Group trends and individual variability in writing development: a descriptive grammatical complexity analysis

References

Baba, Kyoko & Ryo Nitta. 2014. Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning 64(1). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12033.Search in Google Scholar

Baba, Kyoko & Ryo Nitta. 2021. Emergence of multiple groups of learners with different writing-development trajectories in classroom: Growth mixture modeling. Journal of Second Language Writing 54. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100856.Search in Google Scholar

Beers, Scott & William Nagy. 2009. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? Reading and Writing 22(2). 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5.Search in Google Scholar

Bi, Peng & Jingyang Jiang. 2020. Syntactic complexity in assessing young adolescent EFL learners’ writings: Syntactic elaboration and diversity. System 91. 102248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102248.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Kkrnwipa Poonpon. 2011. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? Tesol Quarterly 45(1). 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Shelley Staples. 2016. Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics 37. 639–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu059.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples & Jesse Egbert. 2020a. Investigating grammatical complexity in L2 English writing research: Linguistic description versus predictive measurement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 46. 100869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100869.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Randi Reppen, Shelley Staples & Jesse Egbert. 2020b. Exploring the longitudinal development of grammatical complexity in the disciplinary writing of L2-English university students. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6(1). 38–71. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.18007.bib.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finnegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA & London, England: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469Search in Google Scholar

Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen. 2012. Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In Alex Housen, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency—Investigating complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.32.02bulSearch in Google Scholar

Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen. 2014. Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005.Search in Google Scholar

Casal, J. Elliott & Joseph J. Lee. 2019. Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 44. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Chan, Huiping, Marjolijn Verspoor & Louisa Vahtrick. 2015. Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins. Language Learning 65(2). 298–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12107.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott Andrew & Danielle McNamara. 2014. Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

Cunnings, Ian. 2012. An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers. Second Language Research 28. 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312443651.Search in Google Scholar

de Bot, Kees, Wander Lowie & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2007. A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(1). 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728906002732.Search in Google Scholar

Díez-Bedmar, María Belén & Pascual Pérez-Paredes. 2020. Noun phrase complexity in young Spanish EFL learners’ writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25(1). 4–35. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17058.die.Search in Google Scholar

Fang, Zhihui. 2005. Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education 89. 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20050.Search in Google Scholar

Friginal, Eric & Sara Cushing Weigle. 2014. Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

Galloway, Emily Phillips, Wenjuan Qin, Paola Uccelli & Christopher D. Barr. 2020. The role of cross-disciplinary academic language skills in disciplinary, source-based writing: Investigating the role of core academic language skills in science summarization for middle grade writers. Reading and Writing 33. 13–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09942-x.Search in Google Scholar

Gui, Min, Xiaokan Chen & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2021. The dynamics of reading development in L2 English for academic purposes. System 100. 102546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102546.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (fourth ddition). London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Ting, Rasmus Steinkrauss & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2021. Variability as predictor in L2 writing proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing 52. 100787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100787.Search in Google Scholar

Hunt, Kellogg. W. 1965. Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report No. 3. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Jingyang, Peng Bi & Haitao Liu. 2019. Syntactic complexity development in the writings of EFL learners: Insights from a dependency syntactically-annotated corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing 46. 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Stephanie M., Maria LaRusso, James Kim, Ha Yeon Kim, Robert Selman, Paola Uccelli, Sophie P. Barnes, Suzanne Donovan & Catherine Snow. 2019. Experimental effects of Word Generation on vocabulary, academic language, perspective taking, and reading comprehension in high-poverty schools. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 12(3). 448–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1615155.Search in Google Scholar

Kliesch, Maria & Simone E. Pfenninger. 2021. Cognitive and socioaffective predictors of L2 microdevelopment in late Adulthood: A longitudinal intervention study. The Modern Language Journal 105. 237–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12696.Search in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher & Scott Andrew Crossley. 2017. Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing 34. 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217712554.Search in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher & Scott Andrew Crossley. 2018. Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. Modern Language Journal 102(2). 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12468.Search in Google Scholar

Lan, Ge, Qiusi Zhang, Kyle Lucas, Yachao Sun & Jie Gao. 2022. A corpus-based investigation on noun phrase complexity in L1 and L2 English writing. English for Specific Purposes 67. 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

Lan, Ge, Xiaofei Pan, Yachao Sun & Yuan Lu. 2023. Part of speech tagging of grammatical features related to L2 Chinese development: A case analysis of stanza in the L2 writing context. Frontiers in Psychology 14. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139703.Search in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Lynne Cameron. 2008. Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2006. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics 27(4). 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029.Search in Google Scholar

Lei, Lei, Ju Wen & Xiaohu Yang. 2023. A large-scale longitudinal study of syntactic complexity development in EFL writing: A mixed-effects model approach. Journal of Second Language Writing 59. 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100962.Search in Google Scholar

Lowie, Wander & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2015. Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning 65(1). 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12093.Search in Google Scholar

Lowie, Wander & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2019. Individual differences and the ergodicity problem. Language Learning 69(1). 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12324.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiaofei & Jifeng Wu. 2022. Noun-phrase complexity measures in Chinese and their relationship to L2 Chinese writing quality: A comparison with topic–comment-unit-based measures. Modern Language Journal 106. 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12766.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiaofei. 2010. Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4). 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu.Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian & Catherine Snow. 1990. The child language data exchange system: An update. Journal of Child Language 17(2). 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900013866.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Education & State Language Affairs Commission. 2018. China’s standards of English language ability. Beijing: Higher Educational Press.Search in Google Scholar

Molenaar, Peter C. M. & Cynthia G. Campbell. 2009. The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18(2). 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, John M. & Lourdes Ortega. 2009. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2003. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 24. 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2015. Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing 29. 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.008.Search in Google Scholar

Pallotti, Gabriele. 2015. A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research 31. 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314536435.Search in Google Scholar

Pettitt, Anthony N. 1980. A simple cumulative sum type statistic for the change-point problem with zero-one observations. Biometrika 67(1). 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/67.1.79.Search in Google Scholar

Pienemann, Manfred. 2007. Variation and dynamic systems in SLA. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10. 43–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728906002793.Search in Google Scholar

Qin, Wenjuan & Paola Uccelli. 2016. Same language, different functions: A cross-genre analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing 33. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.001.Search in Google Scholar

Qin, Wenjuan & Paola Uccelli. 2020. Beyond linguistic complexity: Assessing register flexibility in EFL writing across contexts. Assessing Writing 45. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100465.Search in Google Scholar

Qin, Wenjuan & Paola Uccelli. 2021. Textual borrowing in science summaries: Upper-elementary and middle school students learning to write the language of sciences. Reading and Writing 34. 2505–2528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10155-4.Search in Google Scholar

Qin, Wenjuan & Xizi Zhang. 2022. Do EFL learners use different grammatical complexity features in writing across registers? Reading and Writing 36. 1939–1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10367-2.Search in Google Scholar

Siegler, Robert S. 2007. Microgenetic analyses of learning. In William Damon, Richard M. Lerner, Deanna Kuhn & Robert Siegler (eds.), Handbook of child psychology, volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language, 464–510. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0211Search in Google Scholar

Spoelman, Marianne & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2010. Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics 31(4). 532–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq001.Search in Google Scholar

Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Bbethany Gray. 2016. Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication 33(2). 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527.Search in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko, William J. Crawford & Danielle Wetzel. 2013. What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. Tesol Quarterly 47. 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.91.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Wayne A. 2000. Change-point analysis: A powerful new tool for detecting changes. http://www.variation.com/cpa/tech/changepoint.html (accessed 8 January 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Thelen, Esther & Linda Smith. 1994. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2524.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Uccelli, Paola, Christopher D. Barr, Christina L. Dobbs, Emily Phillips Galloway, Alejandra Meneses & Emilio Sanchez. 2014. Core academic language skills: An expanded operational construct and a novel instrument to chart school-relevant language proficiency in preadolescent and adolescent learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 36. 1077–1109. https://doi.org/10.1017/s014271641400006x.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Marijn, Marjolijn Verspoor & Wander Lowie. 2011. Variability and DST. In Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees de Bot & Wander Lowie (eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development, 55–84. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.29.04vanSearch in Google Scholar

van Geert, Paul & Marijn van Dijk. 2002. Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development 25(4). 340–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0163-6383(02)00140-6.Search in Google Scholar

Verspoor, Marjolijn & Kees de Bot. 2021. Measures of variability in transitional phases in second language development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60(1). 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0026.Search in Google Scholar

Verspoor, Marjolijn, Wander Lowie & Kees de Bot. 2021. Variability as normal as apple pie. Linguistics Vanguard 7(s2). 20200034. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0034.Search in Google Scholar

Verspoor, Marjolijn, Wander Lowie & Marijn van Dijk. 2008. Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal 92(2). 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Xiaopeng & Xiaofei Lu. 2022. Revisiting the predictive power of traditional vs. fine-grained syntactic complexity indices for L2 writing quality: The case of two genres. Assessing Writing 51. 100597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100597.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Shiyao Ashlee, Phil Hiver & Yongyan Zheng. 2022. Modeling intra- and inter-individual changes in L2 classroom engagement. Applied Linguistics amac065. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac065.Search in Google Scholar