Abstract
Context
Surgical volume is correlated with increased hospital profitability, yet many Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) offer few or no inpatient surgical services.
Objectives
This study aims to investigate the impact of the presence of different inpatient surgical services on CAH profitability.
Methods
The study design was a cross-sectional analysis of financial data from the most recent fiscal year (FY) of 1299 CAHs. Multiple linear regression was utilized to assess how the operating margin was affected by the number of different inpatient surgical services offered per hospital. Covariates known to be associated with hospital profitability included occupancy rate, case mix index (CMI), system affiliation, ownership status (public, private, or nonprofit), and geographic region.
Results
The regression model for the CAH operating margin returned an R2 value of 0.18. Each additional inpatient surgical service corresponded to a 1.5% increase in operating margin (p=0.0413). Each 10% increase in occupancy rate and 0.1 increase in CMI corresponded to a 0.9% increase in operating margin (p=0.0032 and p=0.0176, respectively). The number of surgical services offered per CAH showed positive correlations with occupancy rate (r=0.23, p<0.0001) and CMI (r=0.59, p<0.0001).
Conclusions
A positive correlation exists between operating margin and the diversity of inpatient surgical specialties available at CAHs. Furthermore, providing surgery allows CAHs to accommodate higher occupancy rates and case mixes, both of which are significantly and positively correlated with CAH operating margin.
The Critical Access Hospital (CAH) program was created by the US federal government in 1997 as part of the Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Program to benefit rural hospitals and rural communities [1]. The CAH designation provides hospitals cost-based reimbursement rather than prospective payment; other benefits include pre-allocated federal grants, guaranteed mortgages, and discounted pharmaceutical prices through the 340B Drug Pricing Program. CAHs must have 25 beds or less, offer 24/7 emergency care, and be located a certain minimal distance from other hospitals.
A key tenet of osteopathic practice is that structure mirrors function, and the application of this principle across a broad social context reminds us that population health is linked to healthcare infrastructure. Rural Americans face disparity when it comes to accessing surgical care [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. There are many barriers to rural access of surgical care, including hospital closures and provider shortages; 64 CAHs have closed since 2005 [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. However, the demand for surgery in rural areas appears no different—and in some cases, may be greater—than the demand for surgery in urban and suburban localities [12]. Rural residents prefer to receive surgical care from local doctors when the quality of local care is no different from elsewhere, and research has shown little difference in the quality and safety of surgical care provided at CAHs compared to similarly sized prospectively paid hospitals [13], [14], [15], [16].
The provision of surgery helps hospitals generate more revenue and higher margins. Operative procedures are involved in over one-fourth of inpatient hospitalizations [17]. One study found that each 10% increase in operating room volume in rural hospitals was associated with a 2% increase in the hospital’s total margin [18]. Although surgical volume is known to be positively correlated with CAH operating margin, it is unclear whether the breadth of surgical services provided affects CAH profitability.
The authors of the present study conducted a pilot study utilizing a sample of 300 CAHs that showed that the breadth of surgical services at CAHs was positively correlated with total margin, albeit without statistical significance [19]. Operating margin was not included as an outcome variable in that previous work, which led the authors to hypothesize that a model utilizing operating margin may yield more robust and realistic results than one utilizing total margin considering the abundance of factors unrelated to surgery that influence hospital total margin. The current study aims to assess the relationship between operating margin and the number of different surgical services offered at CAHs. Knowing the effect of surgery on CAH profitability can help these hospitals make well-informed decisions regarding future directions.
Methods
Data
The study design was a cross-sectional secondary data analysis that obtained data from the American Hospital Directory (AHD), a private company that publishes information on over 7,000 hospitals nationwide within an online database. Primary data was originally reported by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as publicly available Medicare Cost Reports and Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) files from financial years 2020 and 2021. Cost reports yield annual financial data from Medicare-certified providers. MEDPAR files contain information on specific inpatient service categories (e.g., surgical specialties offered per hospital) as well as Medicare case mix index (CMI) data. The study utilized information on hospital system affiliation that the AHD obtained through proprietary in-house methods that were not provided by Medicare Cost Reports.
All 1354 CAHs (as of July 2021) were initially included in data collection. Only the most recent fiscal year (FY) per hospital was utilized for analysis. The earliest FY utilized spanned from May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020, and the latest FY utilized spanned from March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. The final data set therefore represented the period of May 1, 2019 to February 28, 2021. Hospitals were excluded if they had incomplete cost report data. The final data set included 1299 CAHs. The data utilized for this report did not meet the regulatory definition of human subjects research; therefore, institutional review board (IRB) approval was deferred by the REDACTED College of Osteopathic Medicine IRB Board.
Outcome measures
Many factors contribute to a hospital’s overall financial performance [20]. Pink et al. [21] presents a framework specific to CAHs that includes six dimensions of financial performance: profitability, liquidity, capital structure, revenue, cost, and utilization Profitability is measured by ratios that reflect profit relative to costs. Operating margin is the most frequently utilized measure of profitability in the hospital finance literature [20]. Operating margin is measured as operating revenue minus operating expense, divided by operating revenue and multiplied by 100. Because of surgery’s direct contribution to internal operations, and because surgery does not contribute to external operations, operating margin was chosen as the preferred measure of the effect of surgery on overall hospital finances. The use of operating margin rather than net margin also disregards potentially confounding factors such as hospital debt, taxes, and capital structures.
We did not perform regression analysis on operating cost and operating revenue because these two values are subsumed within the calculation of operating margin. The regression model accounted for the financial dimension of utilization by including occupancy rate as a covariate. The dimensions of liquidity and capital structure were not represented in the model. Descriptive statistics were reported for net income, total margin, and net patient revenue, but these financial indicators were not included in linear regression.
Regression model
The dependent variable was operating margin, and the independent variable was the number of surgical services offered per CAH. As defined by the American College of Surgeons, surgical specialties include: cardiothoracic surgery, colon and rectal surgery, general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, gynecologic oncology, neurological surgery, ophthalmic surgery, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthopedic surgery, otorhinolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic and maxillofacial surgery, urology, and vascular surgery [22].
Covariates included system affiliation (yes or no), ownership (public, private, or nonprofit), occupancy rate, CMI, and geographic region. Occupancy rate was calculated as inpatient days divided by available beds multiplied by 365, then multiplied again by 100 to generate a percentile. CMI is the one-year average of a hospital’s diagnosis-related group (DRG) weights and reflects the general cost and complexity of the Medicare and Medicaid cases that each hospital sees over the course of one year. Membership in a parent system, occupancy rate, and CMI have all shown positive correlations with CAH hospital operating margin [20, 23]. Operating as a “for-profit” hospital is associated with increased operating margins compared to “nonprofit” hospitals; additionally, both for-profit and nonprofit hospitals show higher operating margins than public, governmental hospitals [20]. Finally, each CAH was assigned a geographic region of the United States (Northeast, South, West, or Midwest) as per regions defined by the U.S. Census Bureau [24]. CAH closures occur more frequently in the South, and prior work suggests that the regional location in the South has a negative influence on CAH profitability [15, 19, 25].
Statistics
GraphPad Prism 9.2 software was utilized to perform least-squares multiple linear regression analysis utilizing the outcome variable and the different regressors. Goodness of fit was estimated with R2. Standard errors, 95% confidence intervals, and p values were calculated for the intercept and for each regressor. A p value ≤ 0.05 was set as the significance threshold. For categorical variables with multiple degrees of freedom, a reference level was chosen based on the most prevalent categorical variable within each class. For example, when calculating parameter estimates based on geographic region, the Midwest (the most prevalent region) was set as the reference level and other regions were compared to the Midwest. Reference variables did not participate in the regression equation and did not receive parameter estimates. A Pearson correlation test was utilized to obtain correlation coefficients (r) for all continuous variables included in multiple regression. Multicollinearity testing was performed to obtain an R2 for each independent variable.
Results
Out of 1299 CAHs, 838 (65%) offered at least one surgical service and 461 (35%) did not offer surgery (Table 1). CAHs with surgery showed increased net incomes, net patient revenues, and operating margins compared to nonsurgical CAHs. The total margins were lower in surgical CAHs compared to nonsurgical CAHs; however, the total margins were highest among CAHs offering two surgical services. Both the occupancy rate and CMI increased in proportion to the number of surgical services offered. Among 838 CAHs with at least one surgical specialty, 788 (94%) provided urology while 336 (40%) provided orthopedic surgery and 213 (25%) provided general surgery. Of the 498 CAHs with only one surgical specialty, 453 (91%) provided urology, 40 (8%) provided orthopedic surgery, and 5 (1%) provided general surgery. Only nine CAHs offered either cardiovascular surgery, vascular surgery, or surgery for malignancy.
Descriptive statistics.
Variable | All CAHs (n=1,299) | CAHs without surgical services (n=461) | CAHs with surgical services (n=838) | CAHs with 1 surgical service (n=496) | CAHs with 2 surgical services (n=185) | CAHs with 3+ surgical services (n=157) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income ($) | 1,911,858 | 1,018,815 | 2,454,179 | 1,546,951 | 3,362,641 | 4,391,639 |
Total margin | 2.5% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 2.2% | 3.0% | 2.6% |
Net patient revenue ($) | 29,932,677 | 15,702,686 | 38,433,260 | 27,484,781 | 40,458,029 | 70,636,212 |
Operating margin | −14.8% | −18.0% | −12.1% | −15.1% | −8.6% | −6.6% |
Occupancy rate | 27.3% | 23.1% | 29.8% | 26.8% | 31.5% | 37.3% |
Case mix index | 1.10 | 1.02 | 1.15 | 1.06 | 1.21 | 1.35 |
Ownership | ||||||
Public | 524 (40.3%) | 215 (46.6%) | 309 (36.9%) | 205 (41.4%) | 60 (32.4%) | 44 (28.0%) |
For-profit | 63 (4.8%) | 24 (5.2%) | 39 (4.6%) | 29 (5.8%) | 9 (4.9%) | 1 (0.7%) |
Nonprofit | 712 (54.8%) | 222 (48.1%) | 490 (58.5%) | 262 (52.8%) | 116 (62.7%) | 112 (71.3%) |
System affiliation | ||||||
Yes | 481 (37.0%) | 157 (34.1%) | 324 (38.7%) | 185 (37.3%) | 75 (40.5%) | 64 (40.8%) |
No | 818 (63.0%) | 304 (65.9%) | 514 (61.3%) | 311 (62.7%) | 110 (59.5%) | 93 (59.2%) |
Region | ||||||
South | 346 (26.6%) | 124 (26.9%) | 222 (26.5%) | 181 (36.5%) | 29 (15.7%) | 12 (7.6%) |
Midwest | 612 (47.1%) | 215 (46.6%) | 397 (47.4%) | 229 (46.2%) | 108 (58.4%) | 60 (38.2%) |
West | 269 (20.7%) | 106 (23.0%) | 163 (19.4%) | 65 (13.1%) | 35 (18.9%) | 63 (40.1%) |
Northeast | 72 (5.5%) | 16 (3.5%) | 56 (6.7%) | 21 (4.2%) | 13 (7.0%) | 22 (14.0%) |
-
Descriptive data is presented for a sample of 1299 CAHs. CAH, Critical Access Hospital.
Multiple linear regression (Table 2) showed that each additional surgical service corresponded to a 1.47% increase in operating margin (p=0.0413). The coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.1787. The operating margin was positively correlated with the occupancy rate and CMI, and these findings coincided with the literature [20, 23]. Most covariates showed statistical significance with the exceptions being location in the West compared to Midwest and for-profit ownership compared to nonprofit. Locations in the South and in the Northeast were significantly and negatively associated with lower operating margins compared to location in the Midwest.
Multiple linear regression of CAH operating margin.
Parameter | Parameter estimate | Standard error | p |
---|---|---|---|
Intercept | −22.92 | 4.195 | < 0.0001* |
Number of surgical services | 1.477 | 0.723 | 0.0413* |
Region (NE vs. MW) | −9.786 | 2.614 | 0.0002* |
Region (S vs. MW) | −12.20 | 1.439 | < 0.0001* |
Region (W vs. MW) | −2.163 | 1.531 | 0.1578 |
Occupancy rate | 8.929 | 3.019 | 0.0032* |
Case mix index | 9.440 | 3.971 | 0.0176* |
System affiliation | 6.252 | 1.324 | <0.0001* |
Ownership (public vs. nonprofit) | −8.849 | 1.344 | <0.0001* |
Ownership (profit vs. nonprofit) | −3.708 | 2.7 | 0.1811 |
-
Parameter estimates, standard errors, and p values are presented for each of the variables utilized in multiple linear regression. The model returned an R2 of 0.1787. CAH, Critical Access Hospital.
Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for continuous parameters (Table 3). The number of surgical services offered showed positive correlations with operating margin (r=0.23, p<0.0001) and CMI (r=0.59, p<0.0001). Occupancy rate and CMI were weakly and positively correlated with one another (r=0.10, p<0.001). No significant multicollinearity was observed (Table 4), because testing showed independent variables had R2 values between 0.0922 (occupancy rate) and 0.3931 (number of surgical services offered).
Pearson’s correlation test results for continuous variables.
Variable | Operating margin | Number of surgical services | Occupancy rate | Case mix index |
---|---|---|---|---|
Operating margin | – | – | – | – |
Number of surgical services | 0.18** | – | – | – |
Occupancy rate | 0.09* | 0.23** | – | – |
Case mix index | 0.21** | 0.59** | 0.10* | – |
-
Correlation coefficients (r) for a Pearson’s correlation test are shown for all continuous variables included in multiple linear regression. *p<0.001. **p<0.0001.
Multicollinearity of variables.
Variable | R2 with other variables |
---|---|
Number of surgical services | 0.3931 |
Region (Northeast vs. Midwest) | 0.1043 |
Region (South vs. Midwest) | 0.2067 |
Region (West vs. Midwest) | 0.1673 |
Occupancy rate | 0.0922 |
Case mix index | 0.3862 |
System affiliation | 0.2155 |
Ownership (public vs. nonprofit) | 0.2622 |
Ownership (for-profit vs. nonprofit) | 0.1091 |
-
The obtained R2 values represent the percentage of the variance per variable that can be predicted from other variables included in the regression model.
Discussion
Interpretation of results
We obtained a correlation of determination (R2) of 0.18 which suggests that 18% of the variance among hospital operating margins is explained by the regressors included in our model. Although there is no standardized means of interpreting R2, Cohen categorizes an R2 of <0.2 as representing a small effect size [26]. Our result is not dissimilar to R2 values obtained in prior hospital research involving multiple linear regression utilizing operating margin as a dependent variable; such studies tend to involve R2 values from 0.2 to 0.4 [27], [28], [29].
Parameter estimates, also known as beta weights, reflect the contributions of different regressors toward a dependent variable within a multiple linear regression equation while other variables are kept constant. In our model, the parameter estimates reflect the degree of increase in operating margin given a 1-unit increase in any of the regressors. In some cases, such as when hospitals are affiliated with a parent system, this is a binary difference. Considering the number of surgical services, each additional service produced an additional 1.5% increase in operating margin. Occupancy rate was formatted into the model as a percentage, therefore the obtained parameter estimate for occupancy rate reflected an additional 8.9% operating margin per 100% increase in occupancy rate—in more realistic terms, each 10% increase in occupancy rate was correlated with a 0.89% increase in operating margin. Similar manipulation was involved in the interpretation of CMI within the model: each 1-point increase in CMI corresponded to a 9.4% increase in operating margin and therefore each 0.1-point increase in CMI reflected a 0.9% increase in operating margin.
The moderate correlation between surgical services and CMI (r=0.59, p<0.0001) suggests that the presence of surgical services may provide a secondary, indirect effect on CAH profitability. CMI is calculated exclusively utilizing Medicare and Medicaid discharges. Theoretically, in prospective payment models, CMI should not affect operating margin because reimbursements should be proportionate to costs [20]. However, CAHs receive cost-based Medicare reimbursement at a 101% rate and therefore have a greater incentive to take on a high CMI compared to prospectively paid hospitals. Surgical services involve high DRG weights, which seem to help CAHs maximize cost-based Medicare reimbursements.
Occupancy rate was positively correlated with the number of surgical services provided (r=0.23, p<0.0001). Nonsurgical CAHs showed a mean occupancy rate of 23.09 compared to 29.79 at surgical CAHs. CAHs providing two or three surgical services showed occupancy rates of 31.37 and 37.47, respectively. This trend is not well explained by variations in total beds because CAHs are limited to a 25-bed maximum. The data suggest that surgical services help CAHs boost patient volume, and the interaction between surgical services and occupancy rate helps to explain the effects of both variables on operating margin. The effect of occupancy rate on operating margin, as delineated by Oner et al. [20], is attributable to economies of scale, as higher patient volumes lead to lower per-patient fixed operating costs.
Commentary
This study had two important findings reflecting the value of surgical services provided to CAHs. First, the study found that the presence of surgical services was associated with increases in operating margin proportionate to the number of different services provided. Second, the presence of surgical services was positively correlated with occupancy rate and CMI, both of which were independently associated with increases in operating margin. The reported associations of the selected covariates with operating margin also add to the CAH literature.
Low profitability is a predictor of hospital conversion and closure [30, 31]. Generally, rural hospital closures reduce local access to healthcare, and especially to emergency care [32]. Beyond medicine, hospital closures in rural communities can have broad economic impacts, because hospitals are large employers. Closures of sole community hospitals are correlated with reduced local per capita incomes and increased local unemployment rates [33]. The economic impact of CAH closures is observable at the county-wide level [34]. The results of this study suggest that the provision of surgical services can help increase hospital profitability and mitigate potential closures.
However, many CAHs face difficulties recruiting surgeons, and projections indicate that shortages of rural surgeons are likely to continue growing larger [7], [8], [9], [10, 35]. This is problematic for the financial health of hospitals facing surgical recruitment problems because the operating room is a key driver of rural hospital profitability [18]. The question remains: what can be done to address the widespread demand for rural surgeons?
Many osteopathic medical schools have a stated mission to train students who will go on to care for rural and underserved populations, based on an understanding that medical students from rural communities are more likely to practice in rural communities [36, 37]. Osteopathic physicians are overrepresented in the rural workforce compared to the overall workforce [38, 39]. Additionally, osteopathic surgical subspecialists are significantly more likely to practice in rural areas than their rural counterparts [40, 41]. As of 2012, osteopathic physicians comprised 4.9% of the total primary care physician (PCP) workforce yet accounted for 10.4% of the rural PCP workforce [39]. The state of rural primary care is symbiotic with the state of the hospitals that provide acute care to such areas, many of which are CAHs. The continued expansion of osteopathic undergraduate medical education is vital to supplying physicians, including surgeons, to rural populations whose healthcare needs remain unmet.
Student loan repayment poses another salient means of addressing rural surgeon shortages. Approximately 40% of rural hospitals offer some form of educational loan forgiveness in the hope of recruiting general surgeons [8]. Average tuition costs for first-year medical students at private medical schools have risen 22% from 2013 to 2021, outpacing the inflation of the US dollar (14%) across the same time frame [42, 43]. The National Health Service Corps (NHSC) provides a government-funded loan repayment program that extends financial assistance to medical professionals who choose to practice medicine in “communities of need” upon graduation [44]. For physicians, eligibility for NHSC loan repayment is contingent upon practicing in one of five primary care specialties: family medicine, general internal medicine, general pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, or geriatrics. The expansion of NHSC scholarship eligibility to include general surgery would represent a large stride toward assisting rural hospitals in recruiting surgeons considering the degree of need. This move would not be unprecedented, because the American College of Surgeons recognizes obstetrics and gynecology as a surgical specialty.
Study strengths and limitations
The regression model’s effect size was small (R2=0.18) and similar to the R2 values obtained in prior hospital research utilizing multiple linear regression with operating margin as an outcome variable [27], [28], [29]. The generalizability of the results to CAHs is strong, because nearly all CAHs contributed to the analysis. Furthermore, we observed that occupancy rate, CMI, system affiliation, and geographic region exerted effects on CAH operating margin that were consistent with the current literature surrounding these variables [20, 22, 24]. However, the present study is limited in a few ways. First, the analysis is cross-sectional and can only suggest—not measure—causal relationships. Second, the sample window reflects only one year. The overlap between the study window and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic presents a significant obstacle to generalizability, because the findings from this study were derived from a mix of prepandemic and pandemic financial data. A prospective follow-up of this study combining financial data across many years would provide a more accurate depiction of the nature of the relationship between surgical breadth and operating margin at CAHs. Inpatient surgical volume uniformly decreased during certain times of the study window due to institutional moratoriums on many elective surgical procedures; despite this nationwide drop in surgical volume, a positive correlation between surgical breadth and operating margin was still observed [45]. Finally, there were many potential covariates which were not included in the multiple regression model. These include market characteristics such as the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index and wage index, as well as hospital characteristics such as average length of stay and percent revenue from Medicare.
Conclusions
The diversity of surgical specialties provided at CAHs is correlated with increases in operating margin. Furthermore, the provision of surgery at CAHs is correlated with higher patient volumes and more complex cases, and we observed that occupancy rate and CMI were both significantly and positively correlated with operating margin. The results of this study can help executives, stakeholders, and policymakers understand the financial value of surgical services at CAHs.
-
Research funding: None reported.
-
Author contributions: All authors provided substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; W.H. and R.Z. drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content; all authors gave final approval of the version of the article to be published; and all authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigate and resolved.
-
Competing interests: None reported.
References
1. Balanced Budget Act of 1997, P.L. 105-33, 105th Congress, 1st Sess; 1997.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Gruber, K, Soliman, AS, Schmid, K, Rettig, B, Ryan, J, Watanabe-Galloway, S. Disparities in the utilization of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in rural Nebraska: a call for placement and training of rural general surgeons. J Rural Health 2015;31:392–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/JRH.12120.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Torain, MJ, Maragh-Bass, AC, Dankwa-Mullen, I, Hisam, B, Kodadek, LM, Lilley, EJ, et al.. Surgical disparities: a comprehensive review and new conceptual framework. J Am Coll Surg 2016;223:408–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2016.04.047.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Khubchandani, JA, Shen, C, Ayturk, D, Kiefe, CI, Santry, HP. Disparities in access to emergency general surgery care in the United States. Surgery 2018;163:243. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURG.2017.07.026.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Wallace, AE, Young-Xu, Y, Hartley, D, Weeks, WB. Racial, socioeconomic, and rural-urban disparities in obesity-related bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2010;20:1354–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-0054-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Weinhold, I, Gurtner, S. Understanding shortages of sufficient health care in rural areas. Health Pol 2014;118:201–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2014.07.018.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Puls, MW. Shortage of rural surgeons: how bad is it? Bull Am Coll Surg 2018;103:52–5.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Satiani, B, Williams, TE, Ellison, EC. A comparison of future recruitment needs in urban and rural hospitals: the rural imperative. Surgery 2011;140:617–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.047.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Doty, B, Zuckerman, R, Finlayson, S, Jenkins, P, Rieb, N, Heneghan, S. General surgery at rural hospitals: a national survey of rural hospital administrators. Surgery 2008;143:599–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.11.022.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Shelton, J, MacDowell, M. The aging general surgeon of rural America. J Rural Health 2021;37:762–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/JRH.12577.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Rural hospital closures since January 2005. Cecil G. Sheps center for health services research, University of North Carolina. Available at: www.shepscenter.unc.edu/programs-projects/rural-health/rural-hospital-closures/ Published November 16, 2021. [Accessed Dec 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
12. Francis, ML, Scaife, SL, Zahnd, WE. Rural-urban differences in surgical procedures for medicare beneficiaries. Arch Surg 2011;146:579–83. https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHSURG.2010.306.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Finlayson, S, Birkmeyer, J, Tosteson, A, Nease, R. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care 1999;37:204–9.https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199902000-00010.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Natafgi, N, Baloh, J, Weigel, P, Ullrich, F, Ward, MM. Surgical patient safety outcomes in critical access hospitals: how do they compare? J Rural Health 2017;33:117–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/JRH.12176.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Gadzinski, AJ, Dimick, JB, Ye, Z, Miller, DC. Utilization and outcomes of inpatient surgical care at critical access hospitals in the United States. JAMA Surg 2013;148:589. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMASURG.2013.1224.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
16. Ibrahim, AM, Hughes, TG, Thumma, JR, Dimick, JB. Association of hospital critical access status with surgical outcomes and expenditures among medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 2016;315:2095–103. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2016.5618.Suche in Google Scholar
17. McDermott, KW, Liang, L. Overview of operating room procedures during inpatient stays in U.S. Hospitals, 2018: statistical Brief #281. Healthc Cost Util Proj Stat Briefs. Published online March 27, 2018. PMID: 29578672. Available at: http://europepmc.org/books/NBK574416 [Accessed 17 Sep 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
18. Karim, SA, Holmes, GM, Pink, GH. The effect of surgery on the profitability of rural hospitals. J Health Care Finance 2015;41:1–16.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Hoskins, NN, Cunicelli, MA, Hopper, W, Zeller, R, Cheng, N, Lindsey, T. The value surgical services bring to critical access hospitals. Cureus 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14367.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Oner, N, Zengul, F, Ozaydin, B, Pallotta, R, Weech-Maldonado, R. Organizational and environmental factors associated with hospital financial performance: a systematic review. J Health Care Finance 2016;43:14–37.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Pink, GH, Holmes, GM, D’Alpe, C, Strunk, LA, McGee, P, Slifkin, RT. Financial indicators for critical access hospitals. J Rural Health 2006;22:229–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1748-0361.2006.00037.X.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
22. American College of Surgeons. What are the surgical specialties? Available at: https://www.facs.org/education/resources/medical-students/faq/specialties Published 2021. [Accessed Sep 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
23. Rosko, M, Goddard, J, Al-Amin, M, Tavakoli, M. Predictors of hospital profitability: a panel study including the early years of the ACA. J Health Care Finance 2018;44.Suche in Google Scholar
24. U.S. Census Bureau. Census regions and divisions of the United States. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf Published October 2021. [Accessed Dec 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
25. Pink, GH, Freeman, V, Randolph, R, Holmes, GM. Geographic variation in the profitability of critical access hospitals. Available at: https://www.shepscenter.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Geographic-Variation-in-the-Profitability-of-CAHs-Findings-Brief-Final_Sept-2013.pdf Published 2013. [Accessed Nov 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
26. Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Routledge; 2013.10.4324/9780203771587Suche in Google Scholar
27. Tennyson, DH, Fottler, MD. Does system membership enhance financial performance in hospitals? MCR&R 2000;57:29–50.https://doi.org/10.1177/107755870005700103.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Schneider, JE, Ohsfeldt, RL, Morrisey, MA, Li, P, Miller, TR, Zelner, BA. Effects of specialty hospitals on the financial performance of general hospitals, 1997–2004. Inquiry 2007;44:321–34.https://doi.org/10.5034/inquiryjrnl_44.3.321.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Lee, Y, Rhee, H, Choi, M. Factors affecting the profitability of private hospitals in Korea. Korea J Hosp Manag 2004;9:22–45.Suche in Google Scholar
30. Kaufman, BG, Thomas, SR, Randolph, RK, Perry, JR, Thompson, KW, Holmes, GM, et al.. The rising rate of rural hospital closures. J Rural Health 2016;32:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/JRH.12128.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Ly, DP, Jha, AK, Epstein, AM. The association between hospital margins, quality of care, and closure or other change in operating status. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11606-011-1815-5.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Miller, KEM, James, HJ, Holmes, GM, Van Houtven, CH. The effect of rural hospital closures on emergency medical service response and transport times. Health Serv Res 2020;55:288–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13254.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
33. Holmes, GM, Slifkin, RT, Randolph, RK, Poley, S. The effect of rural hospital closures on community economic health. Health Serv Res 2006;41:467–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-6773.2005.00497.X.Suche in Google Scholar
34. Ona, L, Davis, A. Economic impact of the critical access hospital program on Kentucky’s communities. J Rural Health 2011;27:21–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1748-0361.2010.00312.X.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
35. Khubchandani, JA, Shen, C, Ayturk, D, Kiefe, CI, Santry, HP. Disparities in access to emergency general surgery care in the United States. Surgery 2018;163:243. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURG.2017.07.026.Suche in Google Scholar
36. Hyer, JL, Bazemore, AW, Bowman, RC, Zhang, X, Petterson, S, Phillips, RL. Rural origins and choosing family medicine predict future rural practice. Am Fam Physician 2007;76:207.Suche in Google Scholar
37. Shannon, CK, Jackson, J. Validity of medical student questionnaire data in prediction of rural practice choice and its association with service orientation. J Rural Health 2015;31:373–81.https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12123.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
38. Fordyce, MA, Chen, FM, Doescher, MP, Hart, LG. Physician supply and distribution in rural areas of the United States: final report #116; 2005. Available at: https://depts.washington.edu/uwrhrc/uploads/RHRC%20FR116%20Fordyce.pdf Published November 2007. [Accessed February 2022].Suche in Google Scholar
39. Fordyce, MA, Doescher, MP, Chen, FM, Hart, LG. Osteopathic physicians and international medical graduates in the rural primary care physician workforce. Fam Med 2012;44:396–403.Suche in Google Scholar
40. Griffith, S, Power, A, Strand, M. Pennsylvania otolaryngologists as a model for the implications of practice location of osteopathic vs allopathic surgical subspecialists. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2017;117:553–7. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2017.109.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
41. Ahmed, H, Price, MJ, Robbins, W, Braich, PS. Practice locations of Michigan ophthalmologists as a model to compare practice patterns of DO and MD surgical subspecialists. J Osteopath Med 2020;120:568–74. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2020.090.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
42. American Association of Medical Colleges. Tuition and student fees report; 2013–2022. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/reporting-tools/report/tuition-and-student-fees-reports Published 2021. [Accessed Dec 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
43. U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics. Consumer price index inflation calculator. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm Published 2021. [Accessed Dec 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
44. National Health Service Corps. Loan repayment program fiscal year 2022 application & guidance. Available at: https://nhsc.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/nhsc/loan-repayment/lrp-application-guidance.pdf Published November 2021. [Accessed Dec 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
45. Prasad, NK, Englum, BR, Turner, DJ, Lake, R, Siddiqui, T, Mayorga-Carlin, M, et al.. A nation-wide review of elective surgery and COVID-surge capacity. J Surg Res 2021;267:211–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.028.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2022 Wade Hopper et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Behavioral Health
- Commentary
- Overcoming reward deficiency syndrome by the induction of “dopamine homeostasis” instead of opioids for addiction: illusion or reality?
- General
- Original Article
- The association between operating margin and surgical diversity at Critical Access Hospitals
- Medical Education
- Brief Report
- Reported completion of the USMLE Step 1 and match outcomes among senior osteopathic students in 2020
- Commentary
- Addressing disparities in medicine through medical curriculum change: a student perspective
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Original Article
- Cervical cancer screening among women with comorbidities: a cross-sectional examination of disparities from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
- Public Health and Primary Care
- Review Article
- Review of medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder
- Clinical Image
- Idiopathic linear IgA bullous dermatosis with mucosal involvement
- Letters to the Editor
- Standardization of osteopathic manipulative treatment in telehealth settings to maximize patient outcomes and minimize adverse effects
- Response to “Standardization of osteopathic manipulative treatment in telehealth settings to maximize patient outcomes and minimize adverse effects”
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Behavioral Health
- Commentary
- Overcoming reward deficiency syndrome by the induction of “dopamine homeostasis” instead of opioids for addiction: illusion or reality?
- General
- Original Article
- The association between operating margin and surgical diversity at Critical Access Hospitals
- Medical Education
- Brief Report
- Reported completion of the USMLE Step 1 and match outcomes among senior osteopathic students in 2020
- Commentary
- Addressing disparities in medicine through medical curriculum change: a student perspective
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Original Article
- Cervical cancer screening among women with comorbidities: a cross-sectional examination of disparities from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
- Public Health and Primary Care
- Review Article
- Review of medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder
- Clinical Image
- Idiopathic linear IgA bullous dermatosis with mucosal involvement
- Letters to the Editor
- Standardization of osteopathic manipulative treatment in telehealth settings to maximize patient outcomes and minimize adverse effects
- Response to “Standardization of osteopathic manipulative treatment in telehealth settings to maximize patient outcomes and minimize adverse effects”