Startseite YouTube as a source of patient information on external cephalic version
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

YouTube as a source of patient information on external cephalic version

  • Brinley M. Williams , Lindsey M. Le Poidevin , Mark A. Turrentine und Leah W. Antoniewicz ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. September 2022

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the quality and content of information regarding external cephalic version on YouTube.

Methods

YouTube was searched using the phrase “external cephalic version” (ECV) to identify informative videos by two independent reviewers. Videos were included if: (1) in English; (2) available November 20, 2021; (3) related to ECV. Videos were excluded if: (1) duration exceeded 15 min; (2) target audience was not patients or the general public; (3) not in English; (4) were advertisements or news clips; (5) did not relate to ECV. The Global Quality Scale was used to assess overall quality of selected videos. A content score was developed based on guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Video quality was also categorized as “slightly useful”, “useful” and “very useful”. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) for audiovisual materials was used to score understandability and actionability.

Results

Of 60 videos screened, 31 met inclusion criteria. They were classified as People or Blogs (n=19, 61%) or Education (n=12, 39%). Videos were calculated to be “slightly useful” (n=10, 32%), “useful” (n=18, 58%), or “very useful” (n = 3, 10%). The PEMAT – understandability was less in the “slightly useful” compared to the combined “useful” and “very useful” groups, p<0.01. No differences existed between total usefulness score and category, p=0.6.

Conclusions

Most videos were useful, but few were very useful. These results highlight the importance of thorough counseling regarding this procedure.


Corresponding author: Leah W. Antoniewicz, MD, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, Suite F1020, Houston, TX 77030, USA, Phone: 832-826-7458, Fax: 832-825-9348, Email:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. External Cephalic Version. American college of obstetricians and gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 221. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e203–12.10.1097/AOG.0000000000003837Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Atkinson, NL, Saperstein, SL, Pleis, J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res 2009;11:e4. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1035.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Hesse, BW, Moser, RP, Rutten, LJ, Kreps, GL. The health information national trends survey: research from the baseline. J Health Commun 2006;11:vii–xvi. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730600692553.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. McMullan, M. Patients using the internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Counsel 2006;63:24–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Alexa. Top 500 websites on the internet [Online]. Available from http://www. alexa.com/topsites [Accessed 1 Nov 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

6. The News minute. With 1.9 billion users, youtube streams 180 million hours to TV screens daily [Online]. Available from: https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/19-billion-users-youtube-streams-180-million-hours-tv-screens-daily [Accessed 1 Nov 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

7. Searcher Behavior Research Update. Search engine watch [Online]. Available from: https://www.searchenginewatch.com/2006/04/10/searcher-behavior-research-update/ [Accessed 1 Nov 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

8. iProspect search engine user behavior study. 2006 [Online]. Available from: http://district4.extension.ifas.ufl.edu/Tech/TechPubs/WhitePaper_2006_SearchEngineUserBehavior.pdf [Accessed 1 Nov 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

9. Pandey, A, Patni, N, Singh, M, Sood, A, Singh, G. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:e1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Steinberg, PL, Wason, S, Stern, JM, Deters, L, Kowal, B, Seigne, J. YouTube as source of prostate cancer information. Urology 2010;75:619–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Knösel, M, Jung, K, Bleckmann, A. YouTube, dentistry, and dental education. J Dent 2011;75:1558–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2011.75.12.tb05215.x.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Singh, AG, Singh, S, Singh, PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis — a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012;39:899–903. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.111114.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Garg, N, Venkatraman, A, Pandey, A, Kumar, N. YouTube as a source of information on dialysis: a content analysis. Nephrology 2015;20:315–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12397.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Delli, K, Livas, C, Vissink, A, Spijkervet, FKL. Is Youtube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome? Oral Dis 2016;22:196–201.10.1111/odi.12404Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Li, M, Yan, S, Yang, D, Li, B, Cui, W. YouTubeTM as a source of information on food poisoning. BMC Publ Health 2019;19:952. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7297-9.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) for audiovisual materials. The agency for healthcare research and quality in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [Online]. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/patient-education/pemat.html [Accessed 1 Nov 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

17. Çintesun, FNİ, Çintesun, E, Seçilmiş, Ö. YouTube as a source of information on gonadotropin self-injections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021;264:135–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.015.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-07-13
Revised: 2022-08-08
Accepted: 2022-08-17
Published Online: 2022-09-05
Published in Print: 2023-03-28

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. A Celebration of Professor Joachim Dudenhausen
  4. Reviews
  5. Gestational complications associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women during 2020–2021: systematic review of longitudinal studies
  6. Eclampsia a preventable tragedy: an African overview
  7. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  8. How do bicornuate uteri alter pregnancy, intra-partum and neonatal risks? A population based study of more than three million deliveries and more than 6000 bicornuate uteri
  9. Maternal urogenital infection and fetal heart functional assessment – what is the missing link?
  10. Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women on maternal immunization against COVID-19 in Croatia
  11. Retrospective review of GCT cutoff value based on pre-pregnancy BMI class in patients with GDM
  12. Cervical strain elastography: pattern analysis and cervical sliding sign in preterm and control pregnancies
  13. Maternal race/ethnicity impacts the success rates of external cephalic version (ECV) in the United States
  14. Fetal adrenal gland size and umbilical artery Doppler in growth-restricted fetuses
  15. Counseling pregnant women on calcium: effects on calcium intake
  16. Relationship among anogenital distance, adrenal gland volume, and penile length and width at 22–36 weeks of pregnancy
  17. Intra-amniotic inflammation in the mid-trimester of pregnancy is a risk factor for neuropsychological disorders in childhood
  18. Genetic amniocentesis using atraumatic 29 gauge needle in patients having a chorioamniotic separation
  19. YouTube as a source of patient information on external cephalic version
  20. Midwives’ personal and professional attitudes towards women’s delivery choices, interventions and neonatal care
  21. Maternal serum midkine level in fetal growth restriction: a case-control study
  22. Original Articles – Neonates
  23. Interventions for reducing late-onset sepsis in neonates: an umbrella review
  24. Maternal knowledge of recommendations for safe infant sleep and intentions for implementation – a cross sectional analysis of data from the KUNO-Kids birth cohort study
  25. Short Communication
  26. Lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 protein is present in maternal blood in the third trimester and is upregulated by antenatal corticosteroids
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Peripartum hysterectomy at a tertiary university perinatal center – retrospective analysis of the 25-year period
  29. Neonate, infected mother and monkeypox: the present concern
Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2022-0344/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen