Startseite Three-dimensional ultrasound first trimester fetal volume measurement and its relation to pregnancy outcome
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Three-dimensional ultrasound first trimester fetal volume measurement and its relation to pregnancy outcome

  • Haitham A. Torky EMAIL logo , Asem A. Moussa , Ali M. Ahmad , Osama Dief , Manar A. Eldesoouky und Ahmed S. El-Gayed
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. Januar 2017

Abstract

Aim of work:

To determine whether fetal volume (FV) measured by three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound was able to detect fetuses at risk of low birth weight (primary outcome) and/or preterm labor (secondary outcome).

Methods:

One hundred pregnant women carrying a singleton living pregnancy who were sure of dates, and had a dating scan, with gestational age between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days coming for routine first trimester nuchal translucency (NT) were examined by both two-dimensional (2D) and 3D ultrasound (Vocal System) for crown-rump length (CRL) and FV then followed up regularly every 4 weeks until 28 weeks then biweekly until 36 weeks then weekly until delivery both clinically and by ultrasound biometry.

Findings:

Eighty-seven cases had a normal outcome, while the remaining 13 cases had either preterm labor (four cases) or low-birth weight (nine cases). FV positively correlated with CRL (P=0.026), gestational age in weeks (P=0.002), neonatal body weight in grams (P=0.018) and neonatal body length at birth (P=0.04). A mean FV of 8.3 mm3 was association with neonatal complications (P=0.045). A cut-off point of 9 mm3 for FV was associated with 100% sensitivity for detection of the date of birth, while a cut-off point of 9.15 mm3 for FV was associated 100% sensitivity for detection of neonatal birth weight.

Conclusion:

3D assessment of FV in the first trimester provides an accurate method for predicting pregnancy outcome namely low birth weight and neonatal complications, however, it is a better positive predictor than a negative one.


Corresponding author: Dr. Haitham A. Torky, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, October 6th University, Cairo, Egypt, Tel.: +201001230161, Fax: +20225240066

Acknowledgment

Authors declare that they have neither conflict of interest nor received any financial support for this work.

Author’s statement

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  2. Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.

References

[1] World Health Organization. The incidence of low birth weight: a critical review of available information. World Health Stat Q. 2006;33:197.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Barker DJB. Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;49:270–83.10.1097/00003081-200606000-00009Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Mook-Kanamori DO, Steegers EAP, Eilers PH, Raat H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Risk factors and outcomes associated with first-trimester fetal growth restriction. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;30:527–34.10.1001/jama.2010.78Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Behrman RE, Butler AS. Preterm birth: causes, consequences and prevention. In: Richard E. Behrman and Adrienne Stith Butler, editors. Committee on understanding premature birth and assuring healthy outcomes; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Washington, DC, USA: Institute of Medicine; 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Leung TY, Sahota DS, Chan LW, Law LW, Fung TY, Leyng TN, et al. Prediction of birth weight by fetal crown-rump length and maternal serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:10–4.10.1002/uog.5206Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Antsaklis A, Anastasakis E, Komita O, Theodora M, Hiridis P, Daskalakis G. First trimester 3D volumetry. Association of the gestational volumes with birth weight. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;8:1055–9.10.3109/14767058.2010.545915Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Falcon O, Peralta CF, Cavoretto P, Faiola S, Nicolaides KH. Fetal trunk and head volume measured by three-dimensional ultrasound at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks of gestation in chromosomally normal pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:263–6.10.1002/uog.1975Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Smeets NAC, Vande Ven J, Oei SG. Inter-and intraobserver variation of fetal volume measurements with three-dimensional ultrasound in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2011;39:539–43.10.1515/jpm.2011.054Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Meis PJ, Ernest JM, Moore ML. Causes of low birth weight in public and private patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;156:165.10.1016/0002-9378(87)90133-5Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Geasry M, Lamont RF. Prediction of preterm birth. In: Elder MG, Romero R, Lamont RF. editors. Preterm labor. Churchill Livingstone : New York (NY); 2009. p. 51–63.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Bernstein IM, Catalano PM. Influence of fetal fat on the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in diabetic mothers. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;79:561–3.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists committee opinion: Perinatal risks associated with assisted reproductive technology. ACOG opinion paper No. 671; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] ISUOG Practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obste Gynecol. 2013;41: 102–13.10.1002/uog.12342Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Zeitlin J, Ancel PY, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Papiernik E. The relationship between intrauterine growth restriction and preterm delivery: an empirical approach using data from a European case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaec. 2000;107:750–8.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13336.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Smeets NA, Winkens B, Prudon M, De Ven Jv, Gondrie VP, Van Deursen F, et al. The predictive value of first trimester fetal volume measurements, a prospective cohort study. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89:321–6.10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.11.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-9-24
Accepted: 2016-11-30
Published Online: 2017-1-7
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 5.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2016-0315/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen