Home Medicine PCOS diagnosis in adolescents: the timeline of a controversy in a systematic review
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

PCOS diagnosis in adolescents: the timeline of a controversy in a systematic review

  • Helen Vassalou , Marianthi Sotiraki and Lina Michala EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 29, 2019

Abstract

Study objective

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in adolescence, a disorder of exclusion, has proved to be a timeless diagnostic challenge for the clinician. Since 1990, several attempts to provide clear diagnostic criteria have been published, most of the time leading to inconsistencies. We attempted to elucidate the controversies and convergences of this subject by conducting a systematic review of the literature concerning official guidelines or proposed criteria for the diagnosis of PCOS in adolescent girls.

Design

Based on a term search sequence via electronic databases such as Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus and a hands-on review of references and learned societies, all available data were classified and analyzed. Single case reports, original studies with adult population or articles with incomplete diagnostic guidelines were excluded.

Results

Twelve reports dated from 2006 to 2018 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Seven of them were endorsed or published by learned societies. All suggested a stricter diagnosis than in adulthood. Polycystic ovarian morphology was used as a necessary criterion only in three guidelines, and there was a tendency for a more objective diagnosis of hyperandrogenism, defined either by clinical features or by biochemical hyperandrogenemia, although in one case both were required.

Conclusion

Irregular menstrual cycles, allowing for an interval of at least 2 years postmenarche, and hyperandrogenism, usually reinforced by biochemical confirmation, are the main accepted features for PCOS diagnosis in adolescence. Discrepancies among endocrine and reproductive medicine societies still remain, although recent intensified attempts at reaching a consensus should allow for more universally accepted diagnostic criteria.


Corresponding author: Lina Michala, MRCOG, PhD, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, 80 Vas Sofias Avenue, 115 28 Athens, Greece, Phone: +30 2132162375, Fax: +30 2132162376
aHelen Vassalou and Marianthi Sotiraki contributed equally and should be considered as first authors.
  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interests: The authors received no funding for this study and have no conflict of interest to disclose.

  6. Ethical statement: This work did not involve human subjects and did not require a formal Ethical Institutional Review.

References

1. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2016;31:2841–55.10.1093/humrep/dew218Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Zawadski JK, Dunaif A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: towards a rational approach. In: Dunaif A, Given J, Haseltine F, Merriam G, editors. Current issues in endocrinology and metabolism: polycystic ovary syndrome [Internet]. Boston: Blackwell Scientific; 1992. p. 377–84. Available from: http://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1265464.Search in Google Scholar

3. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2004;81:19–25 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14711538.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, et al. The Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: the complete task force report. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2009;91:456–88 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18950759.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2018;110:364–79.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Deeks AA, Moran LJ, Stuckey BG, et al. Assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: summary of an evidence-based guideline. Med J Aust [Internet] 2011;195:S65–112.10.5694/mja11.10915Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Villarroel C, López P, Merino PM, Iñiguez G, Sir-Petermann T, et al. Hirsutism and oligomenorrhea are appropriate screening criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents. Gynecol Endocrinol [Internet] 2015;31:625–9.10.3109/09513590.2015.1025380Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Sultan C, Paris F. Clinical expression of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescent girls. Fertil Steril [Internet] 2006; 86(Suppl 1):S6.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Carmina E, Oberfield SE, Lobo RA. The diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet] 2010;203:201.e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Merino PM, Codner E, Cassorla F. A rational approach to the diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome during adolescence. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol [Internet] 2011;55:590–8.10.1590/S0004-27302011000800013Search in Google Scholar

11. Fauser BC, Tarlatzis BC, Rebar RW, Legro RS, Balen AH, et al. Consensus on women’s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2012 Jan [cited 2018 Jul 29];97:28–38.e25. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153789.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Legro RS, Arslanian SA, Ehrmann DA, Hoeger KM, Murad MH, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab [Internet] 2013;98:4565–92.10.1210/jc.2013-2350Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Witchel SF, Oberfield S, Rosenfield RL, Codner E, Bonny A, et al. The diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome during adolescence. Horm Res Paediatr [Internet] 2015;83:376–89.10.1159/000375530Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Rosenfield RL. The diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents. Pediatrics [Internet] 2015;136:1154–65.10.1542/peds.2015-1430Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Goodman NF, Cobin RH, Futterweit W, Glueck JS, Legro RS, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Androgen Excess and PCOS society disease state clinical review: guide to the best practices in the evaluation and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome – Part 1. Endocr Pract 2015;21:1291–300.10.4158/EP15748.DSCSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Ibáñez L, Oberfield SE, Witchel S, Auchus RJ, Chang RJ, et al. An International Consortium Update: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome in adolescence. Horm Res Paediatr [Internet] 2017;88:371–95.10.1159/000479371Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Akgül S, Düzçeker Y, Kanbur N, Derman O. Do different diagnostic criteria impact polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis for adolescents? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol [Internet] 2018;31:258–62.10.1016/j.jpag.2017.12.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Azziz R. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: a reappraisal. Fertil Steril [Internet] 2005;83:1343–6.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.085Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, et al. Positions statement: criteria for defining polycystic ovary syndrome as a predominantly hyperandrogenic syndrome: an Androgen Excess Society guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab [Internet] 2006;91:4237–45.10.1210/jc.2006-0178Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. NIH. Evidence-based Methodology Workshop on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [Internet]. 2012. Available from: https://prevention-archive.od.nih.gov/docs/programs/pcos/FinalReport.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

21. Senaldi L, Gopi RP, Milla S, Shah B. Is ultrasound useful in the diagnosis of adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome? J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab [Internet] 2015;28:605–12.10.1515/jpem-2014-0307Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Powers SE, Uliassi NW, Sullivan SD, Tuchman LK, Mehra R, et al. Trends in standard workup performed by pediatric subspecialists for the diagnosis of adolescent polycystic ovary syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol [Internet] 2015;28:43–6.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.03.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Sebastian MR, Wiemann CM, Bacha F, Alston Taylor SJ. Diagnostic evaluation, comorbidity screening, and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents in 3 specialty clinics. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol [Internet] 2018;31:367–71.10.1016/j.jpag.2018.01.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Dokras A, Stener-Victorin E, Yildiz BO, Li R, Ottey S, et al. Androgen excess-polycystic ovary syndrome society: position statement on depression, anxiety, quality of life, and eating disorders in polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril [Internet] 2018;109:888–99.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.038Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Rowlands IJ, Teede H, Lucke J, Dobson AJ, Mishra GD. Young women’s psychological distress after a diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome or endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2016;31:2072–81.10.1093/humrep/dew174Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Gibson-Helm M, Teede H, Dunaif A, Dokras A. Delayed diagnosis and a lack of information associated with dissatisfaction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab [Internet] 2017;102:604–12.10.1210/jc.2016-2963Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2019-0024).


Received: 2019-01-13
Accepted: 2019-04-23
Published Online: 2019-05-29
Published in Print: 2019-06-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpem-2019-0024/pdf
Scroll to top button