Notes on the acquisition of L2 English intervention structures: a case of Japanese EFL learners

References

Adani, Flavia. 2012. Some notes on the acquisition of relative clauses: New data and open questions. In Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds.), Enjoy linguistics! papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 6–13. Siena, Italy: CISCL Press.Search in Google Scholar

Adani, Flavia, Heather K. J. Van der Lely, Matteo Forgiarini & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2010. Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua 120. 2148–2166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.018.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 2013. Ways of avoiding intervention: Some thoughts on the development of object relatives, passives, and control. In Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini & Robert C. Berwick (eds.), Rich languages from poor inputs, 115–126. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590339.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2015. Acquisition of Italian: Morpho-syntax and its interfaces in different mode of acquisition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.57Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana, Naama Friedman, Dominique Brunato & Luigi Rizzi. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122. 1053–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.02.007.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, H. Douglas. 1971. Children’s comprehension of relativized English sentences. Child Development 42(6). 1923–1936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1971.tb03780.x.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710701.Search in Google Scholar

Crain, Stephen & Cecil McKee. 1985. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. Proceedings of NELS 15. 94–110.Search in Google Scholar

Crain, Stephen & Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments in the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119. 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

Fujimori, Atsushi, Mineharu Nakayama & Noriko Yoshimura. 2021. Animacy in object relative clauses in Japanese EFL learners’ listening comprehension. Paper presented at the 21st International Conference of the Japan Second Language Association. Tokyo, Japan: Chuo University (Online), 23–24 October.Search in Google Scholar

Fujimori, Atsushi, Noriko Yoshimura & Mineharu Nakayama. 2022. RM effects can be nullified in L2 acquisition. Paper presented at the 22nd International Conference of the Japan Second Language Association. Tokyo, Japan: Chuo University, 22–23 October.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68(1). 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1.Search in Google Scholar

Hakuta, Kenji. 1981. Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese. Cognition 9. 197–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90001-9.Search in Google Scholar

Harada, Kazuko. 1976. Acquisition of relative clauses: A case study on a two-year old. Annual Reports 1, The Division of Languages, 1–16. Tokyo, Japan: International Christian University.Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, Roger & Cecilia Yuet Hung Chan. 1997. The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research 13. 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897671476153.Search in Google Scholar

Hirsch, Christopher & Ken Wexler. 2008. The late development of raising: What children seem to think about seem. In William D. Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising, 35–70. Dordrencht, The Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6176-9_3Search in Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2005. Tōgokōzo to Bunpōkankei [Syntactic structures and grammatical relations]. Tokyo, Japan: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2009. Beisikku Seisei bunpō [Basic generative grammar]. Tokyo, Japan: Hituzi Syobō.Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, Shigeyuki. 1978. Case-marking, canonical sentence patterns and counter equi in Japanese. In John Hinds & Irwin Haward (eds.), Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics, 30–51. Tokyo, Japan: Kaitakusha.Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, Shigeyuki. 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Linguisticae Investigationes 12. 1–47.10.1075/li.12.1.02kurSearch in Google Scholar

Martini, Karen. 2019. Animacy does not help French-speaking children in the repetition of object relatives. In Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes & Cristina Suáretz-Gómez (eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2017: Language acquisition and development, 221–240. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

McKee, Cecile, Dana McDaniel & Merrill F. Garrett. 2022. Fast passives, slow relatives. Language Acquisition 29(4). 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2022.2043328.Search in Google Scholar

Miyamoto, Edison T. & Michiko Nakamura. 2003. Subject/object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 22nd west coast conference on formal linguistics, 342–355. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nakayama, Mineharu & Noriko Yoshimura. 2020. Japanese EFL learners’ null subjects in the control and seem raising constructions. Second Language 19. 7–38.Search in Google Scholar

Ozeki, Hiromi & Yasuhiro Shirai. 2007. Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(2). 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263107070106.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sato, Atsushi. 2011. Nihongo kankeisetu no syorihuka o kettei suru yōin no kentō: Kōpasu ni okeru siyōhindo no eikyō o tyūsin ni [A study on determining factors for processing load of Japanese relative clauses: Influence of corpus-based frequency]. Hiroshima, Japan: Hiroshima University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Rex A. Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the ’full transfer/full access’ model. Second Language Research 12. 40–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Rex A. Sprouse. 2021. The full transfer/full access model and L3 cognitive states. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 11(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20055.sch.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Rex A. 2011. The interface hypothesis and the full transfer/full access/full parse: A brief comparison. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1). 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.16spr.Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Kazunori & Yahiro Hirakawa. 2019. Intervention effects in relative clause production: An L2 English study. Poster presented at the European Second Language Association (EUROSLA 29). Lund, Sweden: Lund University.Search in Google Scholar

Takezawa, Koichi. 1993. A comparative study of omoe and seem. In Heizo Nakajima & Yukio Otsu (eds.), Argument structure: Its syntax and acquisition, 75–95. Tokyo, Japan: Kaitakusha.Search in Google Scholar

Takezawa, Koichi. 2015. Mieru ninsikikōbun-no tōgokōzo-to te-kei zyutsugo no tōgo to imi [The syntactic structure of mieru and the structure-meaning of te predicate]. In Goi Imiron-no Aratana Kanōsei-o sagutte [Exploring the new directions of lexical semantics], 243–273. Tokyo, Japan: Kaitakusha.Search in Google Scholar

Tavakolian, Susan L. 1981. The conjoined clause analysis of relative clauses. In Susan L. Tavakolian (ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory, 167–187. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Villata, Sandra, Luigi Rizzi & Jullie Franck. 2016. Intervention effects and relativized minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments. Lingua 179. 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.004.Search in Google Scholar

Xia, Vera Yunxiao, Lydia White, Natália Barambatti Guzzo. 2020. Intervention in relative clauses: Effects of relativized minimality on L2 representation and processing. Second Language Research 38. 347–372.10.1177/0267658320958742Search in Google Scholar

Yoshimura, Noriko & Mineharu Nakayama. 2017. L2 acquisition of raising without an experiencer: A preliminary report. In Conference handbook of the Japanese society for language sciences 2017, 178–179.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshimura, Noriko, Mineharu Nakayama, Atsushi Fujimori & Hitoya Shimizu. 2016. Control and raising constructions in early L2 English. Second Language 15. 53–76.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshimura, Noriko, Mineharu Nakayama & Atsushi Fujimori. 2017. The acquisition of control, raising, and tough constructions among Japanese learners of English. In Proceedings of pacific second language research forum 2016, 247–252.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshimura, Noriko, Mineharu Nakayama & Atsushi Fujimori. 2021. Effects of animacy on Japanese EFL learners’ comprehension of object relative clauses. Poster presented at the 9th Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America. Reykjavík, Iceland: University of Iceland, 7–9 May.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshimura, Noriko, Atsushi Fujimori & Mineharu Nakayama. 2023. Japanese grammatical knowledge is a way of nullifying intervention effects in L2 English. Paper presented at the 13th Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University, 12–14 May.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshimura, Noriko, Atsushi Fujimori & Mineharu Nakayama. 2024. Puzzles in Japanese EFL learners’ production of object relative clauses in L2 English. Paper presented at the 24th International Conference of the Japan Second Language Association. Osaka, Japan: Osaka Kyoiku University, 22–23 June.Search in Google Scholar