Factor structures of speed and breakdown fluency in EFL learners’ story retelling performances

References

Awwad, Anas, Parvaneh Tavakoli & Clare Wright. 2017. “I think that’s what he’s doing”: Effects of intentional reasoning on second language (L2) speech performance. System 67. 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.05.002.Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank. 2014. A reappraisal of the 4/3/2 activity. RELC Journal 45(3). 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214546964.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2021. Praat, doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.1.51) [Computer software]. http://www.praat.org/ (accessed 20 March 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Bosker, Hans Rutger, Anne-France Pinget & Nivja H. de Jong. 2013. What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing 30(2). 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212455394.Search in Google Scholar

Collier, Joel E. 2020. Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781003018414Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, Nivja H. 2016. Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54(2). 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9993.Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, Nivja H. 2018. Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly 15(3). 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780.Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, NivjaH. & Hans Rutger Bosker. 2013. Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In Robert Eklund (ed.), Proceedings of disfluency in spontaneous speech, 17–20. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, Nivja H., Rachel Groenhout, Rob Schoonen & Jan H. Hulstijn. 2015. Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics 36. 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000210.Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, Nivja H., Margarita P. Steinel, Arjen Florijn, Rob Schoonen & Jan H. Hulstijn. 2013. Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 34. 893–916. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000069.Search in Google Scholar

De Quirós, Ana M. Cruz, Rafael Lara-Alecio, Fuhui Tong & Beverly J. Irby. 2012. The effect of a structured story reading intervention, story retelling and higher order thinking for English language and literacy acquisition. Journal of Research in Reading 35(1). 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01472.x.Search in Google Scholar

Epskamp, Sacha. 2015. semPlot: Unified visualizations of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 22(3). 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937847.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Pauline & Peter Skehan. 2013. Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity, and fluency of second language performance. The Canadian Modern Language Review 69(3). 249–273. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.69.3.249.Search in Google Scholar

Fukuta, Junya & Junko Yamashita. 2015. Effects of cognitive demands on attention orientation in L2 oral production. System 53. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.010.Search in Google Scholar

Ginther, April, Slobodanka Dimova & Rui Yang. 2010. Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing 27(3). 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364407.Search in Google Scholar

Hirai, Akiyo & Rie Koizumi. 2009. Development of a practical speaking test with a positive impact on learning using a story retelling technique. Language Assessment Quarterly 6. 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300902801925.Search in Google Scholar

Hoang, Hien & Frank Boers. 2016. Re-telling a story in a second language: How well do adult learners mine an input text for multiword expressions? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6(3). 513–535. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.3.7.Search in Google Scholar

Iwashita, Noriko, Annie Brown, Tim McNamara & Sally O’Hagan. 2008. Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics 29(1). 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm017.Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Daniel O. & Sakol Suethanapornkul. 2013. The Cognition Hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning 63(2). 330–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12008.Search in Google Scholar

Jin, Yan & Jinsong Fan. 2011. Test for English Majors (TEM) in China. Language Testing 28(4). 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211414852.Search in Google Scholar

Kahng, Jimin. 2014. Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning 64. 809–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12084.Search in Google Scholar

Kahng, Jimin. 2018. The effect of pause location on perceived fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics 39(3). 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000534.Search in Google Scholar

Kormos, Judit & Mariann Dénes. 2004. Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System 32. 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Kormos, Judit. 2006. Speech production and L2 acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Craig, Judit Kormos & Danny Minn. 2017. Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39(1). 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000085.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Craig, Scott Aubrey & Paul Leeming. 2021. Task preparation and second language speech production. TESOL Quarterly 55(2). 331–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.598.Search in Google Scholar

Leonard, Karen Ruth & Christine E. Shea. 2017. L2 speaking development during study abroad: Fluency, accuracy, complexity, and underlying cognitive factors. The Modern Language Journal 101(1). 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12382.Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Llanes, Àngels & Carmen Muñoz. 2009. A short stay abroad: Does it make a difference? System 37(3). 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Otwinowska, Agnieszka, Karolina Mieszkowska, Marta Białecka-Pikul, Marcin Opacki & Ewa Haman. 2020. Retelling a model story improves the narratives of Polish-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23(9). 1083–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1434124.Search in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Frederick L. Oswald. 2014. How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64(4). 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079.Search in Google Scholar

Préfontaine, Yvonne, Judit Kormos & Daniel Ezra Johnson. 2015. How do utterance measures predict raters’ perceptions of fluency in French as a second language? Language Testing 33(1). 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215579530.Search in Google Scholar

Riazantseva, Anastasia. 2001. Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(4). 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310100403X.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2011. Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Second language task complexity, researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance, 3–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.2Search in Google Scholar

Rosseel, Yves. 2012. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48(2). 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Kazuya, Meltem Ilkan, Viktoria Magne, Mai Tran & Shungo Suzuki. 2018. Acoustic characteristics and learner profiles of low-, mid- and high-level second language fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics 39(3). 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000571.Search in Google Scholar

Segalowitz, Norman. 2010. Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203851357Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 2003. Task-based instruction. Language Teaching 36. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X.Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 2009. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047.Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 2014. The context for researching a processing perspective on task performance. In Peter Skehan (ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance, 1–26. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.5.01skeSearch in Google Scholar

Stevens, James P. 1996. Applied multivariate statistics for social sciences. New York, NY: Routledge and Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Shungo & Judit Kormos. 2020. Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42(1). 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000421.Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Shungo & Judit Kormos. 2022. The multidimensionality of second language oral fluency: Interfacing cognitive fluency and utterance fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 08.03. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000899.Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Shungo, Judit Kormos & Takumi Uchihara. 2021. The relationship between utterance and perceived fluency: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. The Modern Language Journal 105(2). 435–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12706.Search in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parveneh. 2011. Pausing patterns: Differences between L2 learners and native speakers. ELT Journal 65(1). 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq020.Search in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parvaneh. 2016. Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54(2). 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9994.Search in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parvaneh, Fumiyo Nakatsuhara & Ann-Marie Hunter. 2020. Aspects of fluency across assessed levels of speaking proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 104(1). 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12620.Search in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parveneh & Peter Skehan. 2005. Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In Rod Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, 239–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.11.15tavSearch in Google Scholar

Thai, Chau & Frank Boers. 2016. Repeating a monologue under increasing time pressure: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. TESOL Quarterly 50(2). 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.232.Search in Google Scholar

Tonkyn, Alan Paul. 2012. Measuring and perceiving changes in oral complexity, accuracy and fluency: Examining instructed learners’ short-term gains. In Alex Housen, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency, complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, 221–245. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/lllt.32.10tonSearch in Google Scholar

Wang, Lei & Chan Chen. 2016. Features of formulaic sequences used by Chinese EFL learners in performing a story retelling assessment task. In Guoxing Yu & Yan Jin (eds.), Assessing Chinese learners of English: language constructs, consequences and conundrums, 101–120. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137449788_6Search in Google Scholar

Yan, Xun, Ha Ram Kim & Ji Young Kim. 2021. Dimensionality of speech fluency: Examining the relationships among complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) features of speaking performances on the Aptis test. Language Testing 38(4). 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220951508.Search in Google Scholar