Home The impact of transfers from neonatal intensive care to paediatric intensive care
Article Open Access

The impact of transfers from neonatal intensive care to paediatric intensive care

  • Emma E. Williams , Rebecca Lee , Nia Williams , Akash Deep , Nadisha Subramaniam , Buvana Dwarakanathan , Theodore Dassios and Anne Greenough
Published/Copyright: February 8, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

Infants receiving care from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can develop chronic problems and be transferred to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for on-going care. There is concern that such infants may take up a large amount of PICU resource, but this is not evidence based. We determined the impact of such transfers.

Methods

We reviewed 10 years of NICU admissions to two tertiary PICUs, which had approximately 12,000 admissions during that period.

Results

Sixty-seven infants, gestational age at birth 34.7 (IQR 27.1–38.8) weeks and postnatal age on transfer 81 (IQR 9–144) days were admitted from NICUs. The median (IQR) length of stay was 12 (4–41) days. The 19 infants born <28 weeks of gestation had a greater median length of stay (32, range IQR 10–93 days) than more mature born infants (7.5, IQR 4–26 days) (p=0.003). The median cost of PICU stay for NICU transfers was £23,800 (range 1,205–1,034,000) per baby. The total cost of care for infants transferred from NICUs was £6,457,955.

Conclusions

Infants transferred from NICUs were a small proportion of PICU admissions but, particularly those born <28 weeks of gestation, had prolonged stays which needs to be considered when determining bed capacity.

Infants receiving care from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can develop chronic problems with resource implications [1]. They may be transferred to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for ongoing care never having been home. There is concern that such infants may take up a large amount of PICU resource, but there is no evidence base to confirm or otherwise such a suggestion. As a consequence, we assessed the impact of such transfers in terms of PICU length and cost of stay. We also tested the hypothesis that infants born at less than 28 weeks of gestational age, are most likely to develop chronic problems and would, therefore, have particularly long stays.

We studied, over a 10-year period (2009–2019), all infants admitted to two regional PICUs from their local or other NICUs without ever being discharged home. Infants were not included if they were transferred to PICU because of a lack of NICU cot capacity.

One ten-bedded PICU and the other 16 bedded PICU receive referrals from South London and the wider region, both have an average number of 600 admissions per year [2]. The national average unit cost per bed day in PICU is £3,748 and in NICU is £1,218 [3]. In 2019–2020, there were 620 admissions to one PICU and 4,504 bed days with a total income of £7,661,854.

Data were collected from the PICAnet database and the Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system, paper notes were requested for those admitted prior to the introduction of EPR (2012).

Differences between those infants born extremely premature and the rest of the NICU transfers were assessed for statistical significance using the Mann Whitney U test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 25.

During the 10-year period, there were 89 transfers from NICUs to the two PICUs and approximately 12,000 admissions overall to the two PICUs. Twenty-two infants were excluded from the analysis as five had missing data and the other 17 were transferred because of lack of NICU cot capacity or required neurosurgery and were transferred to PICU post-operatively for ongoing care.

The 67 infants included in the analysis had a median gestational age at birth of 34.7 (IQR 27.1–38.8, range 23.4–42.1) weeks and birth weight of 2.21 (IQR 0.88–3.27, range 0.53–4.80) kg. Their corrected gestational age on admission was 43.6 (IQR 39.1–52.3, range 33.4–70.6) weeks. Forty infants were transferred from the local NICUs and the rest from other NICUs. Forty of the infants were born prematurely. Nineteen infants were born at less than 28 weeks of gestation and transferred to PICU at a corrected gestational age of 47.3 (IQR 43.9–58.0, range 33.8–70.6) weeks.

Forty-nine infants were receiving respiratory support on admission: 27 were ventilated, 16 were receiving non-invasive ventilation and six were receiving nasal cannula oxygen. Nine infants had a tracheostomy prior to admission. Fifty-three infants (79%) survived to discharge.

The median length of stay was 12 (IQR 4–41) days, range 1–470 days. The median cost of PICU stay was £23,800 (IQR £8,800–83,600, range £1,205–1,034,000) per baby and the total number of bed days was 3,099 days. The total cost of care for infants transferred from NICUs was £6,457,955. Infants born at less than 28 weeks of gestation had a greater median length of stay (32, IQR 10–93, days) than the more mature born infants (median 7.5 (IQR 4–26 days)) (p=0.003). The median cost of care of the very prematurely born infants was £68,200 (IQR £18,000–204,600) per baby.

We have demonstrated that infants transferred from NICUs for ongoing care are a small fraction of the PICU population, but some, particularly those born before 28 weeks of gestation, had a prolonged stay. We did not include the impact of the 17 infants transferred to PICU because of lack of neonatal cot capacity. The cost of a bed day in PICU is three times that of a NICU cot day (the national average unit cost per bed day in PICU is £3,748 and the national average unit cost per bed day in NICU is £1,218 [3]). Such a transfer then is an expensive option and our data argues for increased neonatal cot capacity. A strength of this study is that it is the first study to quantify the impact of transfers from NICUs to PICUs. Furthermore, we collected data from two PICUs. A limitation is that this a retrospective study, but we analysed prospectively, electronically collected data for the majority of the infants.

In conclusion, some infants transferred from NICUs had prolonged stays which need to be considered when determining bed capacity.


Corresponding author: Anne Greenough, Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK; Neonatal Intensive Care Centre, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK; The Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms in Asthma, London, UK; and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, UK, Phone: +44 02032993037, Email:

Funding source: NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trusts and King’s College London

Award Identifier / Grant number: N/A

  1. Research funding: The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

  2. Author contributions: AD, BD, TD and AG designed the study. EEW, RL, NW, NS collected the data. EEW, RL, TD and AG analysed the data. EEW wrote the first draft. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration study and was registered with the Clinical Governance Departments of the two PICU’s Trusts.

References

1. Young Seideman, R, Watson, MA, Corff, KE, Odle, P, Haase, J, Bowerman, JL. Parent stress and coping in NICU and PICU. J Pediatr Nurs 1997;12:169–77.10.1016/S0882-5963(97)80074-7Search in Google Scholar

2. PICANet: a decade of data [Internet]. 2008–2017. [Accessed 10 Jan 2018].Search in Google Scholar

3. Department of Health: reference costs guidance 2015–2016; National schedule of reference costs – main schedule. Department of Health and Social Care; 2016 Dec 15: 1–59pp.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-01-15
Accepted: 2021-01-21
Published Online: 2021-02-08
Published in Print: 2021-06-25

© 2021 Emma E. Williams et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Neonatal lupus erythematosus – practical guidelines
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. Optimal timing to screen for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy: first vs. second trimester
  6. Amniotic fluid embolism – implementation of international diagnosis criteria and subsequent pregnancy recurrence risk
  7. COL1A1, COL4A3, TIMP2 and TGFB1 polymorphisms in cervical insufficiency
  8. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies – the role of maternal age
  9. Comparison of maternal third trimester hemodynamics between singleton pregnancy and twin pregnancy
  10. Daily monitoring of vaginal interleukin 6 as a predictor of intraamniotic inflammation after preterm premature rupture of membranes – a new method of sampling studied in a prospective multicenter trial
  11. Association between the number of pulls and adverse neonatal/maternal outcomes in vacuum-assisted delivery
  12. Original Articles – Fetus
  13. The effect of nuchal umbilical cord on fetal cardiac and cerebral circulation-cross-sectional study
  14. Recognition of facial expression of fetuses by artificial intelligence (AI)
  15. Correlation of first-trimester thymus size with chromosomal anomalies
  16. Fetal intracranial structures: differences in size according to sex
  17. Original Articles – Neonates
  18. Antenatal care and perinatal outcomes of asylum seeking women and their infants
  19. Maturation of the cardiac autonomic regulation system, as function of gestational age in a cohort of low risk preterm infants born between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation
  20. Short Communication
  21. The impact of transfers from neonatal intensive care to paediatric intensive care
  22. Letter to the Editor
  23. Differential microRNA expression in placentas of small-for-gestational age neonates with and without exposure to poor maternal gestational weight gain
Downloaded on 12.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2021-0022/html
Scroll to top button