Home Capacity of Optical Wireless System over Log-Normal Channels with Spatial Diversity in Presence of Atmospheric Losses
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Capacity of Optical Wireless System over Log-Normal Channels with Spatial Diversity in Presence of Atmospheric Losses

  • Rahul Kaushik EMAIL logo , Vineet Khandelwal and R.C. Jain
Published/Copyright: January 25, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, average channel capacity of optical wireless communication system is evaluated under the combined effect of geometrical loss, attenuation due to weather conditions and weak atmospheric turbulence using a simple closed form expression. Fading induced due to atmospheric turbulence is modeled by log-normal distribution. Considering the fact that the sum of log-normal random variables can be well approximated by another log-normal random variable, the proposed expression has been utilized to compute the channel capacity for spatial diversity reception employing maximum ratio combining and equal gain combining over uncorrelated turbulence-induced fading conditions. It is shown that spatial diversity is an effective technique to mitigate the impairments caused by various atmospheric conditions such as haze, rain and fog. The quantitative improvement in channel capacity achieved by using diversity techniques is investigated and compared. Accuracy of the results is validated with exact results computed using Monte Carlo simulation.

References

1. Ghassemlooy Z, Arnon S, Uysal M, Xu Z, Cheng J. Emerging optical wireless communications-advances and challenges. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2015;33:1738–49.10.1109/JSAC.2015.2458511Search in Google Scholar

2. Andrews LC, Phillips RL, Hopen CY. Laser beam scintillation with applications. Bellingham, Washington, DC: SPIE Press, 2001.10.1117/3.412858Search in Google Scholar

3. Majumdar AK. Advanced free space optics (FSO): a system approach. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2015.10.1007/978-1-4939-0918-6Search in Google Scholar

4. Goldsmith A. Wireless communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.10.1017/CBO9780511841224Search in Google Scholar

5. Nistazakis HE, Karagianni EA, Tsigopoulos AD, Fafalios ME, Tombras GS. Average capacity of optical wireless communication systems over atmospheric turbulence channels. J Lightwave Technol 2009;27:974–9.10.1109/JLT.2008.2005039Search in Google Scholar

6. Li J, Usyal M. Optical wireless communications: system model, capacity and coding. In: 58th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003168–72.Search in Google Scholar

7. Anguita JA, Djordjevic IB, Neifeld MA, Vasic BV. Shannon capacities and error-correction codes for optical atmospheric turbulent channels. J Opt Networking 2005;4:586–601.10.1364/JON.4.000586Search in Google Scholar

8. Assimakopoulos VD, Nistazakis HE, Tombras GS. Performance estimation of free space optical links over negative exponential atmospheric turbulence channels. Optik 2011;122:2191–4.10.1016/j.ijleo.2011.01.013Search in Google Scholar

9. Peppas KP, Stassinakis AN, Topalis GK, Nistazakis HE, Tombras GS. Average capacity of optical wireless communication systems over I-K atmospheric turbulence channels. IEEE/OSA J Opt Commun Networking 2012;4:1026–32.10.1364/JOCN.4.001026Search in Google Scholar

10. Kaur P, Jain VK, Kar S. Effect of atmospheric conditions and aperture averaging on capacity of free space optical links. Opt Quantum Electron 2014;46:1139–48.10.1007/s11082-013-9845-3Search in Google Scholar

11. Farid AA, Hranilovic S. Outage capacity optimization for free-space optical links with pointing errors. J Lightwave Technol 2007;25:1702–10.10.1109/JLT.2007.899174Search in Google Scholar

12. Zhu X, Kahn JM. Free-space optical communication through atmospheric turbulence channels. IEEE Trans Commun 2002;50:1293–300.10.1109/TCOMM.2002.800829Search in Google Scholar

13. Lee EJ, Chan VW. Part 1: optical communication over the clear turbulent atmospheric channel using diversity. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2004;22:1896–906.10.1109/JSAC.2004.835751Search in Google Scholar

14. Navidpour SM, Uysal M, Kavehrad M. BER performance of free-space optical transmission with spatial diversity. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 2007;6:2813–19.10.1109/TWC.2007.06109Search in Google Scholar

15. Popoola WO, Ghassemlooy Z, Allen JI, Leitgeb E, Gao S. Free-space optical communication employing subcarrier modulation and spatial diversity in atmospheric turbulence channel. IET Optoelectron 2008;2:16–23.10.1049/iet-opt:20070030Search in Google Scholar

16. Abaza M, Mesleh R, Mansour A, Aggoune EH. Performance analysis of MISO multi-hop FSO links overlog-normal channels with fog and beam divergence attenuations. Opt Commun 2015;334:247–52.10.1016/j.optcom.2014.08.050Search in Google Scholar

17. Haas SM, Shapiro JH. Capacity of wireless optical communications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2003;21:1346–57.10.1109/JSAC.2003.816618Search in Google Scholar

18. AlQuwaiee H, Yang HC, Alouni MS. On the asymptotic capacity of dual-aperture FSO systems with generalized pointing error model. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 2016;15:6502–12.10.1109/TWC.2016.2585486Search in Google Scholar

19. Kaushik R, Khandelwal V, Jain RC. A new closed form approximation for BER for optical wireless systems in weak atmospheric turbulence. J Opt Commun 2016. doi:10.1515/joc-2016-0142.Search in Google Scholar

20. Andrews LC, Phillips RL. Laser beam propagation through random media. Bellingham, Washington, USA: SPIE Press, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

21. Kim II, Mcarthur B, Korevaar EJ. Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications. Proc SPIE 2001;4214:26–37.10.1117/12.417512Search in Google Scholar

22. Rec. ITU-R P.1814. Prediction methods required for the design of terrestrial free-space optical links. Recommendation ITU-R 2007:1–12.Search in Google Scholar

23. Carbonneau TH, Wisely DR. Opportunities and challenges for optical wireless, the competitive advantage of free space telecommunications links in today’s crowded marketplace. Proc SPIE 1998;3232:119–28.10.1117/12.301022Search in Google Scholar

24. Karmeshu, Khandelwal V. On the applicability of average channel capacity in log-normal fading environment. Wireless Pers Commun 2013 Feb;68:1393–402.10.1007/s11277-012-0529-2Search in Google Scholar

25. Laourine A, Stephenne A, Affes S. Estimating ergodic capacity of log-normal channels. IEEE Commun Lett 2007 Jul;11:568–70.10.1109/LCOMM.2007.070302Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-11-14
Accepted: 2016-12-22
Published Online: 2017-1-25
Published in Print: 2018-6-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2016-0151/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button