Home Medicine The effect of mask use on maternal oxygen saturation in term pregnancies during the COVID-19 process
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The effect of mask use on maternal oxygen saturation in term pregnancies during the COVID-19 process

  • Erzat Toprak ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Ayça Nazlı Bulut ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: November 26, 2020

Abstract

Objectives

Our aim was to evaluate the effect of standard surgical and N-95 respiratory mask use on maternal oxygen saturation, vital signs and result on non-stress tests in term pregnancies.

Methods

It is a prospective observational study. The study included healthy, not in labor, singleton pregnant women of 370/7–410/7 weeks who were applied to our hospital for routine obstetric control examination between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2020. Patients were randomised by coin toss method. Oxygen saturation, systolic, and diastolic arterial blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, and temperature of pregnant women using surgical masks and respiratory masks were measured before and after the non-stress test. The tolerance of the masks was also evaluated. Student’s t-test was used for variables showing parametric distribution and the Mann Whitney U-test was used for non-parametric tests. The categorical variables between the groups was analyzed by using the Chi square test or Fisher Exact test. The statistical significance level was taken as p<0.05 in all tests.

Results

A total of 297 pregnant women using masks were included in the study. The effect of mask type on oxygen saturation before and after the non-stress test was found to be significant (97.1±1.8 corresponds to 95.3±2.6 for the surgical mask, p=0.0001; 97.8±1.7 corresponds to 93.7±2.0 for the respiratory mask, p=0.0001). Mask tolerance of patients using respiratory masks was significantly higher than those using surgical masks (mean 8, 1–10, p=0.0001).

Conclusions

Surgical mask and respiratory mask usage decreased significantly in oxygen saturation in term pregnancies.


Corresponding author: Erzat Toprak, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Perinatology, Kayseri City Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey, Phone: +90 505 6699860, E-mail:

  1. Researchfunding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.

  5. Ethical approval: Approval was obtained from the regional Ethics Committee for this study.

References

1. Xu, H, Zhong, L, Deng, J, Peng, J, Dan, H, Zeng, X, et al.. High expression of ACE-2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci 2020;12:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-020-0074-x.Search in Google Scholar

2. Dashraath, P, Jeslyn, WJL, Karen, LMX, Min, LL, Sarah, L, Biswas, A, et al.. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;6:521–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.021.Search in Google Scholar

3. Assiri, A, Abedi, GR, Al Masri, M, Bin Saeed, A, Gerber, SI, Watson, JT. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection during pregnancy: a report of five cases from Saudi Arabia. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:951–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw412.Search in Google Scholar

4. Guan, W-J, Ni, Z-Y, Hu, Y, Liang, W-H, Ou, C-Q, He, J-X, et al.. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1708–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2002032.Search in Google Scholar

5. Levy, A, Yagil, Y, Bursztyn, M, Barkalifa, R, Scharf, S, Yagil, C. ACE2 expression and activity are enhanced during pregnancy. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008;295:R1953–61. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.90592.2008.Search in Google Scholar

6. Li, Y, Zhao, R, Zheng, S, Chen, X, Wang, J, Sheng, X, et al.. Lack of vertical transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, China. Emerg Infect Dis 2020;26:1335–6. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2606.200287.Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhu, H, Wang, L, Fang, C, Peng, S, Zhang, L, Chang, G, et al.. Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Transl Pediatr 2020;9:51. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2020.02.06.Search in Google Scholar

8. Roberge, RJ, Kim, J-H, Benson, SM. Absence of consequential changes in physiological, thermal and subjective responses from wearing a surgical mask. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2012;181:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2012.01.010.Search in Google Scholar

9. Edwards, P, Lipp, A, Steelman, V. Using systematic reviews for evidence-based practice. Assoc Operat Room Nurses 2005;82:363–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)60331-1.Search in Google Scholar

10. Radonovich, LJ, Simberkoff, MS, Bessesen, MT, Brown, AC, Cummings, DA, Gaydos, CA, et al.. N-95 respirators vs medical masks for preventing influenza among health care personnel: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc 2019;322:824–33. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11645.Search in Google Scholar

11. Tong, X, Sandwell, DT, Smith-Konter, B. An integral method to estimate the moment accumulation rate on the creeping section of the San Andreas fault. Geophys J 2015;203:48–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv269.Search in Google Scholar

12. Roberge, RJ, Kim, J-H, Powell, JB. N-95 respirator use during advanced pregnancy. Am J Infect Contr 2014;42:1097–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.025.Search in Google Scholar

13. Roberge, RJ, Coca, A, Williams, WJ, Palmiero, AJ, Powell, JB. Surgical mask placement over N-95 filtering facepiece respirators: physiological effects on healthcare workers. Respirology 2010;15:516–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01713.x.Search in Google Scholar

14. Bobrowski, RA. Pulmonary physiology in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010;53:285–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0b013e3181e04776.Search in Google Scholar

15. Bryce, E, Forrester, L, Scharf, S, Eshghpour, M. What do healthcare workers think? A survey of facial protection equipment user preferences. J Hosp Infect 2008;68:241–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2007.12.007.Search in Google Scholar

16. Nickell, LA, Crighton, EJ, Tracy, CS, Al-Enazy, H, Bolaji, Y, Hanjrah, S, et al.. Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution. CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J) 2004;170:793–8. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1031077.Search in Google Scholar

17. Liverman, CT, Larson, EL. Preventing transmission of pandemic influenza and other viral respiratory diseases: personal protective equipment for healthcare personnel. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-09-09
Accepted: 2020-11-13
Published Online: 2020-11-26
Published in Print: 2021-02-23

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Methods of detection and prevention of preterm labour and the PAMG-1 detection test: a review
  4. Corner of Academy
  5. Long term alterations of growth after antenatal steroids in preterm twin pregnancies
  6. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  7. SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy: maternal and perinatal outcome data of 34 pregnant women hospitalised between May and October 2020
  8. Comparison of hematological parameters and perinatal outcomes between COVID-19 pregnancies and healthy pregnancy cohort
  9. The effect of mask use on maternal oxygen saturation in term pregnancies during the COVID-19 process
  10. Risk factors for pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism in Singapore
  11. Does the length of second stage of labour or second stage caesarean section in nulliparous women increase the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies?
  12. Reference range for C1-esterase inhibitor (C1 INH) in the third trimester of pregnancy
  13. Termination of pregnancy following a Down Syndrome diagnosis: decision-making process and influential factors in a Muslim but secular country, Turkey
  14. High dose vs. low dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  15. Extremely high levels of alkaline phosphatase and pregnancy outcome: case series and review of the literature
  16. Cervical elastography strain ratio and strain pattern for the prediction of a successful induction of labour
  17. Original Articles – Fetus
  18. CD34 immunostain increases sensitivity of the diagnosis of fetal vascular malperfusion in placentas from ex-utero intrapartum treatment
  19. The ability of various cerebroplacental ratio thresholds to predict adverse neonatal outcomes in term fetuses exhibiting late-onset fetal growth restriction
  20. Obstetric and pediatric growth charts for the detection of late-onset fetal growth restriction and neonatal adverse outcomes
  21. Original Articles – Neonates
  22. Bacterial stability with freezer storage of human milk
  23. Protein and genetic expression of CDKN1C and IGF2 and clinical features related to human umbilical cord length
  24. Short Communication
  25. A considerable asymptomatic proportion and thromboembolism risk of pregnant women with COVID-19 infection in Wuhan, China
Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0422/html
Scroll to top button