Home Medicine Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians

  • Maria Antónia Costa , Diogo Ayres-de-Campos , Ana P. Machado , Cristina C. Santos and João Bernardes
Published/Copyright: February 2, 2010
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
From the journal Volume 38 Issue 2

Abstract

Aims: To compare between computer analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) features by the Omniview-SisPorto® 3.5 and a consensus of clinicians.

Methods: Agreement study using 50 consecutively acquired tracings (206 h of signals) with >60 min duration, <10% signal loss and recorded in labor at term by internal fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring. Tracings were divided into 10-min segments and independently analyzed by three experienced clinicians, in order to estimate the FHR baseline and identify periodic events. A consensus was reached using a three round Delphi procedure. Results were compared with the analysis provided by the Omniview-SisPorto® 3.5 system.

Results: For baseline estimation, agreement between the computer and the consensus was high [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46–0.93], with a mean difference of 3.7 bpm (limits of agreement –4.4–11.9 bpm), and 99% of differences under 15 bpm. A concordant identification was observed in 71% of accelerations (95% CI: 69%–73%), 68% of decelerations (95% CI: 66%–70%), and 87% of uterine contractions (95% CI: 85%–89%).

Conclusions: A high agreement was observed between the Omniview-SisPorto® 3.5 and a consensus of clinicians in evaluation of intrapartum CTG baseline, accelerations, decelerations and uterine contractions.


Corresponding author: Maria Antónia Costa, Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdad de Medicna da Universidade do Porto, Alameda Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal Fax: +351225512242

Received: 2009-6-7
Revised: 2009-9-13
Accepted: 2009-10-20
Published Online: 2010-02-02
Published Online: 2010-02-2
Published in Print: 2010-03-01

©2010 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Expert panel recommendation
  2. A template for defining the perinatal care of monochorionic twins: the Istanbul international ad hoc committee
  3. Recommendations and guidelines for perinatal practice
  4. Guidelines for the management of postterm pregnancy
  5. Review article
  6. Unequal but monozygous: a history of twin-twin transfusion syndrome
  7. Original articles – Obstetrics
  8. Retinol binding protein 4 – a novel association with early-onset preeclampsia
  9. Metabolic parameters and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
  10. Retinol-binding protein 4: a novel adipokine implicated in the genesis of LGA in the absence of gestational diabetes mellitus
  11. Preferences of caregiver when experiencing nausea and vomiting during pregnancy
  12. Original articles – Fetus
  13. Pentraxin 3 in amniotic fluid: a novel association with intra-amniotic infection and inflammation
  14. Puerperal symphysis fundus distance: normal values
  15. Comparison of non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram to Doppler cardiotocogram during the 1st stage of labor
  16. Acceptability of the fetal electrocardiographic (STAN®) monitoring system by staff at a high risk maternity unit
  17. Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians
  18. Loss of FHR variability diagnosed by frequency analysis
  19. Oxygen utilization in newborns at delivery
  20. Original articles – Newborn
  21. Recent dramatic increase in the male-to-female sex ratio of babies born in Hong Kong
  22. Intracerebral transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood alleviates hypoxic ischemic brain injury in rat neonates
  23. Letters to the Editor
  24. Comment to “The prognosis of pregnancy conceived despite the presence of an intrauterine device (IUD)”
  25. Advanced maternal age and prenatal diagnosis
  26. Reply
  27. Advanced maternal age and prenatal diagnosis
  28. Congress Calendar
  29. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm.2010.030/pdf
Scroll to top button