Multicentric studies of the fetal neurobehavior by KANET test

References

[1] Yigiter AB, Kavak ZN. Normal standards of fetal behavior assessed by four-dimensional sonography. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19:707–21.10.1080/14767050600924129Search in Google Scholar

[2] Rees S, Harding R. Brain development during fetal life: influences of the intra-uterine environment. Neurosci Lett. 2004;361:111–4.10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.002Search in Google Scholar

[3] Joseph R. Fetal brain and cognitive development. Dev Rev. 1999;20:81–98.10.1006/drev.1999.0486Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kurjak A, Carrera JM, Stanojevic M, Andonotopo W, Azumendi G, Scazzocchio E, et al. The role of 4D sonography in the neurological assessment of early human development. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2004;4:148–59.10.3109/14722240400017075Search in Google Scholar

[5] Stanojevic M, Zaputovic S, Bosnjak AP. Continuity between fetal and neonatal neurobehavior. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17:324–9.10.1016/j.siny.2012.06.006Search in Google Scholar

[6] Haak P, Lenski M, Hidecker MJ, Li M, Paneth N. Cerebral palsy and aging. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:16–23.10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03428.xSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Precht HF. Qualitative changes of spontaneous movements in fetus and preterm infant are a marker of neurological dysfunction. Early Hum Dev. 1990;23:151–8.10.1016/0378-3782(90)90011-7Search in Google Scholar

[8] de Vries JI, Visser GH, Prechtl HF. The emergence of fetal behaviour. II. Quantitative aspects. Early Hum Dev. 1985;12:99–120.10.1016/0378-3782(85)90174-4Search in Google Scholar

[9] de Vries JI, Visser GH, Prechtl HF. The emergence of fetal behaviour. III. Individual differences and consistencies. Early Hum Dev. 1988;16:85–103.10.1016/0378-3782(88)90089-8Search in Google Scholar

[10] de Vries JI, Visser GH, Prechtl HF. The emergence of fetal behaviour. I. Qualitative aspects. Early Hum Dev. 1982;7: 301–22.10.1016/0378-3782(82)90033-0Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kurjak A, Luetic AT. Fetal neurobehavior assessed by three-dimensional/four dimentional sonography. Zdrav Vestn. 2010;79:790–9.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Salihagic-Kadic A, Medic M, Kurjak A, Andonotopo W, Azumendi G, Hafner T, et al. 4D sonography in the assessment of fetal functional neurodevelopment and behavioural paterns. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2005;5:1–15.10.3109/14722240500190640Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kurjak A, Pooh R, Tikvica A, Stanojevic M, Miskovic B, Badreldeen A, et al. Assesment of fetal neurobehavior by 3D/4D ultrasound. In: Kurajk A, Pooh R, editors. Fetal neurology. Jaypee Brothers: New Delhi; 2009, p. 222–250.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Lebit DF, Vladareanu R. The role of 4D ultrasound in the assessment of fetal behaviour. Maedica (Bucharest). 2011;6:120–7.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Merz E, Abramowicz JS. 3D/4D ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: is it time for routine use? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55:336–51.10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182446ef7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Kurjak A, Vecek N, Hafner T, Bozek T, Funduk-Kurjak B, Ujevic B. Prenatal diagnosis: what does four-dimensional ultrasound add? J Perinat Med. 2002;30:57–62.10.1515/JPM.2002.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Kurjak A, Vecek N, Kupesic S, Azumendi G, Solak M. Four-dimensional ultrasound: how much does it improve perinatal practice? In: Carrera JM, Chervenak FA, Kurjak A, editors. Controversies in perinatal medicine, studies on the fetus as a patient. Parthenon Publishing: New York; 2003, p. 222.10.3109/9780203494196Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kurjak A, Miskovic B, Stanojevic M, Amiel-Tison C, Ahmed B, Azumendi G, et al. New scoring system for fetal neurobehavior assessed by three- and four-dimensional sonography. J Perinat Med. 2008;36:73–81.10.1515/JPM.2008.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Gosselin J, Gahagan S, Amiel-Tison C. The Amiel-Tison neurological assessment at term: conceptual and methodological continuity in the course of follow-up. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11:34–51.10.1002/mrdd.20049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Amiel-Tison C, Gosselin J, Kurjak A. Neurosonography in the second half of fetal life: a neonatologist’s point of view. J Perinat Med. 2006;34:437–46.10.1515/JPM.2006.088Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Tomasovic S, Predojevic M. 4D Ultrasound – medical devices for recent advances on the etiology of cerebral palsy. Acta Inform Med. 2011;19:228–34.10.5455/aim.2011.19.228-234Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[22] Kurjak A, Stanojevic M, Andonotopo W, Scazzocchio-Duenas E, Azumendi G, Carrera JM. Fetal behavior assessed in all three trimesters of normal pregnancy by four-dimensional ultrasonography. Croat Med J. 2005;46:772–80.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Stanojevic M, Kurjak A, Salihagic-Kadic A, Vasilj O, Miskovic B, Shaddad AN, et al. Neurobehavioral continuity from fetus to neonate. J Perinat Med. 2011;39:171–7.10.1515/jpm.2011.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Stanojevic M, Talic A, Miskovic B, Vasilj O, Shaddad AN, Ahmed B, et al. An attempt to standardize Kurjak’s antenatal neurodevelopmental test: Osaka Consensus Statement. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;5:317–29.10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1209Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kurjak A, Andonotopo W, Hafner T, Salihagic Kadic A, Stanojevic M, Azumendi G, et al. Normal standards for fetal neurobehavioral developments–longitudinal quantification by four-dimensional sonography. J Perinat Med. 2006;34:56–65.10.1515/JPM.2006.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Andonotopo W, Kurjak A. The assessment of fetal behavior of growth restricted fetuses by 4D sonography. J Perinat Med. 2006;34:471–8.10.1515/JPM.2006.092Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Kurjak A, Carrera J, Medic M, Azumendi G, Andonotopo W, Stanojevic M. The antenatal development of fetal behavioral patterns assessed by four-dimensional sonography. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17:401–6.10.1080/14767050400029657Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Kurjak A, Abo-Yaqoub S, Stanojevic M, Yigiter AB, Vasilj O, Lebit D, et al. The potential of 4D sonography in the assessment of fetal neurobehavior–multicentric study in high-risk pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:77–82.10.1515/jpm.2010.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Miskovic B, Vasilj O, Stanojevic M, Ivanković D, Kerner M, Tikvica A. The comparison of fetal behavior in high risk and normal pregnancies assessed by four dimensional ultrasound. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1461–7.10.3109/14767051003678200Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Talic A, Kurjak A, Ahmed B, Stanojevic M, Predojevic M, Kadic AS, et al. The potential of 4D sonography in the assessment of fetal behavior in high-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:948–54.10.3109/14767058.2010.534830Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Honemeyer U, Kurjak A. The use of KANET test to assess fetal CNS function. First 100 cases. 10th World Congress of Perinatal Medicine 8–11 November 2011. Uruguay. Poster Presentation P 209.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Abo-Yaqoub S, Kurjak A, Mohammed AB, Shadad A, Abdel-Maaboud M. The role of 4-D ultrasonography in prenatal assessment of fetal neurobehaviour and prediction of neurological outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:231–6.10.3109/14767058.2011.568552Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Vladareanu R, Lebit D, Constantinescu S. Ultrasound assessment of fetal neurobehaviour in high-risk pregnancies. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;6:132–47.10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1235Search in Google Scholar

[34] Honemeyer U, Talic A, Therwat A, Paulose L, Patidar R. The clinical value of KANET in studying fetal neurobehavior in normal and at-risk pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2013;41:187–97.10.1515/jpm-2011-0251Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Kurjak A, Talic A, Honemeyer U, Stanojevic M, Zalud I. Comparison between antenatal neurodevelopmental test and fetal Doppler in the assessment of fetal well being. J Perinat Med. 2013;41:107–14.10.1515/jpm-2012-0018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Predojević M, Talić A, Stanojević M, Kurjak A, Salihagić Kadić A. Assessment of motoric and hemodynamic parameters in growth restricted fetuses - case study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:247–51.10.3109/14767058.2013.807241Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Athanasiadis AP, Mikos T, Tambakoudis GP, Theodoridis TD, Papastergiou M, Assimakopoulos E, et al. Neurodevelopmental fetal assessment using KANET scoring system in low and high risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:363–8.10.3109/14767058.2012.695824Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Neto RM. KANET in Brazil: first experience. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;9:1–5.10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1384Search in Google Scholar

[39] Hanaoka U, Hata T, Kananishi K, Mostafa AboEllail MA, Uematsu R, Konishi Y, et al. Does ethnicity have an effect on fetal behavior? A comparison of Asian and Caucasian populations. J Perinat Med. 2016;44:217–21.10.1515/jpm-2015-0036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Talic A, Kurjak A, Stanojevic M, Honemeyer U, Badreldeen A, DiRenzo GC. The assessment of fetal brain function in fetuses with ventrikulomegaly: the role of the KANET test. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:1267–72.10.3109/14767058.2011.634463Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Kurjak A, Stanojevic M, Andonotopo W, Salihagic-Kadic A, Carrera JM, Azumendi G. Behavioral pattern continuity from prenatal to postnatal life--a study by four-dimensional (4D) ultrasonography. J Perinat Med. 2004;32:346–53.10.1515/JPM.2004.065Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Andonotopo W, Kurjak A, Kosuta MI. Behavior of an anencephalic fetus studied by 4D sonography. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17:165–8.10.1080/jmf.17.2.165.168Search in Google Scholar

[43] Kurjak A, Predojevic M, Salihagic-Kadic A. Fetal brain function: lessons learned and future challenges of 4D sonography. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;2:85–92.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Stanojevic M, Antsaklis P, Salihadic-Kadic A, Predojevic M, Vladareanu R, Vladareanu S, et al. Is Kurjak antenatal neurodevelopmental test ready for routine clinical application? Bucharest consensus statement. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;3:260–5.10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1412Search in Google Scholar

[45] Spencer-Smith MM, Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Lee KJ, Lorefice L, Suetin A, et al. Long-term benefits of homebased preventive care for preterm infants: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2012;130:1094–101.10.1542/peds.2012-0426Search in Google Scholar PubMed