Home Publishing issues and overwhelm [Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies]
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Publishing issues and overwhelm [Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies]

  • Johanita Kirsten ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 3, 2024

Abstract

The large volume of research (including linguistic research) being done and published in academia brings with it many challenges, apart from the impossible task of keeping up with it all. Inequality can be amplified in publishing, in terms of opportunities but also implicit bias. Finding willing, capable and available reviewers who actually deliver relevant and sensible reviews remains a challenge. Keeping track of citations, especially incorrect ones, can be difficult. The suggestion to publish much less could help deal with all of these issues, but it is unlikely to be widely accepted. Editors could consider working more closely together to address some of the more pervasive issues.


Corresponding author: Johanita Kirsten, UPSET Research Focus Area, North-West University – Vanderbijlpark Campus, PO Box 1174, Vanderbijlpark, 1900, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa, E-mail:

References

Breuning, Marijke, Jeremy Backstrom, Jeremy Brannon, Benjamin Isaak Gross & Michael Widmeier. 2015. Reviewer fatigue? Why scholars decline to review their peers’ work. PS: Political Science & Politics 48(4). 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096515000827.Search in Google Scholar

Brezis, Elise S. & Birukou Aliaksandr. 2020. Arbitrariness in the peer review process. Scientometrics 123. 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03348-1.Search in Google Scholar

D’Arcy, Alexandra & Salmons Joseph. 2021. Peer review in linguistic journals: Best practices and emerging standards. Language 97(4). e383–e407. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0076.Search in Google Scholar

Demeter, Márton & Zsolt Kohus. 2022. A review and theorization of structural academic inequalities that may influence scholarly publishing. Tér Gazdaság Ember 3–4. 85–102.Search in Google Scholar

Gerwing, Travis G., Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Chi-Yeung Choi, Jeff C. Clements & Joshua A. Rash. 2020. Quantifying professionalism in peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review 5. 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x.Search in Google Scholar

Gerwing, Travis G., Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Chi-Yeung Choi, Jeff C. Clements & Joshua A. Rash. 2021. Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review 6. 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00107-x.Search in Google Scholar

Hosseini, Mohammad, Martin Paul Eve, Bert Gordijn & Neylon Cameron. 2020. MyCites: A proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications. Research Integrity and Peer Review 5. 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00099-8.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang. 1989. Schreiben oder Lesen, aber nicht beides, oder: Vorschlag zur Wiedereinführung der Keilschrift mittels Hammer und Meißel, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 74. 116–119. Repr. 2024 in International Journal of the Sociology of Language 289–290. 5–18.Search in Google Scholar

Skopec, Mark, Hamdi Issa, Julie Reed & Matthew Harris. 2020. The role of geographic bias in knowledge diffusion: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Research Integrity and Peer Review 5. 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0088-0.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-02-01
Accepted: 2024-05-28
Published Online: 2024-12-03
Published in Print: 2024-09-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Reading: An anniversary conversation with journal editors
  4. Article
  5. Schreiben oder Lesen, aber nicht beides, oder: Vorschlag zur Wiedereinführung der Keilschrift mittels Hammer und Meißel
  6. Commentaries
  7. Sobre el acceso a la bibliografía académica desde el Sur: diagnóstico, estrategias de resistencia y un proyecto disruptivo concreto [Anuario de Glotopolítica]
  8. Toward un-WEIRDing academic publishing about language [Applied Linguistics]
  9. Recognising the human in humanities [Australian Review of Applied Linguistics]
  10. 文字简化、学术产出与技术进化—来自中国的经验 [Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning]
  11. Meine kleine Lesemaschine: Reflexion zur Begrenzung der Produktion von wissenschaftlichen Texten [International Journal of Multilingualism]
  12. The politics of writing and reading: An Arabic sociolinguistics perspective [Journal of Arabic Sociolinguistics]
  13. To read is to cite: A moral proposition [Journal of Linguistic Anthropology]
  14. Sociolinguistics towards a culturalist turn: a sociolinguistic response to the challenges of mankind [Journal of Multicultural Discourses]
  15. Wolfgang Klein as Don Quixote [Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development]
  16. An extended lunch break: a response to Wolfgang Klein [Journal of Pragmatics]
  17. The economic reterritorialization of academic publishing and the politics of reading [Journal of Sociolinguistics]
  18. How I learned to stop worrying and love the explosion of information [Journal of Southeast Asian Linguistics Society]
  19. Writing and publishing language studies in the Arab region [Khitabaat Journal]
  20. Accouchons des idées, pas des articles: politiser la proposition de Wolfgang Klein pour repenser le travail scientifique [Langage et Société]
  21. Reading or writing is not the question: politicizing the politics of scholarly production and reception [Language, Culture and Society]
  22. Writing to be read, or how to achieve more through less [Language Matters]
  23. Writing or reading? An incommensurable choice? [Language in Society]
  24. Can we escape the textocalypse? Academic publishing as community building [Language on the Move]
  25. Acceleration, capitalist temporalities and collective challenges in academic publishing [Language Policy]
  26. On close reading and slow writing [Multilingua]
  27. Where global discourses meet local realities: the case of scholarly publishing in Sinhala [Sāhityaya]
  28. Navigating a national linguistics journal through local interests and global pressures: an editorial view on the problem of academic overproduction [Slovo a slovesnost]
  29. What is the place of African languages in knowledge production? [South African Journal of African Languages]
  30. Publishing issues and overwhelm [Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies]
  31. Strengthening local academic publishing in the age of academic fast fashion [TILAMSIK]
  32. Dromm und die verlorene Balance [The Mouth: Critical Studies on Language, Culture and Society]
  33. Meritocracy, governmental intervention, and academic nepotism: a South Korean academic publishing landscape [The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea]
  34. Indagando a aceleração da produção acadêmica com bom humor: Uma visão do sul [Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada]
  35. Final Commentary
  36. How to amend the supply-demand imbalance in research?
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijsl-2024-0025/html
Scroll to top button