Startseite Outcome of fetal congenital pulmonary malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Outcome of fetal congenital pulmonary malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Filomena Giulia Sileo ORCID logo , Sara Alameddine , Daniela Anna Iaccarino , Daniele Di Mascio ORCID logo , Giulia Andrea Giuliani , Emma Bertucci , Asma Khalil und Francesco D’Antonio EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 24. April 2024

Abstract

Objectives

To report the outcome of fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of congenital lung malformation (CLM) diagnosed on ultrasound by performing a comprehensive assessment of these outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Content

CLMs are a heterogeneous group of anomalies that involve the lung parenchyma and its bronchovascular structures. Their presentation and evolution are variable, from entirely asymptomatic lesions with sonographic regression in utero to hydropic fetuses requiring fetal therapy, intrauterine death or neonatal morbidity. A systematic review was conducted in Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases including studies on fetuses with CLM diagnosed prenatally in order to report the in-utero natural history of these lesions. Thirty-nine studies (2,638 fetuses) were included in the final review.

Summary

Regression/reduction in size of the lung lesion during pregnancy was reported in 31 % of cases, while its increase in 8.5 % of cases. Intra-uterine death complicated 1.5 % of pregnancies with fetal CLM, while neonatal and perinatal death were 2.2 and 3 %, respectively. Neonatal morbidity occurred in 20.6 % of newborns with CLM; 46 % had surgery, mainly elective. In fetuses with CLM and hydrops, fetal/perinatal loss occurred in 42 %. Assessment of the role of fetal therapy in improving the outcomes of pregnancies complicated by CLM was hampered by the small number of included cases and heterogeneity of type of interventions.

Outlook

Fetuses with CLM prenatally diagnosed have a generally favorable outcome. Conversely, there is a low quality of evidence on the actual role of fetal therapy in improving the outcome of fetuses presenting with these anomalies.

Introduction

Congenital lung malformations (CLM) are a heterogeneous group of anomalies that involve the lung parenchyma and its bronchovascular structures and accounting for 5–18 % of all congenital anomalies. Their incidence is now reported to be 1 in 2,500 due to the increased detection during routine ultrasound scanning and it is probably still underestimated due to the frequency of undetected and/or asymptomatic lesions incidentally found later in life [1, 2]. The most common lesion is the congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM), previously called congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (CCAM), which is a hamartomatous proliferation of cystic spaces lined by respiratory epithelium, communicating with the bronchial tree and with vascular supply from the pulmonary artery [2], [3], [4]. The second most common lesion is the bronchopulmonary sequestration (BPS), a non-functioning lung lesion not communicating with the tracheobronchial tree and receiving an anomalous artery supply from the systemic circulation [3, 5, 6]. However, CPAM and BPS frequently overlap histopathologically in the so-called “hybrid lesions” [7]. The CLM are usually classified into macrocystic, microcystic/hyperechogenic or mixed lesion according to their ultrasonographic appearance since the histopathological classification is not possible in utero.

Presentation and evolution of CLMs are variable, from entirely asymptomatic lesions with sonographic regression in utero to hydropic fetuses requiring fetal therapy, or suffering from intrauterine death or neonatal morbidity. In order to predict the likely outcome of these pregnancies, several sonographic predictors have been suggested, with the CPAM-volume ratio (CVR) being the most commonly used in order to predict fetal hydrops in CLMs [8].

After birth, around 10 % of newborns with prenatally diagnosed CLMs will develop respiratory distress symptoms early in life while around 90 % of them will be entirely asymptomatic during their life [9]. In the latter, therefore, the optimal management is less defined. The role and timing of surgery in asymptomatic CLMs remains controversial [10]: the rationale for surgery is based on the desire to avoid recurrent pneumonias or abscesses which are usually refractory to antibiotics. However, the true pneumonia risk has not been well defined [11]. Similarly, malignant degeneration of CLMs has been described although the overall risk is likely to be extremely low [12]. This is why, a non-operative management has been proposed, especially for small CLMs prenatally diagnosed whose natural history is believed to be more benign and therefore not justifying the potential major postoperative morbidity of the surgical management [13].

Despite the importance and their relatively high frequency, a systematic review and meta-analysis on the natural history in utero and postnatal outcomes of these lesions is still lacking. In this context, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to report the outcome of fetuses with CPAM diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound.

Methods

Protocol, eligibility criteria, information sources and search strategy

This review was performed according to a priori designed protocol recommended for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched electronically in 2018 and updated in December 2022, utilizing combinations of the relevant medical subject heading (MeSH) terms, key words, and word variants for “congenital pulmonary airways obstruction” and “outcome” (Supplementary Table 1). The search and selection criteria were restricted to English language.

Reference lists of relevant articles and reviews were hand searched for additional reports. PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines were followed. The study was registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration number: CRD42018107238).

Study selection, data extraction and data items

The primary outcome to report was in-utero natural history of prenatally diagnosed CLM by describing the reduction (reduction or disappearance) or the increase in size of the lesions.

The secondary outcomes were:

  1. Intrauterine death (IUD), defined as fetal loss after 20 weeks’ gestation;

  2. Neonatal death (NND), defined as death occurring up to 28 days after birth;

  3. Perinatal death (PND), defined as IUD or NND;

  4. Overall neonatal morbidity (including respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission, respiratory morbidity).

  5. Need for surgery.

  6. Type of surgery: elective or emergency (i.e. in the neonatal period and/or for respiratory symptoms).

Furthermore, we planned to perform sub-group analysis according to the sonographic appearance of the lesion (microcystic, macrocystic, mixed and hyperechoic) and in those presenting with hydrops at ultrasound. Finally, we planned to report the role of fetal therapy (any, cyst drainage or thora-coamniotic shunt placement) in improving the outcome of these anomalies.

Only studies including fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated CLM confirmed at birth were considered eligible for the inclusion in the present systematic review. Studies reporting prenatal information on paediatric or pathologic series were excluded if no information on the natural history and perinatal mortality of these fetuses could be extrapolated.

Case reports, conference abstracts and case series with fewer or equal to three cases were excluded to avoid sampling bias. Studies published before 2010 were also excluded as we believe that the recent important advances in prenatal diagnosis (better resolution of ultrasound machines, improvement in knowledges of these pathologies, etc.) have increased the diagnosis also of small lesions while, on the other hand, it is likely that only more severe forms were prenatally diagnosed in the past. Therefore, by including only papers from 2010 onward, this review will best reflect the natural history and the current management of these lesions.

Three authors (FGS, SA and DAI) reviewed all abstracts independently. Agreement regarding potential relevance was reached by consensus. Full text copies of those papers were obtained, and the same reviewers independently extracted relevant data regarding study characteristics and pregnancy outcomes. Inconsistencies were discussed by the reviewers and consensus reached or by discussion with a senior author (FDA). If more than one study was published on the same cohort with identical endpoints, the report containing the most comprehensive information on the population was included to avoid overlapping populations.

Assessment of risk of bias

Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort and/or case-control studies [14]. According to NOS, each study is judged on three broad perspectives: the selection of the study groups, the comparability of the groups, and the ascertainment outcome of interest. Assessment of the selection of a study includes the evaluation of the representativeness of the exposed cohort, selection of the non-exposed cohort, ascertainment of exposure and the demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at the start of study. Assessment of the comparability of the study includes the evaluation of the comparability of cohorts based on the design or analysis. Finally, the ascertainment of the outcome of interest includes the evaluation of the type of the assessment of the outcome of interest, length and adequacy of follow-up. According to NOS a study can be awarded a maximum of one star for each numbered item within the Selection and Outcome categories. A maximum of two stars can be given for Comparability [14].

Data synthesis

We used meta-analyses of proportions to combine data and reported pooled proportions and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Between-study heterogeneity was explored using the I2 statistic, which represents the percentage of between-study variation that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance. A value of 0 % indicates that no heterogeneity was observed, whereas values >50 % are associated with substantial heterogeneity. Due to the clinical heterogeneity among studies, a random effects model was used for all meta-analyses [15]. Egger’s test was used to assess potential publication bias and funnel plots were created for visual inspection [16]. Tests for funnel plot asymmetry were not used when the total number of publications included for each outcome was less than 10, as the tests lack power to detect real asymmetry in this scenario [17]. The analysis was performed using Statsdirect 3.0.171 (Stats Direct Ltd) and Revman 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) statistical software.

Results

Study selection and study characteristics

A total of 1787 studies were identified, 173 were assessed with respect to their eligibility for inclusion and 39 studies were included in this systematic review (Table 1 and Figure 1) [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56].

Table 1:

General characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review.

First author Year Country Study design Period considered Gestational age at diagnosis Type of lesion Fetuses, n
Delacourt [18] 2022 France Prospective 2015–2018 NS CPAM 436
Karlsson [19] 2022 Sweden Retrospective 2002–2020 19.5 (17–35) CPAM,PBS 66
Rolo [20] 2022 Brasil Retrospective 2013–2017 22–32 CCAM 21
An [21] 2022 China Retrospective 2004–2016 22.5 (CVR<1.0), 23.3 (CVR 1–1.6) CPAM 42
Chen [22] 2021 China Retrospective 2014–2017 24.7 ± 2.8 CPAM 227
Wong [23] 2021 France Retrospective 2009–2018 23 + 6 ± 2.7 CPAM, BPS, BC, CLE 75
Gilad [24] 2020 Israel Retrospective 2008–2018 22 (17.3–26.2) CPAM, BPS 20
Jeong [25] 2020 Korea Retrospective 2010–2016 23.2 (17.4–32.3) CPAM 118
King [26] 2020 USA Retrospective 2015–2018 NS CLM 44
Andersona [27] 2019 USA Retrospective 2009–2017 NS CPAM, BPS 61
Beksac [28] 2019 Turkey Retrospective 2004–2018 From 22 to 34.4 weeks CPAM 35
Cho [29] 2019 Korea Retrospective 2009–2019 23.5 ± 2.2 BPS+Hybrid 47
Molinaro [30] 2019 Italy Retrospective 2003–2016 22 (21–28 weeks) CCAM 33
Tuzovic [31] 2019 USA Retrospective 2005–2015 Median 22 weeks CCAM,PBS 53
Chon [32] 2018 USA Retrospective 2006–2017 21.9 CPAM 8
Girsena [33] 2017 USA Retrospective 2009–2014 NS CPAM 47
Kane [34] 2017 Australia Retrospective 2005–2015 Mean 22 weeks and 6 days (range 17 weeks 5 days–36 weeks and 1 day) CCAM, BPS, mixed lesions 65
Lin [35] 2017 China Retrospective 2008–2015 Median 24 weeks, 24 (18–32) BPS 71
Makhijani [36] 2017 Australia Retrospective 2007–2014 NS CPAM 35
Walker [37] 2017 UK Retrospective 1990–2015 Median 21 weeks CCAM, PS 228
Hellmund [38] 2016 Germany Retrospective 2002–2013 22 weeks (range 17–29) CPAM 67
Lau [39] 2016 China Prospective 2009–2014 22.4 ± 0.52 weeks CPAM 63
Xia [40] 2016 China Retrospective 2012–2014 24.3 weeks (17–36) CCAM 115
Feghali [41] 2015 USA Retrospective 2005–2013 20.2 weeks (±1.4 weeks) CPAM 42
Kunisaki [42] 2015 USA Retrospective 2002–2014 Between a mean of 21.3 ± 1.0 and 24.3 ± 0.5 CPAM 100
Stoiber [43] 2015 Switzerland Retrospective 2000–2013 NS (different GA for CPAM and BPS) CPAM, BPS 37
Bondioni [44] 2014 Italy Retrospective 2004–2012 NS CPAM 27
Mallmann [45] 2014 Germany Retrospective 2002–2011 Median 23.3 (20.4–27.0) BPS 41
Ng [46] 2014 UK Retrospective 2001–2011 NS CCAM, PS 74
Ruchonnet-Metrailler [47] 2014 France Retrospective 2008–2013 Median 22 weeks CPAM 89
Zhang [48] 2014 China Retrospective 2010–2013 Mean 24 weeks (range 18–30 weeks). PS 68
Alamo [49] 2013 Switzerland Retrospective 2006–2012 20–33 CPAMs, BPS, bronchogenic cyst 22
Beydon [50] 2013 France Prospective 2007–2011 NS CPAM, BPS, hybrid lesions and cysts 23
Ho [51] 2013 Hong Kong Retrospective 2008–2010 From 18 to 35 weeks CPAM, BPS, mixed lesions 19
Lima [52] 2013 Brasil Retrospective 1990–2010 Mean 24 ± 3.7 weeks CCAM 25
Muller [53] 2012 France Retrospective 2007–2009 Median 23 CCAM 12
Yong [54] 2012 Canada Retrospective 1996–2004 21 weeks (range 15–39) CCAM 69
Hadchouel [55] 2011 France Retrospective 2004–2008 23.4 ± 0.5 (21−4 to 36.0) CPAM 36
Raychaudhuri [56] 2011 Australia Retrospective 2004–2010 Mean 20.8 weeks (range 17–29 weeks) CCAM 24
  1. aShared cases, Girsen included only for fetal therapy outcomes. BC, bronchogenic cysts; BPS, bronchopulmonary sequestration; CCAM, congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation; CLE, congenital lung emphysema; CCLL, congenital cystic lung lesions; CPAM, congenital pulmonary airway malformation; NS, cot specified; PS, pulmonary sequestration.

Figure 1: 
Systematic review flowchart.
Figure 1:

Systematic review flowchart.

These 39 studies included 2,638 fetuses with an antenatal diagnosis of CPAM (Table 1). No randomized controlled trial was available for inclusion; data for this review were derived only from observational cohort studies or case series. Thirty-nine studies were retrospective [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38, 40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49, 51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56] and only three [18, 39, 50] were prospective in nature. Diagnosis occurred mainly in the second trimester at the time of the anomaly scan and reported at its earliest at 19.5 weeks’ gestation [19].

The sonographic appearance of the lesions (i.e. microcystic, macrocystic, mixed or hyperechoic) was reported by 19 studies [18, 21, 22, 24, 25, 29], [30], [31], [32, 37, 38, 42], [43], [44, 47, 50, 53, 55]. Type of lesions (i.e. CPAM or CCAM or Bronchopulmonary sequestration or hybrid lesions) was reported by 34 studies [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25, 27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32, 34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40, 43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54, 56]. Among the included studies, 15 studies [19, 23, 26, 30, 33, 37, 38, 43, 45, 46, 48, 49, 52, 55, 56] reported also data on fetal therapy: four studies performed a cyst drainage [37, 38, 49, 52], 10 studies positioned a thoraco-amniotic shunt [19, 23, 30, 33, 37, 38, 45, 46, 55, 58], seven studies performed other types of fetal therapy including amniodrainage, laser therapy of the feeding artery, maternal steroids or EXIT procedure [19, 26, 37, 38, 43, 45, 56]. Finally, 17 studies reported data on hydropic fetuses separately from the whole cohort [19, 25, 26, 30, 31, 34, 35, 38, 43, 45], [46], [47, 49, 51, 52, 54].

Risk of bias of included studies

The results of the quality assessment of the included studies using the NOS scale are presented in Table 2. Most of the included studies showed average scores regarding the selection and comparability of study groups, and for ascertainment of the outcome of interest. The main weaknesses of these studies were their retrospective non-randomized design, small sample size, heterogeneity of outcomes observed and lack of stratification of the observed outcomes according to the ultrasound appearance of the lesions for most of the included studies.

Table 2:

Quality assessment of the included studies according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies; a study can be awarded a maximum of one star for each numbered item within the Selection and Outcome categories. A maximum of two stars can be given for Comparability.

First author Year Selection Comparability Outcome
Delacourt [18] 2022 ★★★ ★★
Karlsson [19] 2022 ★★
Rolo [20] 2022 ★★
An [21] 2021
Chen [22] 2021 ★★★ ★★
Wong [23] 2021 ★★
Gilad [24] 2020
Jeong [25] 2020 ★★★
King [26] 2020
Anderson [27] 2019 ★★
Beksac [28] 2019
Cho [29] 2019 ★★
Molinaro [30] 2019
Tuzovic [31] 2019 ★★
Chon [32] 2018 ★★
Girsen [33] 2017 ★★
Kane [34] 2017 ★★★ ★★
Lin [35] 2017 ★★ ★★
Makhijani [36] 2017 ★★ ★★
Walker [37] 2017 ★★
Hellmund [38] 2016 ★★ ★★
Lau [39] 2016 ★★★
Xia [40] 2016 ★★ ★★
Feghali [41] 2015 ★★★
Kunisaki [42] 2015 ★★ ★★
Stoiber [43] 2015 ★★
Bondioni [44] 2014 ★★ ★★
Mallmann [45] 2014 ★★ ★★
Ng [46] 2014 ★★ ★★★
Ruchonnet-Metrailler [47] 2014 ★★
Zhang [48] 2014 ★★ ★★
Alamo [49] 2013 ★★★ ★★★
Beydon [50] 2013 ★★★ ★★
Ho [51] 2013 ★★ ★★
Lima [52] 2013 ★★★
Muller [53] 2012
Yong [54] 2012 ★★ ★★★
Hadchouel [55] 2011 ★★
Raychaudhuri [56] 2011 ★★ ★★★

Synthesis of results

Regression or reduction in size of the lung lesion during pregnancy was reported in 30.90 % (95 % CI 20.09–42.88) of cases, while its increase in 8.47 % (95 % CI 2.93–16.46). Intra-uterine death complicated 1.53 % (95%CI 0.89–2.34) of pregnancies, while the corresponding figures for neonatal and perinatal death were 2.21 % (95 % CI 1.21–3.50) and 2.97 % (95 % 1.77–4.46). 20.57 % (95 % CI 15.66–25.97) of newborns with CLM experienced postnatal morbidity and 18.50 % (95 % CI 8.60–31.10) had radiological signs of mediastinal shift at birth. 46.29 % (95 % CI 33.96–58.86) of newborns with a prenatal diagnosis of CLM had surgery; elective surgical intervention was performed in 67.13 % (95 % CI 54.05–78.99), while 32.87 % (95 % CI 21.01–45.95) required emergency surgery for the presence of respiratory symptoms (Table 3). The occurrence of the explored outcomes when not considering studies including cases of fetal hydrops is reported in Table 3. Unfortunately, a comprehensive assessment of the observed outcomes according to the ultrasound appearance of the lesion was not possible due to the very small number of studies reporting these sub-group analyses.

Table 3:

Pooled proportions for the different outcomes explored in the present systematic review in fetuses with CLM (95 % confidence intervals, CI, between parentheses).

Outcome Studies (n) Fetuses, n/N I2, % Pooled proportion (95 % CI)
All studies

Regression of the lesion during pregnancy 20 450/1,219 94.7 30.90 (20.09–42.88)
Increase in size of the lesion during pregnancy 10 25/334 79.9 8.47 (2.93–16.46)
Intra-uterine death 27 27/2012 33.4 1.53 (0.89–2.34)
Neonatal death 27 35/2012 61.4 2.21 (1.21–3.50)
Perinatal death 27 53/2012 62.4 2.97 (1.77–4.46)
Overall neonatal morbidity 29 362/2007 87 20.57 (15.66–25.97)
Mediastinal shift after birth 7 66/351 86.9 18.50 (8.60–31.10)
Newborns undergoing surgery 32 380/1977 96.9 46.29 (33.96–58.86)
Elective surgery 17 342/485 87.6 67.13 (54.05–78.99)
Emergency surgery 17 143/485 87.6 32.87 (21.01–45.95)

Excluding studies with fetal hydrops

Regression of the lesion during pregnancy 12 249/683 95.8 30.37 (31.68–38.81)
Increase in size of the lesion during pregnancy 6 10/234 60.9 5.38 (1.59–11.23)
Intra-uterine death 9 5/385 55.4 1.36 (0.15–3.73)
Neonatal death 9 6/385 30.4 1.85 (0.56–3.86)
Perinatal death 9 11/385 75.6 3.51 (0.69–8.36)
Overall neonatal morbidity 15 149/729 85 22.63 (15.13–31.14)
Mediastinal shift after birth 4 23/208 82.5 10.19 (2.43–22.44)
Newborns undergoing surgerya 16 419/762 97 53.06 (32.72–72.94)
Elective surgerya 8 198/267 88.2 72.78 (54.22–87.87)
Emergency surgerya 8 69/267 88.2 27.22 (12.13–45.67)
  1. aThese outcomes were not reported consistently by the same studies.

Table 4:

Pooled proportions for the different outcomes explored in the present systematic review in hydropic fetuses with CLM (95 % confidence intervals, CI, between parentheses).

Outcome Studies, n Fetuses, n/N I2, % Pooled proportion (95 % CI)
Fetal or perinatal loss 17 42/96 60.5 42.38 (26.84–58.74)
Reduction in size during pregnancy 16 289 0 4.42 (1.26–9.39)
Table 5:

Pooled proportions for the different outcomes explored in the present systematic review in fetuses with CLM undergoing in utero therapy (thoraco-amniotic shunt or drainage) (95 % confidence intervals, CI, between parentheses).

Outcome Studies, n Fetuses, n/N I2, % Pooled proportion (95 % CI)
All fetuses with CLM

Regression of the lesion during pregnancy 4 14/26 86.3 61.73 (13.99–97.86)
Perinatal death 9 10/52 0 21.51 (11.88–33.07)
Preterm birth 7 14/47 39 29.42 (14.57–46.95)
Post-natal surgery 5 26/36 0 70.37 (55.18–83.55)

Fetuses with hydrops

Regression of the lesion during pregnancy 4 12/13 44.5 84.02 (47.60–99.98)
Resolution of the hydrops after treatment 2 5/6 0 78.76 (43.62–98.82)
Perinatal death 10 8/37 21.1 21.91 (9.37–37.88)
Preterm birth 6 10/19 38.8 52.73 (25.54–79.06)
Post-natal surgery 5 9/19 0 48.41 (28.05–69.05)

Sub-group analyses: fetuses with hydrops and fetal therapy

Fetal or perinatal loss occurred in 42.38 % (95 % CI 26.84–58.74) of fetuses with hydrops, while reduction of the size during pregnancy was reported in 4.42 % (95 % CI 1.26–9.39) as presented in Table 4. Assessment of the role of fetal therapy in improving the outcomes of pregnancies complicated by CLM was hampered by the small number of included cases and even smaller number of events which precluded a comprehensive assessment of the role of fetal therapy in these anomalies. Furthermore, different interventions for fetal CLM were reported in the published literature, including insertion of thoraco-amniotic shunt, drainage of the lesion in case of cystic malformation and laser coagulation of the feeding vessel of the lesion. For the purpose of the analysis and in view of the small number of cases included, we reported the analysis for fetuses undergoing drainage of the lesion or insertion of thoraco-amniotic shunt. When considering all fetuses undergoing intervention (Table 5), regression or reduction in size of the lesion was reported in 61.73 % (95 % CI 13.99–97.86), perinatal death in 21.51 % (95 % CI 11.88–33.07) and preterm birth in 29.42 % (95 % CI 14.57–46.95), while 70.37 % (95 % CI 55.18–83.55) of newborns underwent surgery. Finally, when considering only fetuses presenting with hydrops at ultrasound, regression or reduction in size of the lesion was reported in 84.02 % (95 % CI 47.60–99.98) of cases and 78.76 % (95 % CI 43.62–98.82) had resolution of the hydrops after fetal therapy. Perinatal death occurred in 21.91 % (95 % CI 9.37–37.88) of pregnancies complicated by CLM presenting with hydrops and PTB in 52.73 % (95 % CI 25.54–79.06).

Discussion

Main findings

The findings from this study showed that fetuses with CLM diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound have a generally good outcome. Regression or reduction in size of the lesion occurred in 31 % of cases, while its increase in size in about 8.5 %. The risk of fetal or neonatal mortality was also low. Conversely, in fetuses presenting with hydrops the risk of perinatal loss was high while the regression or resolution of the lesion was less frequent. Assessment of the role of fetal therapy in improving the outcomes of pregnancies complicated by CLM was impaired by the small number of included cases and heterogeneity of interventions explored which precluded a comprehensive assessment of the role of fetal therapy in these anomalies.

Strengths and limitations

This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic review and meta-analysis on congenital lung malformations and their natural in-utero history. The main strengths of this study include the systematic literature search and the large number of included studies. Nevertheless, the retrospective design and differences among the included populations, the different definitions adopted, the different management protocols and criteria to perform fetal therapy represent the main limitation of this review.

Subgroup analysis according to the sonographic appearance of the lesions were conducted although only few studies reported outcomes according to this while the majority of them only described the sonographic appearance of the lesions and then reported the outcomes for the whole population.

Similarly, despite most of the studies included hydropic fetuses in their cohorts, data on these fetuses were frequently aggregated to the whole cohort limiting the number of studies included in the sub-group analysis on hydrops.

Furthermore, we decided to include only studies reporting data on prenatally identified cohort or paediatric cohort with comprehensive prenatal data in order to avoid the selection bias introduced by including pediatric surgical series. The latter, in fact, reported only data on children undergoing surgery and consequently excluded the most severe cases (i.e. pregnancies complicated by IUD or where parents opted for TOP).

Finally, the outcomes reported were not consistent among studies both in prenatal and post-natal reported information. In particular, the post-natal imaging technique and/or its timing were not consistent as well as the indication and type of surgery performed with high heterogeneity among studies.

However, despite these limitations, this review represents the most up-to-date assessment of this important congenital pathology.

Comparison with existing literature

This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic review and meta-analysis reporting the outcome of fetuses with CLM diagnosed prenatally. Another systemic review assessing the diagnostic accuracy of congenital airway malformation lung volume (CVR) ratio in identifying those fetuses who will develop hydrops, reported a sensitivity and specificity of this ultrasound parameter in detecting hydrops of 86 and 90 % respectively [57]. Compared to this review, the present meta-analysis reported the natural history of fetuses with CLM in utero, perinatal and post-natal outcome of these anomalies.

Implications for clinical practice and research

This review updated the knowledge on prenatally diagnosed CLM with the most recently published studies showing a very favorable outcome for fetuses with this diagnosis. In fact, up to one third of the lesions decreased in size or disappeared in utero while only in 8.5 % of them the lesion increased in the prenatal period. Furthermore, the perinatal outcome of uncomplicated (i.e. without hydrops) CLM is good, being these pregnancies complicated by perinatal death in only 3.5 % of the cases while previous studies have produced highly variable rates of perinatal death from 9 to 49 % [58]. This is likely to be explained by the fact that the rate of prenatal diagnosis of CLM has been increasing over recent years thanks to the improvement in prenatal imaging with an increased identification also of small lesions without additional anomalies or without hydrops at presentation.

The CVR has already been described as a possible a tool to predict the development of hydrops in these fetuses two decades ago. However, since then, no clear international consensus has been reached to define the optimal CVR thresholds and, as recently shown by Kane et al. [59] in their systematic review, further large-scale studies are still required to confirm and define the utility of this index.

The possible role of fetal therapy in these fetuses still needs to be clarified. In fact, the number of included fetuses was small and differences in techniques, protocols and management impairs our ability to produce robust evidence on the use of thoracoamniotic shunt or cyst drainage in these fetuses although cyst drainage can be offered for macrocystic lesion occupying space and shunting is frequently offered in CLM complicated by hydrothorax and/or hydrops [9].

Looking at post-natal outcomes, the rate of neonatal morbidity was only 20.6 %, confirming the fact that most of the fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of CLM are likely to be asymptomatic at birth. However, around 33 % of these fetuses required an emergency surgery due to neonatal symptoms. Moreover, more than half (67 %) of the fetuses with CLM underwent surgery in the series included in this review. In fact, prophylactic elective surgery is usually recommended to avoid the long-term risk of pulmonary infections and to prevent the development of malignancy, despite the true incidence of these adverse outcomes remains debated [10], [11], [12]. Therefore, the results of this review should help guiding the counseling with parents of fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of CLM, who should be reassured of the good prognosis of the lesions when the pregnancy is not complicated by the occurrence of hydrops.

Conclusions

Fetuses with CLM diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound have a generally favorable outcome. Conversely, there is a low quality of evidence on the actual role of fetal therapy in improving the outcomes of fetuses presenting with these anomalies.


Corresponding author: Prof. Francesco D’Antonio, MD, PhD, Centre for Fetal Care and High-risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Lakhoo, K. Preface Semin Pediatr Surg 2015;24:151. ISSN 1055-8586. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2015.01.010.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Chowdhury, MM, Chakraborty, S. Imaging of congenital lung malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 2015;24:168–75. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2015.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Berrocal, T, Madrid, C, Novo, S, Gutiérrez, J, Arjonilla, A, Gómez-León, N. Congenital anomalies of the tracheobronchial tree, lung, and mediastinum: embryology, radiology, and pathology. Radiographics 2004;24:e17. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.e17.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Stocker, JT, Madewell, JE, Drake, RM. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Classification and morphologic spectrum. Hum Pathol 1977;8:155–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(77)80078-6.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Biyyam, DR, Chapman, T, Ferguson, MR, Deutsch, G, Dighe, MK. Congenital lung abnormalities: embryologic features, prenatal diagnosis, and postnatal radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2010;30:1721–38. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.306105508.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Lee, EY, Boiselle, PM, Cleveland, RH, Multidetector, CT. Evaluation of congenital lung anomalies. Radiology 2008;247:632–48. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2473062124.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Conran, RM, Stocker, JT. Extralobar sequestration with frequently associated congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation, Type 2: report of 50 cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1999;2:454–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100249900149.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Crombleholme, TM, Coleman, B, Hedrick, H, Liechty, K, Howell, L, Flake, AW, et al.. Cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio predicts outcome in prenatally diagnosed cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:331–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.30832.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Kunisaki, SM. Narrative review of congenital lung lesions. Transl Pediatr 2021;10:1418–31. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-133.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Lo, AY, Jones, S. Lack of consensus among Canadian pediatric surgeons regarding the management of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg 2008;43:797–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.016.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Criss, CN, Musili, N, Matusko, N, Baker, S, Geiger, JD, Kunisaki, SM. Asymptomatic congenital lung malformations: is nonoperative management a viable alternative? J Pediatr Surg 2018;53:1092–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.065.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Casagrande, A, Pederiva, F. Association between congenital lung malformations and lung tumors in children and adults: a systematic review. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:1837–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.06.023.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Eber, E. Antenatal diagnosis of congenital thoracic malformations: early surgery, late surgery, or no surgery? Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2007;28:355–66. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-981656.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Wells, GA, Shea, B, O’Connell, D, Peterson, J, Welch, V, Losos, M, et al.. The newcastle-ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp [Accessed 15 January 2023].Suche in Google Scholar

15. Higgins, J, Thompson, S, Deeks, J, Altman, D. Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819021927674.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Egger, M, Davey Smith, G, Schneider, M, Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Hunter, JP, Saratzis, A, Sutton, AJ, Boucher, RH, Sayers, RD, Bown, MJ. In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:897–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Delacourt, C, Bertille, N, Salomon, LJ, Rahshenas, M, Benachi, A, Bonnard, A, for the MALFPULM study group; members of the MALFPULM study group, et al.. Predicting the risk of respiratory distress in newborns with congenital pulmonary malformations. Eur Respir J 2022;59:2100949. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00949-2021.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Karlsson, M, Conner, P, Ehren, H, Bitkover, C, Burgos, CM. The natural history of prenatally diagnosed congenital pulmonary airway malformations and bronchopulmonary sequestrations. J Pediatr Surg 2022;57:282–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.03.021.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Rolo, LC, Ribeiro, GD, Caldas, JVJ, Coutinho, LG, Muniz, TD, Araujo Júnior, E. Perinatal outcomes of prenatal diagnosis of congenital pulmonary airway malformation: an experience. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2022;68:1582–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20220809.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. An, P, Xiao, X, Zhao, Y, Zhou, J, Li, X, Xiong, Y. Prenatal ultrasound measurements of mild congenital pulmonary airway malformation and long-term prognosis: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022;157:327–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13778.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Chen, Y, Zhao, B, Xi, F, Wang, Y, Yang, M, Luo, Q. The prenatal ultrasonic character and postnatal follow-up of 227 microcystic and macrocystic congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. J Obstet Gynaecol 2021;41:562–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2020.1786032.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Wong, MCY, Faure Bardon, V, Farmakis, K, Berteloot, L, Lapillonne, A, Delacourt, C, et al.. Ultrasound detected prenatal hyperechoic lung lesions and concordance with postnatal findings: a common aspect for multiple diagnoses. Prenat Diagn 2021;41:323–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5854.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Gilad, N, Furman, Y, Weissmann-Brenner, A. A retrospective clinical analysis of 20 cases of congenital lung masses. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022;35:3640–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1836149.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Jeong, BD, An, SA, Lee, MY, Won, HS, Han, M, Yoon, H, et al.. Comparison of the prognostic factors of fetuses with congenital pulmonary airway malformations according to type. J Ultrasound Med 2020;39:2243–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15335.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. King, A, Lee, TC, Steen, E, Olutoye, OO, Belfort, MA, Cassady, CI, et al.. Prenatal imaging to predict need for urgent perinatal surgery in congenital lung lesions. J Surg Res 2020;255:463–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Anderson, JN, Girsen, AI, Hintz, SR, El-Sayed, YY, Davis, AS, Barth, RA, et al.. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal lung masses: does final histology matter? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021;34:3662–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1689559.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Beksac, MS, Fadiloglu, E, Tanacan, A, Unal, C, Tepe, NB, Aydın, E, et al.. Outcomes of cases of prenatally-diagnosed congenital pulmonary airway malformation. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019;41:654–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697983.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Cho, MK, Lee, MY, Kang, J, Kim, J, Won, HS, Lee, PR, et al.. Prenatal sonographic markers of the outcome in fetuses with bronchopulmonary sequestration. J Clin Ultrasound 2020;48:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22780.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Molinaro, F, Schneider, A, Messina, M, Becmeur, F, Favre, R. Congenital pulmonary adenomatoid malformation: indication and management of fetal shunting in our center. Curr Pediatr Res 2019;23:82–7.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Tuzovic, L, Copel, JA, Stitelman, DH, Levit, O, Bahtiyar, MO. Utility of fetal cardiac Axis and cardiac position assessment in predicting neonatal respiratory morbidity in fetal congenital lung lesions. J Ultrasound Med 2019;38:2361–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14931.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Chon, AH, Korst, LM, Abdel-Sattar, M, Llanes, A, Ouzounian, JG, Chmait, RH. Types II and III congenital pulmonary airway malformation with hydrops treated in utero with percutaneous sclerotherapy. Prenat Diagn 2018;38:493–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5266.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Girsen, AI, Hintz, SR, Sammour, R, Naqvi, A, El-Sayed, YY, Sherwin, K, et al.. Prediction of neonatal respiratory distress in pregnancies complicated by fetal lung masses. Prenat Diagn 2017;37:266–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Kane, SC, Da Silva Costa, F, Crameri, JA, Reidy, KL, Kaganov, H, Palma-Dias, R. Antenatal assessment and postnatal outcome of fetal echogenic lung lesions: a decade’s experience at a tertiary referral hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019;32:703–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1388367.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Lin, MF, Xie, HN, Zhao, XH, Peng, R, Zheng, J, Peng, ZP. Systemic venous drainage is associated with an unfavorable prenatal behavior in fetal bronchopulmonary sequestration. Fetal Diagn Ther 2018;44:291–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000485035.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Makhijani, AV, Wong, FY. Conservative post-natal management of antenatally diagnosed congenital pulmonary airway malformations. J Paediatr Child Health 2018;54:267–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13727.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Walker, L, Cohen, K, Rankin, J, Crabbe, D. Outcome of prenatally diagnosed congenital lung anomalies in the North of England: a review of 228 cases to aid in prenatal counselling. Prenat Diagn 2017;37:1001–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5134.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Hellmund, A, Berg, C, Geipel, A, Bludau, M, Heydweiller, A, Bachour, H, et al.. Prenatal diagnosis and evaluation of sonographic predictors for intervention and adverse outcome in congenital pulmonary airway malformation. PLoS One 2016;11:e0150474. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150474.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Lau, CT, Kan, A, Shek, N, Tam, P, Wong, KK. Is congenital pulmonary airway malformation really a rare disease? Result of a prospective registry with universal antenatal screening program. Pediatr Surg Int 2017;33:105–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3991-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Xia, B, Yu, G, Liu, C, Hong, C, Tang, J. Surgical treatment of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation: a retrospective study of single tertiary center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:416–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1174988.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Feghali, M, Jean, KM, Emery, SP. Ultrasound assessment of congenital fetal lung masses and neonatal respiratory outcomes. Prenat Diagn 2015;35:1208–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4678.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Kunisaki, SM, Ehrenberg-Buchner, S, Dillman, JR, Smith, EA, Mychaliska, GB, Treadwell, MC. Vanishing fetal lung malformations: prenatal sonographic characteristics and postnatal outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:978–82. W.B. Saunders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.025.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Stoiber, B, Moehrlen, U, Kurmanavicius, J, Meuli, M, Haslinger, C, Zimmermann, R, et al.. Congenital lung lesion: prenatal course, therapy and predictors of perinatal outcome. Ultraschall der Med 2017;38:158–65. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1553261.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Bondioni, MP, Gatta, D, Lougaris, V, Palai, N, Signorelli, M, Michelini, S, et al.. Congenital cystic lung disease: prenatal ultrasound and postnatal multidetector computer tomography evaluation. Correlation with surgical and pathological data. Radiol Med 2014;119:842–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0398-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Mallmann, MR, Geipel, A, Bludau, M, Matil, K, Gottschalk, I, Hoopmann, M, et al.. Bronchopulmonary sequestration with massive pleural effusion: pleuroamniotic shunting vs intrafetal vascular laser ablation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:441–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13304.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Ng, C, Stanwell, J, Burge, DM, Stanton, MP. Conservative management of antenatally diagnosed cystic lung malformations. Arch Dis Child 2014;99:432–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304048.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Ruchonnet-Metrailler, I, Leroy-Terquem, E, Stirnemann, J, Cros, P, Ducoin, H, Hadchouel, A, et al.. Neonatal outcomes of prenatally diagnosed congenital pulmonary malformations. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1285–91. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2986.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Zhang, H, Tian, J, Chen, Z, Ma, X, Yu, G, Zhang, J, et al.. Retrospective study of prenatal diagnosed pulmonary sequestration. Pediatr Surg Int 2014;30:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3434-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Alamo, L, Reinberg, O, Vial, Y, Gudinchet, F, Meuli, R. Comparison of foetal US and MRI in the characterisation of congenital lung anomalies. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e860–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Beydon, N, Larroquet, M, Coulomb, A, Jouannic, JM, Ducou le Pointe, H, Clément, A, et al.. Comparison between US and MRI in the prenatal assessment of lung malformations. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43:685–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2596-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

51. Ho, G, Cheung, KW, Lam, HL, Ip, JK, Tang, HYM, Lam, WWM. Echogenic and cystic fetal lung lesions: evaluation by prenatal sonography and postnatal imaging. Hong Kong J Radiol 2013;16:5–16. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjr1312145.Suche in Google Scholar

52. Lima, JS, Camargos, PA, Aguiar, RA, Campos, AS, Aguiar, MJ. Pre and perinatal aspects of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:228–32. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.807236.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Muller, CO, Berrebi, D, Kheniche, A, Bonnard, A. Is radical lobectomy required in congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation? J Pediatr Surg 2012;47:642–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.08.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Yong, PJ, Von Dadelszen, P, Carpara, D, Lim, K, Kent, N, Tessier, F, et al.. Prediction of pediatric outcome after prenatal diagnosis and expectant antenatal management of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;31:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1159/000331936.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Hadchouel, A, Benachi, A, Revillon, Y, Rousseau, V, Martinovic, J, Verkarre, V, et al.. Factors associated with partial and complete regression of fetal lung lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:88–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8909.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Raychaudhuri, P, Pasupati, A, James, A, Whitehead, B, Kumar, R. Prospective study of antenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 2011;27:1159–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2909-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Zhu, P, Cheng, K, He, M, Wang, Y, Shen, P, He, K, et al.. Diagnostic value of congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio for fetal hydrops due to congenital lung malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022;17:213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02347-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

58. Ierullo, AM, Ganapathy, R, Crowley, S, Craxford, L, Bhide, A, Thilaganathan, B. Neonatal outcome of antenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:150–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1920.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

59. Kane, SC, Ancona, E, Reidy, KL, Palma-Dias, R. The utility of the congenital pulmonary airway malformation-volume ratio in the assessment of fetal echogenic lung lesions: a systematic review. Fetal Diagn Ther 2020;47:171–81. Epub 2019 Oct 8. PMID: 31593968. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502841.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0017).


Received: 2024-01-14
Accepted: 2024-04-12
Published Online: 2024-04-24
Published in Print: 2024-06-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Outcome of fetal congenital pulmonary malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. Reducing decisional conflict in decisions about prenatal genetic testing: the impact of a dyadic intervention at the start of prenatal care
  6. The value of fibrinogen combined with D-dimer and neonatal weight in predicting postpartum hemorrhage in vaginal delivery
  7. Current obstetric outcomes in Jamaican women with sickle hemoglobinopathy – a balance of risks for aspirin?
  8. Does delayed cord clamping result in higher maternal blood loss in primary cesarean sections? A retrospective comparative study
  9. Trends in antenatal corticosteroid administration: did our timing improve?
  10. A national survey on current practice of ultrasound in labor ward
  11. Understanding current antenatal Hepatitis C testing and care in maternity services in England
  12. Exploring the clinical utility of exome sequencing/Mono, Duo, Trio in prenatal testing: a retrospective study in a tertiary care centre in South India
  13. Original Articles – Fetus
  14. Fetoscopic laser coagulation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a comparison of flexible 1.0/1.2 mm fetoscopes with curved sheaths of 2.7/3.3 mm2 vs. 2 mm fetoscopic lens technique with sheaths of 6.6/11.3 mm2
  15. Value of fetal echocardiographic examination in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes
  16. Bias in the prenatal lung measurements in fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia with intrauterine growth restriction
  17. Original Articles – Neonates
  18. Chest radiographic thoracic areas and respiratory outcomes in infants with anterior abdominal wall defects
  19. Temporal effects of caffeine on intrapulmonary shunt in preterm ventilated infants
  20. Letter to the Editor
  21. HDlive Silhouette features of physiological midgut herniation
Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2024-0017/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen