Advantages of 3D ultrasound in the assessment of fetal abnormalities

References

[1] Merz E. 25 years of 3D ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis (1989–2014). Ultraschall Med. 2015;36:3–8.10.1055/s-0034-1398866Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Benacerraf BR, Benson CB, Abuhamad AZ, Copel JA, Abramowicz JS, Devore GR, et al. Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology: proceedings of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Consensus Conference. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1587–97.10.7863/jum.2005.24.12.1587Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Merz E, Abramowicz JS. 3D/4D ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: is it time for routine use? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55:336–51.10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182446ef7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Kurjak A, Miskovic B, Andonotopo W, Stanojevic M, Azumendi G, Vrcic H. How useful is 3D and 4D ultrasound in perinatal medicine? J Perinat Med. 2007;35:10–27.10.1515/JPM.2007.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Dyson RL, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE, Johnson DD, Sklansky MS, Cantrell CJ, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:321–8.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00183.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Merz E, Bahlmann F, Weber G. Volume (3D) scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformations – A new dimension in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5:222–7.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05040222.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Merz E, Welter C. 2D and 3D ultrasound evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal anomaly in the second and third trimesters in a level III center. Ultraschall Med. 2005;26:9–16.10.1055/s-2004-813947Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Merz E. Current 3D/4D ultrasound technology in prenatal diagnosis. Eur Clinics Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;1:184–93.10.1007/s11296-005-0005-6Search in Google Scholar

[9] Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. Three-dimensional US of the fetus: volume imaging. Radiology 2006;238:988–96.10.1148/radiol.2383050636Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Merz E, Benoit B, Blaas HG, Baba K, Kratochwil A, Nelson T, et al. Standardization of three-dimensional images in obstetrics and gynecology: consensus statement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:697–703.10.1002/uog.4009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Benoit B, Chaoui R. Three-dimensional ultrasound with maximal mode rendering: a novel technique for the diagnosis of bilateral or unilateral abence or hypoplasia of nasal bones in second-trimester screening for Down syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco1. 2005;25:19–24.10.1002/uog.1805Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Pashaj S, Merz E. Detection of fetal corpus callosum abnormalities by means of 3D ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 2016;37:185–94.10.1055/s-0041-108565Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Merz E, Weber G, Bahlmann, Miric-Tesanic D. Application of transvaginal and abdominal three-dimensional ultrasound for the detection or exclusion of malformations of the fetal face. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:237–43.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09040237.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Lee W, McNie B, Chaiworapongsa T, Conoscenti G, Kalache KD, Vettraino IM, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic presentation of micrognathia. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:775–81.10.7863/jum.2002.21.7.775Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Dagklis T, Borenstein M, Peralta CF, Faro C, Nicolaides KH. Three-dimensional evaluation of mid-facial hypoplasia in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:261–5.10.1002/uog.2841Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Merz E. 3D ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis. In: Merz E, editor. Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology, Vol 1: Obstetrics. New York and Stuttgart: Thieme; 2005, pp. 516–528.10.1007/s11296-005-0005-6Search in Google Scholar

[17] Merz E, Miric-Tesanic D, Welter C. Value of the electronic scalpel (cut mode) in the evaluation of the fetal face. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:564–8.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00214.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Pooh RK, Kurjak A. Novel application of three-dimensional HDlive imaging in prenatal diagnosis from the first trimester. J Perinat Med. 2015;43:147–58.10.1515/jpm-2014-0157Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Merz E. Surface reconstruction of a fetus (28+2 GW) using HDlive technology. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:211–12.10.1055/s-0032-1318768Search in Google Scholar

[20] Andresen C, Matias A, Merz E. Fetal face: the whole picture. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:431–40.10.1055/s-0031-1299482Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Pretorius DH, House M, Nelson TR, Hollenbach KA. Evaluation of normal and abnormal lips in fetuses: comparison between three- and two-dimensional sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1233–7.10.2214/ajr.165.5.7572510Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Lee W, Kirk JS, Shaheen KW, Romero R, Hodges AN, Comstock CH. Fetal cleft lip and palate detection by three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:314–20.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00181.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Rotten D, Levaillant JM. Two-and three-dimensional sonographic assessment of the fetal face. 2. Analysis of cleft lip, alveolus and palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:402–11.10.1002/uog.1718Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Mittermayer C, Blaicher W, Brugger PC, Bernaschek G, Lee A. Foetal facial clefts: prenatal evaluation of lip and primary palate by 2D and 3D ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 2004;25:120–5.10.1055/s-2004-813102Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Levaillant JM, Nicot R, Benouaiche L, Couly G, Rotten D. Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip/palate: the surface rendered oro-palatal (SROP) view of the fetal lips and palate, a tool to improve information-sharing within the orofacial team and with the parents. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44:835–42.10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Merz E, Pashaj S. Prenatal detection of orofacial clefts. Ultraschall Med. 2016;37:133–5.10.1055/s-0042-104405Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Merz E, Pashaj S. Current role of 3D/4D Sonography in obstetrics and gynecology. DSJUOG 2013;7:400–8.10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1310Search in Google Scholar

[28] Campbell S, Lees C, Moscoso G, Hall P. Ultrasound antenatal diagnosis of cleft palate by a new technique: the 3D ‘reverse face’ view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:12–8.10.1002/uog.1819Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Benacerraf BR, Sadow PM, Barnewolt CE, Estroff JA, Benson C. Cleft of the secondary palate without cleft lip diagnosed with three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in a fetus with Fryns’ syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:566–70.10.1002/uog.2778Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Pilu G, Segata M. A novel technique for visualization of the normal and cleft fetal secondary palate: angled insonation and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:166–9.10.1002/uog.3877Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Faro C, Benoit B, Wegrzyn P, Chaoui R, Nicolaides KH. Three-dimensional sonographic description of the fetal frontal bones and metopic suture. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:618–21.10.1002/uog.1997Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Helfer TM, Peixoto AB, Tonni G, Araujo Júnior E. Craniosynostosis: prenatal diagnosis by 2D/3D ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Med Ultrason. 2016;18:378–85.10.11152/mu.2013.2066.183.3duSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Kurjak A, Azumendi G, Andonotopo W, Salihagic-Kadic A. Three- and four-di-mensional ultrasonography for the structural and functional evaluation of the fetal face. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:16–28.10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.090Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] DeVore GR, Falkensammer P, Sklansky MS, Platt LD. Spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC): new technology for evaluation of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:380–7.10.1002/uog.217Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Chaoui R, Hoffmann J, Heling KS. Three-dimensional (3D) and 4D color Doppler fetal echocardiography using spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:535–45.10.1002/uog.1075Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Paladini D, Vassallo M, Sglavo G, Lapadula C, Martinelli P. The role of spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) with tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) in the sequential analysis of fetal congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:555–61.10.1002/uog.2749Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Pooh RK, Maeda K, Kurjak A, Sen C, Ebrashy A, Adra A, et al. 3D/4D sonography – any safety problem. J Perinat Med. 2016;44:125–9.10.1515/jpm-2015-0225Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Charach R, Abramowicz J, Shoham-Vardi I, Sheiner E. “Is it safe for my baby?” acoustic exposure of diagnostic ultrasound. Harefuah 2011;150:588–92.Search in Google Scholar