Abstract
The saying of Jesus in Matt 10:34 that he has “not come to bring peace, but a sword,” seems at odds with the general tenor of his life and teachings. Some proponents of a revolutionary Jesus have seized upon this saying as evidence that he was sympathetic to, and perhaps even supportive of, violent revolution. This article surveys patristic commentary on this verse from the first few centuries to see how this “hard saying” was understood and handled. Although a small number of writers expressed unease about the imagery and the perceived contradiction with other texts of scripture, the general trend was to construe the “sword” metaphorically, usually by appealing to a variety of passages containing the same word. No patristic writer understood the saying as an endorsement of violence, even those whose socio-political context might have justified it. Finally, although some of the hermeneutical strategies of the Fathers may not be embraced by modern exegesis, they often produced readings that were culturally and religiously sensitive as well as rhetorically insightful.
Works Cited
Allison, Dale C., Jr. 2005. Studies in Matthew: Interpretation Past and Present. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic.Search in Google Scholar
Ambrose. 1963. Theological and Dogmatic Works. Translated by Roy J. Deferrari. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ambrose. 1964. Sancti Ambrosii Opera. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, vol.79, edited by Otto Faller. Vienna, Austria: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky.Search in Google Scholar
Arens, Eduardo. 1970. The ELTHON – Sayings in the Synoptic Tradition: A Historico-Critical Investigation. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar
Aslan, Reza. 2013. Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth. London: Westbourne.Search in Google Scholar
Augustine. 1956. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Enarrationes in Psalmos, vol. 3, edited by Almut Mutzenbecher. Turnhout: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar
Augustine. 1980. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Quaestiones Evangeliorum cum appendice Quaestionum XVI in Matthaeum, edited by Almut Mutzenbecher. Turnholt: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar
Augustine. 2007. Expositions of the Psalms, vol. 2, Translated by Maria Boulding. Hyde Park, New York: New City Press.Search in Google Scholar
Avalos, Hector. 2015. The Bad Jesus: The Ethics of New Testament Ethics. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bammel, Ernst. 1984. “The Revolutionary Theory from Reimarus to Brandon.” In Jesus and the Politics of his Day, edited by E. Bammel and C. F. D. Moule, 11–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554834.003Search in Google Scholar
Barton, Stephen C. 1994. Discipleship and Family Ties in Mark and Matthew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554841Search in Google Scholar
Beare, F. W. 1981. The Gospel according to Matthew: A Commentary. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Berger, Klaus. 1996. “Der ‘brutale’ Jesus: Gewaltsames in Wirken und Verkündigung Jesu.” Bibel und Kirche 51: 119–127.Search in Google Scholar
Bermejo-Rubio, Fernando. 2014. “Jesus and the Anti-Roman Resistance: A Reassessment of the Arguments.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 12 (1–2): 1–105.10.1163/17455197-01202001Search in Google Scholar
Betz, Otto. 1957. “Jesu Heiliger Krieg.” Novum Testamentum 2 (2): 116–137.10.2307/1560098Search in Google Scholar
Black, Matthew. 1984. “Not Peace but a Sword: Matt 10:34ff; Lk 12:51ff.” In Jesus and the Politics of his Day, edited by E. Bammel and C. F. D. Moule, 287–294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554834.018Search in Google Scholar
Brandon, S. G. F. 1967. Jesus and the Zealots: A Study of the Political Factor in Primitive Christianity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Dennis. 1992. Vir Trilinguis: A Study in the Biblical Exegesis of Saint Jerome. Kampen: Kok Pharos.Search in Google Scholar
Brunner, Frederick Dale. 2004. Matthew: A Commentary. Revised Edition. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar
Canellis, Aline. 2016. “Jerome’s hermeneutics: How to exegete the Bible?” In Patristic Theories of Biblical Interpretation: The Latin Fathers, edited by Tarmo Toom, 49–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107588967.003Search in Google Scholar
Canivet, P. 1958. Théodoret de Cyr. Thérapeutique des Maladies Helléniques, vol. 2. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Search in Google Scholar
Carter, Warren. 1998. “Jesus’ ‘I have come’ Statements in Matthew’s Gospel.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 60 (1): 44–62.Search in Google Scholar
Caspary, Gerard E. 1979. Politics and Exegesis: Origen and the Two Swords. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520333857Search in Google Scholar
Crafer, T. W. 1919. The Apocriticus of Macarius Magnes. London: SPCK (Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge).Search in Google Scholar
Cyril of Alexandria. 1859. A Commentary upon the Gospel According to S. Luke. Part I. Translated by R. Payne Smith (from an ancient Syriac version). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cyril of Alexandria. 2007. Commentary on the Twelve Prophets, vol. 3, Trans. (and introduction) by Robert C. Hill. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Daley, Brian E. 2003. “Is Patristic Exegesis Still Usable? Some Reflections on Early Christian Interpretation of the Psalms.” In The Art of Reading Scripture, edited by Ellen F. Davis and Richard B. Hays, 69–88. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar
Danker, Frederick William, and Walter Bauer, eds. 2000. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, W. D., and Dale C. Allison, Jr. 1991. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Search in Google Scholar
Didymus. 2006. Commentary on Zechariah. Translated by Robert C. Hill. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Didymus. 2016. Commentary on Genesis. Translated by Robert C. Hill. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Doutreleau, Louis. 1962. Didyme l’Aveugle. Sur Zacharie. Introduction, Texte Critique, Traduction et Notes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Search in Google Scholar
Doutreleau, Louis, and P. Nautin. 1976–1978. Didyme l’Aveugle. Sur la Genèse, vols. 1–2. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Search in Google Scholar
Eisler, Robert. 1929–1930. Iesous Basileus ou Basileusas: Die Messianische Unabhängigkeitsbewegung vom auftreten Johannes des Täufers bis zum Untergang Jakobs des Gerechten nach der neuerschlossenen Eroberung von Jerusalem des Flavius Josephus und den christlichen Quellen, vol. 2. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Eisler, Robert. 1931. The Messiah Jesus and John the Baptist. New York: Dial Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eusebius. 2013. Commentary on Isaiah (Ancient Christian Texts). Translated by Jonathan J. Armstrong, edited by Joel C. Elowsky. Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP Academic.Search in Google Scholar
George, Augustin. 1972. “La Venue de Jésus, cause de division entre les hommes Lc 12, 49–53.” Assemblées du Seigneur 51: 62–71.Search in Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard. 2003. Macarios de Magnésie: Le Monogénès. Vol. II. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Harnack, Adolf. 1912. “Ich bin gekommen”: Die ausdrücklichen Selbstzeugnisse Jesu über den Zweck seiner Sendung und seines Kommens.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 22: 1–30.Search in Google Scholar
Hilaire de Poitiers. 1978–1979. Sur Matthieu, vol. 2, Trans. (also Introduction, Critical Text, and Notes) by Jean Doignon. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Search in Google Scholar
Hilary of Poitiers. 2012. Commentary on Matthew. Translated by D. H. Williams. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.10.2307/j.ctt3fgnv8Search in Google Scholar
Irenaeus. 1992. Against the Heresies. Translated by Dominic J. Unger. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jerome. 2008. Commentary on Matthew. Translated by Thomas P. Scheck. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
John Chrysostom. 1959. Commentary on Saint John the Apostle and Evangelist: Homilies 48–88. Trans. Sister Thomas Aquinas Goggin. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kaiser, Walter C., Jr., Peter H. Davids, F. F. Bruce, and Manfred T. Brauch. 1996. Hard Sayings of the Bible. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity.Search in Google Scholar
Kautsky, Karl. 1925. Foundations of Christianity: A Study in Christian Origins. London: George Allen and Unwin.Search in Google Scholar
Kittel, Gerhard, and Gerhard Friedrich, eds. 1964–1976. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 10. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar
Lampe, G. W. H., ed. 1961. A Patristic Greek Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lampe, G. W. H. 1984. “The Two Swords (Luke 22:35–38).” In Jesus and the Politics of his Day, edited by E. Bammel and C. F. D. Moule, 335–351. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554834.021Search in Google Scholar
Louw, Johannes P., and Eugene A. Nida, eds. 1988–1989. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains. 2nd ed. New York: United Bible Societies.Search in Google Scholar
Luz, Ulrich. 2001. Matthew 8–20. Minneapolis: Fortress.Search in Google Scholar
Luz, Ulrich. 2005. Studies in Matthew. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar
Maccoby, Hyam. 1981. Revolution in Judaea: Jesus and the Jewish Resistance. New York: Taplinger.Search in Google Scholar
McKibbens, Thomas R. 1982. “The Exegesis of John Chrysostom: Homilies on the Gospels.” The Expository Times 93 (9): 264–270.10.1177/001452468209300903Search in Google Scholar
Migne, J.-P. 1857–1866. Patrologiae Cursus Completus. Series Graeca, vol. 162. Paris: Migne.Search in Google Scholar
Moorhead, John. 2013. Ambrose: Church and Society in the Late Roman World. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Mounce, Robert H. 1991. Matthew. Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson.Search in Google Scholar
O’Malley, Thomas P. 1967. Tertullian and the Bible: Language, Imagery, Exegesis. Utrecht: Dekker & Van de Vegt N.v. Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar
Origen. 1979. Origen: An Exhortation to Martyrdom, Prayer, and Selected Works. Translated by Rowan Greer. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.Search in Google Scholar
Origen. 1998. Homilies on Jeremiah and I Kings 28. Translated by John Smith. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Origen. 2001. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 1–10. Translated by Ronald E. Heine. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar
Piñero, Antonio. 2010. “Jesús y la Política de su Tiempo.” In El Discípulo: Jesús, el Hombre que nunca fue Dios, edited by Emilio Ruiz Barrachina, 217–311. Barcelona: Editiones B.Search in Google Scholar
Pusey, P. E. 1868. Sancti Patris Nostri Cyrilli Archiepiscopi Alexandrini in xii Prophetas, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Robertson, A. T. 1934. A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research. Nashville: Broadman.Search in Google Scholar
Schaff, Philip, ed. 1986. A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. First Series. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar
Seiler, Ingrid. 1975. Didymus der Blinde: De Trinitate, Buch 2, Kapitel 1–7. Meisenheim: Hain.Search in Google Scholar
Sim, David C. 2000. “The Sword Motif in Matthew 10:34.” Hervormde Teologiese Studies 56 (1): 84–104.10.4102/hts.v56i1.1698Search in Google Scholar
Spiegel, Egon. 1985. “War Jesus gewalttätig? Bemerkungen zur Tempelreinigung.” Theologie und Glaube 75: 239–247.Search in Google Scholar
Steinmetz, David C. 1980. “The Superiority of Pre-Critical Exegesis.” Theology Today 37 (1): 27–38.10.1177/004057368003700103Search in Google Scholar
Tannehill, Robert C. 1975. The Sword of His Mouth. Philadelphia: Fortress.Search in Google Scholar
Tertullian. 1868. The Five Books of Quintus Sept. Flor. Tertullianus Against Marcion. Translated by Peter Holmes. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Search in Google Scholar
Theodoret of Cyrus. 2013. A Cure for Pagan Maladies. Translated by Thomas Halton. New York: Newman Press.Search in Google Scholar
Toom, Tarmo. 2016. “Augustine’s Hermeneutics: The Science of the Divinely Given Signs.” In Patristic Theories of Biblical Interpretation: The Latin Fathers, edited by Tarmo Toom, 77–108. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107588967.004Search in Google Scholar
Torjesen, Karen Jo. 1986. Hermeneutical Procedure and Theological Method in Origen’s Exegesis. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110881981Search in Google Scholar
Votaw, Clyde W. 1896. The Use of the Infinitive in Biblical Greek. Chicago: Votaw.Search in Google Scholar
Wallace, Daniel B. 1996. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.Search in Google Scholar
Waltke, Bruce K., and M. O’Connor. 1990. An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.Search in Google Scholar
Weaver, Dorothy Jean. 1990. Matthew’s Missionary Discourse: A Literary Critical Analysis. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. 1975. Eusebius Werke, Band 9: Der Jesajakommentar. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1515/9783110279245Search in Google Scholar
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Ready for His Closeup? Pasolini’s San Paolo and Paul, Apostle of Christ (2018)
- Exploring Metaphors for the Reception History of the Lord’s Prayer
- Genesis by the Numbers: A Reassessment of the Years of the Patriarchs, Beginning with the Joseph Story
- Emotions in Eden and After: Ancient Jewish and Christian Perspectives on Genesis 2–4
- “Sword Handling: The Early Christian Reception of Matthew 10:34”
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Ready for His Closeup? Pasolini’s San Paolo and Paul, Apostle of Christ (2018)
- Exploring Metaphors for the Reception History of the Lord’s Prayer
- Genesis by the Numbers: A Reassessment of the Years of the Patriarchs, Beginning with the Joseph Story
- Emotions in Eden and After: Ancient Jewish and Christian Perspectives on Genesis 2–4
- “Sword Handling: The Early Christian Reception of Matthew 10:34”