Startseite Nonstandard periphrastic DO and verbal -s in the south west of England
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Nonstandard periphrastic DO and verbal -s in the south west of England

  • Fiona de Both EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. April 2019

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the distribution of periphrastic DO and verbal -s in the south west of England using the FRED-s corpus. The data supports the earlier reported suggestion that the two features are in complementary distribution with regard to region: in counties where one feature is favoured, the other feature is disfavoured and speakers who use one feature tend not to use the other feature. However, there is some overlap as some speakers in the FRED-s corpus use both features, giving support to an idea, earlier proposed, of a transitory area in which a possible change takes place where speakers drop the use of DO and adopt verbal -s. Furthermore, the data shows an interesting tendency where periphrastic DO favours the habitual verbal aspect, whereas verbal -s favours the punctual verbal aspect. These findings could indicate that the two features have a different grammatical function. However, the overall frequency with which these two features occur is very low and seems to suggest that they are disappearing. Moreover, their use seems to be limited to short originally Germanic words, suggesting that the two features only occur in contexts where they were originally used, but are not productive.

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge Dr. Marcelle Cole for her kind support during the process of writing this paper. This article is based on my BA thesis, which was written as part of the BA studies at Utrecht University. Parts of the thesis have been included in full in this article.

References

Brunner, K. 1951. Die Englische Sprache. vol. 2. Halle Saale: Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar

Clarke, Sandra. 1997. English verbal-s revisited: The evidence from Newfoundland. American Speech 72(3). 227–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/455653 (accessed 12 May 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Cole, Marcelle. 2014. Old Northumbrian verbal morphosyntax and the (northern) subject rule. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/nss.25Suche in Google Scholar

Denison, David. 1985. The origins of periphrastic DO: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered. In Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem Koopman & Frederike van der Leek (eds.), Papers from the 4th international conference on English historical linguistics, 45–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.41.07denSuche in Google Scholar

Ellegård, Alvar. 1953. The auxiliary do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Suche in Google Scholar

Elworthy, Frederic Thomas. 1877. An outline of the grammar of the dialect of West Somerset. London: Trübner.Suche in Google Scholar

Elworthy, Frederic Thomas. 1886. The West Somerset word Book. A glossary of dialectal and archaic words and phrases used in the west of Somerset and East Devon. London: Trübner.Suche in Google Scholar

Engblom, Victor. 1938. On the origin and early development of the auxiliary do. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Suche in Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku & Juhani Klemola. 2010. Celtic influence on English: A re-evaluation. In R. A. Cloutier, A. M. Hamilton-Brehm & W. A. Kretzschmar (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language V: Variation and change in English grammar and lexicon: Contemporary approaches, 207–230. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110220339.2.207Suche in Google Scholar

Godfrey, Elizabeth & Sali Tagliamonte. 1999. Another piece for the verbal -s story: Evidence from Devon in Southwest England. Language Variation and Change 11(1). 87–121. http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0954394599111050 (accessed 9 October 2014).10.1017/S0954394599111050Suche in Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. 2013. The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables? Journal of Pragmatics 52. 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.019 (accessed 17 June 2017).Suche in Google Scholar

Holmqvist, E. 1922. On the history of the English present inflexion, particularly -e and -s. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Suche in Google Scholar

Ihalainen, Ossi. 1991. A point of verb syntax in south-western British English: An analysis of a dialect continuum. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of jan svartvik, 290–302. Harlow: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Ihalainen, Ossi. 1994. The dialects of England since 1776. In R. Burchfield (ed.), The cambridge history of the English language, vol. 5, 197–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264785.006 (accessed 11 October 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3. 359–383. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x (accessed 26 June 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2010. Rbrul manual. http://www.danielezrajohnson.com/Rbrul_manual.html (accessed 23 January 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, Megan & Sali Tagliamonte. 2004. From Somerset to Samaná: Preverbal did in the voyage of English. Language Variation and Change 16. 93–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954394504162029 (accessed 11 November 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani. 1996. Non-standard periphrastic DO: A study in variation and change. Essex: University of Essex dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd. 2004. Do as a tense and aspect marker in varieties of English. In Berndt Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets Typology, 245–275. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Function and grammar in the history of English: Periphrastic DO. In Ralph W. Fasold & Deborah Schriffrin (eds.), Language change and variation, 133–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.52.09kroSuche in Google Scholar

Lewis, H. & H. Pedersen. 1961. A concise comparative celtic grammar. Göttingen: Vandehoeck & Ruprecht.Suche in Google Scholar

Nurmi, Arja. 1999. A social history of periphrastic DO (Memoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 56). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Suche in Google Scholar

Peitsara, Kirsti. 2002. Verbal -S in devonshire – the helsinki dialect corpus evidence. In H. Raumolin-Brunberg, M. Nevala & M. Rissanen (eds.), Variation past and present: VARIENG studies on English for Terttu Nevalainen (Memoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 56), 211–230. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Suche in Google Scholar

Pietsch, Lukas. 2005. Some do and some doesn’t: Verbal concord variation in the north of the British Isles. In Bernd Kortmann, Tanja Hermann, Lukas Pietsch & Susanna Wagner (eds.), A comparative grammar of British English dialects: Agreement, gender, relative clauses, 125–209. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197518.125Suche in Google Scholar

Preusler, Walther. 1938. Zu: Keltischer Einfluss im Englischen. Indogermanischen Forschungen 57. 178–191.Suche in Google Scholar

Samuels, M. L. 1972. Linguistic evolution, with special reference to English (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139086707Suche in Google Scholar

Stein, Dieter. 1986. Old English Northumbrian verb inflection revisited. In D. Kastovsky & A. Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, 637–650. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Nuria, Hernández. 2007. Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg Corpus of English dialects sampler (“FRED-S”). Freiburg: English Department, University of Freiburg.Suche in Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2013. Grammatical variation in British dialects: A study in corpus-based dialectometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763380Suche in Google Scholar

Wagner, Susanne. 2007. Unstressed periphrastic DO – From Southwest England to Newfoundland? English World-Wide 28(3). 249–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/eww.28.3.03wag (accessed 11 November 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Wakelin, Martyn. F. 1977. English dialects: An introduction. London: The Athlone Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Laura. 2015. Some more on the history of present-tense -s, do and zero: West Oxfordshire, 1837. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(1). 111–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2015-0005 (accessed 11 October 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-04-04

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 22.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jhsl-2018-0006/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen