Startseite Antibacterial activity of combination of synthetic and biopolymer non-woven structures
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Antibacterial activity of combination of synthetic and biopolymer non-woven structures

  • Sukhwinder K. Bhullar EMAIL logo , Burcak Kaya Özsel , Ramesh Yadav , Ginpreet Kaur , Meena Chintamaneni und Harpal S. Buttar
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. Juni 2015

Abstract

Background: Fibrous structures and synthetic polymer blends offer potential usages in making biomedical devices, textiles used in medical practices, food packaging, tissue engineering, environmental applications and biomedical arena. These products are also excellent candidates for building scaffolds to grow stem cells for implantation, to make tissue engineering grafts, to make stents to open up blood vessels caused by atherosclerosis or narrowed by blood clots, for drug delivery systems for micro- to nano-medicines, for transdermal patches, and for healing of wounds and burn care. The current study was designed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of woven and non-woven forms of nano- and macro-scale blended polymers having biocompatible and biodegradable characteristics.

Methods: The antimicrobial activity of non-woven fibrous structures created with the combination of synthetic and biopolymer was assessed using Gram-negative, Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus vulgaris, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter aerogenes using pour plate method. Structural evaluation of the fabricated samples was performed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

Results: Broad spectrum antibacterial activities were found from the tested materials consisting of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with chitosan and nylon-6 combined with chitosan and formic acid.

Conclusions: The combination of PVA with chitosan was more bactericidal or bacteriostatic than that of nylon-6 combined with chitosan and formic acid. PVA combination with chitosan appears to be a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. HubbellJA. Biomaterials in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol1995;13:56576.10.1038/nbt0695-565Suche in Google Scholar

2. FreymanT, YannasI, GibsonL. Cellular materials as porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Prog Mater Sci2001;46:27382.10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00018-9Suche in Google Scholar

3. RatajskaM, BoryniecS. Physical and chemical aspects of biodegradation of natural polymers. React Funct Polym1998;38:3549.10.1016/S1381-5148(98)00031-5Suche in Google Scholar

4. LiakosaI, RizzellobL, ScurrcDJ, PompabPP, BayeraIS, AthanassiouA. All-natural composite wound dressing films of essential oils encapsulated in sodium alginate with antimicrobial properties. Int J Pharm2014;463:13745.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.10.046Suche in Google Scholar

5. KitaM, OguraY, HondaY, HyonSH, ChaWI, IkadaY. Evaluation of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel as a soft contact lens material. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol1990;228:5337.10.1007/BF00918486Suche in Google Scholar

6. OkaM. Biomechanics and repair of articular cartilage. J Orthop Sci2001;6:44856.10.1007/s007760170014Suche in Google Scholar

7. OkaM, ChangYS, NakamuraT, UshioK, ToguchidaJ, GuHO. Synthetic osteochondral replacement of the femoral articular surface. J Bone Joint Surg Br1997;79:10037.10.1302/0301-620X.79B6.0791003Suche in Google Scholar

8. OkaM, NoguchiT, KumarP, IkeuchiK, YamamuroT, HyonSH, et al. Development of an artificial articular cartilage. Clin Mater1990;6:36181.10.1016/0267-6605(90)90053-XSuche in Google Scholar

9. SwieszkowskiW, KuDN, BerseeHE, KurzydlowskiKJ. An elastic material for cartilage replacement in an arthritic shoulder joint. Biomaterials2006;27:153441.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.032Suche in Google Scholar

10. YoungTH, YaoNK, ChangRF, ChenLW. Evaluation of asymmetric poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes for use in artificial islets. Biomaterials1996;17:213945.10.1016/0142-9612(96)00043-9Suche in Google Scholar

11. BurczakK, GamianE, KochmanA. Long-term in vivo performance and biocompatibility of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel macrocapsules for hybrid-type artificial pancreas. Biomaterials1996;17:23516.10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00076-2Suche in Google Scholar

12. PaulW, SharmaCP. Acetylsalicylic acid loaded poly(vinyl alcohol) hemodialysis membranes: effect of drug release on blood compatibility and permeability. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed1997;8:75564.10.1163/156856297X00290Suche in Google Scholar

13. MaruokaS, MatsuuraT, KawasakiK, OkamotoM, YoshiakiH, KodamaM, et al. Biocompatibility of polyvinylalcohol gel as a vitreous substitute. Curr Eye Res2006;31:599606.10.1080/02713680600813854Suche in Google Scholar

14. StammenJA, WilliamsS, KuDN, GuldbergRE. Mechanical properties of a novel PVA hydrogel in shear and unconfined compression. Biomaterials2001;22:799806.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00242-8Suche in Google Scholar

15. NoguchiT, YamamuroT, OkaM, KumarP, KotouraY, HyonS, et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel as an artificial articular cartilage: evaluation of biocompatibility. J Appl Biomater1991;2:1017.10.1002/jab.770020205Suche in Google Scholar

16. KobayashiM, ChangYS, OkaM. A two year in vivo study of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) artificial meniscus. Biomaterials2005;26:32438.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.028Suche in Google Scholar

17. KobayashiM, ToguchidaJ, OkaM. Preliminary study of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) artificial meniscus. Biomaterials2003;24:63947.10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00378-2Suche in Google Scholar

18. HyonSH, ChaWI, IkadaY, KitaM, OguraY, HondaY. Poly(vinylalcohol) hydrogels as soft contact lens material. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed1994;5:397406.10.1163/156856294X00103Suche in Google Scholar

19. BakerMI, WalshSP, SchwartzZ, BoyanBD. A review of polyvinyl alcohol and its uses in cartilage and orthopedic applications. Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32694.10.1002/jbm.b.32694Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. LiuW, AdanurS. Properties of electrospun PAN membranes and chemically activated carbon nanofibers. Textile Res J2010;80:12434.10.1177/0040517509102384Suche in Google Scholar

21. LeeKH, KwanWK, PesapaneA, KimHY, RaboltJF. Electrospun nylon-6 nanofibers. Macromolecules2008;41:14948.10.1021/ma701927wSuche in Google Scholar

22. ChenCS, LiauWY, TsaiGJ. Antibacterial effects of N-sulfonated and N-sulfobenzoyl chitosan and application to oyster preservation. J Food Prot1998;61:11248.10.4315/0362-028X-61.9.1124Suche in Google Scholar

23. HadwigerLA, KendraDG, FristenskyBW, WagonerW. Chitosan both activated genes in plants and inhibits RNA synthesis in fungi. In: MuzzarelliRA, JeuniauxC, GoodayGW, editors. Chitin in nature and technology. New York: Plenum, 1981:20922.Suche in Google Scholar

24. PapineauAM, HooverDG, KnorrD, FarkasDF. Antimicrobial effect of water-soluble chitosans with high hydrostatic pressure. Food Biotechnol1991;5:4557.10.1080/08905439109549790Suche in Google Scholar

25. ShahidiF, ArachchiJK, JeonYJ. Food applications of chitin and chitosans. Trends Food Sci Technol1999;10:3751.10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00017-5Suche in Google Scholar

26. SudarshanNR, HooverDG, KnorrD. Antibacterial action of chitosan. Food Biotechnol1992;6:25772.10.1080/08905439209549838Suche in Google Scholar

27. YoungDH, KöhleH, KaussH. Effect of chitosan on membrane permeability of suspension-cultured glycine max and phaseolus vulgaris cells. Plant Physiol1982;70:144954.10.1104/pp.70.5.1449Suche in Google Scholar

28. LiuXF, GuanYL, YangDZ, LiZ, YaoKD. Antibacterial action of carboxymethylated chitosan. J Appl Polymer Sci2001;79:132435.10.1002/1097-4628(20010214)79:7<1324::AID-APP210>3.0.CO;2-LSuche in Google Scholar

29. NatthapornL, ThummanoonP, SoottawatB, SurasitP. Influences of degree of hydrolysis and molecular weight of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) on properties of fish myofibrillar protein/PVA blend films. Food Hydrocolloids2012;29:22633.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.03.007Suche in Google Scholar

30. Ngoc-ThangN, Jui-HsiangL. Fabrication and characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan hydrogel thin films via UV irradiation. Eur Poly J2013;49:420111.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.09.032Suche in Google Scholar

31. PantHR, KimHJ, BhattLR, et al. Chitin butyrate coated electrospun nylon-6 fibers for biomedical application. Appl Surf Sci2013;285P:53844.10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.089Suche in Google Scholar

32. YunliM, TaoZ, ChangshengZ. Preparation of chitosan–nylon-6 blended membranes containing silver ions as antibacterial materials. Carbohydr Res2008;343:2307.10.1016/j.carres.2007.11.006Suche in Google Scholar

33. EnricoF, DanieleS, MarcoR, RebeccaP. Nylon 6 film and nanofiber carriers: preparation and laccase immobilization performance. J Mol Catal B Enzym2014;102:417.10.1016/j.molcatb.2014.01.012Suche in Google Scholar

34. JinfuS, ZunceW, ShuhuaL, JiajunL. Nano-hardness and wear properties of C-implanted nylon 6. Surf Coat Technol2006;200:524552.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.06.027Suche in Google Scholar

35. RejaneCG, DouglasB, OdilioBG. Review of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan. Polym Cienc Technol2008;19:2417.10.1590/S0104-14282009000300013Suche in Google Scholar

36. MonarulI, ShahM, KhandakerRM, AntibacterialZH. Activity of crab-chitosan against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J Adv Sci Res2011;2:636.Suche in Google Scholar

37. KaurSP, RaoR, NandaS. Amoxicillin a broad spectrum antibiotic. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci2011;3:307.Suche in Google Scholar

38. PrakashN, RajkumarE, SudhaPN, Udaya PrakashNK. Antimicrobial activity of binary ternary composites of chitosan amended with nylon 6 and montmorillonite clay. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci2014;6:118.Suche in Google Scholar

39. RashmirekhaS, SamuelJ, PatriciaJ, RamyaM. Blend effect of PCL on antimicrobial activity of different molecular weight chitosan. Eur Sci J2014;10:3647. ISSN 1857–7881.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-5-3
Accepted: 2015-6-8
Published Online: 2015-6-30
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 1.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2015-0027/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen