Home The Gulf Oil Spill and Economic Impacts: Extending the National Interstate Economic Model (NIEMO) to Account for Induced Impacts
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Gulf Oil Spill and Economic Impacts: Extending the National Interstate Economic Model (NIEMO) to Account for Induced Impacts

  • JiYoung Park EMAIL logo , James E. Moore II and Harry W. Richardson
Published/Copyright: April 13, 2013

Abstract

There has been considerable controversy about the economic impacts of the federal Gulf deepwater oil drilling suspensions following the oil spill. In this study, we elaborate and apply the National Interstate Economic Model (NIEMO) to estimate direct, indirect and induced economic losses in each of the 50 states (and the District of Columbia). We simulate the effects of three separate, 6-month direct loss scenarios of media guestimates reported by several local sources. While the traditional NIEMO application only captured direct and indirect impacts, we developed a new module to estimate local induced impacts as well. This methodology could be applied to any similar scenario. Our model extension and application suggest a useful approach to tasks such as the one assigned to Gulf Coast Claims Facility administrator Kenneth Feinberg. The terror threat, as well as the possibility of other mishaps and natural disasters, suggests that this is always a serious possibility that these sorts of calculations will have to be made. Our innovation was to estimate the Type-II effects in the impacted states and to trace their trade effects through the NIEMO system with only minor methodological elaborations.


Corresponding author: JiYoung Park, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA, e-mail:

5 Appendix

Appendix: I IMPLAN-to-NAICS-to-USC sector conversions using BEA’s state GDP of 2008 for a 6-month period.

i. Oil, Louisiana.

USC Sector (IMPLAN code)IMPLAN SectorNAICS 2002 CodeDirect
USC10 (19)19, 142, 145, 146211, 32411, 324191, 324199$2.3133B

Damage: 10% of Oil Extraction Relating Industries of LA GDP.

Source: http://www.economy.com/dismal/article_free.asp?cid=199173&src=msnbc.

ii. Seafood, Louisiana (the closest we can get to shrimps and oysters).

USC Sector (IMPLAN Code)IMPLAN SectorNAICS 2002 CodeDirect
USC1 (16)16, 711141, 3117$0.0972B

Damage: 10% of Fishing Relating Industries of LA GDP.

Source: http://www.economy.com/dismal/article_free.asp?cid=199173&src=msnbc.

iii. Tourism and tourist-related activities, Florida. Refer to the direct impact calculation procedure for tourism and related industries applied in Richardson et al. (2007) and Gordon et al. (2007).

USC Sector (IMPLAN Code)IMPLAN SectorNAICS 2002 CodeDirectReference
USC33 (391)391, 395, 397481, 485, 487$1.7622BGordon et al. (2007), Richards et al. (2007)
USC35 (405)405, 408~412445, 448~454$8.0930B
USC44 (475)475~478712, 71394, 71395, 7131$1.8525B
USC45 (479)479~48172111, 72112, 72119, 7212, 7213, 722$4.5390B
Total$16.2467B

Appendix II: Definitions for USC sector system.

USC SectorDescription
 1Live animals and live fish and meat, fish, seafood, and their preparations
 2Cereal grains and other agricultural products except for animal feed
 3Animal feed and products of animal origin, n.e.c.
 4Milled grain products and preparations, and bakery products
 5Other prepared foodstuffs and fats and oils
 6Alcoholic beverages
 7Tobacco products
 8Nonmetallic minerals (Monumental or building stone, natural sands, gravel and crushed stone, n.e.c.)
 9Metallic ores and concentrates
10Coal and petroleum products (Coal and fuel oils, n.e.c.)
11Basic chemicals
12Pharmaceutical products
13Fertilizers
14Chemical products and preparations, n.e.c.
15Plastics and rubber
16Logs and other wood in the rough and Wood products
17Pulp, newsprint, paper, and paperboard and paper or paperboard articles
18Printed products
19Textiles, leather, and articles of textiles or leather
20Nonmetallic mineral products
21Base metal in primary or semi-finished forms and in finished basic shapes
22Articles of base metal
23Machinery
24Electronic and other electrical equipment and components, and office equipment
25Motorized and other vehicles (including parts)
26Transportation equipment, n.e.c.
27Precision instruments and apparatus
28Furniture, mattresses and mattress supports, lamps, lighting fittings, and illuminated signs
29Miscellaneous manufactured products, scrap, mixed freight, and commodity unknown
30Utility
31Construction
32Wholesale trade
33Transportation
34Postal and warehousing
35Retail trade
36Broadcasting and information services
37Finance and insurance
38Real estate and rental and leasing
39Professional, scientific, and technical services
40Management of companies and enterprises
41Administrative support and waste management
42Education services
43Health care and social assistances
44Arts, entertainment, and recreation
45Accommodation and food services
46Public administration
47Other services except public administration

References

Chenery, H.B. (1953) “Regional Analysis, in H.B. Chenery, P.G. Clark and V.C. Pinna eds., The Structure and Growth of the Italian Economy,” U.S. Mutual Security Agency, Rome: 98–139.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, P., J. E. Moore II, J. Y. Park and H. W. Richardson (2007) “The Economic Impacts of a Terrorist Attack on the US Commercial Aviation System,” Risk Analysis, 27(3):505–512.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00903.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gordon, P., J. E. Moore II, J. Y. Park and H. W. Richardson (2009a) “The Economic Impacts of International Border Closure: A State-by-State Analysis.” In: (H. W. Richardson, P. Gordon and J. E. Moore II, eds.) Global Business and the Terrorist Threat. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 341–374.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, P., J. Y. Park and H.W. Richardson (2009b) “Modeling Input-Output Impacts with Substitutions in the Household Sector: A Numerical Example,” Economic Modelling, 26(3):696–701.10.1016/j.econmod.2009.01.019Search in Google Scholar

Isard, W. (1951) “Interregional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Model of a Space Economy,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 33:318–328.10.2307/1926459Search in Google Scholar

Jack Faucett Associates Inc. (1983) The Multiregional Input-Output Accounts, 1977: Introduction and Summary, Vol. I (Final Report), prepared for the US Department of Health and Human Services. Washington.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, B., J. Y. Park, P. Gordon, J. E. Moore II and H. W. Richardson (2012) “Estimating the State-by-State Economic Impacts of a Foot-and-Mouth Disease Attack,” International Regional Science Review, 35(1):26–47.10.1177/0160017610390939Search in Google Scholar

Lindner, R., (2011) “Gulf of Mexico: between Oil Slicks and Shrimp,” Economics Newpaper, (April 16).Search in Google Scholar

Mason, J. R. (2010) The Economic Cost of a Moratorium on Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration to the Gulf Region. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, R. E. and P. D. Blair (2009) Input-output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions (2nd Ed.). NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511626982Search in Google Scholar

Moses, L. N. (1955) “The Stability of Interregional Trading Patterns and Input-Output Analysis,” American Economic Review, 45:803–832.Search in Google Scholar

Park, J. Y. and P. Gordon (2005) “An Evaluation of Input-Output Aggregation Error Using a New MRIO Model.” Paper presented at the North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International 52nd Annual Conference, Riviera Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, NV, November 10–12.Search in Google Scholar

Park, J. Y., P. Gordon, J. E. Moore II, H. W. Richardson and L. Wang (2007) “Simulating The State-by-State Effects of Terrorist Attacks on Three Major U.S. Ports: Applying NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model).” In: (H. W. Richardson, P. Gordon and J. E. Moore II, eds.) The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 208–234.Search in Google Scholar

Park, J. Y., (2008) “The Economic Impacts of Dirty- Bomb Attacks on the Los Angeles and Long Beach Ports: Applying the Supply-driven NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model),” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 5(1), Article 2110.2202/1547-7355.1312Search in Google Scholar

Park, J. Y., P. Gordon, J. E. Moore II and H. W. Richardson (2008) “The State-by-State Economic Impacts of the 2002 Shutdown of the Los Angeles-Long Beach Ports,” Growth and Change, 39(4):548–577.10.1111/j.1468-2257.2008.00446.xSearch in Google Scholar

Park, J.Y., P Gordon, J. E. Moore II and H. W. Richardso (2009) “A Two-Step Approach to Estimating State-by-State Commodity Trade Flows," The Annals of Regional Science, 43(4): 1033–1072.10.1007/s00168-008-0232-0Search in Google Scholar

Park, J. Y., P. Gordon, J. E. Moore II and H. W. Richardson (2011) “Constructing a Flexible National Interstate Economic Model”, presented at the 19th International Input-Output Association conference, Alexandria, VA, June 13–17.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.019Search in Google Scholar

Polenske, K. R. (1980) The U.S. Multiregional Input-Output Accounts and Model. Lexington, MA: DC Health.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, H. W., P. Gordon, J. E. Moore II, S. J. Kim, J. Y. Park and Q. Pan (2007) “Tourism and Terrorism: The National and Interregional Economic Impacts of Attacks on Major U.S. Theme Parks,” In: (H. W. Richardson, P. Gordon and J. E. Moore II, eds.) The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 235–253.10.4337/9781847205506.00021Search in Google Scholar

Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, H. W., J. Y. Park, Q. Pan, P. Gordon and J. E. Moore (2012) “The Joplic Tornado.” In: (H.W. Richardson, J.Y. Park, P. Gordon, J.E. Moore II and Q. Pan, eds.) National Economic Impact Analysis of Terrorist and Natural Disasters. Planetizen Press: Urban Insight, Inc. (forthcoming)Search in Google Scholar

Segal, D. (2010) “Should BPs Money Go Where Oil Didn’t?” NY Times (Oct. 23)Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-04-13
Published in Print: 2013-01-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Research Articles
  4. Integrating Federal Approaches to Post-Cyber Incident Mitigation
  5. Cybersecurity and US Legislative Efforts to address Cybercrime
  6. The Military’s Response to Domestic CBRNE Incidents
  7. Building Public Health Preparedness and Food and Agriculture Defense Capabilities Using Whole Community and One Health Concepts
  8. Situated Response and Learning of Distributed Bushfire Coordinating Teams
  9. A Critical Examination of the Assumptions Regarding Centralized Coordination in Large-Scale Emergency Situations
  10. “Of Gods and Men”: Selected Print Media Coverage of Natural Disasters and Industrial Failures in Three Westminster Countries
  11. Spontaneous Planning after the San Bruno Gas Pipeline Explosion: A Case Study of Anticipation and Improvisation during Response and Recovery Operations
  12. Understanding Incident Response to Unplanned Releases at Chemical Facilities
  13. A Study on the Responsiveness of Local Health Departments that Use Facebook
  14. Texas takes on the TSA: The Constitutional Fight over Airport Security
  15. The Gulf Oil Spill and Economic Impacts: Extending the National Interstate Economic Model (NIEMO) to Account for Induced Impacts
  16. The Economic Value of Water: Providing Confidence and Context to FEMA’s Methodology
  17. Diffusion of Emergency Information during a Crisis within a University
  18. Resilience Building Policies and their Influence in Crisis Prevention, Absorption and Recovery
  19. Communication and News
  20. A Practitioner-Researcher Partnership to Develop and Deliver Operational Value of Threat, Risk and Vulnerability Assessment Training to meet the Requirements of Emergency Responders
  21. Regional Public-Private Interoperable Communications for Catastrophic Events Using a Cloud Computing Based Portal
  22. It’s Never Too Late: Restructuring the Department of Homeland Security’s Regional Framework
  23. Finding the New High Ground in Cyber War: Malware as an Instrument of War
  24. Opinions
  25. Cybersecurity and Emergency Management: Encryption and the Inability to Communicate
  26. Assessing the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards after 5 Years: Achievements, Challenges, and Risks Ahead
  27. Book Review
  28. Emergency Management: The American Experience 1900–2010 (2nd Edition)
Downloaded on 23.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jhsem-2012-0075/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button