Startseite Exploring Metaphors for the Reception History of the Lord’s Prayer
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Exploring Metaphors for the Reception History of the Lord’s Prayer

  • David Clark EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. Mai 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In his work Nomadic Text: A Theory of Biblical Reception History, Brennan Breed argues that texts are nomads which – existing without original form and without original context – have no homeland to claim as their own. Their entire history has been marked by unpredictable movement and variation. He therefore proposes that the study of reception history should primarily be an exploration of the potentiality of textual meanings. The suggestion that meaning progresses without relationship to hermeneutical antecedents, however, runs contrary to Gadamer’s assertion that the contemporary effect (Wirkung) of a text always exists in unity with its historical effects. Following Gadamer, the reception historian may still explore hermeneutical potentiality – but does so with a sense of historical consciousness. In this light, the nature of a biblical text may be more suitably characterized by the metaphor of an emigrant rather than that of a nomad. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the usefulness of these divergent metaphors in our attempt to define both the nature of biblical texts and the task of the reception historian. Our test case will be the early interpretation history of the Lord’s Prayer. Given that the original form and context of this prayer are irretrievable, Breed’s theory is applicable in many respects. Yet it will also be seen that in the early reception history of the Lord’s Prayer there are also patterns of synchronic continuity. Amidst diverse agendas of theology and praxis, we find that interpretations of the Lord’s Prayer were consistently rooted in an inherited conceptualization of Jesus Christ – what we will call a canonical remembrance of his life and proclamation.

Works Cited

Allison, D. C. 1987. “The Structure of the Sermon on the Mount.” Journal of Biblical Literature 106 (3): 423–445.10.2307/3261066Suche in Google Scholar

Betz, Hans Dieter. 1985. Essays on the Sermon on the Mount. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bornkamm, Gunther. 1978. “Der Aufbau der Bergpredigt.” New Testament Studies 24: 419–432.10.1017/S0028688500014454Suche in Google Scholar

Breed, Brennan. 2014. Nomadic Text: A Theory of Biblical Reception History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Carruth, Shawn, and Albrecht Garsky. 1996. Documenta Q: Reconstuctions of Q Through Two Centuries of Gospel Research. Vols. Q 11:2b–4. Leuven: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar

Carson, D. A. 1984. “Matthew.” In The Expositors Bible Commentary, edited by Frank Gaebelein. Vol. 8. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, David. 2016. The Lord’s Prayer: Origins and Early Intepretations. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.STT-EB.5.110928Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, David. 2017. On Earth as in Heaven: the Lord’s Prayer from Jewish Prayer to Christian Ritual. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.10.2307/j.ctt1kgqtjsSuche in Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. 2003. Jesus Remebered. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Jospeh. 2003. “And Lead us not into Temptation.” Biblica 84 (2): 259–273.Suche in Google Scholar

Flusser, David. 2009. Judaism of the Second Temple Period. Translated by Azzan Yadin. Vol 2: The Jewish Sages and Their Literature. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Suche in Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989. Truth and Method. Londom: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibson, Jeffrey. 2015. The Disciples Prayer. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, Kindle Version.10.2307/j.ctt12878s7Suche in Google Scholar

Gundry, Robert. 1982. Matthew: A Commentary on his Literary and Theological Art. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Suche in Google Scholar

Heinemann, Joseph. 1977. Prayer in the Talmud: Forms and Patterns. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110842449Suche in Google Scholar

Holmen, Tom. 2007. “An Introduction to the Continuum Approach.” In Jesus From Judaism to Christianity: Continuum Approaches to the Historical Jesus, edited by Tom Holmen, 1–16. London: T & T Clark.Suche in Google Scholar

Jeremias, Joachim. 1971. New Testament Theology: The Proclamation of Jesus. New York: Charles Scribner’s and Sons.Suche in Google Scholar

Keener, Craig. 2009. The Gospel of Matthew: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Suche in Google Scholar

Luz, Ulrich. 2005. Studies in Matthew. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Suche in Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M. 2002. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Suche in Google Scholar

Milavec, Aaron. 2003. The Didache Faith, Hope, & Life of the Earliest Christian Communities, 50–70 c.E. New York: The Newman Press.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Loughlin, Thomas. 2010. The Didache: A Window on the Earliest Christians. London: SPCK.Suche in Google Scholar

Petuchowski, Jakob J. 1978a. “Jewish Prayer Texts of the Rabbinic Period.” In The Lord’s Prayer and Jewish Liturgy, edited by Jakob J. Petuchowski and Michael Brocke, 21–44. New York: Seabury Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Petuchowski, Jakob J. 1978b. “The Liturgy of the Synagogue.” In The Lord’s Prayer and Jewish Liturgy, edited by Jakob J. Petuchowski and Michael Brocke, 45–58. New York: The Seabury Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schweizer, Eduard. 1975. The Good News According to Matthew. Atlanta: John Knox.Suche in Google Scholar

Simpson, Robert L. 1965. The Interpretation of the Lord’s Prayer in the Early Church. Philadelphia: Westminster.Suche in Google Scholar

Stein, Robert. 2001. Synoptic Gospels: Origin adn Interpretation. Grand Rapids: Baker.Suche in Google Scholar

Stewart-Sykes, Allistair. 2004. Tertullian, Cyprian, Origen: On the Lord’s Prayer. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Suche in Google Scholar

“The Didache.” The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations, edited by Michael W. Holmes. Trans. Michael W. Holmes, 334–369. Third. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic. 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-05-10
Published in Print: 2019-04-24

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbr-2019-1001/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen