Home Beyond the Business Climate: Supplementary Questions in the ifo Business Survey
Article Open Access

Beyond the Business Climate: Supplementary Questions in the ifo Business Survey

  • Katrin Demmelhuber , Stefan Sauer and Klaus Wohlrabe ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 16, 2022

Abstract

In the monthly ifo Business Survey, around 9000 companies answer questions about their current business situation, expectations, and plans for the near future as well as on other business variables. Beyond the regular questions, ifo has also the possibility to include supplementary questions into the survey. These questions may be prompted by the intention to obtain an ad hoc picture of the effects of certain developments in economic policy on the companies and their reactions to them (e.g. the Covid-19 pandemic or the war in Ukraine). Another reason is the collection of data for research projects. This article gives an overview of all supplementary questions since 2009 through May 2022. It intends to show examples of the use of the obtained data and can be used as a guide for future research projects. Researchers can work with the firm-level microdata of supplementary and regular survey questions at the LMU-ifo Economics & Business Data Center.

JEL Classification: C80; C81; C83

1 Introduction

Since 1949, the ifo Institute has been conducting the monthly ifo Business Survey by asking German companies about various relevant variables regarding their economic activity (Anderson 1952; Langelütke and Marquardt 1951).[1] The obtained data proved to be very valuable for empirical economic research and business cycle analysis on the country level as well as at the economic sector and regional level. The advantages of the microdata sets that are most worthy pointing out are the high number of about 9000 monthly responses from a set of firms that are representative for the German economy, the extensive set of questions answered by every firm, and the large number of observations by firm (on average, firms are observed more than 70 times) as response rates are uncommonly high and attrition is low compared to other business surveys (Link 2020). Moreover, the questionnaires of the monthly ifo Business Survey are mostly answered by people in management positions within the participating companies. This means the requirements for reliable reporting are fulfilled (Sauer and Wohlrabe 2019).

As a main result of the ifo Business Survey, the ifo Business Climate Index Germany is one of the most important leading economic indicators in Germany (Abberger and Wohlrabe 2006; Lehmann 2020). In addition, numerous other indicators are calculated and published from the data material of the ifo Business Survey. Among them, for instance, are the overall indicators on employment plans (ifo Employment Barometer), export expectations, or uncertainty in the German economy. An overview of all questions and indicators are shown in Demmelhuber et al. (2022). In addition to the aggregated results, the disaggregated microdata are an enormous data treasure for diverse types of analyses (Becker and Wohlrabe 2008).

The inclusion of supplementary questions has further increased the survey’s potential for economic research. Some of these supplementary questions are surveyed irregularly or only once. Their focus usually is on current economic topics or firm-specific information of interest for research projects.

The scope of this article is to emphasize the enormous possibilities for all kinds of research projects. We give a tabular overview of all supplementary questions from 2009 until May 2022. Moreover, we present selected results. Subsequently, we outline the data access for researchers. We conclude by providing a brief outlook on possible further developments.

2 Supplementary Questions in the ifo Business Survey

In the past few years, supplementary questions became more and more part of the ifo Business Survey. These questions are mainly prompted by the intention to obtain an ad hoc picture of the effects of certain developments in economic policy or in the world economy on the companies, and the firms’ reactions to them (e.g. the Covid-19 pandemic or the war in Ukraine). The other reason is the collection of firm-specific data for various research projects. Since the ifo survey is a panel survey, these questions can also be linked to other survey variables. Additionally, they can serve either as control, group, explanatory, or dependent variables in statistical or econometric analyses. Supplementary questions not only provide information at the current survey period, but also offer the possibility for ex-post evaluations.

We provide in Tables 1 5 an overview of the various topics and contents covered by the supplementary questions that have been surveyed in the ifo Business Surveys from 2009 until May 2022. Furthermore, the tables show the survey date for each question, the sector in which it was asked, and references to selected results. The exact wording of all supplementary questions as well as more results and applications are given in Demmelhuber et al. (2022).

Table 1:

Economic policy questions.

Topics Content Date Surveyed sectors Selected results
Introduction of the minimum wage in Germany A priori and ex-post assessments of companies: Affectedness by the minimum wage, planned/taken measures, and changes of employment structure within the company. 11/2014, 03/2016 All sectors Link (2019)
Refugee crisis Potential of hiring asylum seekers in specific positions and hindrances for hiring asylum seekers in specific positions. 10/2015 All sectors Battisti et al. (2015)
Brexit Impact of a possible Brexit, impact of a hard Brexit, probabilities for a hard Brexit, percentage of sales affected by a hard Brexit, and impact of hard Brexit on this percentage of sales. 06/2016, 12/2018 Manufacturing sector ifo Institute (2018)
US trade policy under President Trump Expectations on changes in trade policy, impact on operations in the U.S., expectations on the company’s sales development in the U.S., and economic relations with the U.S. 02/2017 Manufacturing sector Braml and Felbermayr (2017)
Negative interest rates Confrontation with negative interest rates, measures to avoid negative interest rates, effects on earning situation, and number of company’s main banks. 06/2017 All sectors Hainz et al. (2017)
EU-Mercosur free trade agreement Exports to the Mercosur region, prerequisites for starting export business with Mercosur, and reactions on a possible trade agreement with Mercosur. 08/2017 Manufacturing sector
US tax reform Percentage of turnover in the U.S., competition from companies in the U.S., development of tax burden (short and long term), reactions on the tax reform, and probability of relocation of intellectual property to the U.S. 03/2018 Manufacturing, trade, and service sector Boumans et al. (2020) and Krolage and Wohlrabe (2018)
Tax incentives for R&D in Germany Share of R&D expenditures, received funding by specific institutions, and acceptance and effect of planned tax incentives on R&D activity. 09/2019 Manufacturing sector
Current European economic policy topics Agreement on various statements about European economic topics and knowledge about topics (minimum wage, immigration, robots/artificial intelligence, retirement age, free choice of residence/place of work, and European champions). 02/2020 All sectors
Supply chain act Changes in procurement strategy, and impact and effects of a national supply chain law on company. 05/2021 Manufacturing, trade, and service sector
Table 2:

Company- or respondent-specific questions.

Topics Content Date Surveyed sectors Selected results
Export markets Share of exports on total sales and world regions with biggest export share. 06/2011 Manufacturing sector
Family business Self-classification as family business. 02/2014 All sectors Stiftung Familienunternehmen (2020)
Characteristics of medium-sized companies Number of general managers, company shareholding of general managers, and self-classification as “medium-sized” enterprise. 08/2016 All sectors
Online shops and market places Existence of sales via own online store/other online platforms, type of online sales channels, share of online trade, and expected development of online trade. 08/2016, 08/2019 Trade sector Rumscheidt (2020)
Export of services Existence currently/planned of service offerings abroad and barriers for company’s activities abroad. 08/2018 Service sector
Outsourcing of business processes Share of processes in specific areas provided by external service providers and expected developments for the next years. 08/2018 Manufacturing sector
Share of foreign turnover Percentage of the company’s turnover generate abroad. 09/2018 All sectors
Year of company foundation Year of company foundation 09/2018 All sectors
Characteristics of the respondent(s) Department and position of the respondent(s), highest educational attainment, interest in economic policy, trust in experts (policy issues, Covid-19 pandemic), and risk aversity. 11/2018

02/2020

11/2021

03/2022
All sectors Sauer and Wohlrabe (2019)
Importance of logistics services Business constraints by specific factors of logistics and online business constraints regarding customer delivery (only trade sector). 06/2019 Manufacturing, trade Brandt et al. (2019)
Decisions regarding production and price setting Significance of factors influencing decisions on pricing and production (manufacturing, construction)/orders (trade)/human resources (service). 10/2020 All sectors
Table 3:

Other research questions.

Topics Content Date Surveyed sectors Selected results
Innovation Rating of various factors for the company’s innovation climate. 01/2009 Manufacturing sector
Main bank relations Intensive and long-standing business relations with a bank and types of banks. 06/2009 Manufacturing, trade, and construction Abberger et al. (2009)
Effects of extreme weather events Effects of heat waves/cold waves/drought/heavy rain/storms on specific company areas, occurrence of extreme weather in the region of the company, expectations for extreme weather in the future, and preparations for consequences of extreme weather. 11/2010

02/2013 05/2019

05/2022
All sectors Berlemann and Lehmann (2020)
Importance of flight connections Significance of available flight connections for company to destinations: Germany, Europe, and worldwide. 03/2013 All sectors
Bank credits Credit agreements with banks in the last year, conditions of the agreements as expected, reasons for nonoccurrence, and purpose of credits. 06/2016 All sectors Hainz and Hristov (2017)
GDP expectations of companies Estimation of change of GDP in Germany in % for the current and following year, and importance of general economic developments in Germany for the business situation (only 08/2018). 08/2018 03/2019 08/2019 08/2020 All sectors Dovern et al. (2020)
Capacity utilization Annual average of the capacity utilization of plants/machines in a normal economic situation. 01/2019 Manufacturing, services, and construction
Uncertainty about demand Uncertainty regarding various factors for future demand. 12/2019 Manufacturing, services, and trade Lautenbacher (2020)
Satisfaction with institutions and administration Satisfaction with local government and administration, and satisfaction with social security institutions. 09/2021 All sectors
Supplies from China Dependency on supplies from China, future strategies regarding supplies from China, and reasons for reductions of imports from China. 02/2022 Manufacturing, trade Baur and Flach (2022)
Table 4:

Supplementary questions on the Covid-19 crisis.

Topics Content Date Surveyed sectors Selected results
Effects of the outbreak of the pandemic Business impact of the outbreak and determination of negative effects. 03/2020 All sectors Dorn et al. (2020)
Current effects of the crisis and expectations Effect on the business situation, expectations on duration of the pandemic effects, problems in specific company areas, and current threat to the company’s existence. 04/2020–03/2022 All sectors Balleer et al. (2020) and Buchheim et al. (2022a,b)
Short-time work Current share of employees in short-time work and average reduction in working hours for these employees. 05/2020–05/2022 All sectors Link and Sauer (2020)
Working from home Share of employees working at least partly from home (starting 02/2021) and long-term effects of the pandemic on working from home (04/2020–07/2020). 04/2020–04/2022 All sectors Alipour et al. (2021a,b)
Number of employees Number of employees in the company. 05/2020-ongoing All sectors
Short-term effects of the crisis Measures taken as a reaction on the pandemic, problems and needs, effects on sales, and expected survival time (specific periods) if pandemic continues. 04/2020–11/2020 All sectors Litsche et al. (2020)
Long-term effects of the crisis Permanent changes in specific areas of the company and investment in specific areas. 05/2020–07/2020 All sectors
Liquidity situation Estimated time range of liquidity reserves, development of capital ratio, availability of credits, change of lending rates, cash and cash equivalents in % of total assets, development of specific financing options, and development of equity capital ratio. 05/2020–02/2021 All sectors Peichl et al. (2021)
Governmental pandemic assistance programs for companies Use of tax deferrals, application for specific liquidity assistance programs, and assessment of the programs. 04/2020–05/2020 All sectors
Supply bottlenecks Affection of supply bottlenecks, changes in procurement, assessment of price developments for products and materials, indication of the products/materials concerned, and expected duration of supply bottlenecks. 04/2020-ongoing Manufacturing, trade, and construction Wohlrabe (2021) and Leiss and Wohlrabe (2021)
Table 5:

Supplementary question on the economic effects of the war in Ukraine.

Topics Content Date Surveyed sectors Selected results
Sanctions against Russia after the annexation of Crimea Existence and nature of specific economic relations with Russia, and current and expected constraints because of the conflict. 05/2014 Manufacturing sector Grimme et al. (2014)
Consequences of the outbreak of war Expected negative effects on the company. 03/2022 Manufacturing sector Sauer and Wohlrabe (2022)
Economic relations with Russia Existence and nature of specific economic relations with Russia before the war and in the future. 03/2022

04/2022
Manufacturing, services, and trade
Problems because of the war Effects of the war regarding supply shortages, demand and sales, logistics and financing: Relevance and importance of these effects for the company. 04/2022 Manufacturing, services, and trade
Supply shortages Assessment of the substitutability of products from Russia, Belarus, or Ukraine. 04/2022 Manufacturing, services, and trade
Energy Energy intensity of the company, shares of specific energy sources in energy costs of the company, price developments, percentage of price increases passed on to customers, and effects of possible gas shortages (only manufacturing). 04/2022

05/2022
All sectors
Expected effect on sales Expected effect on sales for the year 2022 because of the war. 04/2022 Manufacturing, services, and trade

We divided the supplementary questions into different thematic blocks. Most commonly, “current economic policy questions” (Table 1) are used for the evaluation of consequences of political decisions or other important (geopolitical) events for the German economy. “Company- or respondent-specific questions” (Table 2) can be used for research projects, where it may be important to have specific information about the responding company or personally about the respondent. This information can also be matched with other variables of the Business Survey or used as control variables. Therefore, some supplementary questions were asked to create control variables or group variables (e.g. family businesses vs. other businesses). “Other research questions” cover a wide topical range. Table 3 gives an overview of these questions surveyed since 2009. Starting March 2020, the Covid-19 crisis overshadowed the German and the World economy. For this reason, numerous supplementary questions have been included in the survey every month dealing with the current economic impact of the pandemic and the reactions of the companies. These questions mainly focus on short- and long-term effects of the pandemic on companies and cover topics such as short-term work, remote working from home, governmental pandemic assistance programs, or internal company problem areas during the crisis (Table 4). As of the date of this article, also various supplementary questions focus on the economic effects of the war in Ukraine (Table 5).

3 Data Access

Researchers can access data from the ifo Business Survey on the microdata level at the LMU-ifo Economics & Business Data Center (EBDC) under strict nondisclosure agreements free of charge for noncommercial and scientific usage (Seiler 2012). This provision of data is intended to increase synergies between empirical and theoretical research. The EBDC provides external databases in combination with innovative data sets on German firms. These company panels include both survey data of the ifo Institute as well as external accounting data or other structural enterprise information concerning corporate finance, investment activity, or corporate governance (e.g. from the company databases Amadeus, Orbis, and Hoppenstedt).

The microdata panel from the ifo Business Survey includes both historical and current data starting from 1980. The EBDC anonymizes the data and continuously expands the data sets both in terms of time and content. The website of the EBDC (https://www.ifo.de/en/EBDC) provides a comprehensive overview and description of the data sets that are hosted at the ifo Institute. Access to the EBDC Business Panels (including a detailed documentation of all variables) can be requested via the online research application.

4 Summary and Outlook

Supplementary questions in the ifo Business Survey offer a large potential for all kinds of economic research and analyses. For instance, they can be very useful for analyzing current developments in the German economy and can also serve as input for various research projects. For the future, ifo intends to use supplementary questions for the introduction of new survey methods. Randomized questions are an example for such a new field. Therefore, it is possible to randomly divide the panel in different groups and ask the participants slightly different questions or give them different texts or information as introduction before the questions. Analyses of the influence of the wording or of the order of the answer categories can be valuable results for the future design of new standard or supplementary questions.

Beyond the ifo Business Survey, ifo has a lot more survey activities. There are among others, the quarterly ifo Personnel Manager Survey that surveys companies from all sectors on HR questions and staff deployment, and the ifo Management-Survey that surveys a selected group of decision-makers in German on current economic policy issues and changes in the macroeconomic environment. Sauer and Wohlrabe (2020) present a detailed description of all ifo surveys. These surveys also have the possibility for supplementary questions and offer a big potential for research projects and economic analyses. The microdata from these surveys can be accessed by researchers at the EBDC.


Corresponding author: Klaus Wohlrabe, ifo Center for Macroeconomics and Surveys, Ifo Institute, 81679 Munich, Germany, E-mail:

References

Abberger, K. and Wohlrabe, K. (2006). Einige Prognoseeigenschaften des ifo Geschäftsklimas – Ein Überblick über die neuere wissenschaftliche Literatur. ifo Schnelld. 59: 19–26.Search in Google Scholar

Abberger, K., Hainz, C., and Kunkel, A. (2009). Kreditvergabepolitik der Banken: Warum leiden große Unternehmen besonders? ifo Schnelld. 62: 32–34.Search in Google Scholar

Alipour, J.-V., Fadinger, H., and Schymik, J. (2021a). My home is my castle. The benefits of working from home during a pandemic crisis. J. Publ. Econ. 196: 1–11.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104373Search in Google Scholar

Alipour, J.-V., Falck, O., Peichl, A., and Sauer, S. (2021b). Homeoffice-Potenzial weiterhin nicht ausgeschöpft. ifo Schnelldienst Digital 2: 1–4.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, O. (1952). The business test of the IFO-Institute for economic research, Munich, and its theoretical model. Revue de l’Institute International de Statistique 20: 1–17.10.2307/1401826Search in Google Scholar

Balleer, A., Link, S., Menkhoff, M., and Zorn, P. (2020). Demand or Supply? Price Adjustment during the Covid-19 Pandemic. CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 8394.10.2139/ssrn.3669497Search in Google Scholar

Battisti, M., Felbermayr, G., and Poutvaara, P. (2015). Arbeitsmarktchancen von Flüchtlingen in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung. ifo Schnelldienst 68: 22–25.Search in Google Scholar

Baur, A. and Flach, L. (2022). Deutsch-chinesische Handelsbeziehungen. Wie abhängig ist Deutschland vom Reich der Mitte? ifo Schnelld. 75: 56–65.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, S. and Wohlrabe, K. (2008). European data watch. Micro data at the ifo institute for economic research – the “ifo business survey,” usage and access. Schmollers Jahrbuch. J. Appl. Soc. Sci. Stud. 128: 307–319.10.3790/schm.128.2.307Search in Google Scholar

Berlemann, M. and Lehmann, R. (2020). Extremwettersensibilität deutscher Unternehmen – Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung. ifo Schnelld. 73: 45–55.Search in Google Scholar

Boumans, D., Fuest, C., Krolage, C., and Wohlrabe, K. (2020). Expected effects of the US tax reform on other countries. Global and local survey evidence. Int. Tax Publ. Finance 27: 1608–1630.10.1007/s10797-020-09618-1Search in Google Scholar

Braml, M. and Felbermayr, G. (2017). Erwartungen deutscher Unternehmen an Donald Trumps Handelspolitik. ifo Schnelld. 70: 61–63.Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, P., Rumscheidt, S., Wohlrabe, K., and Hoberg, K. (2019). Der Einfluss von Logistik auf unternehmerische Tätigkeiten – Ergebnisse aus der ifo Konjunkturumfrage. ifo Schnelld. 72: 34–36.Search in Google Scholar

Buchheim, L., Dovern, J., Krolage, C., and Link, S. (2022a). Sentiment and firm behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 195: 186–198.10.1016/j.jebo.2022.01.011Search in Google Scholar

Buchheim, L., Krolage, C., and Link, S. (2022b). Sudden stop. When did firms anticipate the potential consequences of COVID-19? Ger. Econ. Rev. 23: 79–119.10.1515/ger-2020-0139Search in Google Scholar

Demmelhuber, K., Sauer, S., and Wohlrabe, K. (2022). Beyond the business climate. Regular and supplementary questions in the ifo business survey. CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 9666, Munich.10.2139/ssrn.4077478Search in Google Scholar

Dorn, F., Fuest, C., Göttert, M., Krolage, C., Lautenbacher, S., Link, S., Peichl, A., Reif, M., Sauer, S., Stöckli, M., et al.. (2020). The economic costs of the Coronavirus shutdown for Germany. A scenario calculation. EconPol Policy Brief 21: 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

Dovern, J., Müller, L.S., and Wohlrabe, K. (2020). How do firms form expectations of aggregate growth? New evidence from a large-scale business survey. CESifo Working Paper, No. 8179, Munich.10.2139/ssrn.3564860Search in Google Scholar

Grimme, C., Seiler, C., and Wohlrabe, K. (2014). Der Konflikt in der Ukraine und die Ergebnisse der ifo Unternehmensbefragungen. ifo Schnelld. 67: 46–48.Search in Google Scholar

Hainz, C. and Hristov, N. (2017). Credit crunch indicator. Perceptions of the willingness of banks to lend and firms’ experience in the credit market. CESifo Forum 18: 66–69.Search in Google Scholar

Hainz, C., Marjenko, A., and Wildgruber, S. (2017). How the ECB’s low-interest policy impacts firms. Results of the ifo business survey on them effects of negative interest rates for bank deposits. CESifo Forum 18: 21–24.Search in Google Scholar

ifo Institute (2018). German manufacturers see 43 percent probability of hard Brexit. Press release, online. Available at: https://www.ifo.de/en/node/42638 (Accessed 5 March 22).Search in Google Scholar

Krolage, C. and Wohlrabe, K. (2018). Auswirkungen der US-Steuerreform auf deutsche Unternehmen – Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensumfrage. ifo Schnelld. 71: 74–76.Search in Google Scholar

Langelütke, H. and Marquardt, W. (1951). Das Konjunkturtestverfahren und seine wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Bedeutung. Schriftenreihe des IFO-Instituts, Nr. 13.Search in Google Scholar

Lautenbacher, S. (2020). Subjective Uncertainty, Expectations, and Firm Behavior. MPRA Paper, No. 103516. University Library of Munich, Germany.Search in Google Scholar

Leiss, F. and Wohlrabe, K. (2021). Aktuelle Entwicklungen bei Materialengpässen und Lieferproblemen in der deutschen Wirtschaft. ifo Schnelldienst Digital 2: 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, R. (2020). The forecasting power of the ifo business survey. CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 8291, Munich.10.2139/ssrn.3603848Search in Google Scholar

Link, S. (2019). The price and employment response of firms to the introduction of minimum wages. CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 7575.10.2139/ssrn.3395400Search in Google Scholar

Link, S. (2020). Harmonization of the ifo business survey’s micro data. Jahrb. Natl. Stat. 240: 543–555.10.1515/jbnst-2019-0042Search in Google Scholar

Link, S. and Sauer, S. (2020). Monatlicher Nowcast der realisierten Kurzarbeit auf Basis von Unternehmensbefragungen. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums der Finanzen im Rahmen des Forschungsauftrags fe 3/19. Rahmenvertrag Wissenschaftliche (Kurz-) Expertisen zu Grundsatzfragen der Finanz-, Steuer- und Wirtschaftspolitik. ifo Institute, Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Litsche, S., Sauer, S., and Wohlrabe, K. (2020). Konjunkturumfragen im Fokus. Coronakrise trifft deutsche Wirtschaft mit voller Wucht. ifo Schnelld. 73: 57–61.Search in Google Scholar

Peichl, A., Lautenbacher, S., Miethe, J., Rumscheidt, S., and Sauer, S. (2021). Eigenkapitalentwicklung im Zeichen der Coronakrise. Impulse für die Wirtschaftspolitik, ifo Studie im Auftrag der IHK München und Oberbayern. IHK München, Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Rumscheidt, S. (2020). Die Bedeutung von Marktplätzen/Plattformen für den deutschen Groß- und Einzelhandel. ifo Schnelld. 73: 64–69.Search in Google Scholar

Sauer, S. and Wohlrabe, K. (2019). CEO or intern – who actually answers the questionnaires in the ifo business survey? CESifo Forum 20: 29–31.Search in Google Scholar

Sauer, S. and Wohlrabe, K. (2020). Ifo Handbuch der Konjunkturumfragen. ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung 88. ifo Institute, Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Sauer, S. and Wohlrabe, K. (2022). Auswirkungen des Krieges in der Ukraine auf deutsche Unternehmen. Unsicherheit, Lieferengpässe und Preisanstiege. ifo Schnelld. 75: 15–18.Search in Google Scholar

Seiler, C. (2012). The Data Sets of the LMU-ifo Economics & Business Data Center – A Guide for Researchers. ifo Working Paper Series, No. 138.10.3790/schm.132.4.609Search in Google Scholar

Stiftung Familienunternehmen (2020). Familienunternehmen navigieren stabil durch die Corona-Krise. Press release, online. Available at: https://www.familienunternehmen.de/de/pressebereich/meldungen/2020/2020-05-13/familienunternehmen-navigieren-stabil-durch-die-corona-krise (Accessed 12 March 22).Search in Google Scholar

Wohlrabe, K. (2021). Materialengpässe in der Industrie. Wer ist betroffen, und wie reagieren die Unternehmen? ifo Schnelld. 74: 60–65.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-13
Accepted: 2022-05-13
Published Online: 2022-06-16
Published in Print: 2023-04-25

© 2022 Katrin Demmelhuber et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 23.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbnst-2022-0032/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOorSe83gE4Jr2XJS_RdRinQyqeJ-oKzo2AmXQ2HFvzu7lMoW7Iep
Scroll to top button