Startseite Evaluation of postpartum shock index in hypertensive diseases of pregnancy: a case-control study from a tertiary reference center
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Evaluation of postpartum shock index in hypertensive diseases of pregnancy: a case-control study from a tertiary reference center

  • Melek Durak ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Atakan Tanaçan ORCID logo , Özgür Kara und Dilek Şahin
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Januar 2024

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the postpartum shock index (SI) values between pregnant women with hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) and normotensive controls.

Methods

The present study was conducted in Ankara City Hospital Perinatology Clinic. Postpartum SI was compared between the pregnant women with HDP (n=217) and normotensive controls (n=219). A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the independent predictors of maximum SI ≥1. Finally, a ROC analysis was performed to calculate optimal cut-off values for postpartum SI’s measured at different periods in the prediction of postpartum Hb (hemoglobin) decrease ≥2 g/dL.

Results

Peripartum SI (p<0.001), 15th min SI (p<0.001), 30th min SI (p<0.001), 2nd h SI (p<0.001), 6th h SI (p) of the HDP group (p<0.001) and max SI (p<0.001) values were found to be significantly lower in the study group. A weak positive and statistically significant correlation was found between the maximum SI and the decrease in Hb ≥2 g/dL (r=0.209; p=0.002). Optimal cutoff values for SI were; 0.7 at peripartum 0.7 at 15 min, 0.73 at 30 min, 0.6 at 2 h, and 0.7 at 6 h, respectively.

Conclusions

Clinically significant blood loss may develop at lower SI values in hypertensive pregnant women.


Corresponding author: Melek Durak, Perinatology Clinic, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee with reference number E2-21-773. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All patients and healthy volunteers included in the study were informed, and written and verbal informed consent was obtained.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Berg, CJ, Harper, MA, Atkinson, SM, Bell, EA, Brown, HL, Hage, ML, et al.. Preventability of pregnancy-related deaths. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1228–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000187894.71913.e8.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Khan, KS, Wojdyla, D, Say, L, Gülmezoglu, AM, Van Look, PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367:1066–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68397-9.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Collis, R, Guasch, E. Managing major obstetric haemorrhage: pharmacotherapy and transfusion. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2017;31:107–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2017.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Say, L, Chou, D, Gemmill, A, Tunçalp, Ö, Moller, AB, Daniels, J, et al.. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014;2:e323–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70227-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Sentilhes, L, Goffinet, F, Vayssière, C, Deneux-Tharaux, C. Comparison of postpartum haemorrhage guidelines: discrepancies underline our lack of knowledge. BJOG 2017;124:718–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14305.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Engin-Üstün, Y, Sanisoğlu, S, Keskin, HL, Karaahmetoğlu, S, Özcan, A, Çelen, Ş, et al.. Changing trends in the Turkish maternal deaths, with a focus on direct and indirect causes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;234:21–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.12.031.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Boynukalın, FK, Aral, Aİ. Characteristics of women with postpartum hemorrhage who do not respond to B-lynch suture and require hysterectomy. Gynaecol Obstet Reprod Med 2016;20:20–3.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e168–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e237-60.10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Guly, HR, Bouamra, O, Spiers, M, Dark, P, Coats, T, Lecky, FE. Vital signs and estimated blood loss in patients with major trauma: testing the validity of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock. Resuscitation 2011;82:556–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Program, National High Blood Pressure Education. Report of the national high blood pressure Education Program Working group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:S1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(00)40820-3.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Tanacan, A, Fadiloglu, E, Unal, C, Beksac, MS. Importance of shock index in the evaluation of postpartum hemorrhage cases that necessitate blood transfusion. Women Health 2020;60:1070–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2020.1802638.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Dahlke, JD, Mendez-Figueroa, H, Maggio, L, Hauspurg, AK, Sperling, JD, Chauhan, SP, et al.. Prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage: a comparison of 4 national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:71.e1–6.e10.10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.023Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Jansen, AJG, van Rhenen, DJ, Steegers, EAP, Duvekot, JJ. Postpartum hemorrhage and transfusion of blood and blood Components. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005;60:663–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000180909.31293.cf.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Watkins, EJ, Stem, K. Postpartum hemorrhage. JAAPA 2020;33:29–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jaa.0000657164.11635.93.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Tanacan, A, Yalcin, A, Unal, C, Akinci, SB, Beksac, MS. Fatal postpartum hemorrhage in a patient with Niemann-Pick disease Type B. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;2018:1–3, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9719374.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Mori, H, Shibata, E, Kuwazuru, T, Uchimura, T, Kondo, E, Yoshino, K. The utility of shock index and heart rate in the management of postpartum blood loss in pregnant women complicated with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021;47:3179–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14896.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Pacagnella, RC, Borovac-Pinheiro, A. Assessing and managing hypovolemic shock in puerperal women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019;61:89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Ayadi, AME, Nathan, HL, Seed, PT, Butrick, EA, Hezelgrave, NL, Shennan, AH, et al.. Vital sign prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in women with hypovolemic shock: the role of shock index. PLoS One 2016;11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148729.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Nathan, HL, Cottam, K, Hezelgrave, NL, Seed, PT, Briley, A, Bewley, S, et al.. Determination of normal ranges of shock index and other haemodynamic variables in the immediate postpartum period: a cohort study. PLoS One 2016;11:e0168535. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168535.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Kohn, JR, Dildy, GA, Eppes, CS. Shock index and delta-shock index are superior to existing maternal early warning criteria to identify postpartum hemorrhage and need for intervention. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019;32:1238–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1402882.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Helewa, ME, Burrows, RF, Smith, J, Williams, K, Brain, P, Rabkin, SW. Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference. 1. Definitions, evaluation and classification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J) 1997;157:715–25.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Guralp, O, Tuten, N, Oncul, M, Acikgoz, SA, Ekmekci, H, Tuten, A. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin levels in early and late onset preeclampsia. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2020;26:166–72. https://doi.org/10.21613/gorm.2018.918.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Portelli, M, Baron, B. Clinical presentation of preeclampsia and the diagnostic value of proteins and their methylation products as biomarkers in pregnant women with preeclampsia and their newborns. J Pregnancy 2018;2018:1–23, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2632637.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2023-05-28
Accepted: 2023-12-27
Published Online: 2024-01-18
Published in Print: 2024-03-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Opinion Paper
  3. The importance of professional responsibility and fetal viability in the management of abortion
  4. Corner of Academy
  5. Multifetal pregnancy reductions and selective fetocide in a tertiary referral center – a retrospective cohort study
  6. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  7. Cervical length as a screening tool for preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and critical evaluation of quality clinical practice guidelines
  8. Determinants of prematurity in urban Indonesia: a meta-analysis
  9. Predictors of planned home birth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
  10. Sensitivity of antenatal ultrasound in diagnosing posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders
  11. The prognostic role of CRL discordance in first trimester ultrasound
  12. Evaluation of postpartum shock index in hypertensive diseases of pregnancy: a case-control study from a tertiary reference center
  13. Original Articles – Fetus
  14. Prenatal diagnosis of right aortic arch: associated anomalies and fetal prognosis according to different subtypes
  15. Fetal brain development in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus
  16. The association between parental SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and fetal growth restriction
  17. Subclinical cardiac impairments in fetuses conceived through assisted reproductive technology by speckle tracking echocardiography
  18. Original Articles – Neonates
  19. Coagulation assessment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infected pregnant women and their offspring by using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM)
  20. Comprehensive appraisal of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived via in vitro fertilization in the USA (2016–2021)
  21. Influence of donor characteristics on the milk donation volume and microbiological quality of donated human milk in first 3 years of work of the Croatian human milk bank-retrospective observational study
Heruntergeladen am 6.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2023-0219/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen