Antenatal testing in uncomplicated pregnancies: should testing be initiated after 40 or 41 weeks?

References

[1] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Antepartum fetal surveillance. 1999;9 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 188, January 1994). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;68:175–85.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetricians-gynecologists. 2004;55 (replaces practice pattern number 6, October 1997). Management of postterm pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:639–46.10.1097/00006250-200409000-00052Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Bobby PD, Divon MY. Fetal testing in postdates. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:79–82.10.1097/00001703-199704000-00002Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Brar HS, Platt LD, Devore GR. Antepartum fetal surveillance: the biophysical profile. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1987;30:936–47.10.1097/00003081-198712000-00017Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Caughey AB, Snegovskikh VV, Norwitz ER. Postterm pregnancy: how can we improve outcomes? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008;63:715–24.10.1097/OGX.0b013e318186a9c7Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Cleary-Goldman J, Bettes B, Robinson JN, Norwitz E, D’Alton ME, Schulkin J. Postterm pregnancy: practice patterns of contemporary obstetricians and gynecologists. Am J Perinatol. 2006;23:15–20.10.1055/s-2005-918891Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee, Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee, Delaney M, Roggensack A, Leduc DC, Ballermann C, Biringer A, Delaney M. Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 weeks. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:800–23.10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32945-0Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 579: definition of term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1139–40.10.1097/01.AOG.0000437385.88715.4aSuche in Google Scholar

[9] Crowley P. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000170.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Divon MY, Feldman-Leidner N. Postdates and antenatal testing. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32:295–300.10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.013Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. II. Contraction stress test versus nonstress test for primary surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143:778–81.10.1016/0002-9378(82)90009-6Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Hankins GD, Miller DA. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54:3–7.10.1097/GRF.0b013e31820a015bSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Heimstad R, Skogvoll E, Mattsson LA, Johansen OJ, Eik-Nes SH, Salvesen KA. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:609–17.10.1097/01.AOG.0000255665.77009.94Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Kaimal AJ, Little SE, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, Grobman WA, Long EF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:137e1–e9.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.012Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Kisilevsky BS, Kilpatrick KL, Low JA. Vibroacoustic-induced fetal movement: two stimuli and two methods of scoring. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:174–7.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Kitlinski ML, Kallen K, Marsal K, Olofsson P. Gestational age-dependent reference values for pH in umbilical cord arterial blood at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:338–45.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Lamvu GM, Thorp JM, Jr., Stuart N, Hartmann KE. Impact of abnormal results of outpatient fetal heart rate monitoring on maternal intervention in labor. J Reprod Med. 2006;51:689–93.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Mandujano A, Waters TP, Myers SA. The risk of fetal death: current concepts of best gestational age for delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:207e1–e8.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.005Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Manning FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999;26:557–77.10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70099-1Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Manning FA. Antepartum fetal testing: a critical appraisal. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21:348–52.10.1097/GCO.0b013e32832ae0b3Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Manning FA, Bondaji N, Harman CR, Casiro O, Menticoglou S, Morrison I, et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. VIII. The incidence of cerebral palsy in tested and untested perinates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:696–706.10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70479-XSuche in Google Scholar

[22] Miller DA, Rabello YA, Paul RH. The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:812–7.10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70305-8Suche in Google Scholar

[23] National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. Full guideline. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2008;62:454.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Ohel G, Yaacobi N, Linder N, Younis J. Postdate antenatal testing. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;49:145–7.10.1016/0020-7292(95)02357-ISuche in Google Scholar

[25] Olesen AW, Westergaard JG, Olsen J. Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register-based study, 1978-1993. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:222–7.10.1067/mob.2003.446Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Savitz DA, Terry JW, Jr., Dole N, Thorp JM, Jr., Siega-Riz AM, Herring AH. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1660–6.10.1067/mob.2002.127601Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Smith GC. Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:489–96.10.1067/mob.2001.109735Suche in Google Scholar PubMed