Home Medicine Acceptability of the fetal electrocardiographic (STAN®) monitoring system by staff at a high risk maternity unit
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Acceptability of the fetal electrocardiographic (STAN®) monitoring system by staff at a high risk maternity unit

  • Maryam Parisaei , Kevin F. Harrington and Katrina J. Erskine
Published/Copyright: February 2, 2010
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
From the journal Volume 38 Issue 2

Abstract

Aims: To assess staff acceptability of STAN® monitoring system.

Methods: This was a prospective study of health care professionals involved in the first 18 months of STAN® use at a high risk maternity unit.

Results: During the study period 75% of midwives and 80% of doctors questioned felt confident when interpreting STAN® cases. A total of 88% of midwives and 90% of doctors felt adequately supported in their actual clinical use of the system. Of all the obstetricians who used the STAN®, 95% felt it was an acceptable alternative to fetal blood sampling. One of the main complaints was poor signal quality which occurred in 16% of cases. As many as 97% of doctors and 96% of midwives considered STAN® to be an acceptable way of monitoring high risk women after its introduction.

Conclusions: Introduction of a new monitoring system to a high risk labor ward is possible, and acceptable to its staff. Constant practical and theoretical support and adherence to strict, easily understood guidelines is required.


Corresponding author: Maryam Parisaei, MRCOG Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College Hospital 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK

Received: 2009-3-29
Revised: 2009-8-2
Accepted: 2009-10-7
Published Online: 2010-02-02
Published Online: 2010-02-2
Published in Print: 2010-03-01

©2010 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Expert panel recommendation
  2. A template for defining the perinatal care of monochorionic twins: the Istanbul international ad hoc committee
  3. Recommendations and guidelines for perinatal practice
  4. Guidelines for the management of postterm pregnancy
  5. Review article
  6. Unequal but monozygous: a history of twin-twin transfusion syndrome
  7. Original articles – Obstetrics
  8. Retinol binding protein 4 – a novel association with early-onset preeclampsia
  9. Metabolic parameters and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
  10. Retinol-binding protein 4: a novel adipokine implicated in the genesis of LGA in the absence of gestational diabetes mellitus
  11. Preferences of caregiver when experiencing nausea and vomiting during pregnancy
  12. Original articles – Fetus
  13. Pentraxin 3 in amniotic fluid: a novel association with intra-amniotic infection and inflammation
  14. Puerperal symphysis fundus distance: normal values
  15. Comparison of non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram to Doppler cardiotocogram during the 1st stage of labor
  16. Acceptability of the fetal electrocardiographic (STAN®) monitoring system by staff at a high risk maternity unit
  17. Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians
  18. Loss of FHR variability diagnosed by frequency analysis
  19. Oxygen utilization in newborns at delivery
  20. Original articles – Newborn
  21. Recent dramatic increase in the male-to-female sex ratio of babies born in Hong Kong
  22. Intracerebral transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood alleviates hypoxic ischemic brain injury in rat neonates
  23. Letters to the Editor
  24. Comment to “The prognosis of pregnancy conceived despite the presence of an intrauterine device (IUD)”
  25. Advanced maternal age and prenatal diagnosis
  26. Reply
  27. Advanced maternal age and prenatal diagnosis
  28. Congress Calendar
  29. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm.2010.023/pdf
Scroll to top button