Deposing deponency: Latin non-denominal deponents are not grammatically idiosyncratic verbs

References

Acedo-Matellán, Victor. 2010. Argument structure and the syntax–morphology interface. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Acedo-Matellán, Victor & Jaume Mateu. 2012. The manner/result complementarity revisited: A syntactic approach. In M. C. Cuervo & Y. Roberge (eds.), The end of argument structure? Vol. 38, 209–238. Bingley: Emerald.10.1108/S0092-4563(2012)0000038011Suche in Google Scholar

Acedo-Matellán, Victor & Jaume Mateu. 2013. Satellite framed Latin vs. verb framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus 25. 227–265.10.1515/probus-2013-0008Suche in Google Scholar

Acedo-Matellán, Victor & Cristina Real-Puigdollers 2015. Location and locatum verbs revisited: Evidence from aspect and quantification. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 62. 111–140.10.1556/064.2015.62.2.1Suche in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. Roots don’t take complements. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3/4). 287–297.10.1515/tl-2014-0012Suche in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulu. 2004. Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative alternation: Evidence for a non-unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 114–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis, Giorgos Spathas & Schäfer. Florian 2015. Middle Voice and reflexive interpretations, afto-prefixation in Greek. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33. 1293–1350.10.1007/s11049-014-9279-zSuche in Google Scholar

Bertocci, Davide. 2009. Nasal present and weak causativity: Evidence from Sanskrit and Latin. In Kateřina Ludová & Marie Žáková (eds.), Early European languages in the eyes of modern linguistics, 37–46. Brno: Masaryk University.Suche in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Structuring sense, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Suche in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 1999. Late pleonastic reflexives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Transactions of the Philological Society 97(1). 103–150.10.1111/1467-968X.00046Suche in Google Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 2009. Argument structure and alignment variations and changes in Late Latin. In Jóhanna Barđdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah (eds.), The role of semantic, pragmatic, and discourse factors in the development of case, 307–346. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.108.17cenSuche in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. On si constructions and the theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4). 521–581.Suche in Google Scholar

Claflin, Edith Frances. 1927. The nature of the Latin passive in the light of recent discoveries. The American Journal of Philology 48(2). 157–175.10.2307/290570Suche in Google Scholar

Cuervo, María Cristina. 2014. Alternating unaccusatives and the distribution of roots. Lingua 141. 48–70.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

Cuervo, María Cristina. 2015. Causation without a cause. Syntax 18(4). 388–424.10.1111/synt.12115Suche in Google Scholar

D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2007. Impersonal si constructions. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207514Suche in Google Scholar

De Vaan, Michiel. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1998. Impersonal se constructions in Romance and the passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29(3). 399–437.10.1162/002438998553806Suche in Google Scholar

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2006. The SE-anaphor and its role in argument realization. In M. Everaert & H. Van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 4, 118–179. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch56Suche in Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021Suche in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2000. Features syntax and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 185–230.10.1162/002438900554343Suche in Google Scholar

Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les Verbs Déponents Latins, des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Suche in Google Scholar

Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2005. Flavors of v. In Paula Kempchinsky & Slabakova Roumyana (eds.), Aspectual Inquiries, 95–120. The Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3033-9_5Suche in Google Scholar

Gianollo, Chiara. 2010. I verbi deponenti latini e l’unità della flessione in -r. Incontri triestini di filologia classica 8. 23–49.Suche in Google Scholar

Gianollo, Chiara. 2014. Labile verbs in Late Latin. Linguistics 52(4). 945–1002.10.1515/ling-2014-0013Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2009. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Monika Rathert & Anastasia Giannadikou (eds.), Quantification, definiteness and nominalization, 320–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2010. A minimalist approach to argument structure. In C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, 426–447. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0019Suche in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2014a. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3/4). 225–276.10.1515/tl-2014-0010Suche in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2014b. Reply to commentaries “On the identity of roots”. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3/4). 447–474.10.1515/tl-2014-0024Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSuche in Google Scholar

Haugen, Jason. 2008. Morphology at the interfaces. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.117Suche in Google Scholar

Haverling, Gerd. 2000. On -sco verbs, prefixes and semantic functions, a study in the development of prefixed and unprefixed verbs from early to late Latin. In Karin Hult & Gunhilt Vidén (eds.), Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia LXIV. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1981. Binding, quantifiers, clitics, and control. In Frank Heny (ed.), Bindings and filtering, 191–211. London: Croom Helm.Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1989. Null subject and clitic climbing. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 239–261. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_8Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4). 647–686.Suche in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelica. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck et al. (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Suche in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard Kurth. 2010. On Pylkkänen’s semantics for low applicatives. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 701–704.10.1162/LING_a_00020Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport-Hovav 1995. Unaccusativity at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610479Suche in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2005. Objects out of the lexicon! Argument-structure in the syntax. http://web.mit.edu/marantz/Public/UConn/UConnHOApr05.pdf (accessed 11 January 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2013. Verbal argument structure – Events and participants. Lingua 130. 152–168.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012Suche in Google Scholar

Lavidas, Nikolaos & Dimitra Papangeli. 2007. Deponency in the diachrony of Greek. In Matthew Baerman et al. (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches, 97–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5871/bacad/9780197264102.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

OLD. 2012. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pescarini, Diego. 2015. Le costruzioni con si, italiani, dialetti e lingue romanze. Roma: Carocci.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinzin, Francesco. 2015. VoiceP deactivation and deponency in Latin. Annali di Ca’ Foscari Serie Occidentale 49. 423–452.Suche in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon, a first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486319Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti)-causatives, external arguments in change of state contexts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.126Suche in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Florian. 2017. Romance and Greek medio-passives and the typology of Voice. In & Roberta D’Alessandro, Franco, Irene & Ángel Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 129–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Sportiche, Dominique. 2014. Assessing unaccusativity and reflexivity, using focus alternatives to decide what gets which theta role. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2). 305–321.10.1162/LING_a_00156Suche in Google Scholar

Tichy, Eva. 2002. Gr. οἴ σειν, Lat. ūtī. Glotta 78. 179–202.Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, Jim & Alec Marantz . 2017. The interpretation of external arguments. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Franco, Irene & Ángel Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0011Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Zheng, Mark Aronoff & Frank Anshen. 2007. Deponency in Latin. In Matthew Baerman et al. (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches, 127–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5871/bacad/9780197264102.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Zombolou, Katerina & Artemis Alexiadou. 2013. The canonical function of deponent verbs in Modern Greek. In Wolfgang U. Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Morphology and meaning, selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, 331–344. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.327.23zomSuche in Google Scholar

Zombolou, Katerina & Artemis Alexiadou. 2014. Deponents in Greek: Losing and creating active voice counterparts. Paper presented at the workshop “Voice Systems in Diachrony: A Comparative Perspective”, Pavia, 11 September.Suche in Google Scholar