Startseite Process parameter optimization for Fused Filament Fabrication additive manufacturing of PLA/PHA biodegradable polymer blend
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Process parameter optimization for Fused Filament Fabrication additive manufacturing of PLA/PHA biodegradable polymer blend

  • Muhammad Salman Mustafa , Muhammad Arslan Muneer , Muhammad Qasim Zafar EMAIL logo , Muhammad Arif , Ghulam Hussain und Farrukh Arsalan Siddiqui EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 25. Februar 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) is a widely embraced material extrusion (MEX) additive manufacturing (AM) process to produce complex three-dimensional structures, and it is typically used in the fabrication of biodegradable polymers for biomedical applications. However, FFF as a fabrication process for blended polymeric materials needs to be optimized for enhanced mechanical properties. In this work, biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA)/polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) dog-bone and notched specimens are printed to determine optimum printing parameters for superior mechanical properties in FFF additive manufacturing. The effect of layer thickness, infill density, and printing bed temperature on mechanical properties is investigated by employing a design of experiments (DoE) approach using response surface methodology (RSM). Experimental results showed the significance of the opted parameters for mechanical properties of the PLA/PHA blend. Then, optimum values for layer thickness, infill density, and printing bed temperature are identified for tensile and impact strength and an empirical relationship between parameters is formulated for low density and cost-effective fabrication. Finally, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) is performed to check the adequacy of the model for the influence of process parameters and their mutual interactions. The verification experiments validated the adequacy of the proposed model for PLA/PHA blend in FFF additive manufacturing.


Corresponding authors: Muhammad Qasim Zafar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus, Sahiwal 57000, Pakistan; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, PRC; and Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences & Technology, Topi 23640, Pakistan, E-mail: ; and Farrukh Arsalan Siddiqui, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

Muhammad Qasim Zafar would like to extend his sincere gratitude to “Dr. Khalid Rehman” Dean FME Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Science & Technology Topi, Pakistan, for the position of “International Exchange Scholar“ during his doctoral study.

  1. Author contributions: The design and strategy for this research work were developed and supervised by Muhammad Salman Mustafa. Muhammad Arsalan Muneer completed the experimental trial as a part of his MS Thesis. As co-supervisor, Muhammad Qasim Zafar wrote original draft, prepared graphical illustrations, revised, proofread, and submitted the manuscript. Dr. Muhammad Arif reviewed and proofread the manuscript. Ghulam Hussain and Farrukh Arsalan Siddiqui provided technical support in the FFF printing process.

  2. Research funding: There is no specific funding for this work.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: It is solemnly declared that there is no competing interest among authors.

References

Abeykoon, C., Sri-Amphorn, P., and Fernando, A. (2020). Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures. Int. J. Light. Mater. Manuf. 3: 284–297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003.Suche in Google Scholar

ASTM D256-10 (2018). Standard test methods for determining the izod pendulum impact resistance of plastics. ASTM Int. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0256-10R18.Suche in Google Scholar

ASTM-D638-14 (2014). Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM Int. http://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-14.10.1520/D0638-14Suche in Google Scholar

Bates-Green, K. and Howie, T. (2017). Materials for 3D printing by fused deposition. In Tech. Educ. Addit. Manuf. Mater., WA: Edmond Community College, pp. 1–26. Available at: http://4TEAMM.org.Suche in Google Scholar

Belter, J.T. and Dollar, A.M. (2015). No title strengthening of 3D printed fused deposition manufactured parts using the fill compositing technique. PLoS One10: e0122915, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122915.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Burzic, I., Pretschuh, C., Kaineder, D., Eder, G., Smilek, J., Másilko, J., and Kateryna, W. (2019). Impact modification of PLA using biobased biodegradable PHA biopolymers. Eur. Polym. J. 114: 32–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.01.060.Suche in Google Scholar

Carneiro, O.S., Silva, A.F., and Gomes, R. (2015). Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater. Des. 83: 768–776, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053.Suche in Google Scholar

Chieng, B.W., Ibrahim, N.A., and Yunus, W.M.Z.W. (2012). Optimization of tensile strength of poly(lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites using response surface methodology. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 51: 791–799, https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2012.663043.Suche in Google Scholar

Chiulan, I., Frone, A.N., Brandabur, C., and Panaitescu, D.M. (2018). Recent advances in 3D printing of aliphatic polyesters. Bioengineering 5: 1–18, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5010002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

ColorFabb (2020). PHA/PLA skyblue filament. ColorFabb Technical Datasheet. 53498607. https://colorfabb.com/filaments/pla-filaments/pla-pha.Suche in Google Scholar

Crump, S.S. (1992). Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. US Patent 5121329, USA. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5121329/en11.Suche in Google Scholar

Delfiya, D.S.A., Thangavel, K., and Amirtham, D. (2016). Preparation of curcumin loaded egg albumin nanoparticles using acetone and optimization of desolvation process. Protein J. 35: 124–135, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-016-9652-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Ecker, J.V., Burzic, I., Haider, A., Hild, S., and Rennhofer, H. (2019). Improving the impact strength of PLA and its blends with PHA in fused layer modelling. Polym. Test. 78: 105929, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105929.Suche in Google Scholar

Fakhri, L.A., Ghanbarzadeh, B., Dehghannya, J., Abbasi, F., and Ranjbar, H. (2018). Optimization of mechanical and color properties of polystyrene/nanoclay/nano ZnO based nanocomposite packaging sheet using response surface methodology. Food Packag. Shelf Life 17: 11–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.04.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Ramanujan, D., Ramani, K., Chen, Y., Williams, C.B., Wang, C.C.L., Shin, Y.C., Zhang, S., Zavattieri, P.D., et al.. (2016). A review of additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 46: 1–10, https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/208760.Suche in Google Scholar

Garlotta, D. (2001). A literature review of poly(lactic acid). J. Polym. Environ. 9: 63–84, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020200822435.10.1023/A:1020200822435Suche in Google Scholar

Ghasemi, F.A., Ghasemi, I., Menbari, S., Ayaz, M., and Ashori, A. (2016). Optimization of mechanical properties of polypropylene/talc/graphene composites using response surface methodology. Polym. Test. 53: 283–292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.06.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Gonzalez Ausejo, J., Rydz, J., Musioł, M., Sikorska, W., Sobota, M., Włodarczyk, J., Adamus, G., Janeczek, H., Kwiecień, I., Hercog, A., et al.. (2018). A comparative study of three-dimensional printing directions: the degradation and toxicological profile of a PLA/PHA blend. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 152: 191–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.04.024.Suche in Google Scholar

Guessasma, S., Belhabib, S., and Nouri, H. (2019). Microstructure and mechanical performance of 3D printed wood-PLA/PHA using fused deposition modelling: effect of printing temperature. Polymers 11: 1778, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11111778.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Hull, C.W. (1986). Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US Patent 638905.Suche in Google Scholar

ISO/ASTM 52900-18 (2018). Standard terminology for additive manufacturing – general principles – terminology. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://www.astm.org/Standards/ISOASTM52900.htm.Suche in Google Scholar

ISO/ASTM DIS 52924 (2020). Additive manufacturing, qualification principle, classification of part properties for additive manufacturing of polymer parts.Suche in Google Scholar

Kourmentza, C., Plácido, J., Venetsaneas, N., Burniol-Figols, A., Varrone, C., Gavala, H.N., and Reis, M.A.M. (2017). Recent advances and challenges towards sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Bioengineering. 4: 1–55, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020055.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ligon, S.C., Liska, R., Stampfl, J., Gurr, M., and Mülhaupt, R. (2017). Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 117: 10212–10290, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Muhammadi, Shabina, Afzal, M., and Hameed, S. (2015). Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates-eco-friendly next generation plastic: production, biocompatibility, biodegradation, physical properties and applications. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 8: 56–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2015.1109715.Suche in Google Scholar

Nasr-Isfahani, M., Latifi, M., and Amani-Tehran, M. (2013). Improvement of impact damage resistance of epoxy-matrix composites using ductile hollow fibers. J. Eng. Fiber. Fabr. 8: 69–74, https://doi.org/10.1177/155892501300800108.Suche in Google Scholar

Parandoush, P. and Lin, D. (2017). A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos. Struct. 182: 36–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088.Suche in Google Scholar

Penumakala, P.K., Santo, J., and Thomas, A. (2020). A criticle review on fused deposition modeling of thermoplastic polymer composites. Composites, Part B, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336.Suche in Google Scholar

Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., and Marinescu, R. (2018). FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review. Polym. Test. 69: 157–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020.Suche in Google Scholar

Rahim, T.N.A.T., Abdullah, A.M., and Md Akil, H. (2019). Recent developments in fused deposition modeling-based 3D printing of polymers and their composites. Polym. Rev. 59: 589–624, https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883.Suche in Google Scholar

Rostamiyan, Y., Fereidoon, A., Mashhadzadeh, A.H., Ashtiyani, M.R., and Salmankhani, A. (2015). Using response surface methodology for modeling and optimizing tensile and impact strength properties of fiber orientated quaternary hybrid nano composite. Composites, Part B 69: 304–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.031.Suche in Google Scholar

Rostamiyan, Y., Fereidoon, A., Rezaeiashtiyani, M., Mashhadzadeh, A.H., and Salmankhani, A. (2015). Experimental and optimizing flexural strength of epoxy-based nanocomposite: effect of using nano silica and nano clay by using response surface design methodology. Mater. Des. 69: 96–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.062.Suche in Google Scholar

Salam, Nori, Kamoona, Masood, Seyd, Hasan Mohamed, Omar Ahmed. (2018). Experimental investigation on flexural properties of FDM processed Nylon 12 parts using RSM. In: ICMMRE 2017: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mechanical, Materials and Renewable Energy. IOP Publishing, Bristol, England, pp 012137-1-012137-6-1-12137-6-1–12137–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012137.Suche in Google Scholar

Santhakumar, J., Maggirwar, R., Gollapudi, S., Karthekeyan, S., and Kalra, N. (2016). Enhancing impact strength of fused deposition modeling built parts using polycarbonate material. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9: 1–6, https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i34/100983.Suche in Google Scholar

Shubham, P., Sikidar, A., and Chand, T. (2016). The influence of layer thickness on mechanical properties of the 3D printed ABS polymer by fused deposition modeling. Key Eng. Mater. 706: 63–67, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.706.63.Suche in Google Scholar

Singh, R. and Garg, H.K. (2016). Fused deposition modeling – a state of art review and future applications. Encyclopedia of Smart Materials. 1: 270–288, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.04037-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K., and Mahapatra, S.S. (2010). Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater. Des. 31: 287–295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016.Suche in Google Scholar

Spoerk, M., Gonzalez-Gutierrez, J., Sapkota, J., Schuschnigg, S., and Holzer, C. (2017). Effect of the printing bed temperature on the adhesion of parts produced by fused filament fabrication. Plast. Rubber Compos. 47: 17–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/14658011.2017.1399531.Suche in Google Scholar

Tymrak, B.M., Kreiger, M., and Pearce, J.M. (2014). Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater. Des. 58: 242–246, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038.Suche in Google Scholar

Waseem, M., Salah, B., Habib, T., Saleem, W., Abas, M., Khan, R., Ghani, U., and Siddiqi, M.U.R. (2020). Multi-response optimization of tensile creep behavior of PLA 3D printed parts using categorical response surface methodology. Polymers 12: 1–16, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122962.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Zafar, M.Q. and Zhao, H. (2020). 4D printing: future insight in additive manufacturing. Met. Mater. Int. 26: 564–585, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00441-w.Suche in Google Scholar

Zafar, M.Q., Uddin, G.M., Asim, M., Khan, A.A., Tahir, Z.U.R., Hayat, N., Ghufran, M., and Jawad, M. (2020). Comparative analysis of low-temperature PVD-based TiN nano-thin-film-coated and -uncoated TNMG inserts in dry machining. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 43: 143–152, https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2019.1694438.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-27
Accepted: 2021-07-01
Published Online: 2022-02-25
Published in Print: 2022-03-28

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 1.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ipp-2021-4115/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen