Startseite Fetal intracranial structures: differences in size according to sex
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Fetal intracranial structures: differences in size according to sex

  • Ebru Celik Kavak ORCID logo , Salih Burcin Kavak ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Cengiz Sanli ORCID logo , Ibrahim Batmaz ORCID logo , Seren Ozden ORCID logo und Ekrem Sapmaz ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. Februar 2021

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to compare gender difference on sizes of some structures in the brain of normal male and female fetuses between 20 and 22 week gestations.

Methods

A total of 300 female and 300 male singleton pregnancies with low risk were included in the study. Biparietal diameter, head circumference, transcerebellar diameter, cisterna magna, nuchal fold thickness, anterior and posterior horn of lateral ventricles, length and width of cavum septum pellucidum were measured transabdominally. Mean±SD values were calculated and comparison of measurements were done between male and female fetuses. Kolmogorov–Smirnov and independent samples t-test were used for statistical analysis. A value of p<0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.

Results

We determined statistically significant difference in sizes of some structures of the brain of male and female fetuses. Mean±SD value of cavum septi pellucidi width was 3.38±0.61 and 3.85±0.96 in female and males, respectively (p<0.05). Male fetuses were also found to have larger anterior (1.92±0.30 vs. 1.58±0.26, p<0.0001) and posterior horn of lateral ventricles (6.00±0.87 vs. 5.53±1.17, p<0.05).

Conclusions

Difference in sizes of some structures of the brain starts in fetal life. This finding may be important in evaluating the intracranial structures more precisely. These results may also give a contribution to the understanding physiological and pathologic differences between males and females.


Corresponding author: Salih Burcin Kavak, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Firat University, School of Medicine, 23000, Elazig, Turkey, Phone: +90 424 233 35 55 2124, Fax: +90 424 237 91 38, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: ECK and SBK contributed to the conception and design of the study; ECK, SBK, CS, SO and IB contributed to the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; ECK, SBK, and ES were responsible for drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content; ECK, SBK, and ES gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Disclosure statement: The study was conducted in the perinatology outpatient clinic of Firat University Hospital. The ultrasonography device was provided by Firat University Hospital.

  5. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  6. Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration and has been approved by the Elazig Firat Local Research Ethics Committee.

References

1. Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Berghella, V, Bilardo, C, Hernandez-Andrade, E, Johnsen, SL, et al.. ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:116–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8831.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Medvedev, MV, Kozlova, OI, Altynnik, NA, Alekseevich, D, Lubashev, YA. Normal range of fetal brain structures in the second trimester ultrasound screening. J Pharmaceut Sci Res 2017;9:1156–9.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Jou, HJ, Shyu, MK, Wu, SC, Chen, SM, Su, CH, Hsieh, FJ. Ultrasound measurement of the fetal cavum septi pellucidi. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:419–21. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12060419.x.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Menger, Y, Bettscheider, M, Murgatroyd, C, Spengler, D. Sex differences in brain epigenetics. Epigenomics 2010;2:807–21. https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.10.60.Suche in Google Scholar

5. McCarthy, MM, De Vries, GJ, Forger, NG. Sexual differentiation of the brain: mode, mechanisms, and meaning, 2nd ed. In: Pfaff, DW, editor. Hormones, brain and behavior. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2009:1707–44 pp.10.1016/B978-008088783-8.00054-1Suche in Google Scholar

6. Ishola, A, Asaleye, CM, Ayoola, OO, Loto, OM, Idowu, BM. Reference ranges of fetal cerebral lateral ventricle parameters by ultrasonography. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2016;38:428–35. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593410.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Patel, MD, Goldstein, RB, Tung, S, Filly, RA. Fetal cerebral ventricular atrium: difference in size according to sex. Radiology 1995;194:713–5. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.194.3.7862967.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Oh, KY, Kennedy, AM, Antonio, E, Frias, J, Byrne, JLB. Fetal schizencephaly: pre‐ and postnatal imaging with a review of the clinical manifestations. Radiographics 2005;25:647–57. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.253045103.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Winter, TC, Kennedy, AM, Byrne, J, Woodward, PJ. The cavum septi pellucidi: why is it important?. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29:427–44. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2010.29.3.427.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Abele, H, Babiy‐Pachomow, O, Sonek, J, Hoopmann, M, Schaelike, M, Kagan, KO. The cavum septi pellucidi in euploid and aneuploid fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:156–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12393.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Chaoui, R, Heling, KS, Zhao, Y, Sinkovskaya, E, Abuhamad, A, Karl, K. Dilated cavum septi pellucidi in fetuses with microdeletion 22q11. Prenat Diagn 2016;36:911–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4911.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Ho, YK, Turley, M, Marc-Aurele, KL, Jones, MC, Housman, E, Engelkemier, D, et al.. Enlarged cavum septi pellucidi and vergae in the fetus: a cause for concern. J Ultrasound Med 2017;36:1657–68. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.16.06081.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Sherer, DM, Sokolovski, M, Dalloul, M, Santoso, P, Curcio, J, Abulafia, O. Prenatal diagnosis of dilated cavum septum pellucidum et vergae. Am J Perinatol 2004;21:247–51. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-829869.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Falco, P, Gabrielli, S, Visentin, A, Perolo, A, Pilu, G, Bovicelli, L. Transabdominal sonography of the cavum septum pellucidum in normal fetuses in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:549–53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00244.x.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Ardekani, BA, Figarsky, K, Sidtis, JJ. Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum: an MRI study using the OASIS brain database. Cerebr Cortex 2013;23:2514–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs253.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Fox, NS, Monteagudo, A, Kuller, JA, Craigo, S, Norton, ME. Mild fetal ventriculomegaly: diagnosis, evaluation, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219:B2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.039.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Sethna, F, Tennant, PW, Rankin, J, C Robson, S. Prevalence, natural history, and clinical outcome of mild to moderate ventriculomegaly. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:867–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3182117471.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Melchiorre, K, Bhide, A, Gika, AD, Pilu, G, Papageorghiou, AT. Counseling in isolated mild fetal ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:212–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7307.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Pilu, G, Falco, P, Gabrielli, S, Perolo, A, Sandri, F, Bovicelli, L. The clinical significance of fetal isolated cerebral borderline ventriculomegaly: report of 31 cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:320–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14050320.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-08-29
Accepted: 2021-01-24
Published Online: 2021-02-15
Published in Print: 2021-06-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Neonatal lupus erythematosus – practical guidelines
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. Optimal timing to screen for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy: first vs. second trimester
  6. Amniotic fluid embolism – implementation of international diagnosis criteria and subsequent pregnancy recurrence risk
  7. COL1A1, COL4A3, TIMP2 and TGFB1 polymorphisms in cervical insufficiency
  8. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies – the role of maternal age
  9. Comparison of maternal third trimester hemodynamics between singleton pregnancy and twin pregnancy
  10. Daily monitoring of vaginal interleukin 6 as a predictor of intraamniotic inflammation after preterm premature rupture of membranes – a new method of sampling studied in a prospective multicenter trial
  11. Association between the number of pulls and adverse neonatal/maternal outcomes in vacuum-assisted delivery
  12. Original Articles – Fetus
  13. The effect of nuchal umbilical cord on fetal cardiac and cerebral circulation-cross-sectional study
  14. Recognition of facial expression of fetuses by artificial intelligence (AI)
  15. Correlation of first-trimester thymus size with chromosomal anomalies
  16. Fetal intracranial structures: differences in size according to sex
  17. Original Articles – Neonates
  18. Antenatal care and perinatal outcomes of asylum seeking women and their infants
  19. Maturation of the cardiac autonomic regulation system, as function of gestational age in a cohort of low risk preterm infants born between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation
  20. Short Communication
  21. The impact of transfers from neonatal intensive care to paediatric intensive care
  22. Letter to the Editor
  23. Differential microRNA expression in placentas of small-for-gestational age neonates with and without exposure to poor maternal gestational weight gain
Heruntergeladen am 12.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0419/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen