Home “Sword Handling: The Early Christian Reception of Matthew 10:34”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Sword Handling: The Early Christian Reception of Matthew 10:34”

  • N. Clayton Croy EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 10, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The saying of Jesus in Matt 10:34 that he has “not come to bring peace, but a sword,” seems at odds with the general tenor of his life and teachings. Some proponents of a revolutionary Jesus have seized upon this saying as evidence that he was sympathetic to, and perhaps even supportive of, violent revolution. This article surveys patristic commentary on this verse from the first few centuries to see how this “hard saying” was understood and handled. Although a small number of writers expressed unease about the imagery and the perceived contradiction with other texts of scripture, the general trend was to construe the “sword” metaphorically, usually by appealing to a variety of passages containing the same word. No patristic writer understood the saying as an endorsement of violence, even those whose socio-political context might have justified it. Finally, although some of the hermeneutical strategies of the Fathers may not be embraced by modern exegesis, they often produced readings that were culturally and religiously sensitive as well as rhetorically insightful.

Works Cited

Allison, Dale C., Jr. 2005. Studies in Matthew: Interpretation Past and Present. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Ambrose. 1963. Theological and Dogmatic Works. Translated by Roy J. Deferrari. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ambrose. 1964. Sancti Ambrosii Opera. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, vol.79, edited by Otto Faller. Vienna, Austria: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky.Search in Google Scholar

Arens, Eduardo. 1970. The ELTHON – Sayings in the Synoptic Tradition: A Historico-Critical Investigation. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Aslan, Reza. 2013. Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth. London: Westbourne.Search in Google Scholar

Augustine. 1956. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Enarrationes in Psalmos, vol. 3, edited by Almut Mutzenbecher. Turnhout: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar

Augustine. 1980. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Quaestiones Evangeliorum cum appendice Quaestionum XVI in Matthaeum, edited by Almut Mutzenbecher. Turnholt: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar

Augustine. 2007. Expositions of the Psalms, vol. 2, Translated by Maria Boulding. Hyde Park, New York: New City Press.Search in Google Scholar

Avalos, Hector. 2015. The Bad Jesus: The Ethics of New Testament Ethics. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bammel, Ernst. 1984. “The Revolutionary Theory from Reimarus to Brandon.” In Jesus and the Politics of his Day, edited by E. Bammel and C. F. D. Moule, 11–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554834.003Search in Google Scholar

Barton, Stephen C. 1994. Discipleship and Family Ties in Mark and Matthew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554841Search in Google Scholar

Beare, F. W. 1981. The Gospel according to Matthew: A Commentary. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Klaus. 1996. “Der ‘brutale’ Jesus: Gewaltsames in Wirken und Verkündigung Jesu.” Bibel und Kirche 51: 119–127.Search in Google Scholar

Bermejo-Rubio, Fernando. 2014. “Jesus and the Anti-Roman Resistance: A Reassessment of the Arguments.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 12 (1–2): 1–105.10.1163/17455197-01202001Search in Google Scholar

Betz, Otto. 1957. “Jesu Heiliger Krieg.” Novum Testamentum 2 (2): 116–137.10.2307/1560098Search in Google Scholar

Black, Matthew. 1984. “Not Peace but a Sword: Matt 10:34ff; Lk 12:51ff.” In Jesus and the Politics of his Day, edited by E. Bammel and C. F. D. Moule, 287–294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554834.018Search in Google Scholar

Brandon, S. G. F. 1967. Jesus and the Zealots: A Study of the Political Factor in Primitive Christianity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Dennis. 1992. Vir Trilinguis: A Study in the Biblical Exegesis of Saint Jerome. Kampen: Kok Pharos.Search in Google Scholar

Brunner, Frederick Dale. 2004. Matthew: A Commentary. Revised Edition. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Canellis, Aline. 2016. “Jerome’s hermeneutics: How to exegete the Bible?” In Patristic Theories of Biblical Interpretation: The Latin Fathers, edited by Tarmo Toom, 49–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107588967.003Search in Google Scholar

Canivet, P. 1958. Théodoret de Cyr. Thérapeutique des Maladies Helléniques, vol. 2. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Search in Google Scholar

Carter, Warren. 1998. “Jesus’ ‘I have come’ Statements in Matthew’s Gospel.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 60 (1): 44–62.Search in Google Scholar

Caspary, Gerard E. 1979. Politics and Exegesis: Origen and the Two Swords. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520333857Search in Google Scholar

Crafer, T. W. 1919. The Apocriticus of Macarius Magnes. London: SPCK (Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge).Search in Google Scholar

Cyril of Alexandria. 1859. A Commentary upon the Gospel According to S. Luke. Part I. Translated by R. Payne Smith (from an ancient Syriac version). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cyril of Alexandria. 2007. Commentary on the Twelve Prophets, vol. 3, Trans. (and introduction) by Robert C. Hill. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Daley, Brian E. 2003. “Is Patristic Exegesis Still Usable? Some Reflections on Early Christian Interpretation of the Psalms.” In The Art of Reading Scripture, edited by Ellen F. Davis and Richard B. Hays, 69–88. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Danker, Frederick William, and Walter Bauer, eds. 2000. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, W. D., and Dale C. Allison, Jr. 1991. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Didymus. 2006. Commentary on Zechariah. Translated by Robert C. Hill. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Didymus. 2016. Commentary on Genesis. Translated by Robert C. Hill. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Doutreleau, Louis. 1962. Didyme l’Aveugle. Sur Zacharie. Introduction, Texte Critique, Traduction et Notes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Search in Google Scholar

Doutreleau, Louis, and P. Nautin. 1976–1978. Didyme l’Aveugle. Sur la Genèse, vols. 1–2. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Search in Google Scholar

Eisler, Robert. 1929–1930. Iesous Basileus ou Basileusas: Die Messianische Unabhängigkeitsbewegung vom auftreten Johannes des Täufers bis zum Untergang Jakobs des Gerechten nach der neuerschlossenen Eroberung von Jerusalem des Flavius Josephus und den christlichen Quellen, vol. 2. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Eisler, Robert. 1931. The Messiah Jesus and John the Baptist. New York: Dial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eusebius. 2013. Commentary on Isaiah (Ancient Christian Texts). Translated by Jonathan J. Armstrong, edited by Joel C. Elowsky. Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP Academic.Search in Google Scholar

George, Augustin. 1972. “La Venue de Jésus, cause de division entre les hommes Lc 12, 49–53.” Assemblées du Seigneur 51: 62–71.Search in Google Scholar

Goulet, Richard. 2003. Macarios de Magnésie: Le Monogénès. Vol. II. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Harnack, Adolf. 1912. “Ich bin gekommen”: Die ausdrücklichen Selbstzeugnisse Jesu über den Zweck seiner Sendung und seines Kommens.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 22: 1–30.Search in Google Scholar

Hilaire de Poitiers. 1978–1979. Sur Matthieu, vol. 2, Trans. (also Introduction, Critical Text, and Notes) by Jean Doignon. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Search in Google Scholar

Hilary of Poitiers. 2012. Commentary on Matthew. Translated by D. H. Williams. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.10.2307/j.ctt3fgnv8Search in Google Scholar

Irenaeus. 1992. Against the Heresies. Translated by Dominic J. Unger. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jerome. 2008. Commentary on Matthew. Translated by Thomas P. Scheck. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

John Chrysostom. 1959. Commentary on Saint John the Apostle and Evangelist: Homilies 4888. Trans. Sister Thomas Aquinas Goggin. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Walter C., Jr., Peter H. Davids, F. F. Bruce, and Manfred T. Brauch. 1996. Hard Sayings of the Bible. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity.Search in Google Scholar

Kautsky, Karl. 1925. Foundations of Christianity: A Study in Christian Origins. London: George Allen and Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Kittel, Gerhard, and Gerhard Friedrich, eds. 1964–1976. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 10. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Lampe, G. W. H., ed. 1961. A Patristic Greek Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lampe, G. W. H. 1984. “The Two Swords (Luke 22:35–38).” In Jesus and the Politics of his Day, edited by E. Bammel and C. F. D. Moule, 335–351. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554834.021Search in Google Scholar

Louw, Johannes P., and Eugene A. Nida, eds. 1988–1989. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains. 2nd ed. New York: United Bible Societies.Search in Google Scholar

Luz, Ulrich. 2001. Matthew 820. Minneapolis: Fortress.Search in Google Scholar

Luz, Ulrich. 2005. Studies in Matthew. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Maccoby, Hyam. 1981. Revolution in Judaea: Jesus and the Jewish Resistance. New York: Taplinger.Search in Google Scholar

McKibbens, Thomas R. 1982. “The Exegesis of John Chrysostom: Homilies on the Gospels.” The Expository Times 93 (9): 264–270.10.1177/001452468209300903Search in Google Scholar

Migne, J.-P. 1857–1866. Patrologiae Cursus Completus. Series Graeca, vol. 162. Paris: Migne.Search in Google Scholar

Moorhead, John. 2013. Ambrose: Church and Society in the Late Roman World. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Mounce, Robert H. 1991. Matthew. Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson.Search in Google Scholar

O’Malley, Thomas P. 1967. Tertullian and the Bible: Language, Imagery, Exegesis. Utrecht: Dekker & Van de Vegt N.v. Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar

Origen. 1979. Origen: An Exhortation to Martyrdom, Prayer, and Selected Works. Translated by Rowan Greer. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.Search in Google Scholar

Origen. 1998. Homilies on Jeremiah and I Kings 28. Translated by John Smith. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Origen. 2001. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 110. Translated by Ronald E. Heine. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Piñero, Antonio. 2010. “Jesús y la Política de su Tiempo.” In El Discípulo: Jesús, el Hombre que nunca fue Dios, edited by Emilio Ruiz Barrachina, 217–311. Barcelona: Editiones B.Search in Google Scholar

Pusey, P. E. 1868. Sancti Patris Nostri Cyrilli Archiepiscopi Alexandrini in xii Prophetas, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, A. T. 1934. A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research. Nashville: Broadman.Search in Google Scholar

Schaff, Philip, ed. 1986. A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. First Series. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Seiler, Ingrid. 1975. Didymus der Blinde: De Trinitate, Buch 2, Kapitel 17. Meisenheim: Hain.Search in Google Scholar

Sim, David C. 2000. “The Sword Motif in Matthew 10:34.” Hervormde Teologiese Studies 56 (1): 84–104.10.4102/hts.v56i1.1698Search in Google Scholar

Spiegel, Egon. 1985. “War Jesus gewalttätig? Bemerkungen zur Tempelreinigung.” Theologie und Glaube 75: 239–247.Search in Google Scholar

Steinmetz, David C. 1980. “The Superiority of Pre-Critical Exegesis.” Theology Today 37 (1): 27–38.10.1177/004057368003700103Search in Google Scholar

Tannehill, Robert C. 1975. The Sword of His Mouth. Philadelphia: Fortress.Search in Google Scholar

Tertullian. 1868. The Five Books of Quintus Sept. Flor. Tertullianus Against Marcion. Translated by Peter Holmes. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Theodoret of Cyrus. 2013. A Cure for Pagan Maladies. Translated by Thomas Halton. New York: Newman Press.Search in Google Scholar

Toom, Tarmo. 2016. “Augustine’s Hermeneutics: The Science of the Divinely Given Signs.” In Patristic Theories of Biblical Interpretation: The Latin Fathers, edited by Tarmo Toom, 77–108. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107588967.004Search in Google Scholar

Torjesen, Karen Jo. 1986. Hermeneutical Procedure and Theological Method in Origen’s Exegesis. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110881981Search in Google Scholar

Votaw, Clyde W. 1896. The Use of the Infinitive in Biblical Greek. Chicago: Votaw.Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, Daniel B. 1996. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.Search in Google Scholar

Waltke, Bruce K., and M. O’Connor. 1990. An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.Search in Google Scholar

Weaver, Dorothy Jean. 1990. Matthew’s Missionary Discourse: A Literary Critical Analysis. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. 1975. Eusebius Werke, Band 9: Der Jesajakommentar. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1515/9783110279245Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-05-10
Published in Print: 2019-04-24

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbr-2019-1005/html
Scroll to top button