Divided by a common language? Jocular quips and (non-)affiliative responses in initial interactions among American and Australian speakers of English

References

Arundale, Robert. 2010. Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics 42(8). 2078–2105.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. 1955. A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports. 2. 39–51Search in Google Scholar

Beach, Wayne. 1995. Conversation analysis: ‘okay’ as a clue for understanding consequentiality. In Stuart J Sigman (ed.), The Consequentiality of Conversation, 259–289. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Béal, Christine & Kerry Mullan. 2013. Issues in conversational humour from a cross-cultural perspective: Comparing French and Australian corpora. In Bert Peeters, Kerry Mullan & Chistine Béal (eds.), Cross-culturally Speaking, Speaking Cross-culturally, 107–140. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Search in Google Scholar

Béal, Christine & Kerry Mullan. 2017. The pragmatics of conversational humour in social visits: French and Australian English. Language and Communication 55. 25–42.10.1016/j.langcom.2016.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Nancy. 2006. Interactional adjustments in humorous intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 3. 1–28.10.1515/IP.2006.001Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Nancy. 2007. How native and non-native English speakers adapt to humor in intercultural interaction. Humor 20. 27–48.10.1515/HUMOR.2007.002Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Nancy. 2015. We are Not Amused. Failed Humour in Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501501586Search in Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina B. 2009. Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 41(5). 974–998.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.004Search in Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina B. 2014. Negotiating understanding in ‘intercultural moments’ in immigrant family interactions. Communication Monographs 81(2). 208–238.10.1080/03637751.2014.902983Search in Google Scholar

Brône, Geert. 2008. Hyper- and misunderstanding in interactional humour. Journal of Pragmatics 40(12). 2027–2061.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.011Search in Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal. 2012. A communication theory of culture. In Anastacia Kurylo (ed.), Inter/Cultural Communication. Representation and Construction of Culture, 69–87. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781544304106.n4Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 2007. The Importance of Not Being Earnest: The Feeling Behind Laughter and Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ceb.3Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie. 2003. Humour in intercultural conversations. Semiotica 146. 287–306.10.1515/semi.2003.070Search in Google Scholar

Chovanec, Jan. 2016. Eavesdropping on media talk: Microphone gaffes and unintended humour in sports broadcasts. Journal of Pragmatics 95. 93–106.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.011Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Catherine Evans. 2003. How English-learners joke with native speakers: An interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humour as collaborative discourse across cultures. Journal of Pragmatics 35(9). 1361–1385.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00181-9Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1987. Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25. 219–253.10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2009. Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour. Language and Linguistics Compass 3. 1284–1299.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00152.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2011. Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations. In Marta Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, 217–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.210.15dynSearch in Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederick & Jeffrey Shultz. 1982. The Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social Interaction in Interviews. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Flint, Natalie, Michael Haugh & Andrew John Merrison. Forthcoming. Modulating troubles affiliating in initial interactions: The role of remedial accounts. Pragmatics.10.1075/prag.17010.fliSearch in Google Scholar

Glenn, Phillip. 2003. Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519888Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Charles Goodwin. 1987. Children's arguing. In Susan U Philips, Susan Steele & Chistine Tanz (eds.), Language, gender & sex in comparative perspective, 200–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011Search in Google Scholar

Habib, Rania. 2008. Humour and disagreement: Identity construction and cross-cultural enrichment. Journal of Pragmatics 40(6). 1117–1145.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2010. Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation and face. Journal of Pragmatics 42(8). 2106–2119.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2011a. Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In Bethan Davies, Michael Haugh & Andrew Merrison (eds.), Situated Politeness, 165–184. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2011b. Practices and defaults in interpreting disjunction. In Kasia M Jaszczolt & Keith Allan (eds.), Salience and Defaults in Utterance Processing, 193–230. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110270679.189Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2012. Conversational interaction. In Keith Allan & Kasia M Jaszczolt (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, 251–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022453.014Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2014. Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34. 76–99.10.1080/07268602.2014.875456Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2015. Impoliteness and taking offence in initial interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 86. 36–42.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.018Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2016. “Just kidding”: Teasing and claims to non-serious intent. Journal of Pragmatics 95. 120–136.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2017a. Mocking and (non-)seriousness in initial interactions amongst American and Australian speakers of English. In Donal Carbaugh (ed.), Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural Perspective, 104–117. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2017b. Jocular language play, social action and (dis)affiliation in conversational interaction. In Nancy Bell (ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Language Play, 143–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501503993-007Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2017c. Implicature and the inferential substrate. In Piotr Cap & Marta Dynel (eds.), Implicitness: From Lexis to Discourse, 281–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.276.13hauSearch in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Donal Carbaugh. 2015. Self-disclosure in initial interactions amongst speakers of American and Australian English. Multilingua 34. 461–493.10.1515/multi-2014-0104Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Donal Carbaugh. 2016. Self-deprecation in initial interactions between Americans and Australians. Paper presented at the Australian Applied Linguistics Association, Monash University.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Yasuko Obana. 2015. Transformative continuations, (dis)affiliation, and accountability in Japanese interaction. Text & Talk 35. 597–619.10.1515/text-2015-0015Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Danielle Pillet-Shore. 2018. Getting to know you: Teasing as an invitation to intimacy in initial interactions. Discourse Studies 20. 246–269.10.1177/1461445617734936Search in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer. 1994. Jocular abuse patterns in mixed-group interaction. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 26–55.Search in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer. 2000. Functions of humour in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics 32(6). 709–742.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2015. Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 88. 88–104.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68. 15–38.10.1177/019027250506800103Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet & Meredith Marra. 2002. Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends. Humor 15. 65–87.10.1515/humr.2002.006Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth. 2010. The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics 42(6). 1513–1525.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth. 2012. Using laugh responses to defuse complaints. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45. 430–448.10.1080/08351813.2012.726886Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth. 2013. ‘There’s many a true word said in jest’: Seriousness and nonseriousness in interaction. In Phillip Glenn & Elizabeth Holt (eds.), Studies of Laughter in Interaction, 69–89. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781472542069Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1972. Side sequences. In David Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction, 294–338. New York: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance-declination. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, 79–95. New York: Irvington.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1984a. On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.014Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1984b. On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.021Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1987. On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In Graham Button & John Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation, 81–100. Clevedon: Mutlilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004a. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004b. A note on laughter in ‘male-female’ interaction. Discourse Studies 6. 117–133.10.1177/1461445604039445Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks & Emmanuel Schegloff. 1987. Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In Graham Button & John Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation, 152–205. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene. 1991. On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20. 441–458.10.1017/S0047404500016572Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene. 1996. Finding ‘face’ in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59. 303–321.10.2307/2787073Search in Google Scholar

Marra, Meredith & Janet Holmes. 2007. Humour across cultures: Joking in the multicultural workplace. In Helga Kotthoff & Helen Spencer-Oatey (eds.), Handbook of Intercultural Communication, 153–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198584.2.153Search in Google Scholar

Merriam Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online. 2017. Quip. Retrieved from: https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/quip (accessed 1 February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal. 1984. Stock conversational witticisms. Journal of Pragmatics 8(2). 195–209.10.1016/0378-2166(84)90049-3Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal. 1986. A frame-theoretical analysis of verbal humour: Bisociation as schema conflict. Semiotica 60. 225–245.10.1515/semi.1986.60.3-4.225Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal. 1993. Conversational Joking: Humour in Everyday Talk. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal. 2003. Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1333–1359.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00180-7Search in Google Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2017. Quip. Retrieved from: http://www.oed.com (accessed 1 February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2016. Criticizing another’s child: How teachers evaluate students during parent-teacher conferences. Language in Society 45. 33–58.10.1017/S0047404515000809Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1988. Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs 55. 360–373.10.1080/03637758809376177Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68. 939–967.10.2307/1519752Search in Google Scholar

Reddington, Elizabeth & Hansun Zhang Waring. 2015. Understanding the sequential resources for doing humour in the language classroom. Humor 28. 1–23.10.1515/humor-2014-0144Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2007. The role of numbers and statistics within conversation analysis. Communication Methods and Measures 1. 65–75.10.1080/19312450709336663Search in Google Scholar

Rogerson-Revell, Patricia. 2007. Humour in business: A double-edged sword: A study of humour and style shifting in intercultural business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 39(1). 4–28.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sarangi, Srikant. 1994. Intercultural or not? Beyond celebration of cultural differences in miscommunication analysis. Pragmatics 4(3). 409–427.10.1075/prag.4.3.05sarSearch in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1987. Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics 25. 201–218.10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.201Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 2016. Increments. In Jeffrey D Robinson (ed.), Accountability in Social Interaction, 239–263. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210557.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel & Gene Lerner. 2009. Beginning to respond: Well-preface responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42. 91–115.10.1080/08351810902864511Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel & Harvey Sacks. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 8. 289–327.10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Klaus P. 1988. Small Talk: Analysing Phatic Discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.Search in Google Scholar

Sims, Anntarie L. 1989. The compliment sequence. Southern Communication Journal 54. 171–184.10.1080/10417948909372754Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Blackwell: Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41. 31–57.10.1080/08351810701691123Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya. 2015. Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in conversation analysis? Research on Language and Social Interaction 48. 1–19.10.1080/08351813.2015.993837Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig. 2011. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya & Jeffrey D Robinson. 2006. A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society 35. 367–392.10.1017/S0047404506060179Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya & Federico Rossano. 2010. Mobilising response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43. 3–31.10.1080/08351810903471258Search in Google Scholar

Straehle, Carolyn. 1993. ‘Samuel?’ ‘Yes dear?’ Teasing and conversational rapport. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Framing in Discourse, 210–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Svennevig, Jan. 1999. Getting Acquainted in Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.64Search in Google Scholar

Walker, Gareth. 2012. Coordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resources: ‘trail-off’ conjunctions. Language and Speech 55. 141–163.10.1177/0023830911428858Search in Google Scholar