“We thought about it together and the solution came to our minds”: languaging linguistic problem-solving in multilingual Finnish classrooms

References

Aalto, Eija & Merja Kauppinen. 2011. Tavoitteena monikielisyyttä tukeva äidinkielen ja kirjallisuuden opetus. In Esa Lehtinen, Sirkku Aaltonen, Merja Koskela, Elina Nevasaari & Mariann Skog-Södersved (eds.), AFinLA-e: Soveltavan kielitieteen tutkimuksia, 6–21. Jyväskylä, Finland: Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys AFinLA ry.Search in Google Scholar

Aalto, Eija, Sanna Mustonen & Kaisa Tukia. 2009. Funktionaalisuus toisen kielen opetuksen lähtökohtana. Virittäjä 113(3). 402–423.Search in Google Scholar

ALA. 2020. Association for language awareness. Available at: https://www.languageawareness.org.Search in Google Scholar

Alderson, J. Charles, Caroline Clapham & David Steel. 1997. Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research 1. 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100202.Search in Google Scholar

Alisaari, Jenni, Leena Maria Heikkola, Nancy Commins & Emmanuel Acquah. 2019. Monolingual practices confronting multilingual realities. Finnish teachers’ perceptions of linguistic diversity. Teaching and Teacher Education 80. 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Alisaari, Jenni, Emese Jäppinen, Niina Kekki, Riia Kivimäki, Susanna Kivipelto, Kiia Kuusento, Elisa Lehtinen, Anniina Raunio, Elisa Repo, Salla Sissonen, Maria Tyrer & Heli Vigren. 2020. Kielestä koppi – Oppimateriaali kielitietoiseen perusopetukseen. Turku, Painosalama: University of Turku. https://sites.utu.fi/minasta-ja-kielesta-kiinni/wp-content/uploads/sites/179/2021/02/Kielestä-koppi-oppimateriaali.pdf (accessed 18 June 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Lorin W. & David R. Krathwohl. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, Complete edn. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Benson, Phil. 2007. Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching 40(1). 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444806003958.Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The sociolinguistics of globalization (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Candelier, Michel, Petra Daryai-Hansen & Anna Schröder-Sura. 2012. The framework of reference for pluralistic approaches to languages and cultures – a complement to the CEFR to develop plurilingual and intercultural competences. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 6(3). 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2012.725252.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Guy. 1997. Language play, language learning. ELT Journal 51. 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.3.224.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Guy. 2000. Language play, language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2019. Towards a broader view of language education: the CEFR Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Available at: https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/north-helsinki-cefr-companion-volume-v2.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim. 2000. Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853596773Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim. 2001. Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.Search in Google Scholar

Dillenbourg, Pierre. 1999. What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, 1–19. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Dufva, Hannele. 2013. Language learning as dialogue and participation. In Ellen Christensen, Leena Kuure, Anders Mörch & Berner Lindström (eds.), Problem-based learning for the 21st century. New Practices and Learning Environments, 51–72. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenchlas, Susana & Andrea Schalley. 2020. Making sense of “home language” and related concepts. In Susana Eisenchlas & Andrea Schalley (eds.), Handbook of home language maintenance and development. social and affective factors, 17–37. De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501510175-002Search in Google Scholar

Elder, Cathie, Jane Warren, John Hajek, Diane Manwaring & Alan Davies. 1999. Metalinguistic knowledge: How important is it in studying a language at university? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 22. 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.22.1.04eld.Search in Google Scholar

Finnish National Agency of Education. 2014. Finnish core curriculum for basic education. Available at: https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

García, Ofelia. 2009. Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In Ajit Mohanty, Minati Panda, Robert Phillipson & Tove Skutnabb-Kangas (eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local, 128–145. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.Search in Google Scholar

Garton, Sue & Kathleen Graves. 2014. Identifying a research agenda for language teaching materials. The Modern Language Journal 98. 654–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12094.Search in Google Scholar

Good, Roland H., Jerry Gruba & Ruth Kaminski. 2001. Best practices in using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an outcome driven model. Best Practices in School Psychology 4. 679–700.Search in Google Scholar

Guerrettaz, Anne Marie. 2021. Materials‐in‐action: Pedagogical ergonomics of a French‐as‐a‐foreign‐language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 105(S1). 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12690.Search in Google Scholar

Guerrettaz, Anne Marie, Mel Engman & Yumi Matsumoto. 2021. Empirically defining language learning and teaching materials in use through sociomaterial perspectives: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal 105(S1). 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12691.Search in Google Scholar

Guerrettaz, Anne Marie & Bill Johnston. 2013. Materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal 97. 779–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12027.x.Search in Google Scholar

Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja-Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi. SKS:n toimituksia (SKST) 950. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Search in Google Scholar

Harju-Autti, Raisa & Hanna-Maija Sinkkonen. 2020. Supporting Finnish language learners in basic education: Teachers’ views. International Journal of Multicultural Education 22(1). 53–75. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v22i1.2077.Search in Google Scholar

Harju-Luukkainen, Heidi, Kari Nissinen, Sari Sulkunen, Minna Suni & Jouni Vettenranta. 2014. Avaimet osaamisen tulevaisuuteen. Selvitys maahanmuuttajataustaisten nuorten osaamisesta ja siihen liittyvistä taustatekijöistä PISA 2012 -tutkimuksessa. University of Jyväskylä, Finnish Institute for Educational Research. Available at: https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/44290/978-951-39-5752-0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Search in Google Scholar

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Lea Laitinen. 2006. Person in Finnish: Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in interaction. In Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell (eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish, 173–207. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CILT 277.10.1075/cilt.277.14helSearch in Google Scholar

Honko, Mari & Sanna Mustonen (eds.). 2018. Tunne kieli: matka maailman kieliin ja kielitietoisuuteen. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.Search in Google Scholar

Hornberger, Nancy & David Johnson. 2007. Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. Tesol Quarterly 41(3). 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00083.x.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, David & Roger Johnson. 2005. New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 131(4). 285–358. https://doi.org/10.3200/mono.131.4.285-358.Search in Google Scholar

Joutsenlahti, Jorma & Pirjo Kulju. 2015. Kielentäminen matematiikan ja äidinkielen opetuksenkehittämisessä. In Tapani Kaartinen (ed.), Monilukutaito kaikki kaikessa, 57–76. University of Tampere.Search in Google Scholar

Kalalahti, Mira, Tuomas Zacheus, Linda Maria Laaksonen & Markku Jahnukainen. 2019. Toiselle asteelle ja eteenpäin: Eriytyvät toisen asteen koulutuspolut. teoksessa. In Markku Jahnukainen, Mira Kalalahti & Joel Kivirauma (Toim.), Oma paikka haussa: Maahanmuuttotaustaiset nuoret ja koulutus, 71–89. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Search in Google Scholar

Karvonen, Ulla, Liisa Tainio & Sara Routarinne. 2017. Oppia kirjoista. Systemaattinen katsaus suomalaisten perusopetuksen oppimateriaalien tutkimukseen. Kasvatus & Aika 11(4). 39–69.10.1007/s00058-017-3093-zSearch in Google Scholar

Kauppinen, Anneli. 1998. Puhekuviot, tilanteen ja rakenteen liitto: tutkimus kielen omaksumisesta ja suomen konditionaalista. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Search in Google Scholar

Kauppinen, Merja & Jukka Marjanen. 2020. Millaista on yhdeksäsluokkalaisten kielellinen osaaminen? – Suomen kielen ja kirjallisuuden oppimistulokset perusopetuksen päättövaiheessa 2019. Arviointiraportti. Finnish Education Evaluation Center. Available at: https://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2020/08/KARVI_1320.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Komorowska, Hanna. 2014. Language awareness: From embarras de richesses to terminological confusion. In Andrzej Lyda & Konrad Szcześniak (eds.), Awareness in action: The role of consciousness in language acquisition, 3–20. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-00461-7_1Search in Google Scholar

Krippendorff, Klaus. 2012. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, 3rd edn. CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Lantolf, James & Steven Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leino, Kaisa, Arto Ahonen, Ninja Hienonen, Jenna Hiltunen, Meri Lintuvuori, Suvi Lähteinen, Joni Lämsä, Kari Nissinen, Virva Nissinen, Eija Puhakka, Jonna Pulkkinen, Juhani Rautopuro, Marjo Sirén, Mari-Pauliina Vainikainen & Jouni Vettenranta. 2018. PISA 18 ensituloksia: Suomi parhaiden joukossa. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2019:40. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö. Available at: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-263-678-2.Search in Google Scholar

Lerkkanen, Marja-Kristiina, Anna-Maija Poikkeus, Timo Ahonen, Martti Siekkinen, Pekka Niemi & Jan-Erik Nurmi. 2010. Luku-ja kirjoitustaidon sekä motivaation kehitys esi-ja alkuopetusvuosina. Kasvatus 41(2). 116–128.Search in Google Scholar

Leung, Constant, Roxy Harris & Ben Rampton. 1997. The idealised native speaker, reified ethnicities, and classroom realities. Tesol Quarterly 31(3). 543–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587837.Search in Google Scholar

Lilja, Niina, Emilia Luukka & Sirkku Latomaa. 2017. Kielitietoisuus eriarvoistumiskehitystä juurruttamassa. In Sirkku Latomaa, Emilia Luukka & Niina Lilja (eds.), Kielitietoisuus eriarvoistuvassa yhteiskunnassa, 11–29. AFinLAn vuosikirja 2017. Jyväskylä: Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistyksen julkaisuja 75.Search in Google Scholar

Lucas, Tamara & Ana María Villegas. 2013. Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice 52(2). 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.770327.Search in Google Scholar

Madsen, Lian, Janus Møller & Martha Karrebæk. 2016. Everyday languaging: Collaborative research on the language use of children and youth. Trends in Applied Linguistics, 15. Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614514800Search in Google Scholar

Madsen, Lian & Thomas Nørreby. 2019. Languaging and languagized learning. In David Bloome & Richard Beach (eds.), Languaging relations for transforming the literacy and language arts classroom. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351036580-5Search in Google Scholar

Mikkilä-Erdmann, Mirja-Maija. 2001. Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis through text design. Learning and Instruction 11(3). 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(00)00041-4.Search in Google Scholar

Phipps, Alison. 2006. Learning the arts of linguistic survival: Languaging, tourism, life. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.10.21832/9781845410551Search in Google Scholar

Repo, Elisa. 2020. Discourses on encountering multilingual learners in Finnish schools. Linguistics and Education 60C. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100864.Search in Google Scholar

Roehr, Karen & Gabriela Adela Gánem-Gutiérres. 2009. Metalinguistic knowledge: A stepping- stone towards S2 proficiency. In Alessandro Benati (ed.), Issues in second language proficiency, 79–94. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Rättyä, Kaisu. 2015. Kielitiedon opetusmenetelmien uudet suunnat: toiminnallinen kielioppi ja kielentäminen. In Teppo Jakonen, Juha Jalkanen, Terhi Paakkinen & Minna Suni (eds.), Kielen oppimisen virtauksia, 187–207. Jyväskylä, Finland: Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys AFinLA ry.Search in Google Scholar

Rättyä, Kaisu. 2017. Kielitiedon didaktiikkaa. Kielentäminen ja visualisointi sanaluokkien ja lauseenjäsenten opetusmenetelminä. University of Helsinki Doctoral Dissertation. Helsinki: Unigrafia.10.23982/vir.63430Search in Google Scholar

Rättyä, Kaisu & Pirjo Kulju. 2018. Kielitietoisuutta kielentämällä – kieliopin tehtävätyyppien kehittäminen. Ainedidaktiikka 2(1). 59–74. https://doi.org/10.23988/ad.68750.Search in Google Scholar

Satokangas, Henri. 2020. Tiedonaloja ja käsitteitä – kielitietoisuus oppimateriaaleissa. In Katriina Rapatti (ed.), Kaikkien koulu(ksi) – kielitietoisuus koulun kehittämisen kulmakivenä, 139–156. Helsinki: Äidinkielen opettajain liitto.Search in Google Scholar

Scheppegrell, Mary. 2004. The language of schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Seltzer, Kate. 2019. Reconceptualizing “home” and “school” language: Taking a critical translingual approach in the “English” classroom. Tesol Quarterly 53(4). 986–1007. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.530.Search in Google Scholar

Shore, Susanna. 1988. On the so-called Finnish passive. Word 39(3). 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1988.11435787.Search in Google Scholar

Sierens, Sven, Carolien Frijns, Koen Van Gorp, Lies Sercu & Piet Van Avermaet. 2018. The effects of raising Language Awareness in mainstream and language classrooms: A literature review (1995–2013). In Cristine Hélot, Carolien Frijns, Koen Van Gorp & Sven Sierens (eds.), Language awareness in multilingual classrooms in Europe: From theory to practice, 21–85. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501501326-002Search in Google Scholar

Statistics Finland. 2015. Finnish National Statistical Service. Available at: https://www.stat.fi/index_en.html.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 2006. Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In Heidi Byrnes (ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky, 95–108. London, England: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill & Sharon Lapkin. 1998. Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal 82. 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill & Yuko Watanabe. 2013. Language: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In Carol Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0664Search in Google Scholar

Tainio, Liisa. 2012. The role of textbooks in Finnish mother tongue and literature classrooms. In Hanna Lehti-Eklund, Anna Slotte-Lüttge, Beatrice Silén & Ria Heilä-Ylikallio (eds.), Skriftpraktiker hos barn och unga. Rapport från pedagogiska fakulteten vid Åbo Akademi, 33, 1–33. Vasa: Åbo Akademi.Search in Google Scholar

Tarnanen, Mirja & Åsa Palviainen. 2018. Finnish teachers as policy agents in a changing society. Language and Education.10.1080/09500782.2018.1490747Search in Google Scholar

Tharp, Roland, Peggy Estrada, Stephanie Dalton & Lois Yamauchi. 2000. Teaching Transformed. Achieving Excellence, Fairness, Inclusion and Harmony. Boulder: Westview.Search in Google Scholar

Tighe, Elizabeth & Katherine Binder. 2015. An investigation of morphological awareness and processing in adults with low literacy. Applied PsychoLinguistics 36(2). 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716413000222.Search in Google Scholar

Tomlinson, Brain. 2012. State-of-the-art-article: Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching 45. 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444811000528.Search in Google Scholar

Tomlinson, Brain & Hitomi Masuhara. 2018. The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Udvari-Solner, Alice. 2012. Joyful Learning. Active and Collaborative Learning in Inclusive Classrooms. Sage Publications.10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_795Search in Google Scholar

Ushioda, Ema. 2003. Motivation as a socially mediated process. In David Little, Jennifer Ridley & Ema Ushioda (eds.), Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment, 90–102. Dublin: Authentik Language Learning Resources Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

van Lier, Leo. 2000. From input to affordance: Social interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In James Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Recent advances, 245–259. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

van Lier, Leo. 2004. The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/1-4020-7912-5Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1962/1986. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1037/11193-000Search in Google Scholar

Walqui, Aída & Leo van Lier. 2010. Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners. San Francisco: WestEd.Search in Google Scholar

Zilliacus, Harriet, BethAnne Paulsrud & Gunilla Holm. 2017. Essentializing vs. non-essentializing students’ cultural identities: Curricular discourses in Finland and in Sweden. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 12(2). 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2017.1311335.Search in Google Scholar