Home Performance Investigation of Different Modulation Schemes in RoF Systems under the Influence of Self Phase Modulation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Performance Investigation of Different Modulation Schemes in RoF Systems under the Influence of Self Phase Modulation

  • Abhimanyu Nain EMAIL logo and Suresh Kumar
Published/Copyright: February 21, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Radio over Fiber (RoF) system has emerged out a promising solution to the last mile connectivity along with higher data rates making it the preference for future communication networks. But fiber nonlinearities induce crosstalk and degrade the performance of the system. This paper presents a simulative investigation & comparison of Mach Zehender Modulator (MZM) and Optical Phase Modulator (OPM) including the effects of Self Phase Modulation. A single channel RoF system has been designed using MZM and OPM respectively. The model is analyzed for different ranges of dispersion and input channel power. It is observed that as the dispersion modulus increases the SPM induced pulse broadening also increases. The pulse broadening also increases with increase in the channel input power. Further it is revealed that MZM offers 0.3 dB more channel output power compared to OPM when dispersion is increased from 2 to 10 ps/nm/km. With the increase in channel input power from 10 to 17.5 dBm, OPM suppress SPM effects better than MZM and provides 2 dB more channel output power.

Conflict of Interest: Author “Abhimanyu Nain” is pursuing his doctorate.

References

1. Singla S, Arya SK. Performance evaluation of up-converted radio-over-fiber signal transmission based on SOA-MZI using different recovery schemes. Optik 2013;124:4635–8.10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.02.002Search in Google Scholar

2. Sharma V, Singh A, Sharma AK. Challenges to radio over fiber (RoF) technology and its mitigation schemes – a review. Optik 2012;123:338–42.10.1016/j.ijleo.2011.02.031Search in Google Scholar

3. Agarwal GP. Application of nonlinear fiber optics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

4. Chi H, Zou X, Yao J. Analytical models for phase-modulation-based microwave photonic systems with phase modulation to intensity modulation conversion using a dispersive device. J Lightwave Technol 2009;27(5):511–21.10.1109/JLT.2008.2004595Search in Google Scholar

5. Elbers J-P, Farbert A, Scheerer C, Glinger C, Fischer G. Reduced model to describe SPM-limited fiber transmission in dispersion-managed lightwave systems. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2000;6(2):276–81.10.1109/2944.847763Search in Google Scholar

6. Marks BS, Curtis RM, Campillo AL, Bucholtz F. Analysis of interchannel crosstalk in a dispersion-managed analog transmission link. J Lightwave Technol 2006;24(6):2305–10.10.1109/JLT.2006.874558Search in Google Scholar

7. Meleiro R, Buxens A. Impact of self-phase modulation on in-band crosstalk penalties. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 2008;20(8):644–6.10.1109/LPT.2008.918819Search in Google Scholar

8. Sheetal A, Sharma AK, Kaler RS. Impact of optical modulation formats on SPM-limited fiber transmission in 10 and 40 Gb/s optimum dispersion-managed lightwave systems. Optik 2010;121:246–52.10.1016/j.ijleo.2008.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-11-26
Accepted: 2016-12-13
Published Online: 2017-2-21
Published in Print: 2018-6-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2016-0155/html
Scroll to top button