Home Medicine Clinical significance of a false positive glucose challenge test in patients with a high body mass index
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Clinical significance of a false positive glucose challenge test in patients with a high body mass index

  • Anne Borja , Michael Moretti and Nisha Lakhi EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 26, 2016

Abstract

Objective:

To determine if there is an increased maternal or neonatal morbidity in overweight and obese patients with a false positive glucose challenge test (GCT).

Methods:

Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25.0 at registration were included in this prospective 36-month study. The study cohort consisted of patients with a false positive (FP) GCT, with two comparison cohorts: those with a (1) screen negative (SN) GCT result and (2) true positive (TP) GCT result. Risks were reported as odd ratios with 95% confidence intervals, with a P<0.05 considered as significant.

Results:

There were 60 patients in the FP cohort, 106 in the SN cohort, and 64 in the TP cohort. When the BMI of the FP cohort was compared with either the SN cohort or TP cohort, differences were non-significant (SN 32.3 vs. FP 33.3 kg/m2, P=0.067) and (FP 33.3 vs. TP 34.4 kg/m2, P=0.303). When comparing the FP cohort to the SN cohort, patients in the FP group had significantly more gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia. There was a trend towards delivering large for gestational weight infants and an infant ≥4000 g in the FP cohort, but this fell short of reaching statistical significance. When comparing the FP to TP cohorts, rates of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and infants ≥4000 g were similar; however, neonatal morbidity was increased in the TP group.

Conclusions:

Overweight and obese patients with a FP glucose challenge screen are more likely to have adverse maternal outcomes. Neonatal morbidity was not increased.


Corresponding author: Nisha Lakhi, MD, Assistant Professor, New York Medical College, Director of Research and Co-Director of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Richmond University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 355 Bard Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10310, USA, Tel.: +614-563-0317

References

[1] Kim SY, Sappenfield W, Sharma AJ, Wilson HG, Bish CL, Salihu HM, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal overweight and obesity, by nativity, Florida, 2004e2007. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21:E33e40.10.1002/oby.20025Search in Google Scholar

[2] HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991–2002.10.1056/NEJMoa0707943Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Stamilio DM, Olsen T, Ratcliffe S, Sehdev HM, Macones GA. False-positive 1-hour glucose challenge test and adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:148–56.10.1097/01.AOG.0000109220.24211.BDSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Grotegut CA, Tatineni H, Dandolu V, Whiteman VE, Katari S, Geifman-Holtzman O. Obstetric outcomes with a false-positive one-hour glucose challenge test by the Carpenter-Coustan criteria. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:315–20.10.1080/14767050801909564Search in Google Scholar

[5] Rehder PM, Pereira BG, E Silva JL. The prognostic value of a normal oral glucose tolerance test in pregnant women who tested positive at screening: a validation study. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2012;4:10.10.1186/1758-5996-4-10Search in Google Scholar

[6] Goldberg RJ, Ye C, Sermer M, Connelly PW, Hanley AJ, Zinman B, et al. Predictors and clinical implications of a false negative glucose challenge test in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35:889–98.10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30810-0Search in Google Scholar

[7] Pantham P, Aye IL, Powell TL. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991–2002.10.1056/NEJMoa0707943Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hotamisligil GS, Arner P, Caro JF, Atkinson RL, Spiegelman BM. Increased adipose tissue expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2409e15.10.1172/JCI117936Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Dandona P, Weinstock R, Thusu K, Abdel-Rahman E, Aljada A, Wadden T. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in sera of obese patients: fall with weight loss. J Clin Endocr Metab. 1998;83:2907e10.10.1210/jcem.83.8.5026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Sternberg EM. The stress response and the regulation of inflammatory disease. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:854–66.10.7326/0003-4819-117-10-854Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Aye IL, Lager S, Ramirez VI, Gaccioli F, Dudley DJ, Jansson T, et al. Increasing maternal body mass index is associated with systemic inflammation in the mother and the activation of distinct placental inflammatory pathways. Biol Reprod. 2014;90:129.10.1095/biolreprod.113.116186Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Kleiblova P, Dostalova I, Bartlova M, Lacinova Z, Ticha I, Krejci V, et al. Expression of adipokines and estrogen receptors in adipose tissue and placenta of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;314:150e6.10.1016/j.mce.2009.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Hauguel-de Mouzon S, Guerre-Millo M. The placenta cytokine network and inflammatory signals. Placenta. 2006;27:794e8.10.1016/j.placenta.2005.08.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Atègbo JM, Grissa O, Yessoufou A, Hichami A, Dramane KL, Moutairou K, et al. Modulation of adipokines and cytokines in gestational diabetes and macrosomia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4137e43.10.1210/jc.2006-0980Search in Google Scholar PubMed

  1. The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2016-4-30
Accepted: 2016-7-21
Published Online: 2016-8-26
Published in Print: 2017-4-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Intrapartum care
  4. Recommendation and Guidelines for Perinatal Practice
  5. Delivery modes in case of fetal malformations
  6. Review article
  7. Obstetric analgesia – update 2016
  8. Highlight articles
  9. Risk factors and outcomes in “well-selected” vaginal breech deliveries: a retrospective observational study
  10. Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study
  11. Evaluating fetal head dimension changes during labor using open magnetic resonance imaging
  12. Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure
  13. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal scalp lactate for intrapartum acidosis compared with scalp pH
  14. Reference values for Lactate Pro 2™ in fetal blood sampling during labor: a cross-sectional study
  15. Linear and non-linear analysis of uterine contraction signals obtained with tocodynamometry in prediction of operative vaginal delivery
  16. Evaluation of simparteam – a needs-orientated team training format for obstetrics and neonatology
  17. Transient fetal blood redistribution associated with maternal supine position
  18. Original articles
  19. Underlying causes of neonatal deaths in term singleton pregnancies: home births versus hospital births in the United States
  20. Fourfold increase in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus after adoption of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria
  21. Hematological changes in severe early onset growth-restricted fetuses with absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery
  22. Breast milk feeding in infants with inherited metabolic disorders other than phenylketonuria – a 10-year single-center experience
  23. Clinical significance of a false positive glucose challenge test in patients with a high body mass index
  24. Obituary
  25. Obituary – Edward Ogata (1945–2017)
  26. Congress Calendar
  27. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 15.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2016-0161/pdf
Scroll to top button