Cross-language facilitatory and inhibitory effects in the naming of Japanese words by Chinese-Japanese bilinguals

References

Akimoto, Miharu. 2002. Yoku Wakaru Goi [Well-understood vocabulary]. Tokyo: ALC Press Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Amano, Shigeaki & Kimihisa Kondo. 2000. On the NTT psycholinguistic databases “lexical properties of Japanese”. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 4(2). 44–50.Search in Google Scholar

Balota, David A. & James I. Chumbley. 1984. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10(3). 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.10.3.340.Search in Google Scholar

Bassetti, Benedetta. 2006. Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Written Language and Literacy 9(1). 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.07bas.Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.Search in Google Scholar

DeFrancis, John. 1989. Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.10.1515/9780824841621Search in Google Scholar

Frost, Ram, Leonard Katz & Shlomo Bentin. 1987. Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13(1). 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.13.1.104.Search in Google Scholar

Guzik, Przemyslaw & Barbara Więckowska. 2023. Data distribution analysis – a preliminary approach to quantitative data in biomedical research. Journal of Medical Science 92(2). 81–96. https://doi.org/10.20883/medical.e869.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes-Harb, Rachel, Janet Nicol & Jason Barker. 2010. Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech 53(3). 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910371460.Search in Google Scholar

Hino, Yasushi, Shinobu Miyamura & Stephen J. Lupker. 2011. The nature of orthographic–phonological and orthographic–semantic relationships for Japanese kana and kanji words. Behavior Research Methods 43(4). 1110–1151. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0101-0.Search in Google Scholar

Jared, Debra & Judith F. Kroll. 2001. Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language 44(1). 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2747.Search in Google Scholar

Jared, Debra & Carrie Szucs. 2002. Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5(3). 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728902003024.Search in Google Scholar

Kadota, Shuhei. 2006. Reading and phonological processes in English as a second language. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Leonard & Laurie B. Feldman. 1983. Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9(1). 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.157.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Leonard & Ram Frost. 1992. Chapter 4 The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (eds.). Advances in psychology 94, 67–84. Amsterdam: North-Holland.10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2Search in Google Scholar

Lenth, Russell V. 2016. Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software 69. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Alfred, Beth O’Brien & Luca Onnis. 2023. Online first. Orthography-phonology consistency in English: Theory- and data-driven measures and their impact on auditory vs. visual word recognition. Behavior Research Methods 56. 1283–1313. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02094-5.Search in Google Scholar

Matsumi, Norio, Xiaodong Fei & Fengxiang Cai. 2012. Nihongokanjitango no shorikatei — chūgokugo wo bogotosuru chūkyū nihongogakushūsha wo taishō toshita jikkenteki kentō [The lexical processing of Japanese Kanji words by intermediate Chinese-Japanese bilinguals]. In Kazumi Hatasa, Yukiko Hatasa, Masakazu Kudara & Takahumi Shimizu (eds.). Second language acquisition research and language education, 43–67. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Joanna, Jonathan Grainger & Phillip J. Holcomb. 2013. Tracking the consequences of morpho-orthographic decomposition using ERPs. Brain Research 1529. 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.016.Search in Google Scholar

Pexman, Penny M., Stephen J. Lupker & Lorraine D. Reggin. 2002. Phonological effects in visual word recognition: Investigating the impact of feedback activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28(3). 572–584. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.572.Search in Google Scholar

Qiu, Xuejin. 2002. Kanzi-ken hi-kanzi-ken nihongo gakusyūsya ni okeru kanzi zyukugo no syori katei – Imihandan-kadai o motiita keitai on’in syori no kentō [Processing of kanji idioms in kanji-speaking and non-kanji-speaking learners of Japanese: An examination of morphological and phonological processing using a semantic judgment task]. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 50(4). 412–420.Search in Google Scholar

Qiu, Xuejin. 2003. Taiwanzin nihongo gakusyūsya no nihongo kanzi zyukugo no on’in syori ni tuite tango taipu tango no syūtoku nenrei syūzyukudo no kanten kara no kentō [Phonological processing of Japanese kanji phrases by Taiwanese learners of Japanese: An examination from the perspectives of word type, word acquisition age, and proficiency]. Journal of Japanese Language Teaching 116. 89–98.Search in Google Scholar

Qu, Qingqing & Markus F. Damian. 2017. Orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Evidence from Chinese. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24(3). 901–906. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1164-9.Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Search in Google Scholar

Schielzeth, Holger, Niels Jeroen Dingemanse, Shinichi Nakagawa, David F. Westneat, Hassen Allegue, Céline Teplitsky, Denis Réale, Ned A. Dochtermann, László Zsolt Garamszegi & Yimen Gerardo Araya-Ajoy. 2020. Robustness of linear mixed‐effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11(9). 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13434.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Ana I., Judith F. Kroll & Michele Diaz. 2007. Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(1). 106–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500463920.Search in Google Scholar

Seymour, Philip H. K., Mikko Aro & Jane M. Erskine & Collaboration with COST Action A8 network. 2003. Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology 94(2). 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859.Search in Google Scholar

Showalter, Catherine E. & Rachel Hayes-Harb. 2015. Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 36(1). 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716414000411.Search in Google Scholar

Tamaoka, Katsuo. 2000. The effects of mother-tongue scripts on the phonological processing of the Japanese language by Chinese and English speakers. The Science of Reading 44(3). 83–94.Search in Google Scholar

Wydell, Taeko Nakayama. 1998. What matters in kanji word naming: Consistency, regularity or on/kun-reading difference? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 10(3-5). 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008083513500.10.1023/A:1008083513500Search in Google Scholar

Xiong, Kexin, Rinus G. Verdonschot & Katsuo Tamaoka. 2020. The time course of brain activity in reading identical cognates: An ERP study of Chinese—Japanese bilinguals. Journal of Neurolinguistics 55. 100911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100911.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, Xuehan, Kexin Xiong & Sachiko Kiyama. 2023. Cross-language orthographic associations in proficient Chinese-Japanese bilinguals in a lexical decision task with cross-language priming. Paper presented at the European Second Language Association (EUROSLA) 32, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K., 30 August–2 September, 2023.Search in Google Scholar