Home Analysis of Mixing in Corotating Twin Screw Extruders through Numerical Simulation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analysis of Mixing in Corotating Twin Screw Extruders through Numerical Simulation

  • T. Avalosse and Y. Rubin
Published/Copyright: February 23, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Mixing is a major ingredient in many industrial processes to obtain desired and uniform material properties. Nowadays, many materials, pigments, additives, gas or reactants, are mixed to create new products combining the characteristics of different raw materials to obtain specific product properties. The quality of the mixing, i.e. the uniformity of the mixture, is a key issue that will determine the morphology and the properties of the resulting compound [1, 2]. An insight in the physics of mixing is therefore necessary in order to achieve a good quality of mixing or maintain it when scaling equipment, for example.

Such information can now be obtained through the numerical simulation of the transient flow in extruder components. To improve greatly the ease of obtaining such information, a new technique introduced in a finite elements software is presented. This technique simplifies the meshing, reduces the meshes needed and eliminates complex remeshing algorithms to simulate flow in screws, pumps and mixing devices.

This technique is validated versus traditional simulation methods (i.e. conforming meshes). 3-D transient numerical simulations of two twin screw extruder configurations are then presented. A further quantitative comparison of their mixing behavior is developed as statistical information (of the RTD, deformations, dispersion, etc.) can be obtained to compare both configurations in a synthetic and quantitative way.


T. Avalosse, Polyflow s.a., 16 place de l’Université, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium


References

1 Cheng, J., Xie, Y., Bigio, D.: SPE Antec Tech. Papers 44, p. 60 (1998)Search in Google Scholar

2 Manas-Zloczower, I., Tadmor, Z.: Mixing and Compounding of Polymers, Theory and Practice. Hanser Publishers, Munich, Vienna, New York (1994)Search in Google Scholar

3 Bang, D.S., White, J.L.: Intern. Polym. Process. 12, p. 278 (1997)10.3139/217.970278Search in Google Scholar

4 Vergnes, B., Della Valle, G., Delamare, L.: Polymer Engineering and Science, 11, p. 1781 (1998)10.1002/pen.10348Search in Google Scholar

5 Potente, H., Flecke, J.: SPE Antec Tech. Papers 1, p. 110 (1997)Search in Google Scholar

6 Yao, C.H., Manas-Zloczower, I.: Intern. Polym. Process. 12, p. 92 (1997)10.3139/217.970092Search in Google Scholar

7 Wilson, M.P., Al-Malaika, S., Generalis, S. C., Bruce, D.P.: Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress of Chemical Engineers (San Diego), 4, p. 509 (1996)Search in Google Scholar

8 Rios, A.C., Gramman, P.J., Stanfield, E., Osswald, T.A.: SPE Antec Tech. Papers 1, p. 222 (1998)Search in Google Scholar

9 Avalosse, T.: Macromol. Symp. 112, p. 91 (1996)10.1002/masy.19961120114Search in Google Scholar

10 Ottino, J.M.: The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos and Transport. University Press, Cambridge (1989)Search in Google Scholar

11 POLYFLOW version 3.6 Users Manual, Chapter 26. Polyflow s.a., Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (1998)Search in Google Scholar

12 Bertrand, F., Tanguy, P.A., Thibault, F.: Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 25, p. 719 (1997)10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19970930)25:6<719::AID-FLD585>3.0.CO;2-KSearch in Google Scholar

13 Avalosse, T., Crochet, M.J.: AIChE J. 43, p. 588 (1997)10.1002/aic.690430304Search in Google Scholar

14 Fortin, M.: Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 1, p. 347 (1981)10.1002/fld.1650010406Search in Google Scholar

15 Kiani, A., Heidenmeyer, P.: SPE Antec Tech. Paper 43, p. 328 (1997)Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2000-02-10
Accepted: 2000-02-10
Published Online: 2022-02-23

© 2000 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, Germany

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ipp-2000-0002/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button