Home An observational study to assess Italian obstetrics providers’ knowledge about preventive practices and diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

An observational study to assess Italian obstetrics providers’ knowledge about preventive practices and diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus

  • Chiara Boccherini ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Valentina D’Ambrosio , Sara Corno , Flaminia Vena , Cristina Pajno , Maria Grazia Piccioni , Francesco Rech , Paola Ciolli , Roberto Brunelli , Pierluigi Benedetti Panici , Antonio Pizzuti , Ludovico Muzii and Antonella Giancotti
Published/Copyright: August 25, 2020

Abstract

Objectives

Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection can be easily prevented by hygienic measures. Up to date the majority of the studies in literature highlighted a reduction in cCMV antenatal counseling and its prevention. Our purpose was to evaluate obstetrics providers’ knowledge about cCMV infection, management and the behavioral practices to avoid it.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional survey carried out in Umberto I Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome between November 2019 and January 2020. We recruited 148 specialists and residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology through online anonymous multiple-choice 13-questions, 10 min-survey comparing responses between the two groups.

Results

A total of 94.6% of all participants said they always prescribe cytomegalovirus (CMV) serum screening: 73.6% of them regularly counsel about preventive practices, with specialists recording higher percentages (85.4 vs. 65.1%, p<0.005). We identified a good knowledge about the diagnostic pathway, but only 58.1% of our population knows the correct time of late amniocentesis. 12.2% of providers do not consider magnetic resonance (MRI) as a complementary exam.

Conclusions

Prevention of maternal seroconversion is crucial: even if our data show an acceptable knowledge about antenatal counseling, we encourage clinicians to firmly inform and educate women about behavioral measures.


Corresponding author: Chiara Boccherini, MD, Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. Phone: +39 3493555259, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the participants in this observational survey.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. Kagan, KO, Hamprecht, K. Cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;296:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4380-2.Search in Google Scholar

2. Leruez-Ville, M, Khalil, A, Kagan, KO, Donner, C, Lazzarotto, T, Ville, Y. Antenatal screening for cytomegalovirus infection: to know the chance, the chance to know. Lancet 2019;3:675–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(19)30271-8.Search in Google Scholar

3. Hambrecht, K, Jahn, G. Humanes Cytomegalovirus und kongenitale Infektion. Bundesgesundheitsbla 2007;50:1379–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-007-0194-x.Search in Google Scholar

4. Muldoon, KM, Armstrong-Heimsoth, A, Thomas, J. Knowledge of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) among physical and occupational therapists in the United States. PloS One 2017;12:e0185635. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185635.Search in Google Scholar

5. Manicklal, S, Emery, VC, Lazzarotto, T, Boppana, SB, Gupta, RK. The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013;26:86–102. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00062-12.Search in Google Scholar

6. Cannon, MJ, Schmid, DS, Hyde, TB. Review of cytomegalovirus and demographic characteristics associated with infection. Rev Med Virol 2010;20:202–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.655.Search in Google Scholar

7. Saldan, A, Forner, G, Mengoli, C, Gussetti, N, Palù, G, Abate, D. Testing for cytomegalovirus in pregnancy. J Clin Microbiol 2017;55:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01868-16.Search in Google Scholar

8. Sistema nazionale per le linee guida (ISS-SNLG), Gravidanza fisiologica. Linea guida 20, Rome - Italy: Italian Ministry of Health; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

9. Prevention of congenital (CMV) infection. Australia, (C-Obs-64)-New-Statement. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetrician and Gyneacologist. RANZCOG; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

10. Khalil, A, Heath, P, Jones, C, Soe, A. Ville YG on behalf of the Royal College of obstetricians and gynaecologists. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: update on treatment. Scientific impact paper No. 56. BJOG 2018;125:e1–11. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa043337.Search in Google Scholar

11. Shand, AW, Luk, W, Nassar, N, Hui, L, Dyer, K, Rawlinson, W. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and pregnancy-potential for improvements in Australasian maternity health providers’ knowledge. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;31:2515–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1344968.Search in Google Scholar

12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Knowledge and practices of obstetricians and gynecologists regarding cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy—United States, 2007. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57:65–8.Search in Google Scholar

13. Candiani, G, Daghini, R. Linee Guida Italiane Gravidanza Fisiologica. SNLG 2011;20:138–42.Search in Google Scholar

14. Werner, E, Hughes, B, Albright, C. Cytomegalovirus screening in pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness and threshold analysis. Am J Perinatol 2019;36:678–87. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676495.Search in Google Scholar

15. Hosseinzadeh Adli, A, Karami, C, Baghban Rahimi, S, Mirarab, A, Tabarraei, A. What family doctors know about congenital CMV: a regional survey in Iran. Int J Pediatr 2018 44:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-018-0470-4.Search in Google Scholar

16. Cordier, AG, Guitton, S, Vauloup-Fellous, C, Grangeot-Keros, L, Benachi, A, Picone, O. Awareness and knowledge of congenital cytomegalovirus infection among health care providers in France. J Clin Virol 2012;55:158–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2012.06.022.Search in Google Scholar

17. Ross, DS, Rasmussen, SA, Cannon, MJ, Anderson, B, Kilker, K, Tumpey, A, et al. Obstetrician/gynecologists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding prevention of infections in pregnancy. J Womens Health 2009;18:1187–93. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2008.1288.Search in Google Scholar

18. Revello, MG, Tibaldi, C, Masuelli, G, Frisina, V, Sacchi, A, Furione, M, et al. Prevention of primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. EBIOM 2015;2:1205–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

19. Hughes, BL, Gyamfi-Bannerman, C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult #39: diagnosis and antenatal management of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:B5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.042.Search in Google Scholar

20. Leruez-Ville, M, Foulon, I, Pass, R, Ville, Y. Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: state of the science. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.018.Search in Google Scholar

21. Nigro, G, Adler, SP, La Torre, R, Best, AM. Passive immunization during pregnancy for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1350–62. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa043337.Search in Google Scholar

22. Revello, MG, Lazzarotto, T, Guerra, B, Spinillo, A, Ferrazzi, E, Kustermann, A, et al. CHIP study group. A randomized trial of hyperimmune globulin to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1316–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1310214.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-05-24
Accepted: 2020-08-07
Published Online: 2020-08-25
Published in Print: 2021-01-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Global approach of the cesarean section rates
  4. Review
  5. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
  6. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  7. Non-adherence to labor guidelines in cesarean sections done for failed induction and arrest of dilation
  8. Retrospective study of maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction compared to spontaneous start of labour in women with one previous birth in uncomplicated pregnancies ≥ 41+3
  9. Management of labor after external cephalic version
  10. Evaluation of the labour process with serial transperineal ultrasonography and prediction of the type of birth
  11. Comparative study regarding effect of pH on Misoprostol in induction of labor in full term primigravida pregnant women, a double blind randomized controlled trial
  12. Comparison of the rates of preterm birth and low birth weight of vanishing twin and primary pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology
  13. Obstetric outcomes of pregnancy complicated by urolithiasis: a retrospective cohort study
  14. Serum kallistatin level is decreased in women with preeclampsia
  15. An observational study to assess Italian obstetrics providers’ knowledge about preventive practices and diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus
  16. Predictive values of clinical parameters and biophysical and biochemical markers in the first trimester for the detection of small-for-gestational age fetuses
  17. Original Articles – Newborns
  18. Antenatal and perinatal outcomes of refugees in high income countries
  19. Individualized sex-specific birth weight percentiles for gestational age based on maternal height and weight
  20. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) for preventing prematurity-related bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD): 7-year follow-up of the European Union Nitric Oxide (EUNO) trial
  21. Erratum
  22. Risk factors associated with adverse fetal outcomes in pregnancies affected by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a secondary analysis of the WAPM study on COVID-19
  23. Acknowledgment
  24. Acknowledgment
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0224/html
Scroll to top button