Vocabulary acquisition and young learners: Different tasks, similar involvement loads

References

Alcaraz Mármol, G. & A. A. Sánchez-Lafuente. 2013. The involvement load hypothesis: Its effect on vocabulary learning in primary education. Revista Española de Linguística Aplicada 26. 11–24.Suche in Google Scholar

Atay, D. & G. Kurt. 2006. Elementary school EFL learners’ vocabulary learning: The effects of post-reading activities. The Canadian Modern Language Review 63(2). 255–273.10.3138/cmlr.63.2.255Suche in Google Scholar

Cameron, L. 2001. Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511733109Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, C. & J. Truscott. 2010. The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics 31(5). 693–713.10.1093/applin/amq031Suche in Google Scholar

Cho, K-S. & S. Krashen. 1994. Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids Series: Adult ESL acquisition. Journal of Reading 37(8). 662–667.Suche in Google Scholar

Cobb, T. 2016. Vocabulary profile home. Retrieved from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, M. T. & H. L. Johnson. 2011. Improving the acquisition of novel vocabulary through the use of imagery interventions. Early Childhood Education Journal 38. 357–366.10.1007/s10643-010-0408-ySuche in Google Scholar

Cohen, M. T. & H. L. Johnson. 2012. Improving the acquisition and retention of science material by fifth grade students through the use of imagery interventions. Instructional Science 40. 925–955.10.1007/s11251-011-9197-ySuche in Google Scholar

Craik, F. I. M. & R. S. Lockhart. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 11. 671–684.10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-XSuche in Google Scholar

Craik, F. I. M. & E. Tulving. 1975. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104(3). 263–294.10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268Suche in Google Scholar

De Bot, K. 1996. Review article: The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning 46(3). 529–555.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01246.xSuche in Google Scholar

Elgort, I. 2011. Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning 61(2). 367–413.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00613.xSuche in Google Scholar

Elgort, I. 2013. Effects of L1 definitions and cognate status of test items on the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing 30(2). 253–272.10.1177/0265532212459028Suche in Google Scholar

Elley, W. B. & F. Mangubhai. 1983. The impact of reading on second language learning. Reading Research Quarterly 19(1). 53–67.10.2307/747337Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. & R. Heimbach. 1997. Bugs and birds: Children’s acquisition of second language vocabulary through interaction. System 25(2). 247–259.10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00012-2Suche in Google Scholar

Folse, K. S. 2006. The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly 40(2). 275–295.10.2307/40264523Suche in Google Scholar

Ghabanchi, Z., M. Davoudi & Z. Eskandari. 2012. Vocabulary learning through input and output tasks: Investigating the involvement load hypothesis. California Linguistic Notes 37(1). 2–18.Suche in Google Scholar

Hirsh, D. & I. S. P. Nation. 1992. What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language 8(2). 689–696. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/PastIssues/rfl82hirsh.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Horst, M., T. Cobb & P. Meara. 1998. Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 11(2). 207–223.Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, H. M. & H. Nassaji. 2016. Effective vocabulary learning tasks: Involvement load hypothesis versus technique feature analysis. System 56. 28–39.10.1016/j.system.2015.11.001Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, M. & I. S. P. Nation. 2000. Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 23(1). 403–430.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, S., Z. Eslami & V. Willson. 2012. The effects of task involvement load on L2 incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analytic study. The Modern Language Journal 96(4). 544–557.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01394.xSuche in Google Scholar

Hughes, A. 2011. Teaching reading in English as a foreign language to young learners: A global reflection. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction, 4th edn., 315–358 . Newark, NY: International Reading Association.10.1598/0829.13Suche in Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H. 1990. A comparison between the information-processing and the analysis/control approaches to language learning. Applied Linguistics 11(1). 30–45.10.1093/applin/11.1.30Suche in Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H. 1992. Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics, 113–125. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_11Suche in Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H. 2005. Incidental and intentional learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, 349–381. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756492.ch12Suche in Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H., M. Hollander & T. Greidanus. 1996. Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal 80(3). 327–339.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01614.xSuche in Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H. & B. Laufer. 2001. Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 51(3). 539–558.10.1111/0023-8333.00164Suche in Google Scholar

Javanbakht, Z. O. 2011. The impact of tasks on male Iranian elementary EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning. Language Education in Asia 2(1). 28–42.10.5746/LEiA/11/V2/I1/A03/JavanbakhtSuche in Google Scholar

Jing, L. & H. Jianbin. 2009. An empirical study of the involvement load hypothesis in incidental vocabulary acquisition in EFL listening. Polyglossia 16. 1–11.Suche in Google Scholar

Joe, A. 1998. What effects to task-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics 19(3). 357–377.10.1093/applin/19.3.357Suche in Google Scholar

Keating, G. D. 2008. Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research 12(3). 365–385.10.1177/1362168808089922Suche in Google Scholar

Keyvanfar, A. & A. H. Badraghi. 2011. Revisiting task-induced involvement load and vocabulary enhancement: Insights from the EFL setting in Iran. Žmogus ir Žodis 13(3). 56–66.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Y. 2008. The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 58(2). 285–325.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00442.xSuche in Google Scholar

Knight, S. 1994. Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal 78(3). 285–299.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02043.xSuche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. 2003. Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. Canadian Modern Language Review 59(4). 567–588.10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. 2006. Comparing focus on form and focus on formS in second-language vocabulary learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1). 149–166.10.3138/cmlr.63.1.149Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B., C. Elder, K. Hill & P. Congdon. 2004. Size and strength: Do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge? Language Testing 21. 202–226.10.1191/0265532204lt277oaSuche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. & Z. Goldstein. 2004. Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning 54(3). 399–436.10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.xSuche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. & J. H. Hulstijn. 2001. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics 22(1). 1–26.10.1093/applin/22.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. & B. Rozovski-Roitblat. 2011. Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task-type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research 15. 391–412.10.1177/1362168811412019Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. & B. Rozovski-Roitblat. 2015. Retention of new words: Quantity of encounters, quality of task, and degree of knowledge. Language Teaching Research 19(6). 687–711.10.1177/1362168814559797Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, S. 2007. Revelations from three consecutive on extensive reading. Regional Language Centre Journal 38(2). 150–170.10.1177/0033688207079730Suche in Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & H. Mori 2006. Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28. 269–300.10.1017/S0272263106060128Suche in Google Scholar

Martínez-Fernández, A. 2008. Revisiting the involvement load hypothesis: Awareness, type of task and type of item. Selected Proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum, 210–228. Retrieved from http://www.lingref.com/cpp/slrf/2007/paper1746.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Nagy, W. E. 1997. On the role of context in first- and second-language vocabulary learning. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, 64–83. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. & H. M. Hu. 2012. The relationship between task-induced involvement load and learning new words from context. International Review of Applied Linguistics 50. 69–86.10.1515/iral-2012-0003Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. 2006. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1). 59–81. doi:10.1353/cml.2006.0049Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. 2013. Learning vocabulary in another language, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139858656Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. & M. K. Wang. 1999. Graded readers and vocabulary. Reading in Foreign Language 12(2). 355–380.Suche in Google Scholar

Newton, J. 2013. Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks. Language Teaching Research 17(2). 164–187.10.1177/1362168812460814Suche in Google Scholar

Orosz, A. 2009. The growth of young learners’ English vocabulary size. In M. Nikolov (ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages: Processes and outcomes, 181–194. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691477-015Suche in Google Scholar

Paribakht, T. S. & M. Wesche. 1999. Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21. 195–224.10.1017/S027226319900203XSuche in Google Scholar

Pigada, M. & N. Schmitt. 2006. Vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language 18(1). 1–28.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinter, A. 2006. Teaching young language learners. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rott, S. 2005. Processing glosses: A qualitative exploration of how form-meaning connections are established and strengthened. Reading in a Foreign Language 17(2). 95–124.Suche in Google Scholar

Rott, S., J. Williams & R. Cameron. 2002. The effect of multiple-choice L1 glosses and input-output cycles on lexical acquisition and retention. Language Teaching Research 6(3). 183–122.10.1191/1362168802lr108oaSuche in Google Scholar

Sadoski, M. 2005. A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly 21(3). 221–238.10.1080/10573560590949359Suche in Google Scholar

Sadoski, M., E. T. Goetz & J. B. Fritz. 1993. Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology 85(2). 291–304.10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.291Suche in Google Scholar

Sarani, A., G. M. Negari & M. Ghaviniat. 2013. The role of task type in L2 vocabulary acquisition: A case of involvement load hypothesis. Maringá 35(4). 377–386.10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i4.21135Suche in Google Scholar

Sarbazi, M. R. 2014. Involvement load hypothesis: Recalling unfamiliar words meaning by adults across genders. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences 98. 1686–1692.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.594Suche in Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11(2). 129–158.10.1093/applin/11.2.129Suche in Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. W. & S. N. Frota. 1986. Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, 237–326. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. 2008. Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 12(3). 329–363.10.1177/1362168808089921Suche in Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. 2010. Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230293977Suche in Google Scholar

Schmitt, N., X. Jiang & W. Grabe. 2011. The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal 95(1). 26–43.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.xSuche in Google Scholar

Skinner, C. 2010. In touch 1 student’s book: Bringing friends together. Harlow, UK: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Soleimani, H. & M. Rahmanian. 2015. Visiting involvement load hypothesis and vocabulary acquisition in similar task types. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5(9). 1883–1889.10.17507/tpls.0509.16Suche in Google Scholar

Sonbul, S. & N. Schmitt. 2010. Direct teaching of vocabulary after reading: Is it worth the effort? ELT Journal 64(3). 253–260.10.1093/elt/ccp059Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (eds.), Input in second language acquisition, 235–253. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, M. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of Henry Widdowson, 125–144. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, M. & S. Lapkin. 1995. Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16(3). 371–391.10.1093/applin/16.3.371Suche in Google Scholar

Szpotowicz, M. 2008. Second language learning processes in lower primary children: Vocabulary acquisition. Warsawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.10.31338/uw.9788323516040Suche in Google Scholar

Szpotowicz, M. & D. E. Campfield. 2016. Developing and piloting proficiency tests for Polish young learners. In M. Nikolov (ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives, 109–137. Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_6Suche in Google Scholar

Tajeddin, Z. & D. Daraee. 2013. Vocabulary acquisition through written input: Effects of form-focused, message-oriented, and comprehension tasks. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 16(4). 1–19.Suche in Google Scholar

Tokowicz, N. 2015. Lexical processing and second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203551387Suche in Google Scholar

Waring, R. & M. Takaki. 2003. At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language 15(2). 130–163.Suche in Google Scholar

Watanabe, Y. 1997. Input, intake and retention: Effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19. 287–307.10.1017/S027226319700301XSuche in Google Scholar

Webb, S. 2005. Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27. 33–52.10.1017/S0272263105050023Suche in Google Scholar

Webb, S. 2007. The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics 28(1). 46–65.10.1093/applin/aml048Suche in Google Scholar

Yaqubi, B., R. A. Rayati & N. Allemzade Gorgi. 2010. The involvement load hypothesis and vocabulary learning: The effect of task types and involvement index on L2 vocabulary acquisition. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills 2(1). 145–163. Retrieved from http://www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/13112010590403.pdfSuche in Google Scholar