Home Age and knowledge of morphosyntax in english as an additional language: grammatical judgment and error correction
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Age and knowledge of morphosyntax in english as an additional language: grammatical judgment and error correction

  • Muhammad Asif Qureshi EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 22, 2018

Abstract

Research on age and second language acquisition (L2A) is vast, but inconclusive. Such research has mainly been motivated by the Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH), which postulates that language acquisition becomes extremely difficult after the onset of puberty. Also, there is a lack of research on age and third/additional language (L3/Ln) learning. To fill this gap, this article examines differences in morphosyntactic knowledge between early and late learners of English as a L3/Ln. In this study, ‘early’ and ‘late’ learners are those participants first exposed to English as a medium of instruction (MOI) in 1st and 11th grades, respectively. Participants’ morphosyntactic knowledge was assessed based on two tasks: (a) a Grammaticality Judgment Task (GJT) and (b) an editing task. Three hundred and thirty five undergraduate and graduate students from two universities in Pakistan voluntarily participated in the research. Results of the group comparisons showed no statistically significant differences between early and late learners on the GJT; however, on the editing task, a modest but significant difference was observed between the two groups, with late learners scoring higher. This finding contradicts the predictions of the CPH.

References

Abrahamsson, N. 2012. Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34. 187–214.10.1017/S0272263112000022Search in Google Scholar

Álvarez, E. 2006. Rate and route of acquisition in EFL narrative development at different ages. In C Muñoz (ed), Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning, 127–155. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853598937-008Search in Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. 1979. Explicit and implicit judgments of L2 grammaticality. Language Learning 29. 81–103.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01053.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. & K. Hakuta. 1994. In other words. The science and psychology of second- language acquisition. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. 2009. Age and the end state of second language acquisition. In W Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.), The new handbook of second langugae acquisition, 401–424. Bingley: Emerlad Group.Search in Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. & M. Molis. 2001. On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 44. 235–249.10.1006/jmla.2000.2750Search in Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. 2002. Age differences in foreign language learning. Review of Applied Linguistics 13. 125–142.10.1075/itl.135-136.06cenSearch in Google Scholar

De Groot, A. M. B. 2011. Language and cognition in bilinguals and multilinguals: An introduction. New York, NY: Psychological Press.10.4324/9780203841228Search in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22. 499–533.10.1017/S0272263100004022Search in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R., I. Alfi-Shabatay & D. Ravid. 2010. Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 31. 413–438.10.1017/S0142716410000056Search in Google Scholar

Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, G. Lang & A. Buchner. 2007. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39. 175–191.10.3758/BF03193146Search in Google Scholar

Ferris, D. & B. Roberts. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing 10. 161–184.10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-XSearch in Google Scholar

Francis, N. 2012. Bilingual competence and bilingual proficiency in child development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262016391.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Granena, G. 2012. Age differences and cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning in ultimate second language attainment. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park. Retrieved from http://libproxy.nau.edu/docview.Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, X. 2013. The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35. 423–449.10.1017/S0272263113000041Search in Google Scholar

Harley, B. & D. Hart. 1997. Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19. 379–400.10.1017/S0272263197003045Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, S. & E. Newport. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of the maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21. 60–99.10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0Search in Google Scholar

Kim, R. 1993. A sensitive period for second language acquisition: A reaction time grammaticality judgment task with Korean-English bilinguals. Issues and Developments in English and Applied Linguistics 6. 15–28.Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, D. & R. Harshman. 1972. Lateralization and the critical period. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 23. 13–21.10.1121/1.1982096Search in Google Scholar

Larson-Hall, J. 2008. Weighting the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research 24. 35–63.10.1177/0267658307082981Search in Google Scholar

Muñoz, C. 2006. The effects of age on foreign language learning. In C. Muñoz (ed), Age and the rate of foreign language learning, 1–40. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853598937Search in Google Scholar

Muñoz, C. 2008. Age-related differences in foreign language learning. Revisiting the empirical evidence. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 46. 197–220.10.1515/IRAL.2008.009Search in Google Scholar

Muñoz, C. 2011. Input and long-term effects of starting age in foreign language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 71. 197–220.10.1515/iral.2011.006Search in Google Scholar

Navés, T., R. Torras & M. Celaya. 2003. Long-term effects of an earlier start: An Analysis of EFL written production. EUROSLA Yearbook 3. 103–129.10.1075/eurosla.3.08navSearch in Google Scholar

Patkowski, M. 1980. The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning 30. 449–472.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00328.xSearch in Google Scholar

Plonsky, L. & L. Oswald. 2014. How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64. 878–912.10.1111/lang.12079Search in Google Scholar

Qureshi, M. 2016. A meta-analysis: Age and second language grammar acquisition. System 60. 147–160.10.1016/j.system.2016.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Seol, H. 2005. The critical period in the acquisition of L2 syntax: A partial replication of Johnson and Newport. Educational Psychology 24. 77–97.10.1080/0144341032000146467Search in Google Scholar

Spada, N. 2015. SLA research and L2 pedagogy: Misapplications and questions of relevance. Language Teaching 48. 69—81.10.1017/S026144481200050XSearch in Google Scholar

Storch, N. 2002. Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 51. 119–158.10.1111/1467-9922.00179Search in Google Scholar

Torras, M. & M. Celaya. 2001. Age-related differences in the development of written production. An empirical study of EFL school learners. International Journal of English Studies 1.x. 103–126.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-06-22
Published in Print: 2020-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2015-0062/html
Scroll to top button