Gaps in obstetric care processes – we can only improve what is being measured

References

[1] Vincent C, Burnett S, Carthey J. Safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a framework to guide clinical teams and healthcare organisations in maintaining safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:670–7.10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002757Search in Google Scholar

[2] Helfrich CD, Damschroder LJ, Hagedorn HJ, Daggett GS, Sahay A, Ritchie M, et al. A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci. 2010;5:82.10.1186/1748-5908-5-82Search in Google Scholar

[3] Pronovost PJ, Bo-Linn GW. Preventing patient harms through systems of care. J Am Med Assoc. 2012;308:769–70.10.1001/jama.2012.9537Search in Google Scholar

[4] Clark SL, Belfort MA, Byrum SL, Meyers JA, Perlin JB. Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:105.e1–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2008.02.031Search in Google Scholar

[5] Simpson KR, Kortz CC, Knox GE. A comprehensive perinatal patient safety program to reduce preventable adverse outcomes and costs of liability claims. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35:565–74.10.1016/S1553-7250(09)35077-1Search in Google Scholar

[6] Benn J, Burnett S, Parand A, Pinto A, Iskander S, Vincent C. Studying large-scale programmes to improve patient safety in whole care systems: challenges for research. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1767–76.10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Graham WJ. Criterion-based clinical audit in obstetrics: bridging the quality gap? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23:375–88.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Pirkle CM, Dumont A, Zunzunegui MV. Criterion-based clinical audit to assess quality of obstetrical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:456–63.10.1093/intqhc/mzr033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Berglund S, Pettersson H, Cnattingius S, Grunewald C. How often is a low Apgar score the result of substandard care during labour? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:968–78.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02565.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Millde Luthander C, Kallen K, Nystrom ME, Hogberg U, Hakansson S, Harenstam KP, et al. Results from the National Perinatal Patient Safety Program in Sweden: the challenge of evaluation. Acta Obstet Gynec ol Scand. 2016;95:596–603.10.1111/aogs.12873Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Millde-Luthander C, Högberg U, Nyström ME, Pettersson H, Wiklund I, Grunewald C. The impact of a computer assisted learning programme on the ability to interpret cardiotochography. A before and after study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012;3:37–41.10.1016/j.srhc.2011.10.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Nystrom ME, Westerlund A, Hoog E, Millde-Luthander C, Hogberg U, Grunewald C. Healthcare system intervention for prevention of birth injuries – process evaluation of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and agreement for change. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:274.10.1186/1472-6963-12-274Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Amark H, Millde-Luthander C, Ajne G, Hogberg U, Pettersson H, Wiklund I, et al. Single versus pairwise interpretation of cardiotochography, a comparative study from six Swedish delivery units. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014;5:195–8.10.1016/j.srhc.2014.05.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Millde Luthander C KK, Nyström ME, Högberg U, Håkansson S, Pukk Härenstam K, Grunewald C. Results from the national perinatal patient safety program in Sweden: the challenge of evaluation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:596–603.10.1111/aogs.12873Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:192–202.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Pehrson C, Sorensen JL, Amer-Wahlin I. Evaluation and impact of cardiotocography training programmes: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:926–35.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03021.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Knox GE, Simpson KR. Perinatal high reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:373–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.10.900Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Pronovost PJ. ENhancing physicians’ use of clinical guidelines. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310:2501–2.10.1001/jama.2013.281334Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Gurses AP, Seidl KL, Vaidya V, Bochicchio G, Harris AD, Hebden J, et al. Systems ambiguity and guideline compliance: a qualitative study of how intensive care units follow evidence-based guidelines to reduce healthcare-associated infections. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:351–9.10.1136/qshc.2006.021709Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Pronovost PJ. Ensuring that guidelines help reduce patient harm. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9:e172–3.10.1200/JOP.2012.000780Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? a framework for improvement. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:1458–65.10.1203/00006450-199904020-00719Search in Google Scholar

[22] Berglund S, Grunewald C, Pettersson H, Cnattingius S. Risk factors for asphyxia associated with substandard care during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:39–48.10.3109/00016340903418751Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Ayres-de-Campos D. Introduction: why is intrapartum foetal monitoring necessary – impact on outcomes and interventions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;30:3–8.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Jonsson M, Norden-Lindeberg S, Ostlund I, Hanson U. Acidemia at birth, related to obstetric characteristics and to oxytocin use, during the last two hours of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:745–50.10.1080/00016340802220352Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Lewis. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2003–2005. The Seventh Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, CEMACH. London: CEMACH, 2007 Contract No.: 7.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Pettker CM, Thung SF, Norwitz ER, Buhimschi CS, Raab CA, Copel JA, et al. Impact of a comprehensive patient safety strategy on obstetric adverse events. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:492.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Wagner B, Meirowitz N, Shah J, Nanda D, Reggio L, Cohen P, et al. Comprehensive perinatal safety initiative to reduce adverse obstetric events. J Healthc Qual. 2012;34:6–15.10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00134.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Siassakos D, Fox R, Bristowe K, Angouri J, Hambly H, Robson L, et al. What makes maternity teams effective and safe? Lessons from a series of research on teamwork, leadership and team training. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:1239–43.10.1111/aogs.12248Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q. 2005;83:691–729.10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Latif A, Holzmueller C, Pronovost P. Evaluating safety initiatives in healthcare. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2014;4:100–6.10.1007/s40140-014-0059-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Simpson KR. Measuring perinatal patient safety: review of current methods. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35:432–42.10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00060.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Carthey J, Walker S, Deelchand V, Vincent C, Griffiths WH. Breaking the rules: understanding non-compliance with policies and guidelines. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2011;343:d5283.10.1136/bmj.d5283Search in Google Scholar

[33] Pronovost PJ, Nolan T, Zeger S, Miller M, Rubin H. How can clinicians measure safety and quality in acute care? Lancet 2004;363:1061–7.10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15843-1Search in Google Scholar

[34] Epidemiology Cf. The Swedish Medical Birth Register– A summary of content and quality. The National Board of Health and Welfare, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Ayres-de-Campos D, Arteiro D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians’ interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;118:978–84.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03003.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed