Abstract
The paper raises the question of functioning of Biblical tradition in modern culture in the perspective of the history of ideas. Referring to the postsecular interpretation of the Modernity, the research is based on Biblical paraphrases in Bulgarian literature of the interwar period, which are perceived as a testimony of the search for a worldview. The aim is to show how a situation of ideological turmoil accompanied by experiences of social crisis leads to utilizing a Gnostic worldview. The phenomenon is seen in a broader context as an illustration of transmission of ideas within the Western culture and religious thought.
Works Cited
Arendt, Hannah. 1981. The Life of the Mind. Volume 1–2. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Suche in Google Scholar
Baczko, Bronislaw. 1997. Job, mon Ami: Promesses du bonheur et fatalité du mal [Job, my friend: Promises of happiness and the fatality of evil]. Paris: Gallimard.Suche in Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1968. “Theses on the Philosophy of History.” In Walter Benjamin, Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.10.4324/9781003059509-26Suche in Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. 1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Suche in Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. 1979. The Heretical Imperative: Contemporary Possibilities of Religious Affirmation. Garden City, New York: Anchor Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bielik-Robson, Agata. 2000. Inna nowoczesność. Pytania o współczesną formułę duchowości [The Other Modernity: Questions of a contemporary formula for spirituality]. Kraków: Universitas.Suche in Google Scholar
Bielik-Robson, Agata. 2008. “Na pustyni”. Kryptoteologie późnej nowoczesności [“In the desert.” Cryptotheology of late modernity]. Kraków: Universitas.Suche in Google Scholar
Bielik-Robson, Agata. 2013. “Powrót mesjańskiej obietnicy, czyli postsekularyzm w sensie ścisłym [The Return of the Messianic Promise. On the post-secular turn in a narrower perspective].” In Deus otiosus. Nowoczesność w perspektywie postsekularnej [Deus Otiosus: Modernity in the postsecular perspective], eds. Agata Bielik-Robson and Maciej A. Sosnowski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.Suche in Google Scholar
Dimitrova, Nina. 2003. Obrazi na čoveka (Antropologični idei v bălgarskata filosofska misăl meždu dvete svetovni vojni) [Images of Man: Anthropological ideas in the Bulgarian philosophy in the interwar period]. Veliko Tărnovo: Faber.Suche in Google Scholar
Dobbelaere, Karel. 2002. Secularization: An Analysis at Three Levels. Bruxelles; New York: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0352-6146-2Suche in Google Scholar
Drzewiecka, Ewelina. 2004. “Myśl postsekularna w badaniach slawistycznych. Próba spojrzenia [The Postsecular Thought in Slavic Studies: A brief overview].” Studia Litteraria Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 9 (1): 29–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/20843933ST.14.003.3050.Suche in Google Scholar
Drzewiecka, Ewelina. 2016. Herezja Judasza w kulturze (po)nowoczesnej. Studium przypadku [The Judas Heresy in (Post)modern culture: A case study]. Kraków: Universitas.Suche in Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method, trans. Joel Weinsheimer, Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar
Gałązka, Wojciech. 1991. “Mit niewoli w literaturze i kulturze bułgarskiej [The Myth of Slavery in Bulgarian literature and culture].” Slavia 2: 172–176.Suche in Google Scholar
Hryniewicz, Wacław. 1989. Nadzieja zbawienia dla wszystkich. Od eschatologii lęki do eschatologii nadziei [Hope for Everybody: From the eschatology of fear to the eschatology of hope]. Warszawa: Verbinum.Suche in Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. 1985. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. New York and London: Methuen.Suche in Google Scholar
Kerényi, Karl. 1996. Dionysos: Archetypal Image of Indestructible Life, trans. Ralph Manheim. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kolakowski, Leszek. 2005. Main Currents of Marxism, trans. P. S. Falla. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Suche in Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1968. The Will to Power, trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage.Suche in Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1998. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a philosophy of the future, trans. Marion Faber. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Popović, Justin. 1992. Philosophie Orthodoxe de la Vérité: Dogmatique de l‘Eglise orthodoxe [Orthodox Philosophy of Truth: Dogmatics of the Orthodox Church]. Lausanne: L’Age d’homme.Suche in Google Scholar
Quinzio, Sergio. 1990. Radici ebraiche del modern [The Hebrew Roots of Modernity]. Milano: Adelphi.Suche in Google Scholar
Radkov, Penčo. 1926. Juda [Judas]. Veliko Tărnovo: E. p. Hristov.Suche in Google Scholar
Raynov, Nikolay. 1925. “Bjan li e svărhčovek? [Is the Ubermensch a Dream?].” In Nikolay Raynov, Dnes i utre [Today and Tommorow]. Sofija: Akacija.Suche in Google Scholar
Raynov, Nikolay. 1989. “Isus na planinata [Jesus on the Mount].” In Nikolay Raynov, Săčinenija v pet toma [Works in 5 Volumes], vol. 1, edited by Edvin Sugarev. Sofija: Bălgarski pisatel.Suche in Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1974. The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics, ed. Don Ihde, trans. Willis Domingo et al. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Rudolph, Kurt. 1983. Gnosis: The nature and history of Gnosticism, trans. R McL Wilson. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Suche in Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1972. Ressentiment, trans. William W. Holdheim. New York: Schocken Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1985. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom. 1961. Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism. New York: Schocken Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Stojčeva, Svetlana. 2007. “Okultnijat simvolizăm na Nikolaj Rajnov [Occult Symbolism by Nikolay Raynov].” Literaturen vestnik 22: 14.Suche in Google Scholar
Sugarev, Edvin. 2007. Nikolay Raynov. Bogotărsačăt bogoborec [Nikolay Raynov. The God-Seeker Godfighter]. Sofia: Karina-Mariana Todorova.Suche in Google Scholar
Szacki, Jerzy. 1971. Tradycja. Przegląd problematyki [Tradition: An overview]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Suche in Google Scholar
Szwat-Gyłybowa, Grażyna. 2011. “Niewola turecka [The Turk slavery].” In Leksykon tradycji bułgarskiej [Lexicon of Bulgarian tradition], edited by G. Szwat-Gyłybowa. Warszawa: SOW.Suche in Google Scholar
Szwat-Gyłybowa, Grażyna. 2014. “Playing Catch Up: The Notion of Needing to Accelerate a Country’s Progress Towards a Civilized Paradise – the Bulgarian Version (a Proposed Entry for a Dictionary of Peregrinating Ideas).” Slavia Meridionalis 14: 310–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.11649/sm.2014.015.10.11649/sm.2014.015Suche in Google Scholar
Szwat-Gyłybowa, Grażyna. 2017. Bogomilism. The Afterlife of the “Bulgarian Heresy”. Translated by Piotr Szymczak. Warszawa: Instytut Slawistyki PAN, (http://ireteslaw.ispan.waw.pl/handle/123456789/83).Suche in Google Scholar
Taubes, Jacob. 2010. “The Price of Messianism.” In From Cult to Culture: Fragments Towards a Critique of Historical Reason, edited by Charlotte Elisheva Fonrobert and Amir Engel. Stanford. California: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Voegelin, Eric. 1952. The New Science of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Voegelin, Eric. 1968. Science, Politics, and Gnosticism. Chicago: H. Regnery Co.Suche in Google Scholar
Vrina, Izabel. 1995. ““Bogomilski legendi” ot Nikolay Raynov. Alegorično rezjume na zapadnija ezoterizăm [“Bogomil Legends” by Nikolay Raynov: An allegoric resume of the Westerns esotericism].” Letopisi 1–2: 192–205.Suche in Google Scholar
Vrina, Izabel. 1996. “Nikolay Raynov i poetičnoto vživyavane v sinteza (simvolističen period – 1912–1920) [Nikolay Raynov and the Poetic Immersion into the Synthesis],” Literaturata 1: 145–161.Suche in Google Scholar
Zowczak, Magdalena. 2003. “Apokryf jako próba wiary [Apocrypha as a Trial of Faith].” In Nie-złota legenda. Kanoniczność i apokryficzność w kulturze [The Non-golden Legend: Canonicity and apocrypha in the culture], edited by Jarosław Eichstaedt and Krzysztof Piątkowski. Ożarów: Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Muzeum Wnetrz Dworskich.Suche in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Allegory and Religious Pluralism: Biblical Interpretation in the Eighteenth Century
- Ireland and the Old Testament: Transmission, Translation, and Unexpected Influence
- The Bulgarian Worldview Mosaic: Literary Paraphrases of the Bible as a Source for the History of Ideas
- Scripture and Power: Four Anecdotes from Early Seventeenth-Century England
- “God Never Appeared to Moses:” Eusebius of Caesarea’s Peculiar Exegesis of the Burning Bush Theophany
- “The Greatest Paradox of All”: The “Place of God” in the Mystical Theologies of Gregory of Nyssa and Evagrius of Pontus
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Allegory and Religious Pluralism: Biblical Interpretation in the Eighteenth Century
- Ireland and the Old Testament: Transmission, Translation, and Unexpected Influence
- The Bulgarian Worldview Mosaic: Literary Paraphrases of the Bible as a Source for the History of Ideas
- Scripture and Power: Four Anecdotes from Early Seventeenth-Century England
- “God Never Appeared to Moses:” Eusebius of Caesarea’s Peculiar Exegesis of the Burning Bush Theophany
- “The Greatest Paradox of All”: The “Place of God” in the Mystical Theologies of Gregory of Nyssa and Evagrius of Pontus