Adjuvant administration of 17-α-hydroxy-progesterone caproate in women with three or more second trimester pregnancy losses undergoing cervical cerclage is no more effective than cerclage alone
- 
            
            
        Fernand D. Samson
        
 , Amanda L. Merriman , Danielle L. Tate , Katherine Apostolakis-Kyrus and Luis M. Gomez 
Abstract
Objective:
To investigate the role of adjuvant 17-α-hydroxy-progesterone caproate (17OHP-C) in reducing the risk of preterm delivery <34 weeks and adverse perinatal outcomes in women with ≥3 second trimester pregnancy losses attributed to cervical insufficiency undergoing prophylactic cerclage.
Material and methods:
Retrospective cohort study of women with prophylactic cerclage placed between 2006 and 2014 divided into a cohort of (i) those receiving adjuvant 17OHP-C (n=43), and (ii) controls with cerclage alone (n=59).
Results:
Demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. There was no significant difference in gestational age at delivery between the cerclage-17OHP-C group (33.4±5.6 weeks) and the cerclage-alone group (34.4±4.6 weeks); P=0.33. We noted a non-significant increase for deliveries <34 weeks in the cerclage-17OHP-C group (44.2%) compared to controls (28.8%) which remained non-significant after adjusting for confounders; P=0.46. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of delivery <37, 32, 28 and 24 weeks. Adverse neonatal outcomes were comparable in both groups (cerclage-17OHP-C 48.8% vs. cerclage-alone 39%); P=0.43.
Conclusion:
Intramuscular 17OHP-C in combination with prophylactic cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency and ≥3 second trimester pregnancy losses had no synergistic effect in reducing the rate of recurrent preterm birth or improving perinatal outcomes.
Article note:
Part of this research was presented at the FIGO World Congress 2015 held in Vancouver, Canada from October 4 to 9, 2015 (reference 0099, session name FCS43).
Author’s statement
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.
References
[1] Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, Bekedam DJ, van Geijn HP. Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1106–12.10.1067/mob.2001.118655Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:516–23.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J, Renaud R, Pontonnier G, Papiernik E. Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91:731–5.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04841.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Rush RW, Isaacs S, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A. A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91:724–30.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04840.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP, Bekedam DJ, Hummel P. Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): study design and preliminary results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:823–9.10.1067/mob.2000.108874Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Meis PJ, Klebanoff M, Thom E, Dombroski MP, Sibai B, Moawad AH, et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2379–85.10.1056/NEJMoa035140Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] Berghella V, Figueroa D, Szychowski JM, Owen J, Hankins GD, Iams JD, et al. 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the prevention of preterm birth in women with prior preterm birth and a short cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:351.e1–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[8] Rafael TJ, Mackeen AD, Berghella V. The effect of 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on preterm birth in women with an ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28:389–94.10.1055/s-0031-1272967Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Stetson B, Hibbard JU, Wilkins I, Leftwich H. Outcomes with cerclage alone compared with cerclage plus 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone-caproate. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:983–8.10.1097/AOG.0000000000001681Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Mackeen AD, Rafael TJ, Zavodnick J, Berghella V. Effectiveness of 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on preterm birth prevention in women with history-indicated cerclage. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30:755–8.10.1055/s-0032-1332799Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Egerman R, Ramsey R, Istwan N, Rhea D, Stanziano G. Maternal characteristics influencing the development of gestational diabetes in obese women receiving 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. J Obes. 2014;2014:563243.10.1155/2014/563243Search in Google Scholar
[12] Berghella V, Odibo A, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:181–9.10.1097/01.AOG.0000168435.17200.53Search in Google Scholar
[13] Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:768–73.10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0Search in Google Scholar
[14] Davis G, Berghella V, Talucci M, Wapner RJ. Patients with a prior failed transvaginal cerclage: a comparison of obstetric outcomes with either transabdominal or transvaginal cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:836–9.10.1067/mob.2000.108837Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Method for estimating due date. Committee Opinion Number 611. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:863–6.10.1097/01.AOG.0000454932.15177.beSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] Keirse MJ. Progesterone and preterm: seventy years of “déjà vu” or “still to be seen”? Birth. 2004;31:230–5.10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00315.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[17] Romero R, Yeo L, Miranda J, Hassan S, Conde-Agudelo A, Chiworapongsa T. A blueprint for the prevention of preterm birth: vaginal progesterone in women with a short cervix. J Perinat Med. 2013;41:27–44.10.1515/jpm-2012-0272Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[18] Senat MV, Porcher R, Winer N, Vayssiere C, Deruelle P, Capelle M, et al. Prevention of preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with a short cervix: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;218:194.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] Nelson DB, McIntire DD, McDonald J, Gard J, Turrichi P, Leveno KJ. 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate did not reduce the rate of recurrent preterm birth in a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:600.e1–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[20] Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, Fusey S, Baxter JK, Khandelwal M, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:18–31.10.1002/uog.9017Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[21] Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, Tabor A, O’Brien JM, Cetingoz E, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:124.e1–19.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[22] da Fonseca E, Bittar R, Carvalho MHB, Zugaib M. Prophylactic administration of vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo controlled double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:419–24.10.1067/mob.2003.41Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Grobman WA, Thom EA, Spong CY, Iams JD, Saade GR, Mercer BM, et al. 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in nulliparas with cervical length less than 30 mm. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:390.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[24] Winer N, Bretelle F, Senat MV, Bohec C, Deruelle P, Perroti F, et al. 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate does not prolong pregnancy or reduce the rate of preterm birth in women at high risk for preterm delivery and a short cervix: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:485.e1–10.10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.1097Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] Szychowski JM, Berghella V, Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, Sheffield JS, et al.; for the Vaginal Ultrasound Trial Consortium. Cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in high risk women receiving intramuscular 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:2686–9.10.3109/14767058.2012.717128Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
 - Review article
 - Fetal cardiac tumors: clinical features, management and prognosis
 - Original articles – Obstetrics
 - Chronic inflammatory lesions of the placenta are associated with an up-regulation of amniotic fluid CXCR3: A marker of allograft rejection
 - Gaps in obstetric care processes – we can only improve what is being measured
 - Tokophobia (fear of childbirth): prevalence and risk factors
 - Adjuvant administration of 17-α-hydroxy-progesterone caproate in women with three or more second trimester pregnancy losses undergoing cervical cerclage is no more effective than cerclage alone
 - The role of ultrasound in the prediction of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies: are we there yet?
 - NLRP genes and their role in preeclampsia and multi-locus imprinting disorders
 - Original articles – Fetus
 - Diagnostic value of perinatal autopsies: analysis of 486 cases
 - Feto-maternal osmotic balance at term. A prospective observational study
 - Original articles – Newborn
 - Oxygen saturation trends in normal healthy term newborns: normal vaginal delivery vs. elective cesarean section
 - Causes of death among full term stillbirths and early neonatal deaths in the Region of Southern Denmark
 - Critical congenital heart disease screening with a pulse oximetry in neonates
 - DHA reduces oxidative stress following hypoxia-ischemia in newborn piglets: a study of lipid peroxidation products in urine and plasma
 - A non-invasive method to rule out transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN): fetal pulmonary artery acceleration to ejection time ratio
 - Letter to the Editor
 - Clarification of the methods and statistics in the study “Planned home birth and the association with neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy”
 - Clarification of the methods and statistics in the study “Planned home birth and the association with neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy”
 - Reply to: Planned home birth and the association with neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy
 - Response to the Letter to the Editor, “Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure: methodological issues”
 - Re: Utility of routine urine CMV PCR and total serum IgM testing of small for gestational age infants: a single center review
 
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
 - Review article
 - Fetal cardiac tumors: clinical features, management and prognosis
 - Original articles – Obstetrics
 - Chronic inflammatory lesions of the placenta are associated with an up-regulation of amniotic fluid CXCR3: A marker of allograft rejection
 - Gaps in obstetric care processes – we can only improve what is being measured
 - Tokophobia (fear of childbirth): prevalence and risk factors
 - Adjuvant administration of 17-α-hydroxy-progesterone caproate in women with three or more second trimester pregnancy losses undergoing cervical cerclage is no more effective than cerclage alone
 - The role of ultrasound in the prediction of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies: are we there yet?
 - NLRP genes and their role in preeclampsia and multi-locus imprinting disorders
 - Original articles – Fetus
 - Diagnostic value of perinatal autopsies: analysis of 486 cases
 - Feto-maternal osmotic balance at term. A prospective observational study
 - Original articles – Newborn
 - Oxygen saturation trends in normal healthy term newborns: normal vaginal delivery vs. elective cesarean section
 - Causes of death among full term stillbirths and early neonatal deaths in the Region of Southern Denmark
 - Critical congenital heart disease screening with a pulse oximetry in neonates
 - DHA reduces oxidative stress following hypoxia-ischemia in newborn piglets: a study of lipid peroxidation products in urine and plasma
 - A non-invasive method to rule out transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN): fetal pulmonary artery acceleration to ejection time ratio
 - Letter to the Editor
 - Clarification of the methods and statistics in the study “Planned home birth and the association with neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy”
 - Clarification of the methods and statistics in the study “Planned home birth and the association with neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy”
 - Reply to: Planned home birth and the association with neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy
 - Response to the Letter to the Editor, “Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure: methodological issues”
 - Re: Utility of routine urine CMV PCR and total serum IgM testing of small for gestational age infants: a single center review