Startseite “As if I were otherwise” metapragmatics of ego-splitting and virtualization, nanchatte!
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

“As if I were otherwise” metapragmatics of ego-splitting and virtualization, nanchatte!

  • Miyako Inoue EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. November 2023

Abstract

Nanchatte is a Japanese gag expression, whose literal English translation could be “I have just completed the saying of something like what I have just said.” Its meaning partially overlaps with English expressions such as “Just kidding,” or “I am just saying.” Its felicitous execution is often intended to “crack up” listeners, to take the edge off an impression of formality, arrogance, aggression, austerity, or bluntness, to break the ice, mitigate face-threat or potential embarrassment, keep meaning ambiguous, or other similar performative effects. Positioned right after the completion of the preceding utterance, nanchatte performs a self-quoting speech act, in which it reflexively and retroactively turns one’s own utterance as reporting speech into reported speech. Ex post facto reframes the utterance from a narrating event to a narrated event, which then turns the speaker from the subject of the utterance to the object in the real-time temporal process of the utterance, splitting and doubling the subject “I” and the world it inhabits between the actuality and the virtuality. By doing so, nanchatte structurally produces the space of non-position-taking. As frivolous as it might be, nanchatte’s structural condition warrants a serious semiotic analysis. Drawing on Husserl’s concepts of neutrality modification and ego-splitting, this essay will discuss how and what kind of political subjectivity could be produced in the quoted space afforded by nanchatte. I proposes the concept of virtualization as a performative effect of nanchatte. As I will detail below, nanchatte as a self-quoting operation – that is, “I” quotes what “I” have just said – unsettles other familiar binaries in the illimitable movement of the virtual and the actual, and this paper considers its broader political implications.


Corresponding author: Miyako Inoue, Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

I thank Gavin Furukawa, Ayumi Miyazaki, and Shunshuke Nozawa for their close reading of this essay and immensely helpful comments and suggestions. My sincere gratitude goes out to the two anonymous reviewers whose suggestions assisted me in clarifying some of the key points.

References

Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Anagnost, Ann, Andrea Arai & Hai Ren (eds.), 2013. Global futures in East Asia: Youth, nation, and the new economy in uncertain times. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Argenti‐Pillen, Alexandra. 2007. Obvious pretence: For fun or for real?: Cross‐cousin and international relationships in Sri Lanka. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13(2). 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00430.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Michail M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: four essays. Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and simulation. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9904Suche in Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. 1999. The arcades project. Howard Eiland & Kevin Tiedemann (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cavallaro, Marco. 2020. Husserl’s phenomenology of ego-splitting. In Iulian Apostolescu (ed.), The subject(s) of phenomenology: Rereading Husserl, 118–132. Cham: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and repetition. Paul Patton (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 2004. How do we recognize structuralism. In Michael Taormina (ed.), trans. David Lapoujade, Desert islands and other texts, 1953–1974, 170–192. New York: Semiotexte.Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1990. The logic of sense. In Mark Lester, Charles J. Stivale & Constantin V. Boundas (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164.07duSuche in Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 2009. The relevance of Husserl’s theory to language socialization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 19(2). 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2009.01031.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Language variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden, Mass.; Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stancetaking in discourse subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164Suche in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1973. The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan & Judith T. Irvine. 2019. Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108649209Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodman, Jane E., Matt Tomlinson & Justin B. Richland. 2014. Citational practices: Knowledge, personhood, and subjectivity. Annual Review of Anthropology 43. 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025828.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society 18(1). 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457.Suche in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul H. 1991. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611834Suche in Google Scholar

Hastings, Adi & Paul Manning. 2004. Introduction: Acts of alterity. Language & communication 24(4). 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2004.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1991. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. (Trans.) Dorion Cairns. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Experience and judgment; investigations in a genealogy of logic. (Trans.) James Spencer Churchill & Ameriks, Karl. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1989. In David Carr (ed.), The crisis of European sciences and transcedental phenomenlogy. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1983. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6Suche in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 2005. In John Barnett Brough & Husserl-Archives (eds.), Phantasy, image consciousness, and memory (1898–1925). Dordrecht; London: Kluwer Academic.Suche in Google Scholar

Inoue, Miyako. 2006. Vicarious language: Gender and linguistic modernity in Japan. University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese: Revised edition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra M. 2009a. Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Alexandra M. Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 1–28. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra M. (ed.). 2009b. Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and Poetics. In Thomas, A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1990. Shifters and verbal categories. In Linda R. Waugh & Monique Monville-Burston (eds.), On language: Roman Jakobson, 386–392. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F. 2018. Masculine stances and the linguistics of affect: On masculine ease. NORMA 13(3–4). 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756.Suche in Google Scholar

Kinjo, Katsuya. 2007. Nanchatte no yōhō no bunseki shiron [Notes on the analysis of uses of nanchatte]. Gengo bunka kenkūkiyō 10. 33–52.Suche in Google Scholar

Kockelman, Paul. 2005a. The semiotic stance. Semiotica 157. 233–304. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.157.1-4.233.Suche in Google Scholar

Kockelman, Paul. 2005b. Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2). 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.127.Suche in Google Scholar

Lempert, Michael. 2008. The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society 37(4). 569–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404508080779.Suche in Google Scholar

Lempert, Michael. 2012. Discipline and debate: the language of violence in a Tibetan Buddhist monastery. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520269460.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Manning, Paul. 2020. Free the code, free the world: The chronotopic “worldness” of the virtual world of Ryzom. Language & Communication 70. 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.01.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel. 1954. The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archiac societies. (Trans.) Ian Cunnison. London: Cohen and West.Suche in Google Scholar

Maynard, Senko K. 1996. Multivoicedness in speech and thought representation: The case of self-quotation in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 25. 207–226.10.1016/0378-2166(94)00097-2Suche in Google Scholar

Maynard, Senko K. 2016. Fluid orality in the discourse of Japanese popular culture. Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.263Suche in Google Scholar

Nagai, Hitoshi. 1991. Tamashii ni taisuru taido [An attitude towards a soul]. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.Suche in Google Scholar

Nakassis, Constantine V. 2013. Citation and citationality. Signs and Society 1(1). 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1086/670165.Suche in Google Scholar

Nozawa, Shunsuke. 2013. Characterization. Semiotic Review 3. https://www.semioticreview.com/ojs/index.php/sr/article/view/16.Suche in Google Scholar

Palmer, Frank Robert. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1966. In Arthur Walter Burks & Charles Hartshorne (eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2). 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041.Suche in Google Scholar

Schütz, Alfred. 1945. On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5(4). 533–576.10.2307/2102818Suche in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1). 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500006837.Suche in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In John Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, 33–57. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004Suche in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Ryoko. 1999. Multifunctionality: The developmental path of the quotative tte in Japanese. In Barbara A. Fox, Dan Jurafsky & Laura A. Michaelis (eds.), Cognition and function in language, 50–64. Stanford: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Satoko. 1998. Tte and nante: Markers of psychological distance in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 29. 429–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(97)00050-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Satoko. 2001. Self-mockery in Japanese. Linguistics 40(1). 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(97)00050-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Wortham, Stanton & Angela Reyes. 2015. Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315735207Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-09-02
Accepted: 2022-12-24
Published Online: 2023-11-29
Published in Print: 2023-11-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijsl-2022-0086/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen