Home Medicine Evidence of altered brain regulatory gene expression in tobacco-exposed fetuses
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Evidence of altered brain regulatory gene expression in tobacco-exposed fetuses

  • Hamisu M. Salihu EMAIL logo , Arnut Paothong , Rachita Das , Lindsey M. King ORCID logo , Anupam Pradhan , Bridget Riggs , Eknath Naik , Erin M. Siegel and Valerie E. Whiteman
Published/Copyright: January 28, 2017

Abstract

Aim:

We sought to determine the association between prenatal smoking status and expression of fetal brain regulatory genes.

Methods:

At delivery, we collected information from parturient women on prenatal smoking habits and analyzed salivary cotinine levels. We obtained neonatal umbilical cord blood and extracted total RNA. We then employed the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) analyses and the comparative CT method to calculate the relative gene expression of selected fetal brain regulatory genes responsible for (1) brain growth (brain-derived neutrotrophic factor, BDNF), (2) myelination (proteolipidic protein 1, PLP1 and myelin basic protein, MBP), and (3) neuronal migration and cell-cell interactions during fetal brain development or RLN. The χ2-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the Grubb test were used to evaluate the relationship between prenatal smoking status and relative gene expression levels. Further analysis using bootstrapping was performed to assess the precision of our estimates.

Results:

Of the 39 maternal-infant dyads included in this study, 25.6% were non-smokers, 43.6% were passive smokers and 30.8% were active smokers. The results showed down-regulation of the selected fetal brain regulatory genes among active smokers.

Conclusions:

These findings represent preliminary evidence in humans that intrauterine tobacco exposure impacts fetal brain programming. Future studies are warranted to examine whether our findings represent potential mechanisms through which adverse childhood/adult-onset cognitive and behavioral outcomes that have been previously linked to intrauterine exposure occur.


Corresponding author: Hamisu M. Salihu, MD, PhD, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 3701 Kirby Drive, Suite 600, Houston, TX, USA, Tel.: +713-798-7646, Fax: +713-798-2725

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the James and Esther King Biomedical Research Program, Florida Department of Health (grant number 4KB03 and 1KG14-33987) and the University of South Florida Neuroscience Collaborative – Seed Grant Program and the University of South Florida College of Public Health Interdisciplinary Research Development Grant (IDRG).

Author’s statement

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  2. Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.

References

[1] Salihu HM, Wilson RE. Epidemiology of prenatal smoking and perinatal outcomes. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83:713–20.10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Roza SJ, Verburg BO, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Steegers EA, et al. Effects of maternal smoking in pregnancy on prenatal brain development. The Generation R Study. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:611–7.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05393.xSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Yolton K, Dietrich K, Auinger P, Lanphear BP, Hornung R. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and cognitive abilities among US children and adolescents. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:98–103.10.1289/ehp.7210Search in Google Scholar

[4] Winzer-Serhan UH. Long-term consequences of maternal smoking and developmental chronic nicotine exposure. Front Biosci. 2008;13:636–49.10.2741/2708Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002;16:6–12.10.1101/gad.947102Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2013. Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings [online]. [Cited March 5, 2016]. Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUHresultsPDFWHTML2013/Web/NSDUHresults2013.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Rakic P, Caviness VS. Cortical development: view from neurological mutant two decades later. Neuron. 1995;14:1101–4.10.1016/0896-6273(95)90258-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] Livak KJ, Schmittigen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.10.1006/meth.2001.1262Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Porter PS, Rao ST, Ku J-Y, Poirot RL, Dakins M. Small sample properties of nonparametric bootstrap t confidence intervals. J Air Waste Management Assoc. 1997;47:1197–2203.10.1080/10473289.1997.10464062Search in Google Scholar

[10] Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40:879–91.10.3758/BRM.40.3.879Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Hermann M, King K, Weitzman M. Prenatal tobacco smoke and postnatal secondhand smoke exposure and child neurodevelopment. Curr Opin in Pediatr. 2008;20:184–10.10.1097/MOP.0b013e3282f56165Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Pagani LS. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and brain development: The case of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;44:195–205.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Votavova H, Merkerova M, Krejcik Z, Fejglova K, Vasikova A, Pastorkova A, et al. Deregulation of gene expression induced by environmental tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14;9:1073–82.10.1093/ntr/ntr325Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Hussain N, Krueger W, Covault J, Walsh A, Kranzler HR, Oncken C. Effects of prenatal tobacco exposure on gene expression profiling in umbilical cord tissue. Pediatr Res. 2008;64:147–53.10.1203/PDR.0b013e31817c5507Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Cao J, Wang J, Dwyer JB, Gautier NM, Wang S, Leslie FM, et al. Gestational nicotine exposure modifies myelin gene expression in the brains of adolescent rats with sex differences. Transl Psychiatry. 2013;3;e247.10.1038/tp.2013.21Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Mukhopadhyay P, Horn KH, Greene RM. Prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke alters gene expression in the developing murine hippocampus. Reprod Toxicol. 2010;29:164–75.10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.12.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Hegaard HK, Kjægaard H, Moller LF, Wachmann H, Ottesen B. The effect of environmental tobacco smoke during pregnancy on birth weight. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica. 2006;85:675–81.10.1080/00016340600607032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Evlampidou I, Bagkeris M, Vardavas C, Koutra K, Patelarou E, Koutis A, et al. Prenatal second-hand smoke exposure measured with urine cotinine may reduce gross motor development at 18 months of age. J Pediatr. 2015;167:246–52.e2.10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.03.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-8-18
Accepted: 2016-12-21
Published Online: 2017-1-28
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2016-0279/html
Scroll to top button