Connective Frequency Bands informed by textbook frequencies and midadolescents’ knowledge of connectives: a tool to support Spanish literacy instruction across content areas

References

Agencia de Calidad de la Educación. 2013. Metodología de construcción de grupos socioeconómicos: Pruebas SIMCE 2012. Santiago, Chile: Departamento de Pruebas Nacionales, División de Evaluación de Logros de Aprendizaje, Agencia de Calidad de la Educación. Available at: https://archivos.agenciaeducacion.cl/Metodologia-de-Construccion-de-Grupos-Socioeconomicos-SIMCE-2012.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Andreev, Linda & Paola, Uccelli. 2023. The secret life of connectives: a taxonomy to study individual differences in mid-adolescents’ use of connectives in writing to persuade. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10425-3.Search in Google Scholar

Archila, Pablo Antonio. 2015. Uso de conectores y vocabulario espontáneo en la argumentación escrita: aportes a la alfabetización científica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 12(3). 402–418. https://doi.org/10498/17599.10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2015.v12.i3.02Search in Google Scholar

Barr, Christopher D., Paola, Uccelli & Emily, Phillips Galloway. 2019. Specifiying the academic language skills that support text understanding in the middle graders: The design and validation of the core academic language skills construct and instrument. Language Learning 69(4) 978–1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12365 Search in Google Scholar

Berendes, Karin, Sowmya Vajjala, Detmar Meurers, Doreen Bryant, Wolfgang Wagner, Maria Chinkina & Ulrich Trautwein. 2018. Reading demands in secondary school: Does the linguistic complexity of textbooks increase with grade level and the academic orientation of the school track? Journal of Educational Psychology 110(4). 518–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000225.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. & Dorit Ravid. 2009. Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 92–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609664.007Search in Google Scholar

Briz, Antonio. 1998. El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Briz, Antonio, Salvador Pons & José Portolés. 2008. Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español. In El diccionario como puente entre las lenguas y culturas del mundo. Actas del II Congreso Internacional de Lexicografía Hispánica, 217–227. Alicante: Biblioteca Virtual Cervantes.Search in Google Scholar

Cain, Kate & Hannah M. Nash. 2011. The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology 103(2). 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022824.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Agnus & Art Tsang. 2022. Use and understanding of connectives: An embedded case study of ESL learners of different proficiency levels. Language Awareness 31(2). 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1871912.Search in Google Scholar

Coxhead, Averil & Thomas J. Boutorwick. 2018. Longitudinal vocabulary development in an EMI international school context: Learners and texts in EAL, Maths, and Science. TESOL Quarterly 52(3). 588–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.450.Search in Google Scholar

Crible, Ludivine & Maria-Josep Cuenca. 2017. Discourse markers in speech: Characteristics and challenges for annotation. Dialogue and Discourse 8(2). 149–166. https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2017.207.Search in Google Scholar

Crosson, Amy C. & Nonie K. Lesaux. 2013. Does knowledge of connectives play a unique role in the reading comprehension of English learners and English-only students? Journal of Research in Reading 36(3). 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01501.x.Search in Google Scholar

Cuba, Claret, Héctor Torres, Kelen Gómez, Karol Guillen & Goria Llerena. 2022. Análisis de marcadores y conectores en tesis de Ciencias de la Educación. Apuntes Universitarios 12(3). 94–116. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v12i3.1105.Search in Google Scholar

Cuenca, María José. 2017. Connectors gramaticals i connectors lèxics en la construcció discursiva del debat parlamentari. Zeitschrift für Katalanistik 30. 99–121.10.46586/ZfK.2017.99-121Search in Google Scholar

Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline & Ted Sanders. 2011. Discovering domains – On the acquisition of causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1645–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.015.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to discourse particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780080461588Search in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Jill, Jackie E. Relyea & Jeff Elmore. 2022. Academic vocabulary volumen in elementary grades disciplinary textbooks. Journal of Educational Psychology 114(6). 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000735.Search in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Jill, Jeff Elmore, Jackie E. Relyea & A. Jackson Stenner. 2020. Domain-specific vocabulary network development in elementary grades core disciplinary textbooks. Journal of Educational Psychology 112(5). 1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000386.Search in Google Scholar

Fuentes-Rodríguez, Catalina. 2009. Diccionario de conectores y operadores del español. Madrid: Arco/libros.Search in Google Scholar

García, José Ricardo, Andrea Bustos & Emilio Sánchez. 2015. The contribution of knowledge about anaphors, organisational signals and refutations to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading 38(4). 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12021.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan. 2016. Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: A practical introduction, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315746210Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Knott, Alistair & Ted Sanders. 1998. The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics 30(2). 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00023-X.Search in Google Scholar

Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia & Estrella Montolío (eds.). 1998. Los marcadores del discurso. Teoría y análisis. Madrid: Arco/libros.Search in Google Scholar

Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia & José Portolés. 1999. Los marcadores del discurso. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 3, 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Philip M. & Scott Jarvis. 2010. MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods 42(2). 381–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381.Search in Google Scholar

Meneses, Alejandra, Paola Uccelli, María Verónica Santelices, Marcela Ruiz, Daniela Acevedo & Javiera Figueroa. 2018. Academic language as a predictor of reading comprehension in monolingual Spanish-speaking readers: Evidence from Chilean early adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly 53(2). 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.192.Search in Google Scholar

Michalke, Meik. 2021. koRpus: Text analysis with emphasis on POS tagging, readability and lexical diversity. (Version 0.13-8), https://reaktanz.de/?c=hacking&s=koRpus.Search in Google Scholar

Montolío, Estrella. 2001. Conectores de la lengua escrita: Contraargumentativos, consecutivos, aditivos y organizadores de la información. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Pons, Salvador. 1998. Conexión y conectores. Estudio de su relación en el registro informa de la lengua. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Search in Google Scholar

Pons, Salvador. 2000. Los conectores. In Antonio Briz & Grupo Val.Es.Co (eds.), ¿Cómo se comenta un texto coloquial?, 198–220. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Portolés, José. 1998. Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Renau, Irene & Rogelio Nazar. 2022. Towards a multilingual dictionary of discourse markers. In Annette Klosa-Kückelhaus, Stefan Engelberg, Christine Möhrs & Petra Storjohann (eds.), Dictionaries and society proceeding of the XX EURALEX International Congress, 262–272. Mannheim: IDS-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez, Emilio & José Ricardo García. 2009. The relation of knowledge of textual integration devices to expository text comprehension under different assessment conditions. Reading and Writing 22(9). 1081–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9145-7.Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez, Emilio, José Ricardo García & Andrea Bustos. 2017. Does rethorical competence moderate the effect of rethorical devices on the comprehension of expository texts beyond general comprehension skills? Reading and Writing 30. 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9684-2.Search in Google Scholar

Santana, Andrea, Romualdo Ibáñez, Fernando Moncada & Juan Zamora. 2021. Causal connective expressions in textbooks written in Spanish: A comparative study of four primary school subjects. Journal of Pragmatics 182. 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.010.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2020. Corpus linguistics: A guide to the methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tskhovrebova, Ekaterina, Sandrine Zufferey & Elena Tribushinina. 2022. French-speaking teenagers’ mastery of connectives: The role of vocabulary size and exposure to print. Applied Psycholinguistics 43(5). 1141–1163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716422000303.Search in Google Scholar

Uccelli, Paola. 2019. Learning the language for school literacy. In Vibeke Grøver, Paola Uccelli, Meredith, L. & Elena Lieven (eds.), Learning through language. Towards an educationally informed theory of language learning, 95–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316718537.010Search in Google Scholar

Uccelli, Paola, Emily, Phillips Galloway, Christopher, D., Alejandra Meneses & Christina, L. Dobbs. 2015. Beyond vocabulary: Exploring cross-disciplinary academic-language proficiency and its association with reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 50(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.104.Search in Google Scholar

Uccelli, Paola, Emily Phillips Galloway & Wenjuan, Qin. 2020. The language for school literacy: Widening the lens on language and reading relations. In Elizabeth, B., Peter, P., Patricia Enciso & Nonie, K. (eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. V, 155–179. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315676302-9Search in Google Scholar

Van Silfhout, Gerdineke, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted Sanders. 2015. Connectives as processing signals: How students benefit in processing narrative and expository texts. Discourse Processes 52(1). 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.905237.Search in Google Scholar

Volodina, Anna, Birgit Heppt & Sabine Weinert. 2021. Relations between the comprehension of connectives and school performance in primary school. Learning and Instruction 74. 101430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101430.Search in Google Scholar

Volodina, Anna & Sabine Weinert. 2020. Comprehension of connectives: Development across primary school age and influencing factors. Frontiers in Psychology 11. 814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00814.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Mark. 2005. Constructing measures: An item response theory approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Kyungmo & Jiyoung Bae. 2022. A continuity and difficulty analysis of the reading texts in Korean high school English textbooks with the 2015 Revised National Curriculum. 영어교육 English Teacher 77. 43–62. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.77.s1.202209.43.Search in Google Scholar

Zufferey, Sandrine. 2020. Introduction to corpus linguistics. Newark: Wiley.10.1002/9781119779728Search in Google Scholar