Quintilian on “grammatical homonymy”: The linguistic sensibility of a Roman lawyer

References

Atherton, C. 1993. The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aussant, E. 2014. Sanskrit theories on homonymy and polysemy. Bulletin d’Études Indiennes 32. 13–36.Search in Google Scholar

Ax, W. 1996. Pragmatic arguments in morphology: Varro’s defense of analogy in book 9 of his De lingua Latina. In P. Swiggers & A. Wouters (eds.), Ancient grammar: Content and context, 105–119. Louvain: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Ax, W. 2011a. Quintilian’s “Grammar” (Inst. 1.4–8) and its importance for the history of Roman grammar. In S. Matthaios, F. Montanari & A. Rengakos (eds.), Ancient scholarship and grammar: Archetypes, concepts and contexts, 331–346. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110254044.331Search in Google Scholar

Ax, W. 2011b. Quintilians Grammatik (‘Inst. orat’. 1,4–8). Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110254556Search in Google Scholar

Baratin, M. 1989. Les difficultés de l’analyse syntaxique. In S. Auroux (ed.), Histoire des idées linguistiques. Tome I: La naissance des métalangages en Orient et en Occident, 228–242. Liege & Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.Search in Google Scholar

Baratin, M., F. Biville, G. Bonnet, B. Colombat, A. Garcea, L. Holtz, et al. 2010. Priscien. Grammaire: Livre XVII – Syntaxe, 1. Paris: J. Vrin.10.1484/M.SA-EB.6.09070802050003050300070401Search in Google Scholar

Barwick, K. 1922. Remmius Palaemon und die römische ‘ars grammatica’. Leipzig: Dieterich.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, É. 1948. Don et échange dans le vocabulaire indo-européen. L’Année sociologique 3. 7–20.Search in Google Scholar

Biddau, F. 2008. Q. Terentii Scauri. De orthographia. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Hildesheim: Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar

Bortolusi, B. 2007. Phénomènes d’ambiguïté syntaxique dans la proposition infinitive. In C. Moussy & A. Orlandini (eds.), L’ambiguïté en Grèce et à Rome. Approche linguistique, 81–91. Paris: PUPS.Search in Google Scholar

Calboli, G. 1972. La linguistica moderna e il latino: I casi. Bologna: Patron.Search in Google Scholar

Carstairs, A. D. 1987. Allomorphy in inflexion. London & New York: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. 1953. Grammaire homérique. Tome II: Syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Christol, A. 2007. Homonymie et morphology. In A. Blanc & A. Christol (eds.), L’homonymie dans les lexiques latin et grec, 63–79. Nancy: A.D.R.A.Search in Google Scholar

Colson, F. H. 1924. Marcus Fabius Quintilianus. Institutionis oratoriae liber I. Edited with introduction and commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cousin, J. 1975. Quintilien. Institution oratoire: Livre I. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, D. 1997. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics, 6th edn. Blackwell: Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Dahlmann, H. 2003 [1940]. Varro. De lingua Latina Buch VIII. Hildesheim: Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar

Del Castillo, M. 2007. De nuevo sobre los capítulos gramaticales de la Institutio oratoria de Quintiliano. Emerita 75. 69–92.10.3989/emerita.2007.v75.i1.33Search in Google Scholar

Desbordes, F. 1988. Homonymie et synonymie d’après les textes théoriques latins. In I. Rosier (ed.), L’ambiguïte. Cinq études historiques. Lille: Presses Universitaires.Search in Google Scholar

Desbordes, F. 2007 [1983]. Écriture et ambigüité d’après les textes théoriques latins. In G. Clerico, B. Colombat & J. Soubiran (eds.), Idées grecques et romaines sur le language: Travaux d’histoire et d’épistémologie, 259–281. Paris: ENS. (= Modéles linguistiques 10, 1983, 13–37).Search in Google Scholar

Desbordes, F. 2007 [1991]. L’impersonnel d’après les textes théoriques de l’Antiquité. In G. Clerico, B. Clombat & J. Soubiran (eds.), Idées grecques et romaines sur le langage: Travaux d’histoire et d’épistémologie, 251–258. Lyon: ENS. (= M. Maillard [ed.], L’impersonnel. Mécanismes linguistiques et fonctionnements littéraires, Grenoble, 1991, 11–18)Search in Google Scholar

Ernout, A. & A. Meillet. 1985. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: Histoire des mots, 4th edn revised by Jacques André. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Fehling, D. 1956–57. Varro und die grammatische Lehre von der Analogie und der Flexion. Glotta 35. 258–265.Search in Google Scholar

Flobert, P. 1975. Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Fruyt, M. 2007. L’homonymie en latin: La nature du phénomène et son rôle dans l’évolution linguistique. In A. Blanc & A. Christol (eds.), L’homonymie dans les lexiques latin et grec, 81–116. Nancy: A.D.R.A.Search in Google Scholar

Garcea, A. 2009. Substance et accidents dans la grammaire de Priscien. In M. Baratin, B. Colombat & L. Holtz (eds.), Priscien. Transmission et refondation de la grammaire de l’antiquité aux modernes, 125–138. Turnhout: Brépols.10.1484/M.SA-EB.3.1207Search in Google Scholar

Garcea, A. 2012. Caesar’s De analogia. Edition, translation, and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

García-Hernández, B. 2007. L’ambiguité dans les Verrines: Du verrat au sanglier. In C. Moussy & A. Orlandini (eds.), L’ambiguïté en Grèce et à Rome. Approche linguistique, 65–79. Paris: PUPS.Search in Google Scholar

García-Hernández, B. 2010. Entre homonimia y polisemia. La identificación del significante y la definición de los significados. Cuadernos del Instituto de Historia de la Lengua 5. 51–88.Search in Google Scholar

Heitsch, E. 1972. Die Entdeckung der Homonymie. Mainz & Wiesbaden: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur–Steiner.Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B. & A. Szantyr. 1972 [1965]. Lateinische Grammatik. Band 2. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Holst, H. 1925. Die Wortspiele in Ciceros Reden. Oslo: Some and co.Search in Google Scholar

Householder, F. W. 1981. The syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus, translated, and with commentary. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.23Search in Google Scholar

Hovdhaugen, E. 1987. Genera verborum quot sunt? Observations on the Roman grammatical tradition. In D. J. Taylor (ed.), The history of linguistics in the Classical Period, 133–147. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.46.08hovSearch in Google Scholar

Iso, J. J. 1975. El término ablatiuus en el ars grammatica latina. Cuadernos de Filología Clásica 9. 33–52.Search in Google Scholar

Kent, R. G. 1951. Varro. On the Latin language. Volume 2 (Books VIII–X; Fragments). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lallot, J. 1988. Origines et développement de la théorie des parties du discours en Grèce. Langages 23(92). 11–23.10.3406/lgge.1988.1996Search in Google Scholar

Lallot, J. 1997. Apollonius Dyscole. De la construction (syntaxe), 2 vols. Paris: J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Lallot, J. 2007. Ὁμώνυμος, homonymie en grec ancien: Quelques jalons. In A. Blanc & A. Christol (eds.), L’homonymie dans les lexiques latin et grec, 7–22. Nancy: A.D.R.A.Search in Google Scholar

Langslow, D. (ed.). 2009. Jacob Wackernagel. Lectures on syntax (with special reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic). Edited with notes and bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198153023.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lejeune, M. 1950. Sur le nom grec du ‘cas’ grammatical. Revue des études grecques 63. 1–7.10.3406/reg.1950.3194Search in Google Scholar

Lomanto, V. 2001. Nomi a confronto. Journal of Latin Linguistics 6. 165–190.10.1515/joll.2001.6.1.165Search in Google Scholar

López, M. 2003. Los nombres propios como factor de comicidad en Cicerón. In C. Alonso Del Real et al. (eds.), Vrbs aeterna. Actas y colaboraciones del coloquio internacional ‘Roma entre la literatura y la historia’. Homenaje a la profesora Carmen Castillo, 583–592. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Matthaios, S. 1999. Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs: Texte und Interpretation zur Wortartenlehre. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck und Ruprecht.10.13109/9783666252235Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, P. H. 1991. Morphology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166485Search in Google Scholar

Mignot, X. 1978. Homonymies entre les désinences casuelles du latin. Langages 12(50). 45–50.10.3406/lgge.1978.1946Search in Google Scholar

Milani, C. 2004. Il septimus e l’octavus casus nel pensiero dei grammatici latini. In G. Graffi (ed.), Fortuna e vicissitudini di concetti grammaticali. Atti del convegno, Verona, 22 novembre 2002, 9–43. Padova: Unipress.Search in Google Scholar

Moussy, C. 2007. Ambiguus, ambiguitas, anceps, utroqueuersus dans le vocabulaire de l’ambiguïté. In C. Moussy & A. Orlandini (eds.), L’ambiguïté en Grèce et à Rome. Approche linguistique, 57–64. Paris: PUPS.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Alonso, M. A. 2007. La categoría gramatical del número en el sustantivo latino. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo unpublished dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rosellini, M. 2001. L’ablativo singolare della terza declinazione secondo Cesare e Plinio in Carisio I xvii. RFIC 129. 192–209.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. 2001. Quintilian. The orator’s education. Books 1–2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schad, S. 2007. A lexicon of Latin grammatical terminology. Roma: Fabrizio Serra.Search in Google Scholar

Schenkeveld, D. M. 2004. A rhetorical grammar: C. Iulius Romanus introduction to the Liber de adverbio. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047412595Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, P. L. 2000. Grammaire. In K. Sallmann (ed.), Nouvelle histoire de la littérature latine. 4: L’âge de transition 117–284, 249–298. Turnhout: Brépols. French edition by François Heim (et al.).Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, O. 1843. Apollonii Dyscoli de synthesi et parathesi placita. Zeitschrift für Altertumswissenschaft 1. 641–654.Search in Google Scholar

Schreiner, M. 1954. Die grammatische Terminologie bei Quintilian. Diss. München.Search in Google Scholar

Serbat, G. 1994. Le “septimus casus” en latin: Un cas-fantôme? In J. De Clercq & P. Desmet (eds.), Florilegium historiographiae linguisticae: études d’historiographie de la linguistique et de grammaire comparée à la mémoire de Maurice Leroy, 159–172. Louvain: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Shields, C. 1999. Order in multiplicity: Homonymy in the philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siebenborn, E. 1976. Die Lehre von der Sprachrichtichkeit und ihren Kriterien. Studien zur antiken normativen Grammatik. Amsterdam: Grüner.Search in Google Scholar

Skrzecka, R. 1858. Die Lehre des Apollonius Dyscolus von den Redeteilen. Königsberg: Dalkowski.Search in Google Scholar

Sluiter, I. 1990. Ancient grammar in context. Amsterdam: VU University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Swiggers, P. & A. Wouters. 2007. On the origins of the participle as a part of speech. In D. A. Kibbee (ed.), History of linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the Tenth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHOLS X), 1–5 September 2005, Urbana–Champaign, Illinois, 50–66. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.112.05swiSearch in Google Scholar

Tarp, S. 2001. Lexicography and the linguistic concepts of homonymy and polysemy. Lexicographica 17. 22–39.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, D. J. 1975. Declinatio: A study of the linguistic theory of Marcus Terentius Varro. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.2Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, D. J. 1996. De lingua Latina X: A new critical text and English translation with prolegomena and commentary. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.85Search in Google Scholar

Uría, J. 2007. Personal names and invective in Cicero. In J. Booth & R. Maltby (eds.), What’s in a name. The significance of proper names in classical Latin literature, 13–31. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.10.2307/j.ctvvn9pr.5Search in Google Scholar

Uría, J. 2016. Nomen an aduerbium? Latin grammarians on the adverb. In R. Ferri & A. Zago (eds.), The Latin of the grammarians: Reflections about language in the Roman world, 123–144. Turnhout: Brépols.Search in Google Scholar

Viljamaa, T. 1998. Participium coniunctum: Syntactic definitions of the participle in ancient grammars. Arctos 32. 265–276.Search in Google Scholar

Ward, J. K. 2008. Aristotle on homonymy: Dialectic and science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511663697Search in Google Scholar