifying the inflammatory response and facilitating the elimination of infections. The secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 plays a crucial role in beginning and maintaining inflammation. These cytokines stimulate nearby cells, such as endothelial cells and immune cells, to produce a variety of other pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. [52] This enhances the inflammatory response and attracts immune cells to the location of infection or tissue damage. IL-1β additionally aids in the stimulation of adaptive immunity by facilitating the differentiation of T cells and the generation of antibodies. Pyroptosis can also directly aid in host defense by removing intracellular infections. The process of pyroptosis, which is initiated by caspase-4/5/11, is activated upon the recognition of cytosolic LPS originating from Gram-negative bacteria.[58] This type of pyroptosis enables the liberation of bacteria that are inside cells into the area outside the cells, which helps phagocytes identify and eliminate them.
Pyroptosis mainly happens in macrophage and dentric cells. However, research have identified other cell types going through pyroptosis, such as neutrophils through activating a non-canonical inflammasome pathway through P2X7 receptors. Neutrophils are highly microbicide with short life span. Through pyroptosis, chemo attractive capacity and phagocytosis, few pathogens can survive and replicate.
Although pyroptosis serves as a potent defense mechanism, its dysregulation can contribute to the development of different illnesses. Excessive or prolonged pyroptosis can result in tissue damage and the development of chronic inflammation.[59] Moreover, autoinflammatory diseases and immunodeficiencies have been associated with alterations in the genes that code for inflammasome components or pyroptosis-related proteins.
Crosstalk between netosis and pyroptosis
The term “crosstalk” describes the possible regulatory relationships and interplay between NETosis and pyroptosis, two types of immune responses and cell death. During NETosis, the recruited neutrophils release cytotoxic substances and enzymes in response to pathogens, phagocytose pathogens, and release NETs to carry out host defensive functions.[60] The activation of neutrophils triggers NETosis, which also coincides with changes in intracellular calcium concentration, an increase in ROS, and the activation of kinase signalling cascades that aid in the synthesis of NETs.[61] It has been documented that the same infections that cause NETosis can cause pyroptosis in different kinds of periodontal tissue cells.
Additionally, Inflammasomes are also a major part of the innate immune system and consist of sensors, adaptors, and effectors which serve as a platform within cells to identify various pathogens and harmful signals. Most of the inflammasomes that have been found so far are NLRP1, NLRP3, NLRP6, AIM2, Pyrin, and CARD8.[62] Upon activation, the effectors then cut downstream effectors like pro-IL-18, pro-IL-1β, and GSDM family members. These are then released from cells to start pyroptosis and the inflammatory cascade.[47]
However, while inflammasomes are mostly expressed in myeloid cells, such as macrophages and monocytes, there is mounting evidence that they are also essential components of the adaptive immune system, particularly in lymphocytes. Inflammasomes are expressed and activated in lymphocytes, and lymphocytes in turn regulate inflammasome activity in the adaptive immune system. This relationship between inflammasomes and lymphocytes acts as a bridge for communication between the innate and adaptive immune response, resulting in fine control of immune protection. This study examines the crosstalk that inflammasomes facilitate between the innate and adaptive immune systems, with a particular emphasis on the relationship between inflammasomes and lymphocytes.
Synergistic effects of netosis and pyroptosis in sepsis
The synergistic effects of NETosis and pyroptosis play a significant role in the pathogenesis of sepsis. NETosis creates NETs, composed of chromatin and antimicrobial proteins. Because of their ability to capture and eliminate pathogens, these NETs are helpful during the early stages of an infection. Nevertheless, there may be negative consequences from increased NET creation and decreased NET clearance. In sepsis, NETs components stimulate immune cells and cause the production of inflammatory mediators such as chemokines and cytokines, which in turn promote systemic inflammation.[63] Also, reserch suggests that NETs can exerbate pyroptosis. For example, NETs originated DNA is able to augment pyroptosis via AIM2 inflammasome activation, and NETs originated NE can cleave and activate GSDMD which is a key executive protein of pyroptosis.[64,65]
On the other hand, pyroptosis is a type of programmed cell death that is highly inflammatory. Inflammasomes, multiprotein complexes that trigger the cleavage and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-18 and IL-1β, are what define them. In sepsis, these cytokines help to magnify the inflammatory response.[66] These cytokines can then trigger NETosis. Furthermore, researchers have suggested that pyroptosis is an upstream regulator of NETosis, and GSDMD, the key executive protein of pyroptosis, facilitates NETosis.[65,67] More pro-inflammatory cytokines are released, and pyroptosis is enhanced when NETs trigger inflammasomes., which can lead to an inflammatory cycle that amplifies itself again.[68] Moreover, NETs have the direct ability to cause immune cells to undergo pyroptosis, which intensifies the inflammatory response.[69] The interplay between NETosis and pyroptosis exacerbates sepsis-related immunological dysregulation.
Therefore, understanding the synergistic effects of NETosis and pyroptosis provides new insights into sepsis pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets. Targeted interventions aimed at regulating these processes could help mitigate immune dysregulation and improve patient outcomes. However, further research is needed to fully elucidate the underlying mechanisms and identify specific therapeutic strategies.[70]
Modulation of netosis and pyroptosis pathways
Modulation of NETosis and pyroptosis pathways is an area of active research in the field of immunology. Immunological research is currently being conducted in the domains of NETosis and pyroptosis pathway modification. Both pyroptosis and NETosis are specialized types of cell death that are crucial for inflammation and immunological responses. Excessive NET development can lead to tissue damage and autoimmune disorders.[15,63] Additionally, a variety of stimuli can cause pyroptosis, an inflammatory type of programmed cell death. Cell lysis and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-1β and IL-18) are its defining features. Pyroptosis is modified by controlling downstream signalling pathways and inflammasome activation.[48,71]
Therapeutic strategies targeting netosis and pyroptosis
Circulating NETs are observed in individuals with sepsis, which is often accompanied by severe multi-organ failure and unfavourable clinical outcomes.[72,73] In contrast, an unmanageable rise in NET formation, along with the failure to remove and break down debris and contents resulting from cell death, including cell-free DNA, results in heightened expression of inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor α in these individuals. There have been reports indicating that citrulline histones produced from NETs can function as DAMPs. They achieve this by stimulating the production of inflammatory cytokines, impairing the function of endothelial cells through cytotoxicity, and increasing the formation of ROS. As a consequence, this leads to damage to multiple organs.[74,75] However, pyroptosis, which is a type of programmed cell death that is extremely inflammatory and is activated by inflammasomes, has a crucial function in protecting the host against intracellular pathogens. However, if it is not properly managed, it can worsen tissue damage and inflammation.[76] The dysregulation of NETosis and pyroptosis has been linked to the development of various diseases, such as autoimmune disorders (e.g., lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), infectious diseases (e.g., sepsis), and inflammatory conditions (e.g., atherosclerosis, cancer).[77,78] As a result, there has been significant interest in using therapeutic strategies that focus on these pathways as prospective interventions to reduce disease severity and improve patient outcomes. NETs have been linked to the development of many inflammatory and infectious conditions. Strategies aimed at inhibiting NETosis have the potential to reduce tissue damage and inflammation associated with these disorders. Kenny et al. showed that various stimuli activate distinct pathways that result in the creation of NETs, indicating possible targets for inhibiting NETosis.[77] In addition, a study also discovered that inflammatory caspases can operate as innate immunological receptors for intracellular LPS. This finding implies that it may be possible to regulate NETosis by targeting caspase activation.[76] Overall, these results emphasize the need for establishing therapeutic ways to inhibit NETosis and decrease the inflammatory response in various illness scenarios. Pyroptosis is a type of programmed cell death that is highly inflammatory. It is important for the body’s defense against intracellular infections but can cause more tissue damage and inflammation if not well regulated. Shi et al. found that inflammatory caspases act as innate immunological receptors for LPS inside cells, highlighting their important role in starting pyroptosis.[76] Suppressing the activity of inflammatory caspases is a promising approach to controlling pyroptosis and reducing its harmful consequences. By focusing on certain caspases’ activation or activity, it might be possible to lower the inflammatory response connected to pyroptosis while still letting it do its important job of protecting the host.
Current therapeutic approaches for sepsis
Peptidylarginine deiminases (PADs) show promising therapeutic benefits for acute lung injury produced by sepsis.[79] In a sepsis model, PAD-knockout mice enhanced survival and reduced the degree of organ failure and progression of sepsis.[80] NE, also known as NE, is a protease that is stored in neutrophils and is released into the extracellular environment during inflammatory responses or the creation of NETs.[81] NE plays a role in the creation of NETs, and efficiently blocking NE minimizes damage to lung tissue.[82] Sivelestat is a small-molecule inhibitor of NE that can inhibit NET formation in vitro, ease clinical symptoms of lung injury, lower inflammatory cytokines in the blood, and strengthen the body’s defense mechanism.[83] Sivelestat improves acute lung damage in patients with sepsis.[84] DNase can alter the structure of NET and lower NET levels.[85] Dwivedi et al. assessed 80 patients with sepsis and found that cell-free DNA levels were a better predictor of critical care unit death compared to standard scoring systems.[86] A promising way to treat sepsis involves combination therapy targeting both NETosis and pyroptosis. It may be possible to create synergistic effects and improve patient outcomes by simultaneously regulating various inflammatory pathways. However, the development of such therapeutics requires a full understanding of the interplay between NETosis and pyroptosis, as well as the identification of critical molecular targets for intervention. Several studies have established the efficacy of combination treatments in preclinical models of sepsis. For example, reduction of NETosis by DNase I and blocking of pyroptosis using caspase inhibitors have been demonstrated to minimize organ damage and enhance life in septic animals.[54,87]
Conclusion
In conclusion, sepsis remains a significant global medical challenge, causing high rates of illness and death. Our analysis emphasizes the crucial role of immune response dysregulation in sepsis. We have identified the interaction between two processes, NETosis and pyroptosis, which play a key role in the development of sepsis. NETosis involves the release of chromatin and antimicrobial proteins from neutrophils, while pyroptosis is an inflammatory form of programmed cell death. These processes contribute to tissue damage and systemic inflammation in sepsis. Understanding this interaction opens new avenues for targeted therapies, although further research is needed. Collaboration and translational research are essential to improving patient outcomes in sepsis.
Funding statement: This study was supported by the Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82202394) and Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2023JJ40976).
Acknowledgements
Figures were created with assistance of BioRender.com/Powerpoint.
-
Author Contributions
B. Pan came up with the main idea of the manuscript. A. M. Kashif wrote the manuscript and B. Pan, Y. Li and Y. Ouyang revised the manuscript substantially.
-
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
-
Informed Consent
Not applicable.
-
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools
None declared.
-
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
1 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–810.10.1001/jama.2016.0287Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
2 Delano MJ, Ward PA. The immune system's role in sepsis progression, resolution, and long-term outcome. Immunol Rev 2016;274:330–353.10.1111/imr.12499Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3 Gül F, Arslantaş MK, Cinel İ, Kumar A. Changing Definitions of Sepsis. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2017;45:129–138.10.5152/TJAR.2017.93753Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4 Zhu CL, Wang Y, Liu Q, Li HR, Yu CM, Li P, et al. Dysregulation of neutrophil death in sepsis. Front Immunol 2022;13:963955.10.3389/fimmu.2022.963955Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5 Liew PX, Kubes P. The Neutrophil's Role During Health and Disease. Physiol Rev 2019;99:1223–1248.10.1152/physrev.00012.2018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
6 Fink SL, Cookson BT. Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells. Infect Immun 2005;73:1907–1916.10.1128/IAI.73.4.1907-1916.2005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7 Booty LM, Bryant CE. Gasdermin D and Beyond - Gasdermin-mediated Pyroptosis in Bacterial Infections. J Mol Biol 2022;434:167409.10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167409Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
8 van der Poll T, van de Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, Netea MG. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol 2017;17:407–420.10.1038/nri.2017.36Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
9 Zhang H, Chen Z, Zhou J, Gu J, Wu H, Jiang Y, et al. NAT10 regulates neutrophil pyroptosis in sepsis via acetylating ULK1 RNA and activating STING pathway. Commun Biol 2022;5:916.10.1038/s42003-022-03868-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10 Wen X, Xie B, Yuan S, Zhang J. The "Self-Sacrifice" of ImmuneCells in Sepsis. Front Immunol 2022;13:833479.10.3389/fimmu.2022.833479Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
11 Ladha E, House-Kokan M, Gillespie M. The ABCCs of sepsis: A framework for understanding the pathophysiology of sepsis. Can J Crit Care Nurs 2019;30:12-21.Suche in Google Scholar
12 Amulic B, Cazalet C, Hayes GL, Metzler KD, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil function: from mechanisms to disease. Annu Rev Immunol 2012;30:459–489.10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074942Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
13 Kawalkowska J, Quirke AM, Ghari F, Davis S, Subramanian V, Thompson PR, et al. Abrogation of collagen-induced arthritis by a peptidyl arginine deiminase inhibitor is associated with modulation of T cell-mediated immune responses. Sci Rep 2016;6:26430.10.1038/srep26430Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14 Scapini P, Cassatella MA. Social networking of human neutrophils within the immune system. Blood 2014;124:710–719.10.1182/blood-2014-03-453217Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
15 Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 2004;303:1532–1535.10.1126/science.1092385Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
16 Banerjee D, Levy MM. Sepsis definitions. In: Ward NS, Levy MM, eds. Sepsis: Definitions, Pathophysiology and the Challenge of Bedside Management. Springer; 2017:7-24.10.1007/978-3-319-48470-9_2Suche in Google Scholar
17 Tong R, Ding X, Liu F, Li H, Liu H, Song H, et al. Classification of subtypes and identification of dysregulated genes in sepsis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023;13:1226159.10.3389/fcimb.2023.1226159Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
18 Zhang X, Zhang Y, Yuan S, Zhang J. The potential immunological mechanisms of sepsis. Front Immunol 2024;15:1434688.10.3389/fimmu.2024.1434688Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
19 Broz P, Pelegrín P, Shao F. The gasdermins, a protein family executing cell death and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2020;20:143–157.10.1038/s41577-019-0228-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
20 Stephan A, Fabri M. The NET, the trap and the pathogen: neutrophil extracellular traps in cutaneous immunity. Exp Dermatol 2015;24:161–166.10.1111/exd.12599Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
21 Colón DF, Wanderley CW, Franchin M, Silva CM, Hiroki CH, Castanheira FVS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) exacerbate severity of infant sepsis. Crit Care 2019;23:113.10.1186/s13054-019-2407-8Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
22 Nauseef WM, Borregaard N. Neutrophils at work. Nat Immunol 2014;15:602-611.10.1038/ni.2921Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
23 Sangaletti S, Tripodo C, Chiodoni C, Guarnotta C, Cappetti B, Casalini P, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate transfer of cytoplasmic neutrophil antigens to myeloid dendritic cells toward ANCA induction and associated autoimmunity. Blood 2012;120:3007-3018. Erratum in: Blood 2022;140:2646-2647.10.1182/blood.2022017965Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
24 Tanaka K, Koike Y, Shimura T, Okigami M, Ide S, Toiyama Y, et al. In vivo characterization of neutrophil extracellular traps in various organs of a murine sepsis model. PLoS One 2014;9:e111888.10.1371/journal.pone.0111888Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
25 Kolaczkowska E, Jenne CN, Surewaard BG, Thanabalasuriar A, Lee WY, Sanz MJ, et al. Molecular mechanisms of NET formation and degradation revealed by intravital imaging in the liver vasculature. Nat Commun 2015;6:6673.10.1038/ncomms7673Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
26 Radermecker C, Detrembleur N, Guiot J, Cavalier E, Henket M, d'Emal C, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps infiltrate the lung airway, interstitial, and vascular compartments in severe COVID-19. J Exp Med 2020;217:e20201012.10.1084/jem.20201012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
27 Barnes BJ, Adrover JM, Baxter-Stoltzfus A, Borczuk A, Cools-Lartigue J, Crawford JM, et al. Targeting potential drivers of COVID- 19: Neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med 2020;217:e20200652.10.1084/jem.20200652Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
28 Cicco S, Cicco G, Racanelli V, Vacca A. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) and Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs): Two Potential Targets for COVID-19 Treatment. Mediators Inflamm 2020;2020:7527953.10.1155/2020/7527953Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
29 Clark SR, Ma AC, Tavener SA, McDonald B, Goodarzi Z, Kelly MM, et al. Platelet TLR4 activates neutrophil extracellular traps to ensnare bacteria in septic blood. Nat Med 2007;13:463–469.10.1038/nm1565Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
30 Sônego F, Castanheira FV, Ferreira RG, Kanashiro A, Leite CA, Nascimento DC, et al. Paradoxical Roles of the Neutrophil in Sepsis: Protective and Deleterious. Front Immunol 2016;7:155.10.3389/fimmu.2016.00155Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
31 Milot E, Fotouhi-Ardakani N, Filep JG. Myeloid nuclear differentiation antigen, neutrophil apoptosis and sepsis. Front Immunol 2012;3:397.10.3389/fimmu.2012.00397Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
32 Barkaway A, Rolas L, Joulia R, Bodkin J, Lenn T, Owen-Woods C, et al. Age-related changes in the local milieu of inflamed tissues cause aberrant neutrophil trafficking and subsequent remote organ damage. Immunity 2021;54:1494–1510.10.1016/j.immuni.2021.04.025Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
33 Aldabbous L, Abdul-Salam V, McKinnon T, Duluc L, Pepke-Zaba J, Southwood M, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Promote Angiogenesis: Evidence From Vascular Pathology in Pulmonary Hypertension. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2016;36:2078–2087.10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307634Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
34 Polet F, Feron O. Endothelial cell metabolism and tumour angiogenesis: glucose and glutamine as essential fuels and lactate as the driving force. J Intern Med 2013;273:156–165.10.1111/joim.12016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
35 Herrero-Mendez A, Almeida A, Fernández E, Maestre C, Moncada S, Bolaños JP. The bioenergetic and antioxidant status of neurons is controlled by continuous degradation of a key glycolytic enzyme by APC/C-Cdh1. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:747–752.10.1038/ncb1881Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
36 Papayannopoulos V, Metzler KD, Hakkim A, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol 2010;191:677–691.10.1083/jcb.201006052Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
37 Kimball AS, Obi AT, Diaz JA, Henke PK. The Emerging Role of NETs in Venous Thrombosis and Immunothrombosis. Front Immunol 2016;7:236.10.3389/fimmu.2016.00236Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
38 Leppkes M, Knopf J, Naschberger E, Lindemann A, Singh J, Herrmann I, et al. Vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID- 19. EBioMedicine 2020;58:102925.10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102925Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
39 Middleton EA, He XY, Denorme F, Campbell RA, Ng D, Salvatore SP, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to immunothrombosis in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Blood 2020;136:1169–1179.10.1182/blood.2020007008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
40 Lerman YV, Kim M. Neutrophil migration under normal and sepsis conditions. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets 2015;15:19–28.10.2174/1871529X15666150108113236Suche in Google Scholar
41 Gupta AK, Joshi MB, Philippova M, Erne P, Hasler P, Hahn S, et al. Activated endothelial cells induce neutrophil extracellular traps and are susceptible to NETosis-mediated cell death. FEBS Lett 2010;584:3193–3197.10.1016/j.febslet.2010.06.006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
42 Li RHL, Ng G, Tablin F. Lipopolysaccharide-induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation in canine neutrophils is dependent on histone H3 citrullination by peptidylarginine deiminase. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2017;193-194:29-37.10.1016/j.vetimm.2017.10.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
43 Pieterse E, Rother N, Yanginlar C, Hilbrands LB, van der Vlag J. Neutrophils Discriminate between Lipopolysaccharides of Different Bacterial Sources and Selectively Release Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Front Immunol 2016;7:484.10.3389/fimmu.2016.00484Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
44 Liu S, Su X, Pan P, Zhang L, Hu Y, Tan H, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps are indirectly triggered by lipopolysaccharide and contribute to acute lung injury. Sci Rep 2016;6:37252.10.1038/srep37252Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
45 Taro Kawai, Shizuo Akira. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 2010;11:373–384.10.1038/ni.1863Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
46 Miao EA, Leaf IA, Treuting PM, Mao DP, Dors M, Sarkar A, et al. Caspase-1-induced pyroptosis is an innate immune effector mechanism against intracellular bacteria. Nat Immunol 2010;11:1136–1142.10.1038/ni.1960Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
47 Rathinam VA, Fitzgerald KA. Inflammasome Complexes: Emerging Mechanisms and Effector Functions. Cell 2016;165:792–800.10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.046Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
48 Broz P, Dixit VM. Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 2016;16:407–420.10.1038/nri.2016.58Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
49 Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang K, Shi X, Wang Y, Huang H, et al. Cleavage of GS-DMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature 2015;526:660–665.10.1038/nature15514Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
50 Kayagaki N, Stowe IB, Lee BL, O'Rourke K, Anderson K, Warming S, et al. Caspase-11 cleaves gasdermin D for non-canonical inflammasome signalling. Nature 2015;526:666–671.10.1038/nature15541Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
51 Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Gao W, Ding J, Li P, et al. Inflammatory caspases are innate immune receptors for intracellular LPS. Nature 2014;514:187–192.10.1038/nature13683Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
52 Kayagaki N, Warming S, Lamkanfi M, Vande Walle L, Louie S, Dong J, et al. Non-canonical inflammasome activation targets caspase- 11. Nature 2011;479:117–121.10.1038/nature10558Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
53 Hagar JA, Powell DA, Aachoui Y, Ernst RK, Miao EA. Cytoplasmic LPS activates caspase-11: implications in TLR4-independent endotoxic shock. Science 2013;341:1250–1253.10.1126/science.1240988Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
54 Kayagaki N, Wong MT, Stowe IB, Ramani SR, Gonzalez LC, Akashi-Takamura S, et al. Noncanonical inflammasome activation by intracellular LPS independent of TLR4. Science 2013;341:1246–1249.10.1126/science.1240248Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
55 He WT, Wan H, Hu L, Chen P, Wang X, Huang Z, et al. Gasdermin D is an executor of pyroptosis and required for interleukin-1β secretion. Cell Res 2015;25:1285–1298.10.1038/cr.2015.139Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
56 Liu X, Zhang Z, Ruan J, Pan Y, Magupalli VG, Wu H, et al. Inflammasomeactivated gasdermin D causes pyroptosis by forming membrane pores. Nature 2016;535:153–158.10.1038/nature18629Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
57 Aglietti RA, Dueber EC. Recent Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Pyroptosis and Gasdermin Family Functions. Trends Immunol 2017;38:261–271.10.1016/j.it.2017.01.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
58 Lamkanfi M, Dixit VM. Mechanisms and functions of inflammasomes. Cell 2014;157:1013–1022.10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
59 Shi J, Gao W, Shao F. Pyroptosis: Gasdermin-Mediated Programmed Necrotic Cell Death. Trends Biochem Sci 2017;42:245–254.10.1016/j.tibs.2016.10.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
60 Hajishengallis G. New developments in neutrophil biology and periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 2020;82:78–92.10.1111/prd.12313Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
61 Thiam HR, Wong SL, Wagner DD, Waterman CM. Cellular Mechanisms of NETosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2020;36:191–218.10.1146/annurev-cellbio-020520-111016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
62 Deets KA, Vance RE. Inflammasomes and adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol 2021;22:412–422.10.1038/s41590-021-00869-6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
63 Bonaventura A, Liberale L, Carbone F, Vecchié A, Diaz-Cañestro C, Camici GG, et al. The Pathophysiological Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Inflammatory Diseases. Thromb Haemost 2018;118:6–27.10.1160/TH17-09-0630Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
64 Li H, Li Y, Song C, Hu Y, Dai M, Liu B, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Augmented Alveolar Macrophage Pyroptosis via AIM2 Inflammasome Activation in LPS-Induced ALI/ARDS. J Inflamm Res 2021;14:4839–4858.10.2147/JIR.S321513Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
65 Gabriel Sollberger, Axel Choidas, Garth Lawrence Burn, Peter Habenberger, Raffaella Di Lucrezia, Susanne Kordes, et al. Gasdermin D plays a vital role in the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci Immunol 2018;3:eaar6689.10.1126/sciimmunol.aar6689Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
66 Miao EA, Mao DP, Yudkovsky N, Bonneau R, Lorang CG, Warren SE, et al. Innate immune detection of the type III secretion apparatus through the NLRC4 inflammasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:3076–3080.10.1073/pnas.0913087107Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
67 Xiong Y, Liu S, Liu Y, Zhao J, Sun J, Li Y, et al. PI3Kγ promotes neutrophil extracellular trap formation by noncanonical pyroptosis in abdominal aortic aneurysm. JCI Insight 2024;9:e183237.10.1172/jci.insight.183237Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
68 Caudrillier A, Kessenbrock K, Gilliss BM, Nguyen JX, Marques MB, Monestier M, et al. Platelets induce neutrophil extracellular traps in transfusion-related acute lung injury. J Clin Invest 2012;122:2661–2671.10.1172/JCI61303Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
69 Pfister H. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Neutrophil-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Common Players in Neutrophil Effector Functions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:1715.10.3390/diagnostics12071715Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
70 Vitkov L, Minnich B, Knopf J, Schauer C, Hannig M, Herrmann M. NETs Are Double-Edged Swords with the Potential to Aggravate or Resolve Periodontal Inflammation. Cells 2020;9:2614.10.3390/cells9122614Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
71 Fink SL, Cookson BT. Caspase-1-dependent pore formation during pyroptosis leads to osmotic lysis of infected host macrophages. Cell Microbiol 2006;8:1812–1825.10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00751.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
72 Li RHL, Johnson LR, Kohen C, Tablin F. A novel approach to identifying and quantifying neutrophil extracellular trap formation in septic dogs using immunofluorescence microscopy. BMC Vet Res 2018;14:210.10.1186/s12917-018-1523-zSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
73 Ekaney ML, Otto GP, Sossdorf M, Sponholz C, Boehringer M, Loesche W, et al. Impact of plasma histones in human sepsis and their contribution to cellular injury and inflammation. Crit Care 2014;18:543.10.1186/s13054-014-0543-8Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
74 Akgul C, Moulding DA, Edwards SW. Molecular control of neutrophil apoptosis. FEBS Lett 2001;487:318–322.10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02324-3Suche in Google Scholar
75 Abrams ST, Zhang N, Manson J, Liu T, Dart C, Baluwa F, et al. Circulating histones are mediators of trauma-associated lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:160–169.10.1164/rccm.201206-1037OCSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
76 Kenny EF, Herzig A, Krüger R, Muth A, Mondal S, Thompson PR, et al. Diverse stimuli engage different neutrophil extracellular trap pathways. Elife 2017;6:e24437.Suche in Google Scholar
77 Kenny EF, Herzig A, Krüger R, Muth A, Mondal S, Thompson PR, et al. Diverse stimuli engage different neutrophil extracellular trap pathways. Elife 2017;6:e24437.10.7554/eLife.24437Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
78 Rühl S, Broz P. Caspase-11 activates a canonical NLRP3 inflammasome by promoting K(+) efflux. Eur J Immunol 2015;45:2927–2936.10.1002/eji.201545772Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
79 Surolia R, Li FJ, Wang Z, Kashyap M, Srivastava RK, Traylor AM, et al. NETosis in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury following cutaneous chemical burns. JCI Insight 2021;6:e147564.10.1172/jci.insight.147564Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
80 Franck G, Mawson TL, Folco EJ, Molinaro R, Ruvkun V, Engelbertsen D, et al. Roles of PAD4 and NETosis in Experimental Atherosclerosis and Arterial Injury: Implications for Superficial Erosion. Circ Res 2018;123:33–42.10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312494Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
81 Sanni Kumar, Ena Gupta, Sanket Kaushik, Anupam Jyoti. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: Formation and Involvement in Disease Progression. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018;17:208–220.Suche in Google Scholar
82 Baron S, Binenbaum Y, Berger Achituv S, Tene Y, Elhasid R. Neutrophil Elastase Activity as a Surrogate Marker for Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019;25:2350–2356.10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.032Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
83 Okeke EB, Louttit C, Fry C, Najafabadi AH, Han K, Nemzek J, et al. Inhibition of neutrophil elastase prevents neutrophil extracellular trap formation and rescues mice from endotoxic shock. Biomaterials 2020;238:119836.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119836Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
84 Gao X, Zhang R, Lei Z, Guo X, Yang Y, Tian J, et al. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomics of sivelestat sodium in the treatment of septic acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10:11910–11917.10.21037/apm-21-3164Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
85 Wang R, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Chang L, Bai X, Kang L, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote tPA-induced brain hemorrhage via cGAS in mice with stroke. Blood 2021;138:91–103.10.1182/blood.2020008913Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
86 Dwivedi DJ, Toltl LJ, Swystun LL, Pogue J, Liaw KL, Weitz JI, et al. Prognostic utility and characterization of cell-free DNA in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care 2012;1:6.10.1186/cc11466Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
87 Xu J, Zhang X, Pelayo R, Monestier M, Ammollo CT, Semeraro F, et al. Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat Med 2009;15:1318–1321.10.1038/nm.2053Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2025 Ali Muhammad Kashif, Yang Ouyang, Yongqing Li, Baihong Pan, published by De Gruyter on behalf of the SMP
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Perspective
- Mechanisms and treatment of atrial fibrillation and stroke
- Dysfunction of monocyte in the development of HBV-ACLF: Immune activation or immune suppression?
- Induced pluripotent stem cells in the treatment of ischemic stroke
- Artificial intelligence in glycemic management for diabetes: Applications, opportunities and challenges
- Review Article
- NETosis and pyroptosis of immune cells in sepsis
- The roles of subcellular Argonaute 2 in cardiovascular diseases
- Original Article
- B10 cell-induced PD-L1/PD-1-linked macrophage polarization in periodontitis
- Is integrative therapy of traditional Chinese medicine and progesterone capsule more effective than monotherapies in oligomenorrhea and hypomenorrhea? Evidence based on a multi-center randomized controlled trial and metabolomic profile
- Definition and validation of recompensation in patients with primary biliary cholangitis-related decompensated cirrhosis treated with ursodeoxycholic acid: Based on the BAVENO VII criteria
- DEK-NUP214 monitoring before and after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the TROPHY study group
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Perspective
- Mechanisms and treatment of atrial fibrillation and stroke
- Dysfunction of monocyte in the development of HBV-ACLF: Immune activation or immune suppression?
- Induced pluripotent stem cells in the treatment of ischemic stroke
- Artificial intelligence in glycemic management for diabetes: Applications, opportunities and challenges
- Review Article
- NETosis and pyroptosis of immune cells in sepsis
- The roles of subcellular Argonaute 2 in cardiovascular diseases
- Original Article
- B10 cell-induced PD-L1/PD-1-linked macrophage polarization in periodontitis
- Is integrative therapy of traditional Chinese medicine and progesterone capsule more effective than monotherapies in oligomenorrhea and hypomenorrhea? Evidence based on a multi-center randomized controlled trial and metabolomic profile
- Definition and validation of recompensation in patients with primary biliary cholangitis-related decompensated cirrhosis treated with ursodeoxycholic acid: Based on the BAVENO VII criteria
- DEK-NUP214 monitoring before and after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the TROPHY study group