Beginning and intermediate L2 writer’s use of N-grams: an association measures study

References

Ackerman, K. & Y.H. Chen. 2013. Developing the Academic Collocations List (ACL) - A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12. 235–247.10.1016/j.jeap.2013.08.002Suche in Google Scholar

Ädel, A. & B. Erman. 2012. Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 31. 81–92.10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004Suche in Google Scholar

Bestgen, Y. & S. Granger. 2014. Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 28–41.10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.004Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Suche in Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. 1978. A theoretical model of second language learning model. Language Learning 28. 69–83.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00305.xSuche in Google Scholar

Chen, Y.H. & P. Baker (2014). Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2, C1. Applied Linguistics Advance Access published December 5, 2014. 10.1093/applin/amu065Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, S.A. 2013. Advancing research in second language writing through computational tools and machine learning techniques: A research agenda. Language Teaching 46(2). 256–271.10.1017/S0261444812000547Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & Jarvis, S. 2011. Predicting lexical proficiency in language learners using computational indices. Language Testing, 28, 561–580.10.1177/0265532210378031Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, S.A., Z. Cai & D.S. McNamara (2012). Syntagmatic, paradigmatic, and automatic n-gram approaches to assessing essay quality. In P. M. McCarthy & G. M. Youngblood (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference, 214–219. Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, S.A., T. Cobb & D.S. McNamara. 2013. Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications. System 41. 965–981.10.1016/j.system.2013.08.002Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, S.A., K. Kyle, L.K. Allen, L. Guo & D.S. McNamara. 2014. Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation. The Journal of Writing Assessment 7. 1.Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, S.A., K. Kyle & D.S. McNamara. 2016. The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. The Journal of Second Language Writing 32. 1–16.10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, S.A. & D.S. McNamara. 2012. Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading 35(2). 115–135.10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.xSuche in Google Scholar

Crossley, S.A. & D.S. McNamara. 2013. Applications of text analysis tools for spoken response grading. Language Learning and Technology 17(2). 171–192.Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, S.A. & D.S. McNamara. 2014. Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 26(4). 66–79.10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2009). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Avaliable online at: http://corpus/byu.edu/cocaSuche in Google Scholar

DeCock, S., S. Granger, G. Leech & T. McEnery. 1998. An automated approach to the phrasicon of EFL learners. In S. Granger (ed.), Learner English on Computer, 67–79. London: Longman.10.4324/9781315841342-5Suche in Google Scholar

Durrant, P. & N. Schmitt. 2009. To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?. International Review of Applied Linguistics 47. 157–177.10.1515/iral.2009.007Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, N.C. 2006. Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics 27(1). 1–24.10.1093/applin/ami038Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C., & Simpson-Vlach, R. 2009. Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1). 61–78.10.1515/CLLT.2009.003Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, N.C. 2012. Formulaic language and second language acqusition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 17–44.10.1017/S0267190512000025Suche in Google Scholar

Erman, B., & Warren, B. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20. 29–62.10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29Suche in Google Scholar

Evert, S. (2004). The Statistics of Word Cooccurrences: Word Pairs and Collocations. (Dissertation). University of Stuttgart: Stuttgart.Suche in Google Scholar

Evert, S. 2009. Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, 1211–1248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213881.2.1212Suche in Google Scholar

Fisher, R.A. 1934. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Suche in Google Scholar

Friginal, E., M. Li & S. Weigle. 2014. Revisiting multiple profiles of learner compositions: A comparison of highly rated NS and NNS essays. Journal of Second Language Writing 23. 1–16.10.1016/j.jslw.2013.10.001Suche in Google Scholar

Granger, S. 1998. Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In A. P. Cowie (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, 145–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198294252.003.007Suche in Google Scholar

Granger, S. & Y. Bestgen. 2014. The use of collocations by intermediate vs. advanced non-native writers: A bigram-based study. International Review of Applied Linguistics 52(3). 229–252.10.1515/iral-2014-0011Suche in Google Scholar

Granger, S. & M. Paquot. 2008. Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger & F. H. Meunier (eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 27–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.139.07graSuche in Google Scholar

Grant, L. & A. Ginther. 2000. Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing 9(2). 123–145.10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, S.T., Hampe, B., & Schönfeld, D. 2005. Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4). 635–676.10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.635Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, S.T. 2013. 50-something years of work on collocations: What is or should be next …. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1). 137–165.10.1075/bct.74.07griSuche in Google Scholar

Gries, S.T. & N.C. Ellis. 2015. Statistical measures for Usage-Based Linguistics. Language Learning 65(Supplement 1). 228–255.10.1111/lang.12119Suche in Google Scholar

Groom, N. 2009. Effects of second language immersion on second language collocational development. In A. Barfield & H. Gyllstad (eds.), Researching Collocations in Another Language: Multiple Interpretations, 21–33. Bastingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230245327_2Suche in Google Scholar

Guo, L., S.A. Crossley & D.S. McNamara. 2013. Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparative study. Assessing Writing 18. 218–238.10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 2008. Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1). 41–62.10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.xSuche in Google Scholar

Ishikawa, S. 2009. Phraseology overused and underused by Japanese learners of English: A contrastive Interlanguage Analysis. Phraseology, Corpus Linguistics and Lexicography: Papers from Phraseology 2009 in Japan, 87–100. Nishinomiya: Kwansei Gakuin University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. 2002. Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19(1). 57–84.10.1191/0265532202lt220oaSuche in Google Scholar

Jin, W. 2001. A quantitative study of cohesion in Chinese graduate students’ writing: Variations across genres and proficiency levels. ERIC database (ED452726). (accessed).Suche in Google Scholar

Kyle, K. & S.A. Crossley. 2015. Automatically assessing lexical sophsitication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly 49(4). 757–786.10.1002/tesq.194Suche in Google Scholar

Kyle, K. & S.A. Crossley. 2016. The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 34(4). 12–24.10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. & P. Nation. 1995. Vocabulary size and use: Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production. Applied Linguistics 16(3). 307–322.10.1093/applin/16.3.307Suche in Google Scholar

Meara, P. 2005. Designing vocabulary tests for English, Spanish and other languages. In C. Butler, S. Christopher, M.A. Gómez González, & S. M. Doval-Suárez (Eds.), The Dynamics of Language Use (pp. 271–285). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.140.19meaSuche in Google Scholar

Nesselhauf, N. 2003. The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics 24(2). 223–242.10.1093/applin/24.2.223Suche in Google Scholar

Nesselhauf, N. 2005. Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.14Suche in Google Scholar

Nunan, D. 1989. Designing tasks for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ohlrogge, A. 2009. Formulaic expressions in intermediate EFL writing assessment. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali & K. M. Wheatley (eds.), Formulaic Language (Volume 2): Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, and Functional Explanations, 375–385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.83.07ohlSuche in Google Scholar

Reid, J. 1992. A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in English discourse by native and nonnative writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 1. 79–107.10.1016/1060-3743(92)90010-MSuche in Google Scholar

Rhee, S.C. & C.K. Jung. 2014. Compilation of the Yonsei English Learner Corpus (YELC) 2011 and its use for understanding current usage of English by Korean pre-university students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 14(11). 1019–1029.10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.11.1019Suche in Google Scholar

Read, J. 2000. Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732942Suche in Google Scholar

Read, J. 2004. Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined. Vocabulary in a Second Language: Selection, Acquisition, and Testing, 10(1). 209–227.10.1075/lllt.10.15reaSuche in Google Scholar

Römer, U. 2009. The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 7. 140–162.10.1075/arcl.7.06romSuche in Google Scholar

Simpson-Vlach, R. & N.C. Ellis. 2010. An academic formulas list (AFL). Applied Linguistics 31. 487–512.10.1093/applin/amp058Suche in Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chantura, A. & R. Martinez. 2015. The idiom principle revisited. Applied Linguistics 36(5). 549–569.10.1093/applin/amt054Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, A. & S.T. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243.10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03steSuche in Google Scholar

Vidakovic, I. & F. Barker. 2010. Use of words and multi-word units in Skills for Life Writing examinations. Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes 41. 7–14.Suche in Google Scholar

White, R. 1981. Approaches to writing. Guidelines 6. 1–11.10.2190/0MDH-XF0T-F93C-PR68Suche in Google Scholar

Yates, F. 1934. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Supplement 1. 217–235.10.2307/2983604Suche in Google Scholar